RENIN-ANGIOTENSIN SYSTEM BLOCKER AND THE COVID-19 AGGRAVATION: REPORT BY THE COVID-19 REGISTRY JAPAN

Objective: The role of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) in the pandemic context of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to be debated. Patients with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, cerebro-cardiovascular disease, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), who often use ACEi/ARB, may affect risk of severe COVID-19. However, there are no data available on the association of ACEi/ARB use with COVID-19 severity in this population. Design and method: This study is an observational study of patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test and inpatient treatment at a healthcare facility, using the registry information of COVIREGI-JP. Our primary outcomes were consisting of in-hospital death, ventilator support, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, and ICU admission. Out of the 6,055 patients, 1,921 patients with preexisting hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, cerebro-cardiovascular disease, or COPD were enrolled. We also evaluated 1,097 patients with hypertension. Results: Factors associated with an increased risk of the primary outcomes were aging, male sex, COPD, severe renal impairment, and diabetes mellitus. No correlations were observed with ACEi/ARB, cerebro-cardiovascular diseases, or hypertension. Associated factors in male patients were aging, renal impairment, hypertension, and diabetes. In female patients, factors associated with an increased risk were aging, ACEi/ARB, renal impairment, and diabetes, whereas hypertension was associated with a lower risk of the primary outcomes. In patients with hypertension, factors associated with an increased risk of the primary outcomes were aging, male sex, severe renal impairment, and diabetes mellitus, but not ACEi/ ARB, cerebro-cardiovascular diseases, or COPD. Conclusions: Independent factors for the primary outcomes were aging, male sex, COPD, severe renal impairment, and diabetes, but not ACEi/ARB, in the COVID-19 patients with preexisting hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, cerebro-cardiovascular disease or COPD. Based on this registry data analysis, more detailed data collection and analysis is needed with the cooperation of multiple healthcare facilities.

Hospitalizations and mortality during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Hong Kong, China: An observational study

Background: Hong Kong followed a strict COVID-19 elimination strategy in 2020. We estimated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic responses on all-cause and cause-specific hospitalizations and deaths in 2020. Methods: Interrupted time-series analysis using negative binomial regression accounting for seasonality and long-term trend was used on weekly 2010–2020 data to estimate the change in hospitalization risk and excess mortality occurring both within and out of hospitals. Findings: In 2020, as compared to a 2010–2019 baseline, we observed an overall reduction in all-cause hospitalizations, and a concurrent increase in deaths. The overall hospitalization reduction (per 100,000 population) was 4809 (95% CI: 4692, 4926) in 2020, with respiratory diseases (632, 95% CI: 607, 658) and cardiovascular diseases (275, 95% CI: 264, 286) contributing most. The overall excess mortality (per 100,000 population) was 25 (95% CI: 23, 27) in 2020, mostly among individuals with pre-existing cardiovascular diseases (12, 95% CI: 11, 13). A reduction in excess in-hospital mortality (−10 per 100,000, 95% CI: −12, −8) was accompanied by an increase in excess out-of-hospital mortality (32, 95% CI: 29, 34). Interpretation: The COVID-19 pandemic might have caused indirect impact on population morbidity and mortality likely through changed healthcare seeking particularly in youngest and oldest individuals and those with cardiovascular diseases. Better healthcare planning is needed during public health emergencies with disruptions in healthcare services. Funding: Health and Medical Research Fund, Collaborative Research Fund, AIR@InnoHK and RGC Senior Research Fellow Scheme, Hong Kong. © 2022 The Authors

CRT-100.87 Impact of COVID 19 on Patients Admitted for ACS: A Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database Study

Background: COVID rapidly became a multisystemic infection with varied cardiovascular complications including Acute Coronary Syndrome. Current literature is limited on the impact of COVID on ACS patients. Methods: We queried the national inpatient sample (NIS) from 2020 to identify patients who were admitted for ACS and stratified them based on the presence or absence of COVID. The adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of in-hospital outcomes and resource utilization were calculated using chi-square statistics in the software STATA v.17. Results: Out of 883940 patients analyzed, who were admitted for ACS, 3900 patients had COVID. On adjusted analysis, patients with COVID had significantly elevated In-Hospital mortality (aOR, 2.91 CI 2.25-3.79), MACCE (aOR 2.53, CI 1.90-3.10), cardiac arrest (aOR 3.34, CI 1.1-10.1) with longer length of stay (6.34 ± 0.39 vs 4.48 ± 0.02). Interestingly, the outcome PCA (aOR, 0.39 CI 0.33-0.46) showed significant improvement. Interestingly, mean costs were elevated in patients without COVID at $105,550.8 vs $98597.7 in patients without COVID. In terms of trends, as exposure increased through the year with the highest levels in December, the mortality also increased (April 18.52% vs 25.64%). Interestingly, the cardiac arrest percentage decreased from April 2020 (7.4%) to Dec 2020 (1.98%) as well as MCS in April 202 (11.11%)vs December 2020 (3.47%) in patients exposed to COVID. Conclusions: In patients admitted for ACS, the presence of COVID significantly increases the risk of MACCE, in-hospital mortality, and cardiac arrest. Prospective trials are necessary for the identification of risk factors to improve clinical outcomes in these patients. Key words: COVID, Sars-2 coronavirus. Coronavirus. ACS. Acute Coronary Syndrome. [Formula presented]

Early Short-Term Use of Different Doses of Corticosteroid in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia

Objective Encouraged by reports of favorable outcomes following the use of corticosteroids in patients with moderate-to-severe coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia, we aimed to present our experience with early short-term corticosteroid use at our center in pediatric patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods One hundred and twenty-nine pediatric patients were included in the study. Patients were divided into four groups according to the type and dose of corticosteroids given: Group 1 (those receiving dexamethasone 0.15 mg/kg/d);Group 2 (those receiving methylprednisolone 1 mg/kg/d);Group 3 (those receiving methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg/d);and Group 4 (those receiving pulse methylprednisolone 10-30 mg/kg/d). Results Of 129 patients, 19 (14.7%) patients were assigned to Group 1, 30 (23.3%) patients to Group 2, 30 (23.3%) patients to Group 3, and 50 (38.8%) patients to Group 4. Thirty-two (24.8%) patients were followed in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), of whom 13 (10%) required mechanical ventilation, and 7 (%5.4) died. In Group 4, the hospitalization length was significantly longer than in other groups (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). No significant difference was found among the groups in terms of mortality (p = 0.15). The most common comorbidity was obesity (33%). A significant association was found between the presence of comorbidity and mortality (p < 0.001). All patients who died had an underlying disease. Cerebral palsy was the most common underlying disease among the patients who died. Worsening of lymphopenia was significant in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia at the time of transfer to the PICU (p = 0.011). Conclusion Although children usually have a milder course of COVID-19 than adults, underlying diseases and obesity increase the severity of disease manifestations also in children. Further studies are needed to define the exact role of corticosteroids in COVID-19 patients. © 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

THERAPEUTIC TARGET AND CLINICAL IMPACT OF DAY-TO-DAY BLOOD PRESSURE VARIABILITY IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS WITH COVID-19

Objectives: Blood pressure variability (BPV) plays an important role in hypertensive patients, and frequently associated with organ damage. Although hypertension is the most common comorbidity in COVID-19, the impact of BPV and therapeutic target of BPV to outcome in COVID-19 patients with hypertension remain unclear. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between BPV and severity of COVID-19, in-hospital mortality, hypertensive status,, and efficacy of antihypertensives in suppress hypertensive covid-19 patient's BPV. Design and method: This was a cohort retrospective study that enrolled 351 patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Subjects were classified according to the presence of hypertension, the severity of COVID-19, and BPV status. Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) was measured at 6 a.m. and 6 p.m. during hospitalization, and BPV was calculated as the coefficient of variation of MAP (MAPCV). MAPCV values above the median were defined as high BPV. We compared the hypertensive status, COVID-19 severity, in-hospital mortality and antihypertensive agents between the BPV groups. Results: The mean age was 53.85 ± 18.84 years-old. Subjects with high BPV were significantly associated with hypertension status (PR = 1.38;95%CI = 1.13- 1.70;p = 0.003) or severe COVID-19 (PR = 1.39;95%CI = 1.09-1.76;p = 0.005). In laboratory findings, high BPV group had higher CRP (55.15 ± 50.80 vs 97.79 ± 77.17), higher creatinine cerum (1.80 ± 3.15 vs 0.91 ± 0.14) and high BPV status also significantly increased risk of mortality (HR = 2.30;95%CI = 1.73-3,86;p = <0.001). Patients with combination of severe COVID-19 status, hypertension (+) and high BPV status had the highest risk of in-hospital mortality (HR = 3.51;95%CI = 2.32-4,97;p < 0.001) compared to other combination status of groups. In COVID-19 patients with hypertension, combination teraphy with CCB as well as CCB monoteraphy significantly decreased BPV (PR = 0.50;95%CI = 0.27-0.93;p = 0.004) and mortality (HR = 0.17;95%CI = 0.05-0.56;p = 0.004). Conclusions: High BPV was associated with hypertensive status and severe COVID-19, and these factors together increased in-hospital mortality. CCB are antihypertensive agents that were potentially effective in suppressing BPV and mortality in COVID-19 patients.

COURSE OF ACS IN PATIENTS CO-INFECTED WITH COVID-19

Aim: To study and compare the features of the course of ACS in patients who underwent COVID19 infection. Material and Methods: The study included ACS patients with ST segment elevation admitted from January 2021 to February 2022. Patients were compared with a group of patients who did not suffer from COVID 19 infection and were hospitalized for ACS in a similar period of time. The study included 114 patients. In all patients, the presence of IgG antibodies to the agent of the coronavirus infection COVID-19 was determined, which indicates that the person has already had a coronavirus infection or not. Patients were divided into 2 groups: 1 - patients who had COVID19 infection;2 - not recovered from coronavirus infection. All patients were assessed the following indicators: the presence of coronary artery disease before hospitalization, the incidence of cardiogenic shock, the presence of STEMI, as well as the number of deaths during hospitalization. Results: In the first group, only 39.5% (45) of patients were examined, of which men - 80.0% (36). Prior to hospitalization, coronary artery disease was present in 64.4% (29) of patients. STEMI was present in 75.5% (34) of patients. The incidence of cardiogenic shock in 4.4% (2) of patients. The number of deaths during hospitalization is 4.4% (2). In the second group, only 60.5% (69) of patients were examined, of which 78.3% (54) were men. Prior to hospitalization, CAD was present in 55.07% (38) of patients. STEMI was recorded in 59.4% (41) of patients. The incidence of cardiogenic shock is 1.45% of patients. The number of deaths during hospitalization was 1.45%. Conclusion: Before hospitalization, CAD was present in the majority of patients 39.5% (45) who had COVID 19, who did not have COVID19 patients 60.5% (69). STEMI was present in 75.5% (34) of patients who had COVID19 and 59.4% (41) of those who did not have COVID 19 infection (p < 0.05). During the pandemic, there is a high incidence of cardiogenic shock in 4.4% (2) of patients who have had COVID19 and 1.45% (1) of those who have not been ill. The percentage of deaths during hospitalization in COVID19 survivors is higher compared to 4.4% with 1.45% who did not recover.

HYPERTENSION AND RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH IN-HOSPITAL DEATH IN PATIENTS WITH COVID-19

Objective: To explore the prevalence of hypertension and the common risk factors associated with increased death rate among (Covid-19) patients. Design and method: This is a retrospective cohort study using de-identified data retrieved from clinical records of patients from two COVID 19 isolation centers. Medical history, demographic data, self-reported comorbidities, symptoms, disease complications and laboratory investigations were extracted from clinical records of 406 confirmed COVID 19 hospitalized patients between Feb 2020 and July 2021. The outcomes of interest were death or discharge from the hospital. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the impact of age, gender, associated comorbidities and some laboratory abnormalities on increased death rate among in-hospital (Covid-19) patients. Results: The prevalence of hypertension, was 59.6%, followed by diabetes (47.3%). COVID-19 patients with hypertension were older (67.0 ± 10.7vs 65.0 ± 13.0 P = 0.001). 70.4% were males. Undiagnosed high blood pressure was detected among 14.5%. Overall mortality was 46.2%, while mortality among normotensives, known hypertensives and undiagnosed hypertension was 47.7%, 54.7% and 37.6%, respectively (p < 0.005). Death was significantly higher among the age group > 65 years compared to ≦ 65 years old (53.6% % vs 39.0% (P = 0.005) irrespective of their blood pressure. Severe respiratory and gastrointestinal symptoms were significantly higher among hypertensives. Type I Respiratory failure 22.1%, and acute kidney injury 11.8% were the most typical complications among hypertensives. Leucocytosis (24.2%), Lymphopenia (56.8%) and higher levels of D-Dimer (47.7%) and C-reactive protein (49.7%) were mainly observed among hypertensive patients. Logistic Regression analysis after adjusting for age significantly showed age OR: 1.81, 95% CI: (1.12: 2.73, p = 0.01), undiagnosed HTN OR: 5.65, 95% CI: (2.04:15.67, p = 0.00), low platelets count OR: 6.53, 95% CI, (1.23:35.23, p = 0.02), higher levels of urea OR:1.67, 95% CI, (1.04:2.63, p = 0.03) and creatinine OR:1.71, 95% CI, (1.063:2.70, p = 0.02), were associated with worse prognosis and in-hospital death among Covid- 19 patients. Conclusion: The age group, more than 65 years with undiagnosed BP of more than 140/90, is significantly associated with higher in-hospital death. Thrombocytopenia and elevated urea and creatinine levels were the most prominent laboratory markers and may be used as a potential indicator for prognosis and outcome among Covid 19 hypertensives. (Table Presented).

CRT-100.96 Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Six-Month Mortality and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection has changed everyday clinical practice with a shortage of solid data about its implications on ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Aim: To evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on six-month clinical outcomes of patients with STEMI and determine the mortality predictors after STEMI during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted on consecutive STEMI patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection who were presented to our hospital between April and October 2021. A total of 74 COVID-19 patients were included (group I) and were compared to 148 STEMI patients with matched baseline clinical parameters to the COVID-19 cases (group II). We compared the two cohorts' rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs;composite of death from any cause, recurrent MI, target-vessel revascularization, and stroke) at six months. Results: COVID-19 STEMI patients were more likely to present with angina equivalent symptoms, had higher Killip class at admission, and higher levels of high-sensitive cardiac Troponin T and serum C-reactive Protein. The six-month rates of MACEs were significantly higher in STEMI patients with COVID-19 compared to non- COVID-19 patients (41.9% vs. 16.9%, respectively;P<0.001) and were mainly due to higher in-hospital mortality (20.3% vs. 6.1%, respectively;P=0.001). The independent predictors of Six-month mortality in STEMI patients during the COVID-19 pandemic were the absence of ST resolution, low systolic blood and higher Killip class on admission, presence of severe MR and atrial fibrillation, and anterior wall STEMI. Conclusion: STEMI patients with superimposed COVID -19 infection had worse clinical outcomes with almost three times higher in-hospital mortality and six-month MACEs.

The burden of viral infections in pediatric intensive care unit between endemic and pandemic coronavirus infections: A tertiary care center experience

Objectives: To measure the prevalence of viral infections, length of stay (LOS), and outcome in children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) during the period preceding the COVID-19 pandemic in a MERS-CoV endemic country. Methods: A retrospective chart review of children 0–14 years old admitted to PICU with a viral infection. Results: Of 1736 patients, 164 patients (9.45%) had a positive viral infection. The annual prevalence trended downward over a three-year period, from 11.7% to 7.3%. The median PICU LOS was 11.6 days. Viral infections were responsible for 1904.4 (21.94%) PICU patient-days. Mechanical ventilation was used in 91.5% of patients, including noninvasive and invasive modes. Comorbidities were significantly associated with intubation (P-value = 0.025). Patients infected with multiple viruses had median pediatric index of mortality 2 (PIM 2) scores of 4, as compared to 1 for patients with single virus infections (p < 0.001), and a median PICU LOS of 12 days, compared to 4 in the single-virus group (p < 0.001). Overall, mortality associated with viral infections in PICU was 7 (4.3%). Patients with viral infections having multiple organ failure were significantly more likely to die in the PICU (p = 0.001). Conclusion: Viral infections are responsible for one-fifth of PICU patient-days, with a high demand for mechanical ventilation. Patients with multiple viral infections had longer LOS, and higher PIM 2 scores. The downward trend in the yearly rate of PICU admissions for viral infections between the end of the MERS-CoV outbreak and the start of the COVID-19 pandemic may suggest viral interference that warrants further investigations. © 2022 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases

COVID-19 vaccination decreased COVID-19 hospital length of stay, in-hospital death, and increased home discharge.

COVID-19 vaccination impact on hospital outcome metrics among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 is not well known. We evaluated if covid-19 vaccination was associated with better hospital outcomes such as in-hospital mortality, overall length of stay, and home discharge. This retrospective study analyzed data from the electronic health records of 29,732 patients admitted with COVID-19 with or without vaccination (21,525 unvaccinated and 8207 vaccinated) from January to December 2021. The association of COVID-19 vaccination status with overall length of hospitalization, in-hospital mortality rate, home discharge after hospitalization was investigated using a multivariate logistic regression and a generalized linear model. The mean age of all groups was 58.16 ± 17.39 years. The unvaccinated group was younger (54.95 ± 16.75) and had less comorbidities compared to the vaccinated group. Patients that had received COVID-19 vaccination exhibited decreased in-hospital mortality (OR 0.666, 95 % CI 0.580-0.764), decreased length of stay (-2.13 days, CI 2.73-1.55 days), and increased rate of home discharge (OR 1.168, CI 1.037-1.315). Older age and cerebrovascular accident diagnosis at admission demonstrated a negative effect on hospital outcomes with decreased home discharge (OR 0.950 per 1 year, CI 0.946-0.953 and OR 0.415, CI 0.202-0.854) and increased inhospital mortality (OR 1.04 per 1 year, CI 1.036-1.045 and OR 3.005, CI 1.961-4.604). This study shows the additional positive impact of COVID-19 vaccination has not just on in-hospital mortality but also in reducing overall length of stay and improved hospital outcome metrics including increasing likelihood of home discharge after hospitalization.

Incidence and Clinical Outcomes of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Critically lll Patients with COVID-19: A Multicenter Cohort Study - New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation and COVID-19.

Atrial fibrillation (Afib) can contribute to a significant increase in mortality and morbidity in critically ill patients. Thus, our study aims to investigate the incidence and clinical outcomes associated with the new-onset Afib in critically ill patients with COVID-19. A multicenter, retrospective cohort study includes critically ill adult patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care units (ICUs) from March, 2020 to July, 2021. Patients were categorized into two groups (new-onset Afib vs control). The primary outcome was the in-hospital mortality. Other outcomes were secondary, such as mechanical ventilation (MV) duration, 30-day mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and complications during stay. After propensity score matching (3:1 ratio), 400 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients who developed new-onset Afib had higher odds of in-hospital mortality (OR 2.76; 95% CI: 1.49-5.11, P = .001). However, there was no significant differences in the 30-day mortality. The MV duration, ICU LOS, and hospital LOS were longer in patients who developed new-onset Afib (beta coefficient 0.52; 95% CI: 0.28-0.77; P < .0001,beta coefficient 0.29; 95% CI: 0.12-0.46; P < .001, and beta coefficient 0.35; 95% CI: 0.18-0.52; P < .0001; respectively). Moreover, the control group had significantly lower odds of major bleeding, liver injury, and respiratory failure that required MV. New-onset Afib is a common complication among critically ill patients with COVID-19 that might be associated with poor clinical outcomes; further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure Due to SARS-CoV-2 Interstitial Pneumonia Treated with CPAP in a Medical Intermediate Care Setting: A Retrospective Observational Study on Comparison of Four Waves.

BACKGROUND: In COVID-19 patients non-invasive-positive-pressure-ventilation (NIPPV) has held a challenging role to reduce mortality and the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics of patients admitted to a Medical Intermediate Care Unit for acute respiratory failure due to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia throughout four pandemic waves. METHODS: The clinical data of 300 COVID-19 patients treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) were retrospectively analysed, from March-2020 to April-2022. RESULTS: Non-survivors were older and more comorbid, whereas patients transferred to ICU were younger and had fewer pathologies. Patients were older (from 65 (29-91) years in I wave to 77 (32-94) in IV, p < 0.001) and with more comorbidities (from Charlson's Comorbidity Index = 3 (0-12) in I to 6 (1-12) in IV, p < 0.001). No statistical difference was found for in-hospital mortality (33.0%, 35.8%, 29.6% and 45.9% in I, II, III and IV, p = 0.216), although ICU-transfers rate decreased from 22.0% to 1.4%. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 patients have become progressively older and with more comorbidities even in critical care area; from risk class analyses by age and comorbidity burden, in-hospital mortality rates remain high and are thus consistent over four waves while ICU-transfers have significantly reduced. Epidemiological changes need to be considered to improve the appropriateness of care.

Anti-phospholipid antibodies were associated with clinical symptoms, disease severity and mortality among hospitalized COVID-19 patient

Background: This study was aimed to find the correlation of anti-phospholipid antibodies in the risk of coagulopathy and disease severity in coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). Method(s): Clinical and laboratory findings were obtained from 50 confirmed COVID-19 patients hospitalized in Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, Indonesia from September to November 2020. Anti-phospholipid antibodies were measured by finding of IgM anti-beta2 glycoprotein, lupus anticoagulant and IgM anti-cardiolipin. Clinical Symptoms, thrombotic events, and mortality during hospitalization were recorded. Disease severity was defined by COVID-19 Treatment by multi-departement guidelines, Ministry of Health, Year 2020, Indonesia. Result(s): Among 50 patients, 5 patient (10%) were positive of IgM anti-beta2 glycoprotein (2%), IgG anti-cardiolipin (2%) and IgM anti-cardiolipin (8%). Anti-phospholipid antibodies were associated with anosmia OR 8.1 (1.1-57.9) (P = 0.018), nausea and vomiting OR 12.4 (1.2-122.6) (P = 0.010), diarrhea OR 9.8 (1.3-70.9) (P = 0.010), cardiovascular disease OR 1.4 (1.0-1.9), (P = 0.001), chronic kidney disease OR 12.0 (1.6-90.1) (P = 0.05), acute coronary syndrome (P = 0.001), moderate OR 0.11 (0.01-1.1) (P = 0.031) and severe OR 18.5 (1.8-188.4) (P = 0.002) disease severity, and in-hospital mortality OR 8.1 (1.1-57.9) (P = 0.018). Conclusion(s): In conclusion, anti-phospholipid antibodies show a low prevalence in COVID-19 patients and are associated with increased risk of acute coronary syndrome, clinical manifestations, disease severity, and mortality. Anti-phospholipid antibodies in COVID-19 patients are mainly directed against anti-cardiolipin.

Inpatient Mortality in People With Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-sectional Study

Objective: This study aimed to estimate inpatient mortality rate for diabetes and identify its associated factors. Material(s) and Method(s): This is a cross-sectional study. The population was comprised between January 1 and December 31, 2019 in 32 public hospitals in Portugal, using summary hospital discharge data. We used both the Disease-Related Diagnosis Groups and the Disease Staging. Patients were grouped into survivors and non-survivors, and inpatient mortality was compared using competing event regression. Result(s): A total of 7980 patients were admitted with type 2 diabetes mellitus, there were 747 (10.3%) non-survivors. The advanced age (OR = 1.772;95% CI 1.625-1.932), the stage (3) severity of type 2 diabetes mellitus (OR = 4.301;95% CI 2.564-7.215), comorbid lung, bronchial or mediastinal malignant neoplasm (OR = 5.118;95% CI 2.222-11.788), comorbid bacterial pneumonia (OR = 3.214;95% CI 2.539-4.070), other respiratory system disorders (OR = 2.187;95%CI1.645-2.909),comorbidrhino-,adeno-andcorona-virus infections (OR = 1.680;95% CI 1.135-2.488) were determinants for inpatient mortality. Conclusion(s): Elderly patients with diabetes with micro- and macrovascular complications of the disease, who have bacterial pneumonia and who enter the emergency department are those who have a lower survival rate. Copyright © 2022 Via Medica. All rights reserved.

ANALYSIS OF SPECIALIZED CARE FOR PATIENTS WITH DIABETIC FOOT SYNDROME IN ST. PETERSBURG FOR 2010-2021.

BACKGROUND: A decrease in the frequency of amputations due to diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) is one of the parameters that determine the quality of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus. AIM: Our aim was to study the indicators characterizing medical care for patients with lower limb pathology in diabetes mellitus in St. Petersburg from 2010 to 2021. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Annual reports on the treatment of patients with DFS in city hospitals specializing in the surgical treatment of DFS and in outpatient offices <<Diabetic foot>> (DFO) from 2010 to 2021 were analyzed. RESULT(S): The average number of patients per year admitted to the DFO was 18,527 (34,440 visits). Proportion of patients with foot ulcers - 8,9%, with Charcot's arthropathy - less than 1%. Before 2020, the frequency of above the foot amputations decreased from 48.3% to 8.6%, hospital mortality - from 11.7 to 5.7%, the number of revascularizations increased from 37 to 642 per year. The increase in operational activity was not accompanied by a decrease in the frequency of amputations (59.3% in 2019). Of all amputations, 11.3% were patients referred from DFO. During the epidemic, the number of visits and patients admitted to the DFO decreased by 27,3% and 31%, respectively. The proportion of foot ulcers and the frequency of amputations have not changed. Inpatient care was characterized by a decrease in operational activity, a decrease in the availability of revascularization, a 2-fold increase in the proportion of high amputations and an increase in hospital mortality from 5.7% in 2019 to 14.9% in 2021. CONCLUSION(S): An analysis of the statistics of specialized care for patients with DFS over 12 years showed the reduction of the frequency of high amputations, but revealed an increase in the frequency of surgical interventions in DFS against the background of an almost unchanged proportion of amputations in the structure of all operations. Despite significant quantitative indicators, the outpatient service seems to be insufficiently effective in reaching the target population. The negative impact of the epidemic has led to a significant increase in the frequency of high amputations and mortality. Copyright © Endocrinology Research Centre, 2022.

A significant predictor of in-hospital and long-term mortality and progression in COVID-19 patients: The end-stage liver disease (MELD) score model.

The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score and disease progression and mortality in COVID-19 patients. The files of 4213 patients over the age of 18 who were hospitalized with the diagnosis of COVID-19 between March 20, 2020 and May 1, 2021 were retrospectively scanned. Sociodemographic characteristics, chronic diseases, hemogram and biochemical parameters at the time they were diagnosed with COVID-19 of the patients, duration of hospitalization, duration of intensive care unit (ICU), duration of intubation, in-hospital mortality from COVID-19 and outside-hospital mortality for another reason (within the last 1 year) and recurrent hospitalization (within the last 1 year) were recorded. The MELD scores of the patients were calculated. Two groups were formed as MELD score < 10 and MELD score ≥ 10. The rate of ICU, in-hospital mortality from COVID-19 and outside-hospital mortality from other causes, intubation rate, and recurrent hospitalization were significantly higher in the MELD ≥ 10 group. The duration of ICU, hospitalization, intubation were significantly higher in the MELD ≥ 10 group (p < 0.001). As a result of Univariate and Multivariate analysis, MELD score was found to be the independent predictors of ICU, in-hospital mortality, intubation, and recurrent hospitalization (p < 0.001). MELD score 18.5 predicted ICU with 99% sensitivity and 100% specificity (area under curve [AUC]: 0.740, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.717-0.763, p < 0.001) also MELD score 18.5 predicted in-hospital mortality with 99% sensitivity and 100% specificity (AUC: 0.797, 95% CI: 0.775-0.818, p < 0.001). The MELD score was found to be the independent predictors of in-hospital mortality, ICU admission, and intubation in COVID-19 patients.

The Profile and All-Cause In-Hospital Mortality Dynamics of St-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients during the Two Years of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

During the coronavirus pandemic 2019 (COVID-19), some studies showed differences in the profile of subjects presenting with acute coronary syndromes as well as in overall mortality due to the delay of presentation and other complications. The purpose of this study was to compare the profile and outcomes, with emphasis on all-cause in-hospital mortality, of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) subjects presenting to the emergency department during the pandemic period compared with a control group from the previous year, 2019. The study enrolled 2011 STEMI cases, which were divided into two groups-pre-pandemic (2019-2020) and pandemic period (2020-2022). Hospital admissions for a STEMI diagnosis sharply decreased during the COVID-19 period by 30.26% during the first year and 25.4% in the second year. This trend was paralleled by a significant increase in all-cause in-hospital mortality: 11.5% in the pandemic period versus 8.1% in the previous year. There was a significant association between SARS-CoV-2 positivity and all-cause in-hospital mortality, but no correlation was found between COVID-19 diagnosis and the type of revascularization. However, the profile of subjects presenting with STEMI did not change over time during the pandemic; their demographic and comorbid characteristics remained similar.

Intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy and the risk of in-hospital mortality among acute COVID-19 patients: Nationwide clinical cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Steroids are widely used to modulate the inflammatory reactions associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, the optimal upper limit dose of steroid use for acute COVID-19 care remains unclear and currently available data may suffer from a time-dependent bias of no effectiveness or reversed causation given the desperate situation of treatment during this pandemic. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to elucidate the impact of intravenous pulse therapy with methylprednisolone (500 mg or greater per day) on the risk of in-hospital mortality among patients with COVID-19 by controlling for time-dependent bias. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study with 67,348 hospitalised acute COVID-19 patients at 438 hospitals during 2020-2021 in Japan. The impact of intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy on the risk of in-hospital mortality was examined based on hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), with stratification according to the status of invasive mechanical ventilation (iMV). Time-dependent bias was controlled for in a marginal structural model analysis, with reference to patients without methylprednisolone therapy. RESULTS: During the study period, 2400 patients died. In-hospital mortality rates of iMV-free patients without or with methylprednisolone pulse therapy were 2.3% and 19.5%, and the corresponding values for iMV-receiving patients were 24.7% and 28.6%, respectively. The marginal structural model analysis showed that intravenous pulse therapy with methylprednisolone was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality among patients receiving-iMV (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.52-0.68). In contrast, pulse therapy with methylprednisolone increased the risk of in-hospital mortality among iMV-free patients (HR 3.38; 95% CI 3.02-3.79). The benefits of pulse therapy for iMV-receiving patients were greater than in those treated with intermediate/higher doses (40-250 mg intravenously) of methylprednisolone (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.71-0.89). CONCLUSION: The results of our study suggest that intravenous methylprednisolone showed dose-response efficiencies, and pulse therapy may benefit critically ill patients with acute COVID-19, such as those requiring iMV.

Developing a mortality risk prediction model using data of 3663 hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study in an Egyptian University Hospital.

PURPOSE: Since the declaration of COVID-19 as a pandemic, a wide between-country variation was observed regarding in-hospital mortality and its predictors. Given the scarcity of local research and the need to prioritize the provision of care, this study was conducted aiming to measure the incidence of in-hospital COVID-19 mortality and to develop a simple and clinically applicable model for its prediction. METHODS: COVID-19-confirmed patients admitted to the designated isolation areas of Ain-Shams University Hospitals (April 2020-February 2021) were included in this retrospective cohort study (n = 3663). Data were retrieved from patients' records. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazard regression were used. Binary logistic regression was used for creating mortality prediction models. RESULTS: Patients were 53.6% males, 4.6% current smokers, and their median age was 58 (IQR 41-68) years. Admission to intensive care units was 41.1% and mortality was 26.5% (972/3663, 95% CI 25.1-28.0%). Independent mortality predictors-with rapid mortality onset-were age ≥ 75 years, patients' admission in critical condition, and being symptomatic. Current smoking and presence of comorbidities particularly, obesity, malignancy, and chronic haematological disorders predicted mortality too. Some biomarkers were also recognized. Two prediction models exhibited the best performance: a basic model including age, presence/absence of comorbidities, and the severity level of the condition on admission (Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) = 0.832, 95% CI 0.816-0.847) and another model with added International Normalized Ratio (INR) value (AUC = 0.842, 95% CI 0.812-0.873). CONCLUSION: Patients with the identified mortality risk factors are to be prioritized for preventive and rapid treatment measures. With the provided prediction models, clinicians can calculate mortality probability for their patients. Presenting multiple and very generic models can enable clinicians to choose the one containing the parameters available in their specific clinical setting, and also to test the applicability of such models in a non-COVID-19 respiratory infection.

Efficacy of Tocilizumab in Management of COVID-19 Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Units: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background and Objectives: Mortality and illness due to COVID-19 have been linked to a condition known as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) that is characterized by excessive production of inflammatory cytokines, particularly interleukin-6 (IL-6). Tocilizumab (TCZ), a recent IL-6 antagonist, has been redeployed as adjunctive treatment for CRS remission in COVID-19 patients. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of Tocilizumab on patients' survival and the length of stay in hospitalized COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Methods: Between January 2021 and June 2021, a multicenter retrospective cohort study was carried out in six tertiary care hospitals in Egypt's governorate of Giza. Based on the use of TCZ during ICU stay, eligible patients were divided into two groups (control vs. TCZ). In-hospital mortality was the main outcome. Results: A total of 740 patient data records were included in the analysis, where 630 patients followed the routine COVID-19 protocol, while 110 patients received TCZ, need to different respiratory support after hospitalization, and inflammatory mediators such as C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, and Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) showed a statistically significant difference between the TCZ group and the control group. Regarding the primary outcome (discharged alive or death) and neither the secondary outcome (length of hospital stay), there is no statistically significant difference between patients treated with TCZ and the control group. Conclusions: Our cohort of patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 did not assert a reduction in the risk of mortality or the length of stay (LOS) after TCZ administration.