ABSTRACT
Introduction: Lung cavitation is a rare radiological finding of COVID- 19 pneumonia associated with unfavorable outcome. Its pathogenesis is unclear and it is characterized by diffuse alveolar damage, intra-alveolar hemorrhage and necrosis of parenchymal cells. Method(s): We retrospectively reviewed the radiological findings of COVID-19 patients admitted to our ICU during the pandemic in order to identify the development of lung cavitary lesions. Result(s): From 11/2020 until 10/2022 1000 patients were admitted to our COVID-19 ICU (92% on invasive mechanical ventilation). According to our data there were three cases of lung cavity formation. The first case was a 78 years male with history of hypertension. Chest CT (Day26) showed a 11.6 cm cavity in the right middle lobe (Fig. 1). The second case was a 52 year old female with history of diabetes mellitus, obesity, hypertension and rheumatoid arthritis. Follow up chest CT (D29) revealed progressive development of multiple bilateral cavitary lesions. The third case was a 61 year old male with no medical history, who developed (D17) multiple cavitary lesions in both lower lobes, concomitant with left-sided pulmonary embolism. The presence of other well defined etiologies of cavitary lesions such as mycobacterial and fungal infections as well as neoplasmatic or autoimmune diseases had been widely excluded. However, since pulmonary cavitation is a late complication of severe COVID disease, we cannot overlook the fact that all patients suffered from superinfections by XDR Acinetobacter baumanii and/or Klebsiella pneumonia, as most of our patients with prolonged length of stay. Moreover, two of the three patients developed pneumothorax. All patients finally died. Conclusion(s): Although bacterial co-infection does not allow absolute association between cavitary formation and coronavirus disease, it seems that destructive triggers, such as bacteria or mechanical ventilation, may aggravate COVID underlying lung lesions leading to cavitation.
ABSTRACT
Background: Viral infections including SARS-CoV-2 may trigger autoimmune disease through T-cell-mediated autoimmune response through molecular mimicry-cross-reactive T-cell recognition or bystander T-cell activation. Autoantibodies have been detected in patients with COVID-19 and some human proteins have homologous regions with SARS-CoV-2 peptides that could function as autoantigens. While there are scattered reports of various autoimmune diseases diagnosed after COVID-19, the risk is not known. Method(s): TriNetX (a global federated health research network providing access to electronic medical records across 72 large healthcare organizations) was utilized to define a cohort of adults 18 years or older seen on or after January 1, 2020 with at least one follow-up visit after an index date. Exposure was defined as COVID-19 diagnosis by ICD10 code or positive laboratory test. Controls did not have COVID-19 (by the same criteria) and were propensity score-matched to patients who had COVID-19 by age and female sex. Index date was the date of COVID-19 diagnosis or first provider visit for any reason during the study period for controls. Outcomes (see table) were assessed starting one month after index date (to exclude prior undiagnosed autoimmune disease) until one year after. Patients with a specific outcome prior to the index date or within one month after the index date were excluded from the analysis for that outcome. Incidence by COVID-19 exposure status and risk ratios for each outcome were assessed. Result(s): 4,016,472 patients were included (2,008,236 in both groups). Overall, mean (SD) age was 49.2 (17.9) and 57.7% were female. Patients who had COVID-19 were more likely to be white (63 vs 56.9%;p< 0.001). Rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis and type 1 diabetes mellitus had the highest incidence after COVID-19 (0.24, 0.22 and 0.19%, respectively). While the incidence of most of the autoimmune diseases assessed were low in both groups, the risk ratios for all but one condition (Grave's) showed statistically significant higher risk in patients after COVID-19 than in those without COVID-19 (see table). Risk ratios were highest for polyarteritis nodosa (4.43, 3.27-6.01), reactive arthritis (3.56, 2.05-6.2) and ANCA-associated vasculitis (3.36, 2.6-4.34). Conclusion(s): Autoimmune diseases were more likely to be diagnosed within the first year after COVID-19 than in age-, sex-matched controls. Future work will assess the validity of autoantibodies in predicting autoimmune disease after COVID-19. (Table Presented).
ABSTRACT
Purpose of Study The COVID-19 pandemic changed the physician- patient interaction. Telemedicine has emerged as the universal method of communication with patients. We compared conventional clinic visit (CCV) with telemedicine (TM) in clinic administered through video conferencing. Physician patient communication is key in determining treatment outcome and patient satisfaction in complex auto immune disease process including Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (cSLE) and Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA). Methods Used We performed a quality improvement project using a telephone questionnaire survey in rheumatology clinic at Valley Children's Healthcare. We surveyed 25 patients total. The respondents in the survey experienced both CCV before and during pandemic and TM during pandemic. Summary of Results Among the 25 patients surveyed 15 had JIA and 10 had cSLE. Among JIA patients 95% felt doctor was paying attention, able to make shared decision regarding the medications and treatment options. All the JIA and cSLE patients in the group felt that doctor listened and asked appropriate questions. Patients in both groups felt they were able to discuss all their problems and had a strong positive impact on the quality of care during the TM visit as compared with CCV. In cSLE group 70% felt shared decision making and ability to discuss their medical problem via TM was not as good as CCV. Conclusions This survey divulged patient perspective regarding clinic visit during pandemic. Telemedicine is preferred by 95% and 75% of the respondents over the conventional clinic visit during the pandemic among JIA and CSLE groups. The main concerns were breakdown of the physician-patient relationship and issues regarding the technologies with connectivity along with organizational challenges. Patients in both groups strongly agreed that TM met the need for their care compared to conventional clinic visit. Patients in the JIA group were satisfied with TM visit in handling complex medical problems and shared decision making. Patients in cSLE group preferred CCV especially in addressing complex medical issues and shared decision making.
ABSTRACT
Case Report: Cryptococcosis is an opportunistic infection caused by the encapsulated yeast Cryptococcus, with C. neoformans and C. gattii being the most common species to cause human disease. Immunocompromised individuals are predisposed to infections with C. neoformans, which has known predilection to CNS and pulmonary lymph nodes. We present a unique case of disseminated cryptococcosis in the setting of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), cirrhosis, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor use and steroid use for COVID19. Method(s): A single-patient case report was conducted after IRB approval. Case Presentation: A 55-year-old woman with uncontrolled diabetes, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis on adalimumab, hepatitis C status post boceprevir, cirrhosis, former IV drug use, and ESRD on hemodialysis via bovine arterial-venous fistula graft presented with worsening dyspnea, cough, and altered mental status. Three months prior, patient was admitted to an outside hospital for COVID19, complicated by pulmonary embolism status post anticoagulation therapy. Patient was treated with an unknown steroid regimen, which was continued by a second outside facility when symptoms failed to improve. Patient then presented to our facility 24 hours after discharge due to continued symptoms. On admission, patient was noted to have altered mentation and hypoxia with pulmonary edema on chest x-ray and was urgently hemodialyzed. Further work-up was obtained due to non-resolving symptoms, including blood and sputum cultures, cocci serology and QuantiFERON gold. CT chest revealed bilateral consolidations. Patient was started on antibiotics for presumed hospital-acquired pneumonia. During the hospital stay, preliminarily blood cultures grew yeast and patient was started on Micafungin. However, Micafungin was changed to Liposomal Amphotericin B as ovoid structures seen on gram stain could not confirm nor rule out cryptococcus. Subsequent bronchial wash and bronchoalveolar lavage cultures, as well as final blood cultures resulted Cryptococcus neoformans. Serum cryptococcus antigen returned reactive, titer 1:512. Antibiotics were discontinued and Isavuconazonium was started with Liposomal Amphotericin B. Due to recurrent headaches, lumbar puncture was obtained and revealed lymphocytic pleocytosis without cryptococcal antigenicity. Patient completed 14 days of Liposomal Amphotericin B and Isavuconazole with continuation of Isavuconazole upon discharge. Conclusion(s): Disseminated cryptococcosis in non-HIV patients is rare in the modern HIV era. Clinicians should be aware and include it in their differential of any patient with multiple risk factors for opportunistic infection. In patients with cirrhosis and ESRD, treatment is limited given altered pharmacokinetics. Studies have shown improved survival with the addition of Isavuconazole in patients with disseminated cryptococcosis with CNS involvement in the setting of chronic liver disease and ESRD.
ABSTRACT
Purpose of study Since mid-April 2020 in Europe and North America, clusters of pediatric cases with a newly described severe systemic inflammatory response with shock have appeared. Patients had persistent fevers >38.5 C, hypotension, features of myocardial dysfunction, coagulopathy, gastrointestinal symptoms, rash, and elevated inflammatory markers without other causes of infection. The World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control, and Royal College of Paediatrics associated these symptoms with SARS-CoV-2 as multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). Cardiac manifestations include coronary artery aneurysms, left ventricular systolic dysfunction evidenced by elevation of troponin-T (TnT) and pro-B-type naturietic peptide (proBNP), and electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities. We report the clinical course of three children with MIS-C while focusing on the unique atrioventricular (AV) conduction abnormalities. Case #1:19-year-old previously healthy Hispanic male presented with abdominal pain, fever, and non-bloody diarrhea for three days. He was febrile and hypotensive (80/47 mmHg) requiring fluid resuscitation. Symptoms, lab findings, and a positive COVID-19 antibody test were consistent with MIS-C. Methylprednisolone, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and enoxaparin were started. He required epinephrine for shock and high flow nasal cannula for respiratory distress. Initial echocardiogram demonstrated a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 40% with normal appearing coronaries. Troponin and proBNP were 0.41 ng/mL and proBNP 15,301 pg/mL respectively. ECG showed an incomplete right bundle branch block. He eventually became bradycardic to the 30s-50s and cardiac tracing revealed a complete AV block (figure 1a). Isoproterenol, a B1 receptor agonist, supported the severe bradycardia until the patient progressed to a type 2 second degree AV block (figure 1b). A second dose of IVIG was administered improving the rhythm to a type 1 second degree AV block. An IL-6 inhibitor, tocilizumab was given as the rhythm would not improve, and the patient soon converted to a first-degree AV block. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showed septal predominant left ventricular hypertrophy and subepicardial enhancement along the basal inferior/anteroseptal walls typical for myocarditis. Case #2: 9-year-old previously healthy Hispanic male presented after three days of daily fevers, headaches, myalgias, diffuse abdominal pain, and ageusia. He was febrile, tachycardic, and hypotensive (68/39 mmHg). Hypotension of 50s/20s mmHg required 3 normal saline boluses of 20 ml/kg and initiation of an epinephrine drip. Severe hypoxia required endotracheal intubation. After the MIS-C diagnosis was made, he was treated with IVIG, mehtylprednisolone, enoxaparin, aspirin, and ceftriaxone. Due to elevated inflammatory markers by day 4 and patient's illness severity, a 7-day course of anakinra was initiated. Initial echocardiogram showed mild tricuspid and mitral regurgitation with a LVEF of 35-40%. Despite anti-inflammatory therapy, troponin and proBNP were 0.33 ng/mL and BNP of 25,335 pg/mL. A second echocardiogram confirmed poor function so milrinone was started. Only, after two doses of anakinra, LVEF soon normalized. Despite that, he progressively became bradycardic to the 50's. QTc was prolonged to 545 ms and worsened to a max of 592 ms. The aforementioned therapies were continued, and the bradycardia and QTc improved to 405 ms. Patient #3: 9-year-old African American male presented with four days of right sided abdominal pain, constipation, and non-bilious non-bloody emesis. He had a negative COVID test and unremarkable ultrasound of the appendix days prior. His history, elevated inflammatory markers, and positive COVID- 19 antibody were indicative of MIS-C. He was started on the appropriate medication regimen. Initial ECG showed sinus rhythm with normal intervals and echocardiogram was unremarkable. Repeat imaging by day three showed a decreased LVEF of 50%. ECG had since changed to a right bundle branch block. Anakinra as started and steroid dosing was increased. By day 5, he became bradycardic to the 50s and progressed to a junctional cardiac rhythm. Cardiac function normalized by day 7, and anakinra was subsequently stopped. Thereafter, heart rates ranged from 38-48 bpm requiring transfer to the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit for better monitoring and potential isoproterenol infusion. He remained well perfused, with continued medical management, heart rates improved. Methods used Retrospective Chart Review. Summary of results Non-specific T-wave, ST segment changes, and premature atrial or ventricular beats are the most often noted ECG anomalies. All patients initially had normal ECGs but developed bradycardia followed by either PR prolongation or QTc elongation. Two had mild LVEF dysfunction prior to developing third degree heart block and/or a junctional escape rhythm;one had moderate LVEF dysfunction that normalized before developing a prolonged QTc. Inflammatory and cardiac markers along with coagulation factors were the highest early in disease course, peak BNP occurred at approximately hospital day 3-4, and patient's typically had their lowest LVEF at day 5-6. Initial ECGs were benign with PR intervals below 200 milliseconds (ms). Collectively the length of time from initial symptom presentation till when ECG abnormalities began tended to be at day 8-9. Patients similarly developed increased QTc intervals later in the hospitalization. When comparing with the CRP and BNP trends, it appeared that the ECG changes (including PR and QTc elongation) occurred after the initial hyperinflammatory response. Conclusions Although the mechanism for COVID-19 induced heart block continues to be studied, it is suspected to be secondary to inflammation and edema of the conduction tissue. Insufficiency of the coronary arterial supply to the AV node and rest of the conduction system also seems to play a role. Although our patients had normal ECG findings, two developed bundle branch blocks prior to more complex rhythms near the peak of inflammatory marker values. Based on the premise that MIS-C is a hyperinflammatory response likely affecting conduction tissue, our group was treated with different regimens of IVIG, steroids, anakinra, and/or tocilizumab. Anakinra, being an IL-1 inhibitor, has been reported to dampen inflammation in viral myocarditis and tocilizumab has improved LVEF in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Based on our small case series, patient's with MISC can have AV nodal conduction abnormalities. The usual cocktail of IVIG and steroids helps;however, when there are more serious cases of cardiac inflammation, adjuvant immunosuppresants like anakinra and toculizumab can be beneficial. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
The proceedings contain 47 papers. The topics discussed include: long COVID rehabilitation services, Cardiff and Vale and Cwm Taf Morgannwg University health boards: social return on investment;the clinical meaning of family reported outcome measure (FROM-16) scores: translational research to support holistic clinical practice;patient-centered outcome measure design: the perspectives and preferences of children and young people with life-limiting or life-threatening conditions;co-creation of a patient reported outcome measure for older people with frailty and acute care needs (PROM-OPAC);PROMs: coming of age in lymphoedema services in Wales;ForMi-person-centered planning and outcomes recording app;true colors online mood monitoring in the bipolar disorder research network (BDRN) research program: challenges, benefits and importance of personalization;patient reported outcome measures for rheumatoid arthritis disease activity: using Rasch measurement theory to achieve more meaningful measurement;developing a roadmap towards national collection of electronic patient-reported outcomes for people with chronic kidney disease in the UK;and measuring bereavement support needs in people bereaved during Covid-19;the adaptation and development of a bereavement support needs scale.
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly changed the understanding of the safety profile of therapies for immunoinflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs). This is primarily due to the negative impact of a number of basic anti-inflammatory drugs (DMARDs) and biological DMARDs on the course and outcomes of a new coronavirus infection. A number of studies have shown that anti-B-cell therapy (rituximab) gave a statistically significant increase in the risk of severe COVID-19 and an increase in mortality. At the same time, the analysis of real clinical practice data dictated the need to establish a number of restrictions on the use of certain classes of biological DMARDs and to search for alternative therapy programs to maintain control over disease activity. Purpose of the study - to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the drug Artlegia (olokizumab), solution for subcutaneous injection, 160 mg/ml - 0.4 ml, manufactured by R-Pharm JSC, Russia) for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in real clinical practice after switching with rituximab during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and methods. The study included 14 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who were previously on rituximab therapy at a dose of 1000-500 mg twice with an interval of 2 weeks, who received at least one course of therapy with this drug. As RA worsened, patients were switched to olokizumab against the background of standard DMARDs. At 4, 8, 12 weeks after the switch, the severity of pain was assessed on the VAS scale, the number of painful and swollen joints (TJC28 and TSC28), the level of acute phase markers of inflammation, the DAS28 disease activity index calculated using ESR and CRP, and the CDAI (clinical activity index), functional state index HAQ, as well as assessment of the safety profile of therapy. Results. Data analysis was performed using median values (Me) were used for data analysis. A significant decrease of TJC28 was after the injection of olokizumab (Artlegia) in 8 and 12 weeks (Me baseline = 10;Me 8 weeks = 4;Me 12 weeks = 4;p<0.05) and a decrease of TSC28 in 4, 8 and 12 weeks (Me baseline = 9;Me 4 weeks = 3.5;Me 8 weeks = 2.5;Me 12 weeks = 2.0;p<0.05). Laboratory markers of inflammation showed a decrease in CRP and ESR levels after 4 weeks of treatment (CRP: Me baseline = 21, Me 4 weeks = 1 (p<0.05);ESR: Me baseline = 31, Me 4 weeks = 7 (p<0.05)). Positive dynamics persisted at 8 and 12 weeks (CRP: Me 8 weeks = 1, Me 12 weeks = 0;ESR: Me 8 weeks = 4, Me 12 weeks = 5). The level of CRP by the fourth week 4 became within the normal range, regardless of the initial values. All activity indices improved from the fourth week in each evaluation period compared to baseline: DAS28-ESR: Me baseline = 5.52, Me 4 weeks = 3.59, Me 8 weeks = 3.33, Me 12 weeks = 3.22 (p<0.05);DAS28-CRP: Me baseline = 5.39, Me 4 weeks = 3.71, Me 8 weeks = 3.35, Me 12 weeks = 3.45 (p<0.05);CDAI: Me baseline = 28.5, Me 4 weeks = 18.0, Me 8 weeks = 16.5, Me 12 weeks = 16.0 (p<0.05). All patients showed a reduction in pain (VAS scale) by week 8. The functional status of patients, according to the HAQ index, showed a significant decrease only by the 12th week of the study: Me baseline = 1.62, Me 12 weeks = 1.31 (p<0.05). Conclusion. The study found that switching from rituximab to olokizumab was effective and safe during the COVID-19 pandemic.Copyright © 2023 Ima-Press Publishing House. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused a global pandemic of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most common pathogenic bacteria in humans, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is among the most prevalent autoimmune conditions. RA is a significant risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 and S. aureus infections, although the mechanism of RA and SARS-CoV-2 infection in conjunction with S. aureus infection has not been elucidated. The purpose of this study is to investigate the biomarkers and disease targets between RA and SARS-CoV-2 and S. aureus infections using bioinformatics analysis, to search for the molecular mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 and S. aureus immune escape and potential drug targets in the RA population, and to provide new directions for further analysis and targeted development of clinical treatments. Methods: The RA dataset (GSE93272) and the S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) dataset (GSE33341) were used to obtain differentially expressed gene sets, respectively, and the common differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were determined through the intersection. Functional enrichment analysis utilizing GO, KEGG, and ClueGO methods. The PPI network was created utilizing the STRING database, and the top 10 hub genes were identified and further examined for functional enrichment using Metascape and GeneMANIA. The top 10 hub genes were intersected with the SARS-CoV-2 gene pool to identify five hub genes shared by RA, COVID-19, and SAB, and functional enrichment analysis was conducted using Metascape and GeneMANIA. Using the NetworkAnalyst platform, TF-hub gene and miRNA-hub gene networks were built for these five hub genes. The hub gene was verified utilizing GSE17755, GSE55235, and GSE13670, and its effectiveness was assessed utilizing ROC curves. CIBERSORT was applied to examine immune cell infiltration and the link between the hub gene and immune cells. Results: A total of 199 DEGs were extracted from the GSE93272 and GSE33341 datasets. KEGG analysis of enrichment pathways were NLR signaling pathway, cell membrane DNA sensing pathway, oxidative phosphorylation, and viral infection. Positive/negative regulation of the immune system, regulation of the interferon-I (IFN-I; IFN-α/ß) pathway, and associated pathways of the immunological response to viruses were enriched in GO and ClueGO analyses. PPI network and Cytoscape platform identified the top 10 hub genes: RSAD2, IFIT3, GBP1, RTP4, IFI44, OAS1, IFI44L, ISG15, HERC5, and IFIT5. The pathways are mainly enriched in response to viral and bacterial infection, IFN signaling, and 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3. IFI44, OAS1, IFI44L, ISG15, and HERC5 are the five hub genes shared by RA, COVID-19, and SAB. The pathways are primarily enriched for response to viral and bacterial infections. The TF-hub gene network and miRNA-hub gene network identified YY1 as a key TF and hsa-mir-1-3p and hsa-mir-146a-5p as two important miRNAs related to IFI44. IFI44 was identified as a hub gene by validating GSE17755, GSE55235, and GSE13670. Immune cell infiltration analysis showed a strong positive correlation between activated dendritic cells and IFI44 expression. Conclusions: IFI144 was discovered as a shared biomarker and disease target for RA, COVID-19, and SAB by this study. IFI44 negatively regulates the IFN signaling pathway to promote viral replication and bacterial proliferation and is an important molecular target for SARS-CoV-2 and S. aureus immune escape in RA. Dendritic cells play an important role in this process. 1,25-Dihydroxy vitamin D3 may be an important therapeutic agent in treating RA with SARS-CoV-2 and S. aureus infections.
Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid , COVID-19 , MicroRNAs , Staphylococcal Infections , Antigens , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/genetics , Biomarkers , COVID-19/genetics , Cholecalciferol , Cytoskeletal Proteins , Humans , Immune Evasion , Interferons , MicroRNAs/genetics , SARS-CoV-2 , Staphylococcus aureus/metabolismABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To estimate absolute and relative risks for seasonal influenza outcomes in patients with inflammatory joint diseases (IJDs) and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). To contextualise recent findings on corresponding COVID-19 risks. METHODS: Using Swedish nationwide registers for this cohort study, we followed 116 989 patients with IJD and matched population comparators across four influenza seasons (2015-2019). We quantified absolute risks of hospitalisation and death due to influenza, and compared IJD to comparators via Cox regression. We identified 71 556 patients with IJD on active treatment with conventional synthetic DMARDs and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs)/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (tsDMARDs) at the start of each influenza season, estimated risks for the same outcomes and compared these risks across DMARDs via Cox regression. RESULTS: Per season, average risks for hospitalisation listing influenza were 0.25% in IJD and 0.1% in the general population, corresponding to a crude HR of 2.38 (95% CI 2.21 to 2.56) that decreased to 1.44 (95% CI 1.33 to 1.56) following adjustments for comorbidities. For death listing influenza, the corresponding numbers were 0.015% and 0.006% (HR=2.63, 95% CI 1.93 to 3.58, and HR=1.46, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.01). Absolute risks for influenza outcomes were half (hospitalisation) and one-tenth (death) of those for COVID-19, but relative estimates comparing IJD to the general population were similar. CONCLUSIONS: In absolute terms, COVID-19 in IJD outnumbers that of average seasonal influenza, but IJD entails a 50%-100% increase in risk for hospitalisation and death for both types of infections, which is largely dependent on associated comorbidities. Overall, bDMARDs/tsDMARDs do not seem to confer additional risk for hospitalisation or death related to seasonal influenza.
Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/immunology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/virology , COVID-19/mortality , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Influenza, Human/mortality , Aged , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , COVID-19/immunology , Female , Humans , Influenza A virus/immunology , Influenza, Human/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Seasons , Sweden/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Targeting interleukin (IL)-6 has become a major therapeutic strategy in the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory disease. Interference with the IL-6 pathway can be directed at the specific receptor using anti-IL-6Rα antibodies or by directly inhibiting the IL-6 cytokine. This paper is an update of a previous consensus document, based on most recent evidence and expert opinion, that aims to inform on the medical use of interfering with the IL-6 pathway. METHODS: A systematic literature research was performed that focused on IL-6-pathway inhibitors in inflammatory diseases. Evidence was put in context by a large group of international experts and patients in a subsequent consensus process. All were involved in formulating the consensus statements, and in the preparation of this document. RESULTS: The consensus process covered relevant aspects of dosing and populations for different indications of IL-6 pathway inhibitors that are approved across the world, including rheumatoid arthritis, polyarticular-course and systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, giant cell arteritis, Takayasu arteritis, adult-onset Still's disease, Castleman's disease, chimeric antigen receptor-T-cell-induced cytokine release syndrome, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and severe COVID-19. Also addressed were other clinical aspects of the use of IL-6 pathway inhibitors, including pretreatment screening, safety, contraindications and monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: The document provides a comprehensive consensus on the use of IL-6 inhibition to treat inflammatory disorders to inform healthcare professionals (including researchers), patients, administrators and payers.
ABSTRACT
Background and ImportanceIn recent years not just the novel therapeutic approaches, but the Coronavirus pandemic has also affected the therapy management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Beside these changes, the immunisation against COVID-19 has also been an issue and raised several questions from clinicians to patients.Aim and ObjectivesTherefore, our aim was to find out the possible changes that patients were experiencing and the potential factors influencing their therapy.Material and MethodsData was collected through structured personal interviews with a 33-item questionnaire licensed by the Regional Research Ethics Committee of the University of Pécs and review of the medical records from January until September in 2022. We used the data available in the ambulatory medical records and the itemised reporting interface of the National Health Insurance Fund. Drug interactions were analysed using UpToDate Lexicomp database.Results35 female patients (average age: 63.53 years ± 13.82) and 23 male patients (average age: 53.54 ± 12.96) received biological or targeted therapy for an average of 7.17 years ( ± 4.12), while the average patient activity index DAS28 was 3.15 ( ± 1.17) and BASDAI was 5.29 ( ± 5.52). 87.93% (51/58) of the patients have used non-medication health products, mainly vitamin C or D. 34.48% of the patients were confirmed with coronavirus infection during the pandemic, while the vaccination rate was 87.89%. 83.45% of the patients received at least one mRNA vaccine. In our patient group, the influenza vaccination rate was 36.21%, while only 5.21% of the patients had been vaccinated against Pneumococcus in six months previous to our survey. The total number of serious (category X and D) interactions were 216, in 135 cases a vaccine and in 58 cases a monoclonal antibody or targeted therapy was included as interacting pair.Conclusion and RelevanceDespite the growing number of new therapeutic approaches and vaccines, the screening methods for analysing potential drug interaction are lacking behind and the Summary of Product Characteristics are not suitable for comprehensive evaluations. The inclusion of these therapies and the optimisation in vaccination status in the medication review process and the understanding of immunological mechanism potentially influencing the therapy of patients is warranted.References and/or AcknowledgementsConflict of InterestNo conflict of interest
ABSTRACT
Rheumatoid vasculitis is a rare and late complication of rheumatoid arthritis, affecting small to medium sized vessels. Inflammation in the vessel wall produces an occlusive vasculopathy with downstream infarction. We present the case of a 70-year-old female with long standing stable RA status post recent COVID-19 vaccination admitted with community acquired Legionnaires disease found to have an incidental renal infarct on chest imaging without a clear etiology. She improved from a respiratory standpoint but then had a fever spike with repeat imaging showing a second renal infarct and CT angiography showing extensive beading with aneurysmal dilation in the bilateral hepatic and renal arteries consistent with vasculitis. Given extensive RA history, there was a high index of suspicion for rheumatoid vasculitis and she was treated with pulse steroids followed by Rituximab with tapering of steroids and clinical recovery. Her presentation is unique given the salient features, extensive multi-vessel disease without localizing symptoms and potential role of Legionella infection or COVID-19 vaccine in immune activation.
ABSTRACT
Introduction Anti-spike severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies produced after infection with the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) will offer protection and prevent re-infection for a few months. Seroprevalence studies measuring the SARSCoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels will be helpful to know the herd immunity level that prevents community transmission. Very few studies have addressed the antibody titer among healthy participants and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. The present study was conducted to determine the anti-spike SARS-CoV-2 antibody (Ab) status before COVID-19 vaccination in healthy participants and RA patients. Methodology A cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital to estimate the serum anti-spike antibody levels against COVID-19 among the pre-vaccinated healthy participants and patients with RA during the third wave of COVID-19. After receiving written informed consent, participants were recruited as per the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Demographic details, co-morbid status, and medication details were collected. Five milliliters of blood samples were collected, and anti-spike antibodies were estimated. The SARS-CoV-2 Ab positivity rate was expressed in percentage and was correlated with gender and age groups. Ab-positive participants were classified into three categories based on the neutralizing antibody titers (NAT). Results A total of 58 participants (49 healthy volunteers and nine RA patients) were recruited. Out of 58 participants, 40 were males, nine were females among healthy participants, and one male and eight females in the RA group were enrolled. Among the RA patients, one participant was found to have the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and two participants with hypothyroidism. Antibody positivity was found to be 83.6% among the healthy volunteers and 100% in the RA patients. About 48% had NAT between 50 and 90%. There was no significant difference for age and gender-specific positivity for SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies and neutralizing antibody titers among healthy participants. Conclusion Our study showed 84% positivity for anti-spike SARS-CoV-2 antibodies around the third wave (between November 2021 and February 2022). The majority had high neutralizing antibody titers. The probable reason for the SARS-CoV-2 antibody positivity before vaccination was either asymptomatic infection or herd immunity.
ABSTRACT
Cytokines are secretion proteins that mediate and regulate immunity and inflammation. They are crucial in the progress of acute inflammatory diseases and autoimmunity. In fact, the inhibition of proinflammatory cytokines has been widely tested in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Some of these inhibitors have been used in the treatment of COVID-19 patients to improve survival rates. However, controlling the extent of inflammation with cytokine inhibitors is still a challenge because these molecules are redundant and pleiotropic. Here we review a novel therapeutic approach based on the use of the HSP60-derived Altered Peptide Ligand (APL) designed for RA and repositioned for the treatment of COVID-19 patients with hyperinflammation. HSP60 is a molecular chaperone found in all cells. It is involved in a wide diversity of cellular events including protein folding and trafficking. HSP60 concentration increases during cellular stress, for example inflammation. This protein has a dual role in immunity. Some HSP60-derived soluble epitopes induce inflammation, while others are immunoregulatory. Our HSP60-derived APL decreases the concentration of cytokines and induces the increase of FOXP3+ regulatory T cells (Treg) in various experimental systems. Furthermore, it decreases several cytokines and soluble mediators that are raised in RA, as well as decreases the excessive inflammatory response induced by SARS-CoV-2. This approach can be extended to other inflammatory diseases.
Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid , COVID-19 , Humans , Cytokines/metabolism , SARS-CoV-2/metabolism , Peptides/pharmacology , Peptides/therapeutic use , Inflammation/drug therapyABSTRACT
COVID-19 drastically changed healthcare delivery models for rheumatology services. We sought to understand the impact of these changes for patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and adult Juvenile Inflammatory Arthritis (AJIA) in established patients and those newly diagnosed during the pandemic. RESULTS: Of the 316 participants, a significant proportion regularly used analgesics (45.4%, n = 119), corticosteroids (17.9%, n = 47) and Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs [(NSAIDs) (36.6%, n = 96)]. Two thirds of participants (66.5%, n = 210) did not know their Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28). Of the remaining third, moderate disease activity (12%, n = 38) was most reported. We found that 16.8% (n = 53) felt their condition was managed well during the pandemic. The remainder felt more negatively. For the newly diagnosed cohort, 34.5% (n = 10) delayed seeking GP help because of COVID-19 concerns. Once assessed, a quarter (24.1%, n = 7) were referred to rheumatology after 4 or more consultations. We found 47% (n = 77) expressed positive opinions on remote consultations, whereas 36% (n = 59) had concerns. The lack of clinical examination (42.5%, n = 25) was flagged. Changing the dynamic from health worker to a patient centred approach was the most wished for improvement (20.3%, n = 64). CONCLUSIONS: Most participants did not know their disease activity status, which is of concern. With a push towards patient-centred and patient-led care, education and supported self-management is critically important. There is high use of NSAIDs and corticosteroids. Pathways of care underwent change with subsequent delays in specialist assessment. The introduction of patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU) and virtual consultations further distances healthcare professionals from patients and could affect outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the archetypal inflammatory arthritis, remains a complex and challenging disease to manage in spite of the abundance of new therapies in the last 20 years. The unpredictable relapsing/remitting nature of RA is at odds with the current prevailing system of scheduled follow-ups, leaving patients with RA to manage pain, flares, and medications between appointments, which may be of little value if occurring during a period of disease control. The rapid progress in the field of mobile health (mHealth) in the last 10 years has led to a proliferation of smartphone applications (apps) targeted at people with RA. Harnessing the power of smartphones to deliver remote monitoring for patients with RA has gone from an exciting possibility to an urgent necessity due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Apps developed solely by commercial providers have been found to be of limited utility in disease monitoring. However, multiple global institutions have developed mHealth technology to support remote monitoring of RA patients, utilizing asynchronous technology for patients to submit indicators of their disease activity, ranging from validated electronic patient-reported outcome measures, to innovative monitoring utilizing smartphone biosensors. This review discusses the current published evidence for mobile applications designed to facilitate remote monitoring of RA, the common barriers faced in implementing mhealth monitoring and strategies to overcome these, and potential areas for future research.
ABSTRACT
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the archetypal inflammatory arthritis, remains a complex and challenging disease to manage in spite of the abundance of new therapies in the last 20 years. The unpredictable relapsing/remitting nature of RA is at odds with the current prevailing system of scheduled follow-ups, leaving patients with RA to manage pain, flares, and medications between appointments, which may be of little value if occurring during a period of disease control. The rapid progress in the field of mobile health (mHealth) in the last 10 years has led to a proliferation of smartphone applications (apps) targeted at people with RA. Harnessing the power of smartphones to deliver remote monitoring for patients with RA has gone from an exciting possibility to an urgent necessity due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Apps developed solely by commercial providers have been found to be of limited utility in disease monitoring. However, multiple global institutions have developed mHealth technology to support remote monitoring of RA patients, utilizing asynchronous technology for patients to submit indicators of their disease activity, ranging from validated electronic patient-reported outcome measures, to innovative monitoring utilizing smartphone biosensors. This review discusses the current published evidence for mobile applications designed to facilitate remote monitoring of RA, the common barriers faced in implementing mhealth monitoring and strategies to overcome these, and potential areas for future research.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are more susceptible to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) than healthy population, but there is still no therapeutic strategy available for RA patients with corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Guizhi-Shaoyao-Zhimu decoction (GSZD), Chinese ancient experience decoction, has a significant effect on the treatment of Rheumatism and gout. To prevent RA patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 from developing into severe COVID-19, this study explored the potential possibility and mechanism of GSZD in the treatment of this population. METHODS: In this study, we used bioinformatic approaches to explore common pharmacological targets and signaling pathways between RA and mild-to-moderate COVID-19, and to assess the potential mechanisms of in the treatment of patients with both diseases. Beside, molecular docking was used to explore the molecular interactions between GSZD and SARS-CoV-2 related proteins. RESULTS: Results showed that 1183 common targets were found in mild-to-moderate COVID-19 and RA, of which TNF was the most critical target. The crosstalk signaling pathways of the two diseases focused on innate immunity and T cells pathways. In addition, GSZD intervened in RA and mild-to-moderate COVID-19 mainly by regulating inflammation-related signaling pathways and oxidative stress. Twenty hub compounds in GSZD exhibited good binding potential to SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein, 3C-like protease (3CLpro), RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), papain-like protease (PLpro) and human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), thereby intervening in viral infection, replication and transcription. CONCLUSIONS: This finding provides a therapeutic option for RA patients against mild-to-moderate COVID-19, but further clinical validation is still needed.