Covid-19 Vaccination Impact on Atrial Arrhythmias - Real-World Evidence from the Certitude Registry

Background: The COVID-19 vaccines were developed unprecedentedly and have proven safe and efficacious in reducing transmissibility and severe infection. The impact of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines on atrial arrhythmias (AA) incidence is unknown. Objective(s): To analyze the incidence of AA after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED). Method(s): BIOTRONIK Home Monitoring data and Medicare claims data from CERTITUDE patients implanted with a CIED between 2010-20 were utilized to identify recipients of one or more doses of the COVID-19 vaccine in 2021. Those who had influenza vaccination in 2020 were also identified in the same cohort as a control. From remote monitoring data, the number of atrial high rate events (AHR) and % burden of AA in the three months post-vaccination was compared to the preceding three months using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Kruskal-Wallis test was used for group difference comparisons. New AF diagnosis was determined from ICD-10 diagnosis codes in Medicare claims. Result(s): First and 2nd doses of COVID vaccine (50% Pfizer, 47% Moderna, and 3% J&J) were administered to 7757 and 6579 individuals with a CIED (age 76.2 (+/-9.0) y, 49% males), respectively. In the same cohort, 4723 (61%) individuals received the influenza vaccine. A statistically significant increase in the number of AHR episodes and % burden of AA was noted in the three months post-vaccination compared to the preceding three months after the 1st and 2nd doses of the COVID-19 vaccine (Figure). No such association was noted following influenza vaccination. In subgroup analysis, AHR episodes increased significantly in age groups >70 and men. Post-vaccination increase in AHR episodes was more significant in those without a pre-vaccination history of AHR episodes (mean increase of AHR 6.9+/-88.4, p<0.001) and was non-significant in those with a preceding history of AHR (p=0.8). Among the 764 patients with no AF diagnosis in claims preceding the first COVID-19 vaccine, 87 (11.4%) developed a new AF diagnosis or AHR event in the first three months post-vaccination. Conclusion(s): We report a small but significant increase in the number of CIED-detected atrial arrhythmias following vaccination for COVID-19 but not influenza, specifically in men and age >70 years. Acknowledging the immense public health benefit of COVID-19 vaccines, our results should prompt increased awareness of evaluating for AF in this high-risk group following vaccination. [Formula presented]Copyright © 2023

An audit of uptake of flu, COVID-19 and pneumococcal vaccines in a cohort of people living with HIV

Background: People living with HIV are at greater risk of complications associated with influenza, SARS-CoV-2 and pneumococcus than the general population and BHIVA guidelines recommend vaccinating all patients against these infections. The purpose of this audit was to determine the uptake of these vaccines, and factors associated with uptake, to inform vaccine delivery models. Method(s): All patients who received HIV care in our service at the end of November 2022 were included. Demographic data were collected from the service database, clinical data and pneumococcal vaccine (Prevenar-13) status were obtained from clinical records and COVID-19 and flu vaccine (2021) uptake was obtained from the Vaccine Management Tool (VMT). At the time of audit all patients were recommended to have received at least 3 doses of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Caldicott approval was received for this work. Result(s): There were 364 patients known to the service of which one was excluded as clinical information was not available. Sixty-seven percent had received flu vaccine, 88% >= one dose of COVID-19 vaccination, 76% at least 3 doses of COVID-19 vaccination and 88% had received Prevenar-13. Three percent had received no vaccines and 60% had completed all vaccines. Uptake of both flu and COVID-19 vaccines were lower in the following groups: <50 years old (51% and 62% respectively), urban residence (65%, 71%), higher deprivation scores (51-65%, 64-75%) less time in HIV care (57%, 70%), those not on ART (13%, 25%), CD4 <200 cells/mm3 (40%, 50%), detectable viral load (33%, 42%), those out of care (23%, 23%) and those known to the harm reduction service (33%, 33%). There was higher uptake of Prevenar-13 in all groups. Uptake of all vaccines was high in those with comorbidities. Conclusion(s): The high uptake of Prevenar-13 in higher risk groups suggests that the model of vaccine delivery, opportunistic and pro-active recall for inhouse vaccination, is more effective for protecting those at highest risk for poor outcomes and for those for whom access is challenging compared to the centralised national recall system at designated Vaccine hubs. Vaccination resourcing, planning and delivery should consider the needs of specific risk groups to ensure best outcomes.

Barriers to Barrett's Esophagus Screening Within Veterans Affair Patient Population

Introduction: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a metaplastic change in the distal esophagus in which squamous epithelium is replaced by columnar epithelium with goblet cells. Chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is strongly linked to the development of BE, which is a known precursor lesion to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). There is no universal guideline for BE screening, however AJG suggest a single screening endoscopy in patients with chronic GERD symptoms and 3 or more addition risk factors, such as male sex, age > 50 years, white race, tobacco smoking, obesity and family history of BE or EAC. Within the Veteran's Affair (VA) hospital in Northport, New York, many veterans possess multiple risk factors for BE. Residents in VA primary care clinic are diligent in colorectal cancer screening, yet there is concern for limited offerings for BE screening. Our project aims to study the barriers to BE screening within a high-risk veteran population. Method(s): This is a survey-based study. A total of 36 internal medicine residents working in VA primary care clinic were asked to fill out a survey regarding their perspective towards BE screening. The results of the survey are compiled in Table. Result(s): 36 residents within the clinic completed the survey. As shown in Table, 35 out of 36 residents expressed that the primary care clinic does not screen for BE adequately. 30 residents expressed uncertainty regarding referral criteria for BE screening, 24 residents revealed having never referred patients for BE screening. When asked about barriers regarding BE screening, consensus polling showed that there is a lack of resident education surrounding indications for screening. Other common barriers include lack of transportation for veterans to appointments, the COVID 19 pandemic, and lack of health literacy within the veteran population. Conclusion(s): Although there is no established guideline for BE screening, per AJG there is recommendation for a one-time screening endoscopy in susceptible population. VA patients pose a high-risk population that appears to have low screening rates. Patients appear to be placed on long term PPIs without re-assessment and endoscopic screening despite possessing multiple risk factors for BE. Our survey shows that within our resident cohort there is concern for lack of awareness regarding screening criteria for BE. With the initiation of this project, we hope to increase awareness of BE screening within the resident group and improve health outcomes within veteran population. (Table Presented).

Missed opportunities for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and outcomes of people acquiring HIV with previous or recent PrEP use

Background: With NHS PrEP now available for those at risk, we aimed to identify missed opportunities for people newly diagnosed with HIV who attended sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services, and to determine the HIV outcomes associated with people acquiring HIV with previous or recent PrEP use. Method(s): A retrospective observational study reviewed all new HIV diagnoses from the last 2 years to see if they were eligible for PrEP and offered in SRH services. Data was collected using electronic medical records on HIV outcomes - virological suppression, resistance and antiretroviral choice. Result(s): There were 74 new HIV diagnoses. 41 people were eligible but only 10 were known to have accessed PrEP at our services. 21% were heterosexual and of black ethnicity - it was not possible to ascertain whether they were eligible for PrEP from the notes. Of the 10 people with recent PrEP use, 2 stopped due to side effects;headaches, vomiting, fatigue and renal toxicity concerns. For the remaining adherence concerns were reported - taking event based dosing (EBD) incorrectly and difficulty accessing services. 80% of people achieved virological suppression. 90% were put on a second generation integrase or protease inhibitor. No one developed nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance. 6 people eligible for PrEP had attended SRH services but not given PrEP. 2 attended during the IMPACT trial being full and referred to IwantPrEPnow. 2 attended during COVID where baseline bloods were done with follow up but subsequently tested positive. 2 people refused PrEP with 1 deeming themselves to be low risk. Conclusion(s): Our data highlights several missed opportunities for starting same-day PrEP which potentially may have prevented HIV acquisition. If PrEP is not issued on the day, adequate follow up must be ensured. Reassuringly those who acquired HIV with recent PrEP use have achieved good virological control without NRTI mutations. Counselling on potential side effects, EBD dosing and ongoing HIV risk are essential. Despite NHS PrEP available over 2 years, our data shows we are still failing to meet the demand of PrEP not only in men who have sex with men but also in other key at risk groups.

The experience and inspiration on the prevention and control of coronavirus disease 2019 in the department of radiotherapy

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), as a public health emergency, is a serious threat to human health. Cancer patients have a high risk of being infected with COVID-19. As one of important means of cancer treatment, radiotherapy has become an important alternative to surgery during the epidemic of COVID-19. The radiotherapy department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital ensured the smooth development of radiotherapy work on the setup of prevention and control systems for COVID-19 by establishing admission strategies for cancer patients, disinfection, isolation, daily management measures, scientific exploration, and clinical practice. In this paper, the associated strategies are summarized and analyzed, which can provide experience and reference for radiotherapy treatment under public health emergencies.Copyright © 2021, Peking Union Medical College Hospital. All rights reserved.

Prevalence and related factors of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among medical staff during COVID-19 pandemic

[Background] The epidemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) seriously affects the psychological status of medical staff who directly face the risk of the disease. [Objective] This study investigates the prevalence and related factors of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among medical staff during the COVID-19 pandemic. [Methods] From February 13 to March 1, 2020, a network questionnaire survey was conducted among 482 medical staff selected by convenience sampling. A self-designed questionnaire was used to investigate the basic demographic information and COVID-19-related questions. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) were used to estimate the prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among the medical staff. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was performed with PHQ-9 score, GAD-7 score, and ISI score as dependent variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis (forward-conditional method) on depression, anxiety, and insomnia as dependent variables was performed with basic demographic information and COVID-19-related questions as independent variables. [Results] Among the surveyed medical staff, the prevalence rates of depression, anxiety, and insomnia were 14.3%, 11.2%, and 23.2%, respectively. There were no significant differences in the prevalence rates among different age, gender, local risk level, and occupation groups and those aiding Hubei Province or not. The medical staff who directly contacted fever or diagnosed patients had more serious depression (b=1.73, 95%CI: 0.79-2.66) and insomnia (b=2.43, 95%CI: 1.48-3.39) and a higher risk of insomnia (OR=1.89, 95%CI: 1.21-2.96). The medical staff whose current protective measures cannot prevent infection had more serious depression (b=1.72, 95% CI: 0.65-2.80), anxiety (b=1.75, 95% CI: 0.76-2.75), and insomnia (b=1.73, 95% CI: 0.63-2.82), and had a higher risk of depression (OR=1.97, 95% CI: 1.11-3.49), anxiety (OR=3.00, 95%CI: 1.64-5.46), and insomnia (OR=1.79, 95%CI: 1.08-2.96). [Conclusion] During the COVID-19 epidemic, the risks of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among selected medical staff are increased compared with the non-epidemic period. Occupational exposure to high-risk groups and protective measures would significantly affect mental health of medical staff.Copyright © 2021, Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention. All rights reserved.

Quality Improvement Project: Improving Osteoporosis Treatment for Patients with a Neck of Femur Fracture

Background/Aims The Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) identifies patients >50 who have sustained a fragility fracture (FF). These patients need prompt assessment and decision on appropriate treatment for osteoporosis in order to reduce their risk of sustaining further FFs. Without treatment, 1/5 patients can go on to have a further FFs which carry significant risk to mortality and morbidity. Zoledronate is a bone agent that halves the risk of another FF. Patients with a neck of femur fracture (#NOF) present as one of the most at-risk groups for a further FF. These patients are generally elderly and frail and attendance to outpatient hospital appointments are difficult. Therefore, transforming the FLS from an out-patient-based service, to one that is streamlined to systematically identify and opportunistically treat patients whilst they are still in hospital means delivering timely, effective and efficient patient-centred care. Methods We used various Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles to aim to deliver Zoledronate to>=90% of appropriately assessed in-patients >60 who have had a #NOF within a year of commencing QIP. Results PDSA cycle 1-Involvement of ortho-geriatrician: P-Improve working relationship with ortho-geriatrician with an interest in bone health over a 6-month period;D-Regular meetings with wider MDT;S-Priority of bone health assessments made greater through ward round documentation;A-Expand knowledge throughout the wider ortho-geriatrician team. PDSA cycle 2-Timing of Zoledronate delivery: P-Literature review regarding delivery of Zoledronate timing;D-Discuss as MDT;SNo evidence to suggest delay in fracture healing if given on day 7;AAdopted process and communicated. PDSA cycle 3-FLS team on the wards as a result of PDSA cycle 2 not improving treatment outcomes: P-FLS nurses to join ortho-geriatrician ward round twice-weekly for 3- month trial period;D-Bank holidays and spike in Covid cases presented a challenge. Solution: Improvement of MDT relationships;S-At the end of the trial period an increase in patients who received treatment was shown and proved our prediction;A-Adaptation to documentation in FLS to streamline and reduce duplication. Conclusion The ability to deliver Zoledronate to>=90% of appropriate patients with a #NOF as an inpatient was reached after 8 months of initiating QIP. Furthermore, maintaining this was consistently achieved throughout the following year and beyond. A few of the main reasons for this included earlier drug delivery, having a dedicated ortho-geriatrician as part of the FLS, and the FLS team attending the wards. A prompt bone health assessment of patients has enabled appropriate treatment to be delivered efficiently. The delivery of Zoledronate as an in-patient has meant that a significantly greater proportion of patients receive treatment, and sooner, in comparison to awaiting an outpatient assessment (that they may not attend). Therefore, this QIP has demonstrated time- and cost-effective management of patients with #NOF requiring Zoledronate.

Comparison between COVID-19 and monkeypox vaccine uptake in a diverse London HIV cohort

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic caused millions of deaths, its impact lessened with effective vaccines and treatments. The subsequent monkeypox outbreak posed another global threat, disproportionately affecting men who have sex with men (MSM), with concerns around increasing community stigma. Vaccinating at risk groups is vital in minimising COVID-19 and monkeypox transmissions and adverse sequalae. Our HIV clinic serves a diverse population in a deprived area with a large immigrant population and high level of co-morbidities, associated with poorer outcomes. We explored factors associated with COVID-19 and monkeypox vaccine uptake. Method(s): We reviewed COVID-19 vaccine first, second and third/booster uptake and first smallpox vaccine among MSMs attending our HIV clinic. Monkeypox vaccination is a two-dose course. Initial limited vaccine availability meant first monkeypox vaccine was prioritised for all eligible patients;we therefore analysed first monkeypox vaccination uptake. 186 MSM PLWH were identified. 164 were included in our analysis;22 were excluded due to insufficient vaccination information. Data was recorded contemporaneously in patients' records. COVID-19 vaccine uptake was verified using NHS Summary Care Record and London Care Record. Data on age and ethnicity was collected. Result(s): Demographics: Age: mean 42.9 years, 49% <=40 years, 51% >40 years Ethnicity: 55% White, 26% Black, 5% Asian, 2% mixed, 7% other, 4% not stated COVID-19 vaccination uptake reached statistical significance between age groups: <=40y 53%, >40y 80% (p = 0.001) and ethnicities: White 73%, Black 50%, Asian 67% (p = 0.026). Monkeypox vaccination uptake did not reach significance: <40y 26%, >40y 29%;ethnicity: White 31%, Black 24%, Asian 33%. Additionally, COVID-19 vaccinated patients were not statistically significantly more likely to accept monkeypox vaccination. Conclusion(s): Monkeypox vaccination uptake was similar across ages and ethnicities. However, monkeypox vaccination uptake was considerably lower than COVID-19 vaccination. Further work is needed to identify and engage at risk groups and address obstacles affecting monkeypox vaccination in marginalised communities. Lessons from COVID vaccination campaigns should be employed to reach unvaccinated high-risk MSMs. (Table Presented).

Performance of Indicators Used in the Regular Risk Assessment for Covid-19

Intro: Since November 2021, gradual changes in non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) had begun in consideration of the socio-economic cost and the high rate of COVID-19 vaccination. As an effort to monitor the COVID-19 situation and the effect of NPIs, regular risk assessment for COVID-19 has been conducted based on the input from the external advisory committee. This paper examines the correlation between the risk assessment results and other indicators, such as the incidence of COVID-19, public perception, community mobility, and the government policy from November 2021 to May 2022. Method(s): For weekly regular risk assessment of COVID-19, the data were collected from the National Infectious Disease Surveillance System website, which included incidence, mortality, and % of severe cases. Other indicators were from regular surveys on perceived risk among the public, community mobility from the Google website, and the government's response policy from The Oxford Stringency Index. The level of risk was classified into five levels from very low to very high. The level of COVID-19 risk and its correlation with the COVID-19 incidence, risk perception, community mobility, and government policy were examined. Finding(s): The result of the correlation analysis showed the highest positive correlation between the risk level and risk perception (r=0.86, CI 0.72-0.94). This indicates that the actual risk level and the risk perceived by the public are similar. Among the incidence-related indicators, the number of new severe cases of COVID-19 per week showed the highest correlation with the risk level (r=0.62, CI 0.33-0.80). Conclusion(s): The high correlation between the weekly severe cases and the overall COVID-19 risk level suggests that Korea's COVID-19 policy priority was mainly at protecting the high-risk populationCopyright © 2023

Insights Regarding Outcomes for Covid-19 Hospitalizations with Adult Congenital Heart Disease (Achd)

Background: As of December 2022, SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus resulted in over 6 million deaths worldwide.[1] It was realized early into the pandemic, that COVID-19 significantly impacts the Cardiovascular system. [2] Patients with pre-existing cardiovascular comorbidities were particularly at higher risk of adverse outcomes during their hospitalizations. [3] Similarly, it can be safe to assume patients with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) should considered a high-risk population for the development of severe COVID infection with increased rates of significant cardiovascular complications. Objective(s): Based on this reasoning and the paucity of data available on this topic using a large database, we sought to investigate the outcomes of patients with ACHD who were admitted to the hospital with COVID-19. Method(s): The National Inpatient Sample database for 2020 was queried to identify adult hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 and a secondary diagnosis of ACHD using International Classification of Diseases - 10 Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes. The primary outcome studied was inpatient mortality, while secondary outcomes included inpatient complications, mean length of stay (LOS), and total hospital charge (THC). Multivariate logistic and linear regression analyses were used to adjust for possible confounders and analyze the variables. Result(s): Out of 1,050,045 COVID-19 hospitalizations registered, 2,425 (0.23%) had ACHD as a secondary diagnosis. Encounters with ACHD who were hospitalized with COVID-19 had significantly higher adjusted odds of inpatient mortality (Adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR]: 1.4, [95% CI: 1.05-1.88], p=0.022), Longer LOS (Mean 2.4 days, [95% CI: 1.35-3.40], p <0.001), and higher Total Hospital Charges (Mean $53,000, [95% CI: 20811-85190], p <0.001). A Forrest plot (Figure 1) demonstrates a graphical representation of the multivariate analysis of the significant in-hospital complications when adjusted for patient demographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. Conclusion(s): Among COVID-19 hospitalizations, those with a history of congenital heart diseases had significantly worse outcomes in terms of in-hospital mortality, sepsis;the need for endotracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressors;developing acute kidney injury and pulmonary embolism, in addition to the longer length of stay, and higher total hospital charges. [Formula presented]Copyright © 2023

Cooperate with community health centers to eliminate HCV in low prevalence region of South China

Background: Shenzhen, a city of immigrants in South China, has a low HCV incidence rate of 19.47 per 100,000. To eliminate HCV in this low prevalence region, it may be efficiency to collaborate with the communities to screen HCV in high risk population. There are 849 Community Health Centers up to now in Shenzhen. The study aimed to evaluate the model of HCV elimination in high-risk population with Community Health Centers. Method(s): The Shenzhen Medical Association assigned hepatologists to educate Primary Care Physicians (PCPs) of 13 Community Health Centers in Bao'an District from 2021.6-2022.6. The PCPs need to take HCV knowledge tests before and after the training. Only when all the questions are answered correctly can the test be passed. Then they recommend the high risk population, e.g., PWID, pricking wound, iatrogenic exposure, to do the HCV antibody test and transfer the patients with HCV-Ab (+) to the hepatologist of Shenzhen Bao'an People's Hospital. Result(s): 151 PCPs participated in HCV knowledge education, the pass rate improved from 15.2% to 53.8% after the training. The high risk population screening number in Community Health Centers improved from 192 (a year before) to 300, even affected by the lockdown of COVID-19. The HCV antibody positive rate in high risk population is 4% (12/300), higher than the hospital population (0.8%, Shenzhen Bao'an People's Hospital), the blood donor (0.3%, Shenzhen Blood Center). The HCV-Ab positive patients in communities transferred to Shenzhen Bao'an People's Hospital, where the rate of DAA treatment is improved from 36.6% (a year before) to 64.1%. Conclusion(s): It is an efficient way to achieve HCV elimination earlier to screening in high risk population through PCPs in low prevalence region. Expanding this model to other Community Health Centers in Shenzhen may accelerate HCV elimination. (Figure Presented).