ABSTRACT
Background: On March 9, 2020, the Italian Prime Minister announced the lockdown, which was officially closed on May 4. This extraordinary measure was necessary to contain the COVID-19 pandemic spread in Italy. During this phase, a significant decrease in patients' access to Emergency Department (ED) was observed. Delayed access to treatment determined a delay in the diagnosis of acute surgical conditions, as already documented in other clinical areas, with consequences on surgical outcome and survival. Aim of this study is to provide a detailed description of abdominal urgent-emergent conditions surgically treated and surgical outcomes during the lockdown in a tertiary referral Italian hospital, compared with historical data. Methods: A retrospective review of urgent-emergent patients surgically treated in our department was conducted in order to compare patients' characteristics and surgical outcomes during the period March 9th-May 4th, 2020 with the same period of the previous year. Results: 152 patients were included in our study, 79 patients in 2020 group and 77 patients in 2019. We found no significant differences between the groups regarding ASA score, age, gender, and disease prevalence. Significant differences were found in symptom duration before ER access and abdominal pain as the main symptom in non-traumatic conditions. We also performed a sub-analysis on peritonitis which showed significant differences in: hospital length of stay, presence of colostomy vs. ileostomy, and fatal events in 2020. No differences were found in the use of laparoscopy. Conclusions: While the overall number of ER accesses has decreased in 2020 group, the number of patients surgically treated in emergency-urgency conditions has not decreased. However, those patients waited significantly more before the hospital access. This diagnostic delay was associated with a more severe clinical condition and a consequent significantly worse prognosis.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic brought rapid and major changes to research, and those wishing to carry out Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) activities faced challenges, such as restrictions on movement and contact, illness, bereavement and risks to potential participants. Some researchers moved PPI to online settings during this time but remote consultations raise, as well as address, a number of challenges. It is important to learn from PPI undertaken in this period as face-to-face consultation may no longer be the dominant method for PPI. METHODS: UK stay-at-home measures announced in March 2020 necessitated immediate revisions to the intended face-to-face methods of PPI consultation for the ESORT Study, which evaluated emergency surgery for patients with common acute conditions. PPI plans and methods were modified to all components being online. We describe and reflect on: initial plans and adaptation; recruitment; training and preparation; implementation, contextualisation and interpretation. Through first-hand accounts we show how the PPI processes were developed, experienced and viewed by different partners in the process. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: While concerns have been expressed about the possible limiting effects of forgoing face-to-face contact with PPI partners, we found important benefits from the altered dynamic of the online PPI environment. There were increased opportunities for participation which might encourage the involvement of a broader demographic, and unexpected benefits in that the online platform seemed to have a 'democratising' effect on the meetings, to the benefit of the PPI processes and outcomes. Other studies may however find that their particular research context raises particular challenges for the use of online methods, especially in relation to representation and inclusion, as new barriers to participation may be raised. It is important that methodological challenges are addressed, and researchers provide detailed examples of novel methods for discussion and empirical study. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: We report a process which involved people with lived experience of emergency conditions and members of the public. A patient member was involved in the design and implementation, and two patients with lived experience contributed to the manuscript.
ABSTRACT
Aim: Emergency surgery can be defined as surgical interventions and operations necessary to deal with an acute threat to life, organ, limb, or tissue. Our study examined the impact of the Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on emergency surgical operations (ESOs) performed in state hospitals in Turkey. Materials and Methods: In this national, retrospective, and descriptive study, ESOs performed in 2nd and 3rd-level state hospitals in Turkey in 2021 were recorded for the study. ESOs performed in 2019 were taken as the control group, and the changes between the two groups were examined. Results: A total of 1,822,075 ESOs were included in the analysis. There was a 7.6% decrease in ESOs in 2021 compared to 2019. In both 2019 and 2021, cesarean section, surgical treatment of upper/lower extremity fractures and dislocations, and cholecystectomy were the most frequently performed ESOs. An increase in the number of ESOs in 2021 compared to 2019 was observed only in the urology department (7.1%) and orthopedics and traumatology department (2.7%). The surgical departments with the greatest decreases were neurosurgery (-28.1%), Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (-27.7%), and thoracic surgery (-20.9%) Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of ESOs performed in the 2nd and 3rd-level state hospitals in Turkey decreased compared with the previous year.
ABSTRACT
Acute appendicitis is inflammation of the vermiform appendix. It is the commonest general surgical emergency in children and young adults, yet its diagnosis can still confound even the most skilled surgeon due to its highly variable presentation of appendicitis, with fewer than 50% of patients exhibiting classical features. Taking a detailed history and performing a careful examination remains the cornerstone of diagnosis. Urinalysis and blood tests, particularly C-reactive protein, are useful adjuncts and are performed routinely. Radiological imaging, commonly ultrasound and computed tomography scans, also have a role when the diagnosis is unclear and/or other common conditions need to be excluded, such as gynaecological pathology in young females. Nevertheless 20% of appendices removed in UK are histologically normal. Appendicitis scoring systems may further assist in stratifying risk and increasing the accuracy of diagnosis. Recently, there has been growing interest in non-surgical management of appendicitis, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Antibiotics alone have been used to successfully treat uncomplicated appendicitis (without perforation, abscess or gangrene) in the short-term, however nearly 40% of these cases eventually require appendicectomy. Surgery, usually laparoscopic appendicectomy, remains the treatment of choice for acute appendicitis and non-operative management is reserved for specific cases.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
A 5-month-old, intact male, yellow Labrador retriever was presented with a 24-hour history of anorexia and vomiting. Abdominal imaging revealed the presence of a mechanical obstruction in the jejunum and peritoneal effusion. Cytologic evaluation and culture of the effusion prior to surgery identified a suppurative exudate with bacteria consistent with septic peritonitis and suspected to be related to the intestinal lesion. An exploratory laparotomy was performed, and a segment of jejunum was circumferentially severely constricted by an off-white, fibrous band of tissue. Resection and anastomosis of the strangulated segment of jejunum and excision of the constricting band provided resolution of the clinical signs. The dog made a complete recovery. Histologic evaluation revealed the band to be composed of fibrovascular and smooth muscle tissue, consistent with an idiopathic anomalous congenital band. No other gastrointestinal lesions were observed, either grossly at surgery or histologically in the resected segment of intestine. To our knowledge, a similar structure has not been reported in the veterinary literature.Copyright © 2022 Canadian Veterinary Medical Association. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: In March 2020 a new viral pandemic was declared. As etiological factor a virus belonging to the coronavirus family was isolated. This virus was named SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19. This virus can cause different clinical frames, variating from mild symptomatology to cases of ARDS or death. Although the pandemic outbroke in China, COVID-19 had one of first hotspots in Italy, where the Public Health System needed a re-arrangement to face the disease. The incidence of oncological disease doesn't suffer any variation in relation to pandemics or emergency period, but need to be managed as soon as possible in every situation. In our maxillo-facial surgery Unit we continued our regular activities to treat all oncological patient that needed surgery during the pandemic. Because of the absence of knowledge about the COVID-19, first periods were very difficult to manage, due to the risk of infection of patients and health professionals. We decided to share our experience. Material(s) and Method(s): Between March and June 2020, 34 patients affected by head and neck cancer were admitted at our Unit. All patients underwent surgical treatment and were hospitalized until their situation guaranteed a safe discharge. Result(s): All patients treated for head and neck cancer underwent surgery. All the medical and nurse post-operative management was performed by health operators by using all the personal protective equipment (PPE) to prevent any possible infection. All contacts between patients and their family were suspended. During phase 1, all patients were submitted to a short verbal triage, measurements of physiological parameters and qualitative COVID-19 test. They were also screened by imaging to guarantee there were not any bronchopulmonary diseases referable to viral infections. During phase 2, patients were also screened by serological tests. During phase 3, all patients practiced oropharyngeal swap before being hospitalized. Discussion(s): During lockdown a re-arrangement of the management of oncological patients was mandatory. The difficulties were caused by the restriction of several activities that guarantee a normal health care system function. To date there is not a standardized therapeutic protocol to face the infection. Main therapies are symptomatic and a lot of patients need to be treated in ICUs. To prevent any possible infections, surgical activities were reserved only for urgent disease that cannot be delayed. In our Unit we continued to manage oncological patients. Social distancing and confinement measures were necessary and mandatory, in order to manage our patients. During first phases we had not any valid instrument to totally exclude COVID-19 infection. During phase 3, when oropharyngeal swaps were introduced in the screening of our patients, we could start to work in a safer way. Conclusion(s): There are still a lot of difficulties in the management of patients during COVID 19 pandemic. Because of the important consequences deriving from the delay of oncological patients their management must to be clearly defined.Copyright © 2021
ABSTRACT
Purpose: We examined the effect of COVID-19 on diseases treated with hepato- biliary- pancreatic surgery from the experience of nosocomial infection at our hospital. Method(s): We examined the treatment of 106 patients admitted by the Division of Hepato- Biliary- Pancreatic Surgery to The Jikei University Hospital for elective surgery from January through May 2020. Result(s): Of the 106 operations, 90 (85%) were performed as scheduled and did not include COVID-19-positive patients. Operations for 16 patients (15%) were postponed, but 5 (31%) of these operations were urgent or quasiurgent and were performed during the study period. Of 95 patients who underwent surgery, 50 (53%) had a malignant tumor, 3 (3%) had a borderline malignant tumor, and 42 (44%) had a benign lesion, of which 41 were gallstones or gallbladder polyps and 1 was an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm that caused pancreatitis. Surgery for the latter tumor was postponed while conservative treatment improved conditions, but pancreatitis recurred 2 weeks after discharge, leading to a quasiurgent surgery. Conclusion(s): Owing to COVID-19, 15% of the scheduled elective hepato- biliary- pancreatic operations were postponed. Even lesions considered benign or not requiring emergency surgery should be treated promptly. Thus, the timing of treatment should be determined so that the risks of exacerbation and COVID-19 can be balanced.Copyright © 2022 Jikei University School of Medicine. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
SARS-CoV-2 has been associated with an increased rate of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients. Since surgical patients are already at higher risk of venous thromboembolism than general populations, this study aimed to determine if patients with peri-operative or prior SARS-CoV-2 were at further increased risk of venous thromboembolism. We conducted a planned sub-study and analysis from an international, multicentre, prospective cohort study of elective and emergency patients undergoing surgery during October 2020. Patients from all surgical specialties were included. The primary outcome measure was venous thromboembolism (pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis) within 30 days of surgery. SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was defined as peri-operative (7 days before to 30 days after surgery);recent (1-6 weeks before surgery);previous (>=7 weeks before surgery);or none. Information on prophylaxis regimens or pre-operative anti-coagulation for baseline comorbidities was not available. Postoperative venous thromboembolism rate was 0.5% (666/123,591) in patients without SARS-CoV-2;2.2% (50/2317) in patients with peri-operative SARS-CoV-2;1.6% (15/953) in patients with recent SARS-CoV-2;and 1.0% (11/1148) in patients with previous SARS-CoV-2. After adjustment for confounding factors, patients with peri-operative (adjusted odds ratio 1.5 (95%CI 1.1-2.0)) and recent SARS-CoV-2 (1.9 (95%CI 1.2-3.3)) remained at higher risk of venous thromboembolism, with a borderline finding in previous SARS-CoV-2 (1.7 (95%CI 0.9-3.0)). Overall, venous thromboembolism was independently associated with 30-day mortality (5.4 (95%CI 4.3-6.7)). In patients with SARS-CoV-2, mortality without venous thromboembolism was 7.4% (319/4342) and with venous thromboembolism was 40.8% (31/76). Patients undergoing surgery with peri-operative or recent SARS-CoV-2 appear to be at increased risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism compared with patients with no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Optimal venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment are unknown in this cohort of patients, and these data should be interpreted accordingly.Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists.
ABSTRACT
At present, the prevention and control situation of epidemics of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still serious, medical institutions should provide quality and safe routine medical services while doing their best in the prevention and control of this disease. The purpose of this article is to suggest a way to give quality and safe medical services to patients who need surgical treatment, especially to those who need emergency surgical treatment, with strict classified managements and standard precaution during perioperative period. With those suggestions, we may reduce the incidence of nosocomial infection and contribute to the prevention and control of COVID-19.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association.
ABSTRACT
Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a syndrome that resembles to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Platelet factor 4 (PF-4) reacts to a vaccine component resulting formation of immune complex that stimulates an autoimmune reaction triggering platelet consumption causing thrombus formation and producing thrombotic events. When suspected is important to confirm for make a correct anticoagulation management to avoid complications related to unfractioned and low weight heparins use. In this report we describe a case of acute limb ischemia secondary to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (Astrazeneca, Cambridge, UK)Copyright © 2022
ABSTRACT
Objective: To investigate the emergency surgical strategies for patients with acute abdomen during the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. Method(s): The retrospective and descriptive study was conducted. The clinical data of 20 patients with acute abdomen who were admitted to the Union Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology between January 18, 2020 and February 10, 2020 were collected. There were 13 males and 7 females, aged from 25 to 82 years, with an average age of 57 years. All the patients with emergency surgeries received pulmonary computed tomography (CT) examination before surgery, and completed nucleic acid detection in throat swab if necessary. Patients excluded from COVID-19 underwent regular anesthesia, suspected and confirmed cases were selected a proper anesthesia based on their medical condition and surgical procedure. Patients excluded from COVID-19 underwent emergency surgeries following the regular procedure, suspected and confirmed cases underwent emergency surgeries following the three-grade protection. Observation indicators: (1) surgical situations;(2) postoperative situations. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as average (range). Count data were described as absolute numbers. Result(s): (1) Surgical situations: of the 20 patients with acute abdomen, 16 patients were excluded from COVID-19, and 4 were not excluded. All the 20 patients underwent emergency abdominal surgeries successfully, of whom 2 received surgeries under epidural anesthesia (including 1 with open appendectomy, 1 with open repair of duodenal bulbar perforation), 18 received surgeries under general anesthesia (including 9 with laparoscopic repair of duodenal bulbar perforation, 3 with open partial enterectomy, 3 with laparoscopic appendectomy, 1 with laparoscopic left hemicolectomy, 1 with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, 1 with cholecystostomy). The operation time of patients was 32-194 minutes, with an average time of 85 minutes. The volume of intraoperative blood loss was 50-400 mL, with an average volume of 68 mL. (2) Postoperative situations: 16 patients excluded from COVID-19 preopratively were treated in the private general ward postoperatively. One of the 16 patients had fever at the postoperative 5th day and was highly suspected of COVID-19 after an emergency follow-up of pulmonary CT showing multiple ground-glass changes in the lungs. The patient was promptly transferred to the isolation ward for treatment, and results of nucleic acid detection in throat swab showed double positive. Medical history described by the patient showed that the patient and family members were residents of Wuhan who were not isolated at home during the epidemic. There was no way to confirm whether they had a history of exposure to patients with COVID-19. Medical staffs involved in this case did not show COVID-19 related symptoms during 14 days of medical observation. The other 15 patients recovered well postoperatively. The 4 patients who were not excluded from COVID-19 preoperatively based on medical history and results of pulmonary CT examination were directly transferred to the isolation ward for treatment postoperatively. They were excluded from COVID-19 for two consecutive negative results of nucleic acid detection in the throat swab and recovered well. Two of the 20 patients with acute abdomen had postoperative complications. One had surgical incision infection and recovered after secondary closure following opening incision, sterilizing and dressing, the other one had intestinal leakage and was improved after conservative treatment by abdominal drainage. There was no death in the 20 patients with acute abdomen. Conclusion(s): Patients with acute abdomen need to be screened through emergency forward. Patients excluded from COVID-19 undergo emergency surgeries following the regular procedure, and patients not excluded from COVID-19 undergo emergency surgeries following the three-grade protection. The temperature, blood routine test and other l boratory examinations are performed to monitor patients after operation, and the pulmonary CT and throat nucleic acid tests should be conducted if necessary. Patients excluded from COVID-19 preopratively are treated in the private general ward postoperatively, and they should be promptly transferred to the isolation ward for treatment after being confirmed. Patients who are not excluded from COVID-19 preoperatively based on medical history should be directly transferred to the isolation ward for treatment postoperatively.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To investigate the emergency surgical strategies for patients with acute abdomen during the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. Method(s): The retrospective and descriptive study was conducted. The clinical data of 20 patients with acute abdomen who were admitted to the Union Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology between January 18, 2020 and February 10, 2020 were collected. There were 13 males and 7 females, aged from 25 to 82 years, with an average age of 57 years. All the patients with emergency surgeries received pulmonary computed tomography (CT) examination before surgery, and completed nucleic acid detection in throat swab if necessary. Patients excluded from COVID-19 underwent regular anesthesia, suspected and confirmed cases were selected a proper anesthesia based on their medical condition and surgical procedure. Patients excluded from COVID-19 underwent emergency surgeries following the regular procedure, suspected and confirmed cases underwent emergency surgeries following the three-grade protection. Observation indicators: (1) surgical situations;(2) postoperative situations. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as average (range). Count data were described as absolute numbers. Result(s): (1) Surgical situations: of the 20 patients with acute abdomen, 16 patients were excluded from COVID-19, and 4 were not excluded. All the 20 patients underwent emergency abdominal surgeries successfully, of whom 2 received surgeries under epidural anesthesia (including 1 with open appendectomy, 1 with open repair of duodenal bulbar perforation), 18 received surgeries under general anesthesia (including 9 with laparoscopic repair of duodenal bulbar perforation, 3 with open partial enterectomy, 3 with laparoscopic appendectomy, 1 with laparoscopic left hemicolectomy, 1 with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, 1 with cholecystostomy). The operation time of patients was 32-194 minutes, with an average time of 85 minutes. The volume of intraoperative blood loss was 50-400 mL, with an average volume of 68 mL. (2) Postoperative situations: 16 patients excluded from COVID-19 preopratively were treated in the private general ward postoperatively. One of the 16 patients had fever at the postoperative 5th day and was highly suspected of COVID-19 after an emergency follow-up of pulmonary CT showing multiple ground-glass changes in the lungs. The patient was promptly transferred to the isolation ward for treatment, and results of nucleic acid detection in throat swab showed double positive. Medical history described by the patient showed that the patient and family members were residents of Wuhan who were not isolated at home during the epidemic. There was no way to confirm whether they had a history of exposure to patients with COVID-19. Medical staffs involved in this case did not show COVID-19 related symptoms during 14 days of medical observation. The other 15 patients recovered well postoperatively. The 4 patients who were not excluded from COVID-19 preoperatively based on medical history and results of pulmonary CT examination were directly transferred to the isolation ward for treatment postoperatively. They were excluded from COVID-19 for two consecutive negative results of nucleic acid detection in the throat swab and recovered well. Two of the 20 patients with acute abdomen had postoperative complications. One had surgical incision infection and recovered after secondary closure following opening incision, sterilizing and dressing, the other one had intestinal leakage and was improved after conservative treatment by abdominal drainage. There was no death in the 20 patients with acute abdomen. Conclusion(s): Patients with acute abdomen need to be screened through emergency forward. Patients excluded from COVID-19 undergo emergency surgeries following the regular procedure, and patients not excluded from COVID-19 undergo emergency surgeries following the three-grade protection. The temperature, blood routine test and other l boratory examinations are performed to monitor patients after operation, and the pulmonary CT and throat nucleic acid tests should be conducted if necessary. Patients excluded from COVID-19 preopratively are treated in the private general ward postoperatively, and they should be promptly transferred to the isolation ward for treatment after being confirmed. Patients who are not excluded from COVID-19 preoperatively based on medical history should be directly transferred to the isolation ward for treatment postoperatively.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association.
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the emergency treatment of patients with colorectal cancer in a university surgery clinic. Data from patients undergoing emergency surgery during the pandemic period (2020-2021) was taken into consideration and the results were analyzed and compared with the periods 2016-2017 and 2018-2019. A significant decrease in the number of patients undergoing emergency surgery was reported (p = 0.028). The proportion of patients who presented more severe symptoms at the hospital was significantly higher (p = 0.007). There was an increase in the average duration of surgical interventions compared to pre-pandemic periods (p = 0.021). An increase in the percentage of stomas performed during the pandemic was reported. The average duration of postoperative hospitalization was shorter during the pandemic. A postoperative mortality of 25.7% was highlighted. Conclusions: The pandemic generated by COVID-19 had significant consequences on the emergency treatment of patients with colon cancer. A smaller number of patients showed up at the hospital, and with more severe symptoms. In order to reduce the risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 virus, the postoperative hospitalization period was shortened and a higher number of protective stomas were performed.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Common complications of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related ARDS and ventilation are barotrauma-induced pneumothorax, pneumatocele and/or empyema. We analysed indications and results of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in complicated COVID-19 patients. This is a retrospective single-institution study analysing a case series of patients treated by VATS for secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP), pneumatocele and empyema complicating COVID-19, not responding to drainage in Lodi Maggiore Hospital between February 2020 and May 2021. Out of 2076 patients hospitalized in Lodi Maggiore Hospital with COVID-19, nine Males (0,43%; mean age 58,1-33-81) were treated by VATS for complications of pneumonia (6 SSP and 3 empyema; 1 case complicated by haemothorax). 7 patients (77%) had CPAP before surgery for 21.3 days mean (4-38). Mean Operative time was 80.9 min (38-154). Conversion rate was 0%. 3 (33%) patients were admitted to ICU before VATS. Treatments were: bullectomy in six patients (66%), drainage of the pleural space in all patients, pleural decortication and fluid aspiration in five cases (55%). two patients (22%) needed surgery interruption and bilateral ventilation to restore adequate oxygenation. Mortality was 1/9 (11%) due to respiratory failure for persistent pneumonia. In one patient (11%) redo surgery was performed for bleeding. Mean postop Length of Stay (LOS) was 37.9 days (10-77). Our report shows that VATS can be considered an extreme, but effective treatment for COVID-19 patients with SSP, pneumatocele or empyema, for patients who can tolerate general anaesthesia. Attention must be paid to the aerosol-generation of infected droplets.
ABSTRACT
Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) infection was first identified in China and spread to the whole world in a very short time. The COVID-19 pandemic was declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) in March 2020 due to the rapid increase in the number of cases and deaths. Studies show that the virus is primarily transmitted by respiratory droplets and close contact. Although 90% of children are asymptomatic or have mild symptoms, they should be accepted as positive until they are proven negative regardless of any complaints. Despite the process, trauma, burn and surgical emergencies continue to concern pediatric surgeons. The basic principles those generally accepted during Covid-19 pandemic are to perform emergency and urgent surgical procedures and to reschedule elective surgeries. However, the most important issue in the process is to take precautions for protecting the healthcare team and to plan keeping hospital reserves. We aimed to adapt general principles of trauma and surgery to the COVID-19 pandemic in children and to discuss the specific conditions in our review.
ABSTRACT
Aim: The Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has strained healthcare systems worldwide. Some institutions have implemented additional precautionary measures such as pre-procedural swabbing (PPS) to reduce transmission in patients and healthcare workers. We evaluate our experience with universal pre-procedural screening for COVID-19 in low-risk pediatric patients. Method(s): We performed a retrospective review of patients aged 18 years and below who underwent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) assay swabs in our center over two waves (1st May 2020 to 31st July 2020 and 1st April 2021 to 30th June 2021). We included patients who underwent rRT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 prior to any procedures requiring general anesthesia and were deemed low risk for COVID-19 according to our institutional screening criteria. All study patients were followed up for 14 days post-procedure. Result(s): Of 2065 swabs done for patients aged 18 years and below during the study period, 645 (31.2%) were pre-procedural swabs. Patients were aged 4.2 years (median, interquartile range: 1.6 years-9.8 years). Two patients (0.3%) tested positive for COVID-19 by PPS, detected during Period 2 - both had risk criteria which were overlooked by healthcare workers. Within 14 days post-procedure, 10 patients had unscheduled readmissions and 15 required repeat rRT-PCR, all of which were negative. Conclusion(s): In patients deemed low risk for COVID-19 infection according to our screening criteria, routine pre-procedural swabbing returns a low positive rate. Our findings can guide screening protocols at institutions that provide surgical services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Copyright © The Author(s) 2022.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Tocilizumab, a monoclonal anti-interleukin- 6 receptor antibody, has been widely used as a treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. Gastrointestinal perforation is a rare but critical complication that occurs in patients treated with tocilizumab. In the COVID-19 pandemic, tocilizumab has been recently highlighted for its beneficial effect in reducing the risk of death in severely ill COVID-19 patients. In this current study, we report the ileal perforation in a COVID-19 confirmed patient who had received tocilizumab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Case Presentation: A 57-year- old woman with a medical history of rheumatoid arthritis and hypertension presented to our emergency room with abrupt onset of severe abdominal pain and nausea. Physical examination revealed direct and indirect tenderness of the whole abdomen. She had a history of COVID-19 infection 1 month ago and recovered without severe complications. She also has been treated for rheumatoid arthritis, and the disease activity has been maintained low with the administration of tocilizumab since 2019. The latest administration of tocilizumab to the patient was 2 weeks ago. The plain radiograph of the abdomen showed intraperitoneal free air suggesting pneumoperitoneum. The abdominal computed tomography was also conducted to find the origin of free extraluminal air, and it revealed heterogenous wall enhancement of the ileal loop and the mesenteric haziness. The emergency surgery was performed, and the ileal perforation was noted. The small bowel segmental resection was performed through the surgical procedure. Conclusion(s): COVID-19 has been founded to cause gastrointestinal inflammation. The use of tocilizumab in COVID-19 patients should be carefully conducted because it could act as a permissive of gastrointestinal perforation. Furthermore, the physician should be aware of the possible complication of tocilizumab because early diagnosis and timely management are crucial to preventing high mortality complications.
ABSTRACT
Victoria suffered three major waves during the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic. Melbourne became the longest locked down city in the world at 267 days. This narrative review documents the chronological waves of COVID-19 in Victoria and key themes influencing the State-wide surgical response. In 2020, Victoria needed to secure supplies of personal protective equipment (PPE) and later, recognizing the importance of aerosol transmission, introduced a respiratory protection program to protect health care workers (HCWs) with fit-tested N-95 masks. It established routine preoperative PCR testing for periods when community prevalence was high and developed strategies to restrict elective surgery when hospital capacity was limited. In 2021, three short-term outbreaks were contained and eliminated whilst vaccination of HCWs and the vulnerable was taking place. A third major wave (Delta) occurred July to November 2021, succeeded by another involving the Omicron variant from December 2021. Planned surgery waiting list numbers, and waiting times for surgery, doubled between March 2020 and March 2022. In early 2022, almost 300 patients underwent surgery when infected with Omicron, with a low mortality (2.6%), though mortality was significantly higher in the unvaccinated (7.3% versus 1.4%). In conclusion, the Victorian response to COVID-19 involved tight state-wide social restrictions, contact tracing, furlough, escalating PPE guidance and respiratory protection. HCW infections were greatly reduced in 2021 compared with 2020. Pre-operative PCR testing gave confidence for emergency and urgent elective surgery to proceed during pandemic waves. Other elective cases were performed as health system capacity allowed, without compromising outcomes.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics/prevention & control , Respiratory Aerosols and DropletsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The iodinated contrast material (ICM) shortage of 2022 has affected healthcare systems worldwide, forcing institutions to adapt by implementing interventions to conserve ICM without compromising patient care. We aim to present the practices proven to be effective in reducing ICM consumption to improve resource allocation in trauma patients. METHODS: A literature search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane was conducted. Studies investigating the utility of ICM in the management of trauma & emergency surgery patients, as well as institutional interventions that were implicated as a response to the ICM shortage of 2022 were included for review. RESULTS: Eight articles were selected and reviewed. The use of alternative, non-contrast-enhanced imaging modalities, particularly non-contrast-enhanced CT (NECT), was found to be effective in reducing ICM consumption. Other institutions have implemented strategies to reduce the ICM dose for each imaging study performed, including decreasing ICM dose itself as well as reducing tube voltage, which was shown to reduce ICM use by 50%. Waste minimization by splitting single-dose contrast vials into smaller aliquots utilized for multiple imaging studies has also been an effective method. Additionally, assembling a Radiology Command Center Team, responsible for monitoring ICM supplies while offering 24/7 consults regarding options for alternative imaging, has resulted in an overall reduction in contrast consumption of 50% in 7 days. CONCLUSION: In response to the ICM shortage of 2022, most healthcare institutions have found the use of alternative imaging modalities to be effective in reducing ICM consumption. Other effective measures include ICM dose reduction and ICM waste minimization.