ABSTRACT
Background: Functional Somatic Disorders (FSDs) are characterized by persistent physical symptoms that cannot be explained by other somatic or psychiatric conditions. Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) is a non-allergic FSD characterized by odour intolerance and various somatic symptoms being attributed to the influence of toxic environmental chemicals in low, usually harmless doses. The pathophysiology of FSDs are still not clear. Smell and taste complaints were also among the notable symptoms characterizing the covid epidemic and the latest evidence suggests overlaps between long COVID and FSDs. Method(s): The study includes advanced analysis of MRI-derived functional and structural connectomes acquired on a 3 T MR scanner. Furthermore, it includes questionnaires and paraclinical tests, e.g. the Sniffin' Stick olfactory test, Mini-Mental State Examination, and Sino-Nasal Outcome test 22. The pilot part of the project included 6 MCS patients who were compared with 6 matched healthy participants. Later follow-up included analysis of 8 multiorgan FSD and 4 post-COVID patients. Result(s): The MCS group showed important brain structural connectivity differences in 34 tracts. Notably, for MCS patients, the olfactory cortex (especially in the right hemisphere) showed decreased connectivity with regions in the emotional system. Conclusion(s): We plan to extend these findings with whole-brain modelling of the functional connectivity in the patient groups. Long-term this could be used as a 'fingerprint' which could help with diagnosis and treatment monitoring in FSDs as well as with new diagnoses such as long-COVID.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION. Two-thirds of patients with COVID-19 developed smell and taste dysfunction, of whom half experienced improvement within the first month. After six months, 5-15% still suffered from significant olfactory dysfunction (OD). Before COVID-19, olfactory training (OT) was proved to be effective in patients with post-infectious OD. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the progress of olfactory recovery with and without OT in patients with long COVID-19. METHODS. Consecutive patients with long COVID-19 referred to the Flavour Clinic at Godstrup Regional Hospital, Denmark, were enrolled. The diagnostic set-up at the first visit and follow-up included smell and taste tests, questionnaires, ENT examination and instructions in OT. RESULTS. From January 2021 to April 2022, 52 patients were included due to long COVID-19-related OD. The majority of patients complained of distorted sensory quality, in particular, parosmia. Two-thirds of the patients reported a subjective improvement of their sense of smell and taste along with a significant decline in the negative impact on quality of life (p = 0.0001). Retesting at follow-up demonstrated a significant increase in smell scores (p = 0.023) where a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in smell scores was found in 23% of patients. Full training compliance was significantly associated with the probability of MCID improvement (OR = 8.13;p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS. The average effect of OT is modest;however, full training compliance was significantly associated with an increased probability of a clinically relevant olfactory improvement. FUNDING. none. TRIAL REGISTRATION. not relevant.Copyright © 2023, Almindelige Danske Laegeforening. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background and Aims Viral infections occur acutely but can also progress chronically, with the immune system having a central role in immunopathoge-nesis. The question arises whether all alterations in immune responses are reversible after viral elimination (spontaneously or by therapy). Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare soluble infammatory markers (SIM) during and after infection with SARS-CoV-2 and acute and chronic HCV-infections. Patients and Method Patients with acute HCV (n = 29), chronic HCV (n = 54), SARS-CoV-2 (n = 39) and 31 healthy-controls were included. Blood samples were tested at baseline, end of treatment/infection, and follow-up ( >= 9 months after baseline). IL-12p70, IL-1b, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, TNF, IFN-g, IL-10, IL-22, CXCL-10, MCP-1, MIP-1b, ITAC were quantified using the HD-SP-X Imaging and Analysis SystemTM. Results SIM profiles in patients with acute HCV were substantially elevated at baseline and the decrease during follow-up was considerably less compared to the SARS-CoV-2 cohort. In chronic HCV-patients, viral elimination by therapy resulted in a decrease in SIM, although not always to those of controls. Cirrhotic HCV patients had higher SIM levels after HCV elimination than non-cirrhotic chronic HCV-patients. In the SARS-CoV-2 cohort, most SIM returned to levels of controls 3 months after baseline. Conclusions SIM profiles and kinetics after viral elimination difer between blood-borne acute and chronic HCV- and respiratory SARS-CoV-2-infections. The immunologic imprint 9 months after cured HCV-infection (both acute and chronic) appears to be more pronounced than after SARS-CoV-2-infection. Further analysis is needed to correlate the SIM profle with the clinical pheno-type (long-HepC vs. long-COVID-19).
ABSTRACT
Purpose To investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on middle-aged and older patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who underwent spinal fusion. Methods The subjects were 252 AIS patients who underwent spinal fusion between 1968 and 1988. The surveys were performed before the COVID-19 pandemic (a primary survey in 2014) and during the pandemic (a secondary survey in 2022). The self-administered questionnaires were mailed to the patients. We analyzed 35 patients (33 females and two males) who replied to both surveys. Results The pandemic had low impacts on 11 patients (31.4%). Two patients reported refraining from seeing a doctor because they were concerned about going to the clinic or hospital, eight reported that the pandemic impacted their work, and five reported fewer opportunities to go out (based on multiple-choice answers). Twenty-four patients reported that their lives were unaffected by the pandemic. No significant differences were detected between both surveys for Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) in any domains (function, pain, self-image, mental, or satisfaction). The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaires revealed a significant worsening of the survey during the pandemic compared with the survey before the pandemic. There was no significant difference in the impact of the pandemic between the ODI deterioration group (27.8%) and the ODI stable group (35.3%). Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic had a low impact on 31.4% of middle-aged and older patients with AIS who underwent spinal fusion. The impact of the pandemic did not significantly differ between the groups with ODI deteriorations and the groups with stable ODI. The pandemic had a smaller impact on AIS patients at a minimum of 33 years after surgery.