ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the clinical significance of serum interleukin 6 (IL-6) in elderly patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) omicron variant and its correlation with underlying diseases. Methods A total of 22 elderly patients (>80 years old) infected with omicron variant, who were admitted to Department of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University) from Apr. to Jun. 2022 and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, were included. The level of serum IL-6 was measured by flow cytometry, and the level of serum C reactive protein (CRP) was measured by immunonephelometry. Patients were divided into pneumonia group (16 cases) and non-pneumonia group (6 cases) according to the imaging examination results, and were divided into severe group (severe and critical type, 5 cases) and non-severe group (mild and normal type, 17 cases) according to the condition. Binary logistic regression model and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to analyze the correlation between serum IL-6 and CRP levels and the severity of the disease and whether it would progress to pneumonia. Meanwhile, the relationships between underlying diseases and serum IL-6 level were explored. Results Among the 22 patients, 6 were mild, 11 were normal, 3 were severe, and 2 were critical. The baseline serum IL-6 level in the pneumonia group was significantly higher than that in the non-pneumonia group ([20.16+/-12.36]pg/mL vs [5.42+/-1.57] pg/mL, P=0.009), and there was no significant difference in baseline serum CRP level between the 2 groups (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in baseline serum IL-6 or CRP levels between the severe group and the non-severe group (both P>0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that the baseline serum IL-6 and CRP might be related to pneumonia after infection with omicron variant (odds ratio [OR]=2.407, 95% confidence interval [CI]0.915-6.328;OR=1.030, 95% CI 0.952-1.114). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under curve values of serum IL-6 and CRP in predicting the progression to pneumonia were 0.969 (95% CI 0.900-1.000) and 0.656 (95% CI 0.380-0.932), respectively, with statistical significance (Z=2.154, P=0.030). There were no significant differences in the baseline serum IL-6 level or proportions of severe patients or pneumonia patients among patients with or without hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, chronic kidney disease or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (all P>0.05). The baseline serum IL-6 levels of the omicron variant infected elderly patients with 1, 2, and 3 or more underlying diseases were 12.50 (9.15, 21.75), 23.55 (9.63, 50.10), and 10.90 (5.20, 18.88) pg/mL, respectively, with no statistical significance (P>0.05). Conclusion For omicron variant infected patients, serum IL-6 level is significantly increased in patients with pneumonia manifestations and is correlated with disease progression. Serum IL-6 level is of great guiding significance to judge disease progression and evaluate efficacy and prognosis of elderly coronavirus disease 2019 patients.Copyright © 2022, Second Military Medical University Press. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
[Background] Sleep is closely related to immune function and human health, and adequate sleep is an important foundation for human health. [Objective] This study investigates the sleep status of the first-line medical staff in Wuhan in a fight against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, provides reference for improving the sleep quality of the first-line medical staff in public health emergencies. [Methods] Through convenience sampling, 112 medical workers (first-line group) who aided the COVID-19 fight in Wuhan and 134 medical staff (non-first-line group) who did not participate in the fight were selected. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was employed to collect data on the incidence of sleep disorders, time to fall asleep, duration of sleep, sleep efficiency, sleep disorders, use of sleep aid, and daytime functions. In addition, a self-made questionnaire was used to investigate the common concerns and time allocation characteristics of the first-line medical workers in the context of major infectious disease outbreaks. [Results] There were no significant differences between the two groups in demographic variables such as gender, age, job title, educational background, marriage status, number of children, and working years (P > 0.05). In the first-line group, 62 medical workers (55.36%) reported sleep disorders, while in the non-first-line group, 54 medical workers (40.30%) did;the difference was statistically significant (P=0.008). Among the seven components of the PSQI, the median sleep time (component 3) score of the first-line group was 1.5, which was higher than that of the non-first-line group (median 1.0) (P < 0.001);the median sleep efficiency (component 4) score of the first-line group was 1.0, which was higher than that of the non-first-line group (median 0) (P < 0.001). The actual sleep duration of the first-line group [(5.65+/-1.15) h] was lower than that of the non-first-line group [(7.00+/-1.40) h] (P < 0.001). The distributions of common concerns were different between the two group. The top three concerns were being infected (76.79%), exhausted (37.50%), and overloaded (27.68%) in the first-line group, and family members being infected (53.73%), being infected (45.52%), and child care (33.58%) in the non-first-line group. [Conclusion] The first-line medical team members report poor sleep quality, short sleep time, low sleep efficiency, sleep disorders, and many psychological concerns. It is necessary to take appropriate measures to improve their sleep quality.Copyright © 2021, Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant changes in delivery of healthcare. Telemedicine emerged as a popular option. Numerous studies demonstrate a favorable opinion of telemedicine from patient and physician perspectives. What factors make it more efficient and effective This study explores how type of office visit impacts attitudes towards telemedicine and affects patient's preferences for future visits. Method(s): Surveys were delivered by mail or in person to 1,100 randomly selected patients of Sierra Nevada Gastroenterology, a community-based practice in Grass Valley, CA. Each patient (pt) had a telemedicine visit (TMV) from April 2020-October 2021. Three hundred twenty surveys were returned completed. Surveys contained a 5-point Likert scale set of questions rating the quality, communication, compassion, thoroughness and convenience of TMV. In person visits (IPV) were then directly compared to TMV for the same qualities. Demographics were recorded (Table 1). Surveys were separated into 3 categories based on type of visit: new complaint (NC), follow-up of existing problem (FU), procedure-related visit (PRV). Statistical analysis and chi-square test were used to determine statistical significance. Result(s): Quality, communication, thoroughness and compassion during TMV rated high with Likert scores of 4.3-4.7 (= 0 strongly agree) for all groups. Comparing the 3 groups (NC, FU, PRV) with chi-square testing, no statistical difference in ratings was seen. FU pts had the highest Likert scores in all categories. Pts with new complaints preferred IPV over TMV for quality, communication, thoroughness and compassion, which was rated statistically significantly higher (P< 0.05). TMV was favored for convenience in all groups with highest ranking in FU pts (73%). Conclusion(s): This study showed type of office visit did not affect satisfaction or ratings of TMV. However, type of visit did reveal preferences for either IPV or TMV. Pts with NC preferred IPV and felt compassion is important and delivered more effectively in person. This suggests non-verbal communication such as body language, facial expression and tone is conveyed more effectively in person than over phone or video calls. FU or PRV pts rated TMV as more convenient and preferable over IPV for future visits, suggesting that pts with stable or less acute problems prioritize convenience over other factors when selecting type of visit. Further studies are needed to determine what other factors will influence and improve quality of TMV.
ABSTRACT
The course of a new coronavirus infection is associated with immune system disorders during the acute stage of the desease. Administration of effective etiotropic drugs contributes to early elimination of the virus. At the same time, risks of post-COVID immune system disorders are minimized. The aim of the study was to investigate features of the immune response formation against the background of etiotropic therapy in patients who underwent COVID-19. Material and methods. An observational retrospective comparative study was conducted. The study involved patients with COVID-19 3 months after treatment with etiotropic drugs (riamilovir or umifenovir). The study involved 87 patients (52 women and 35 men) with varying degrees of COVID-19 severity. In accordance with the study design, participants were divided into 2 groups: the first group - 41 patients (received riamilovir during the acute period of the disease);the second group - 46 patients (received umifenovir in the acute period of the disease). Statistical processing of the results was carried out using the Statistica 8.0 software package. Extensive indicators, median (Me) and interquarter range Q25-Q75 were calculated. Statistical significance between the indicators of independent samples was assessed by Mann-Whitney nonparametric test and Chi-square test. P-values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results and discussion. Analysis of clinical and laboratory data showed that after suffering COVID-19, not all indicators of the immune system in patients who had had COVID-19 recovered to control values. However, it is noted that in patients of the main group, which using riamilovir, compared to the comparison group was less likely to be diagnosed with chronic systemic syndrome, inflammation, dysregulation of the cellular link of immunity in the early post-COVID period.Copyright © Eco-Vector, 2022.
ABSTRACT
Rabies is an ancient disease. Two centuries since Pasteur, fundamental progress occurred in virology, vaccinology, and diagnostics—and an understanding of pathobiology and epizootiology of rabies in testament to One Health—before common terminological coinage. Prevention, control, selective elimination, and even the unthinkable—occasional treatment—of this zoonosis dawned by the twenty-first century. However, in contrast to smallpox and rinderpest, eradication is a wishful misnomer applied to rabies, particularly post-COVID-19 pandemic. Reasons are minion. Polyhostality encompasses bats and mesocarnivores, but other mammals represent a diverse spectrum of potential hosts. While rabies virus is the classical member of the genus, other species of lyssaviruses also cause the disease. Some reservoirs remain cryptic. Although global, this viral encephalitis is untreatable and often ignored. As with other neglected diseases, laboratory-based surveillance falls short of the notifiable ideal, especially in lower- and middle-income countries. Calculation of actual burden defaults to a flux within broad health economic models. Competing priorities, lack of defined, long-term international donors, and shrinking local champions challenge human prophylaxis and mass dog vaccination toward targets of 2030 for even canine rabies impacts. For prevention, all licensed vaccines are delivered to the individual, whether parenteral or oral–essentially ‘one and done'. Exploiting mammalian social behaviors, future ‘spreadable vaccines' might increase the proportion of immunized hosts per unit effort. However, the release of replication-competent, genetically modified organisms selectively engineered to spread intentionally throughout a population raises significant biological, ethical, and regulatory issues in need of broader, transdisciplinary discourse. How this rather curious idea will evolve toward actual unconventional prevention, control, or elimination in the near term remains debatable. In the interim, more precise terminology and realistic expectations serve as the norm for diverse, collective constituents to maintain progress in the field.
ABSTRACT
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionally affected people of black ethnicities, who have been at greater risk of SARS-CoV-2 acquisition, morbidity and mortality than those of white ethnicity. We describe factors associated with severe COVID-19 infection in the GEN-AFRICA cohort of people of black ethnicities living with HIV in the U.K. Method(s): First reported episodes of COVID-19 up to October 2022 were ascertained by direct questioning and/or medical records review. Pre-pandemic immune-virological and comorbidity status was based on measurements obtained prior to 01/2020 and used to identify risk factors for severe (requiring hospitalisation or resulting in death) COVID-19, using logistic regression Results: COVID-19 status was available for 1806 (72%) of 2503 GEN-AFRICA participants (mean age 49.2 [SD 10.2] years;56% female;80% sub-Saharan African and 14% Caribbean ancestry, median CD4 count 555 [IQR 400-733] cells/mm3;93% undetectable HIV RNA [<200 copies/ mL]);573 (32%) reported a clinical illness consistent with COVID-19;63 (3.5%) experienced severe COVID-19 (hospitalisation 59;death 4). Those who experienced severe COVID-19 were older, more often male, had lower CD4 counts and fewer had undetectable HIV RNA;they more often had prior AIDS, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. Region of ancestry, nadir CD4 count, and obesity were not associated with severe COVID-19. In multivariable analysis, CD4 count <350 cells/mm3, diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease were associated with increased odds of severe COVID-19 (Table). Sex and a pre-pandemic HIV RNA were associated with severe disease although this did not reach statistical significance. By October 2022, 1534 (88%) of this sample had received >=1 dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine;those who experienced severe COVID-19 were less likely to report vaccination (77% vs. 89%, p=0.01). Conclusion(s): By the end of October 2022, nearly onethird of people of Black ethnicities with HIV in this sample had experienced COVID-19;3.5% had developed severe COVID-19 disease. Pre-pandemic immunovirological and comorbidity status were associated with severe COVID-19. Black populations with less favourable HIV control than observed for GEN-AFRICA participants may have suffered greater COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. (Table Presented).
ABSTRACT
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic caused millions of deaths, its impact lessened with effective vaccines and treatments. The subsequent monkeypox outbreak posed another global threat, disproportionately affecting men who have sex with men (MSM), with concerns around increasing community stigma. Vaccinating at risk groups is vital in minimising COVID-19 and monkeypox transmissions and adverse sequalae. Our HIV clinic serves a diverse population in a deprived area with a large immigrant population and high level of co-morbidities, associated with poorer outcomes. We explored factors associated with COVID-19 and monkeypox vaccine uptake. Method(s): We reviewed COVID-19 vaccine first, second and third/booster uptake and first smallpox vaccine among MSMs attending our HIV clinic. Monkeypox vaccination is a two-dose course. Initial limited vaccine availability meant first monkeypox vaccine was prioritised for all eligible patients;we therefore analysed first monkeypox vaccination uptake. 186 MSM PLWH were identified. 164 were included in our analysis;22 were excluded due to insufficient vaccination information. Data was recorded contemporaneously in patients' records. COVID-19 vaccine uptake was verified using NHS Summary Care Record and London Care Record. Data on age and ethnicity was collected. Result(s): Demographics: Age: mean 42.9 years, 49% <=40 years, 51% >40 years Ethnicity: 55% White, 26% Black, 5% Asian, 2% mixed, 7% other, 4% not stated COVID-19 vaccination uptake reached statistical significance between age groups: <=40y 53%, >40y 80% (p = 0.001) and ethnicities: White 73%, Black 50%, Asian 67% (p = 0.026). Monkeypox vaccination uptake did not reach significance: <40y 26%, >40y 29%;ethnicity: White 31%, Black 24%, Asian 33%. Additionally, COVID-19 vaccinated patients were not statistically significantly more likely to accept monkeypox vaccination. Conclusion(s): Monkeypox vaccination uptake was similar across ages and ethnicities. However, monkeypox vaccination uptake was considerably lower than COVID-19 vaccination. Further work is needed to identify and engage at risk groups and address obstacles affecting monkeypox vaccination in marginalised communities. Lessons from COVID vaccination campaigns should be employed to reach unvaccinated high-risk MSMs. (Table Presented).