Hairy Cell Leukemia in a Filipino Male during the COVID-19 Pandemic - Report of a Rare Case

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare, chronic, mature B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder accounting for 2% of all leukemias. In this paper, we would like to present our experience in the management of HCL in a financially limited setting where other diagnostic tests and chemotherapy are unavailable. The case report aims to emphasize the recognition of the distinctive morphology of hairy cells in the peripheral blood in the consideration of the initial diagnosis. A 60-year-old Filipino male was incidentally found to have anemia, thrombocytopenia and an absolute neutrophilic count below 1,000 in a pre-operative clearance for elective herniorrhaphy. Blood smear revealed atypical lymphocytes with hair like cytoplasmic projections. CT-scan of the abdomen showed splenomegaly and prominent paraaortic nodes. Flow cytometry of the bone marrow aspirate was consistent with an involvement of a Mature B cell neoplasm markers CD19, CD20, CD22 and surface immunoglobulin lambda and hairy cell leukemia markers CD11c, CD103 and CD25. He responded to six-weekly sessions of Cladribine with remission of the bone marrow and hematologic parameters. HCL is a rare type of a mature B cell neoplasm characterized by pancytopenia, splenomegaly, bone marrow fibrosis and the presence of atypical lymphoid cells with hairy projections in blood, bone marrow and spleen. Immunophenotyping express CD11c, CD103, CD123, and CD25. BRAF V600E mutation is the disease defining genetic event. Cladribine and Pentostatin are the first line of treatment. Cases of leukemia can be easily overlooked because of the mild derangement in the complete blood count. A meticulous differential review of the atypical lymphocyte, is the first step in the diagnosis of this rare disease.Copyright © 2022, Philippine College of Physicians. All rights reserved.

Toxicity patterns associated with chronic ketamine exposure

Introduction: Synthesized in 1962, ketamine is used as a sedative, antidepressant and for the management of complex chronic pain. More recently, besides its therapeutic use, ketamine has been increasingly used as a recreational drug among young adults. As a result, an increasing number of reports have described side effects associated with its chronic exposure. This review aims to present the current evidence on the toxicity associated with chronic ketamine exposure. Method(s): Considering the limited literature on the topic, Pubmed and Embase were searched and all types of articles were considered, including systematic reviews, retrospective studies, case series and animal studies. Evidence: Chronic ketamine exposure is associated with urological toxicity manifesting mainly by lower urinary tract symptoms with features of ulcerative cystitis. More severe forms with upper urinary tract involvement can require multiple line treatments, including surgery. There are reports of gastrointestinal toxicity with abdominal pain, liver function test derangement and cholangiopathy. More recently, reports have described the association between prolonged ketamine sedation during covid-19 outbreak and cholangiopathies. Development of tolerance, brain and psychiatric changes have been described. These can manifest in cognitive impairment and psychiatric disorders, with schizophrenia-like symptoms. Possible cardiovascular alterations have been described in few reports. Whereas supportive treatment can offer transient relief, ketamine cessation remains the cornerstone of the treatment. Conclusion(s): There is evidence of toxicity associated with chronic ketamine exposure on the different systems studied in this review. Nevertheless, due to the limitation of the studies more prospective studies would be required to clarify those findings.Copyright © 2023 Societe Francaise de Toxicologie Analytique

The negative impact of the pandemic on hospital admissions, morbidity and 30-day mortality for acute cirrhosis decompensation: a tertiary care perspective

Background and aims: The global pandemic has inevitably diverted resources away from management of chronic diseases, including cirrhosis, where up to 40% of patients are readmitted with new cirrhosis decompensation events. Whilst there is increasing knowledge on COVID-19 infection in liver cirrhosis, little is described on the impact of the pandemic on decompensated cirrhosis admissions and outcomes, which was the aim of this study. Method: A single-centre, retrospective study, evaluated decompensated cirrhosis admissions to a tertiary London hepatology and transplantation centre, from October 2018 to February 2021. Patients were included if they had an admission with cirrhosis decompensation defined as new onset jaundice or ascites, infection, encephalopathy, portal hypertensive bleeding or renal dysfunction. Admissions were excluded if they lasted <24 hours,were elective or occurred post liver-transplant. Results: Therewere 351 admissions in the pre-COVID period (October 2018 to February 2020) and 240 admissions during the COVID period (March 2020 to February 2021), with an average of 20.4 admissions per month throughout. Patients transferred in from secondary centres had consistently higher severity scores during the COVID period (UKELD 58 versus 54;p = 0.007, MELD Na 22 versus 18;p = 0.006, AD score 55.0 versus 51.0;p = 0.055). The proportion of ITU admissions pre versus during-COVID stayed constant (22.9% versus 19.2%), but there was a trend towards increased ICU admissions with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) (73.9% versus 63.8% prepandemic). Of those admitted to the intensive care without ACLF, there was a significant increase in EF-CLIF acute decompensation (AD) scores during the COVID period (58 versus 48, p = 0.009). In addition, there was a trend towards increased hospital re-admission rates during the COVID period (29.5% versus 21.5%, p = 0.067). When censored at 30 days, time to death post discharge was significantly reduced during the COVID period (p < 0.05) with a median time to death of 35 days compared to 62 days pre-COVID.(Figure Presented)Conclusion: This study provides a unique perspective on the impact that the global pandemic had on the clinical course and characteristics of decompensated cirrhosis admissions. The findings of increased early mortality and re-admissions, and higher AD scores, indicating increased disease morbidity, highlight the need to maintain resourcing on providing high-level hepatology care. Given that COVID-19 will likely be a chronic issue, alternative care pathways such as remote monitoring may need adoption to facilitate continuity of care post-discharge and to reduce readmission rates and morbidity in the future

Fractionated Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Combined with Low-Intensity Chemotherapy Provides Very Good Outcome in Older Patients with Newly Diagnosed CD22+ Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: First Results from the EWALL-INO Study

On behalf of the GRAALL group, the Czech Republic ALL group, the Finland ALL group and the EWALL group. Introduction. Treatment of older patients (pts) with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) remains an unmet medical need. Inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO), an anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, is approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL in adults, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) being the major adverse event associated with INO. A previous first line study conducted by the MDACC in pts 60 years or older successfully used INO in combination with a lower intensity version of the hyper-CVAD (mini-hyper-CVD). Due to the occurrence of SOS, the total doses were fixed at 1.3 mg/m² for cycle 1 followed by 3 cycles at 1 mg/m² (Kantarjian H et al. Lancet Oncol, 2018). Here, we aimed to assess the activity and safety of fractionated INO at a reduced dosage in combination with low-intensity chemotherapy as frontline therapy for older pts with CD22+ Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-neg) BCP-ALL. Methods. EWALL-INO is a single arm prospective phase 2 multicentric study conducted in European centers belonging to the EWALL group. Eligibility criteria were pts aged 55y or older, performance status ≤2, and newly diagnosed CD22+ (20% or more of positive blast cells) Ph-neg BCP-ALL without central nervous system involvement. After a prephase including 5 days (D) of dexamethasone (DEX) 10mg per D and a single intrathecal injection (IT), the induction regimen was begun and split in 2 parts. Induction part I (Induc1) consisted of one triple IT, vincristine (VCR) 2 mg (1 mg over 70y) D1 D8 D15 D22 and DEX 20 mg D1D2 D8D9 D15D16 D22D23 combined with 3 injections of INO (0.8 mg/m² D1, 0.5 mg/m² D8 and D15). Induction part II (Induc2) was offered to pts in CR or CRp (CR with platelets < 100 G/l) after Induc1 or as salvage therapy. Induc2 consisted of DEX 20mg D1D8, cyclophosphamide (CY) 300 mg/m² D1 to D3, one triple IT D2 and 2 injections of INO (0.5 mg/m² D1 and D8). Pts in CR/CRp were programmed to receive 6 blocks of consolidation (Ara-C 1.5g/m²/12h adapted to renal clearance D1D2 and DEX 10mg/12h D1D2, cycles 1 and 4;Methotrexate (MTX) 1.5 g/m² over 24h D1, VCR 1 or 2 mg D1, one triple IT D2 and 6-mercaptopurin (6-MP) D1 to D7, cycles 2 and 5;CY 500 mg/m² D1D2, VP16 75 mg/m² D1D2, one triple IT D2 and MTX 25 mg/m² D1, cycles 3 and 6) followed by a POMP maintenance (VCR, 6-MP, MTX, DEX) during 18 months. Allograft was allowed after at least 3 blocks of consolidation at the discretion of the investigators. The evaluable population was pts who received at least 1 dose of INO. Analyses were by modified intention to treat and performed JUN 28, 2021. All pts gave informed consent. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the NCT number: NCT03249870. Results. Between DEC 29, 2017 and JUN 22, 2021, 115 pts (out of 130 planned pts) were enrolled including 6 pts with screen failure. The first 90 eligible pts (up to MAR 1, 2021) were considered for this analysis to obtain a minimum of 4 months follow-up. Median age was 69y (range 55-84) and median follow-up for alive pts was 1.18 years (range 0.3-3.5). At time of analysis, 90 and 88 pts had started induc1 and induc2, respectively. Treatment related mortality was 2.2% (2/90) and CR/CRp rate was 85.5% (77/90, 6 CRp) after induc1. Three cases relapsed between induc1 and induc2 and 5 pts were salvaged by induc2 allowing to a CR/CRp rate of 87.7% (79/90, 8 CRp) after induc2. One pts died from refractory disease during induc2. One, 2, 3 4 and 5 injections of INO were administered to 2 (2.2%), 2(2.2%), 11 (12.2%), 2 (2.2%) and 73 pts (81.1%) respectively. Only 6 pts were allografted. One-year OS was estimated to be 78.5% (95%CI 68-85.9) and median OS was not reached. One-year relapse free survival was 74.5% (95CI 63.5-82.6) (Figure 1). Grade 3-4 liver toxicity was observed in 8 pts (8.8%) during the study including 3 pts (3.3%) developing SOS, 2 related to INO during induc1 and one occurred after transplant. Twenty-nine pts died during the follow-up, 16 from relapses (overall incidence 18%) and 13 from adverse events (overall incidence 14.4%), including one COVID19 fatal infection during consolidation. Conclusion. Fractionated inotuzumab ozogamicin at reduced doses (0.8/0.5/0.5/0.5 mg/m²) combined with low-intensity chemotherapy is a very active and well tolerated frontline therapy for older patients with CD22+ Ph-neg BCP-ALL. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Doubek: Janssen-Cilag, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Gilead, Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Huguet: Novartis: Other: Advisor;Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisor;Celgene: Other: Advisor;BMS: Other: Advisor;Amgen: Other: Advisor;Pfizer: Other: Advisor. Raffoux: ABBVIE: Consultancy;PFIZER: Consultancy;CELGENE/BMS: Consultancy;ASTELLAS: Consultancy. Boissel: CELGENE: Honoraria;Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria;Incyte: Honoraria;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding;PFIZER: Consultancy, Honoraria;JAZZ Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding;SANOFI: Honoraria. Dombret: Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding;Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding;Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding;Novartis: Research Funding;Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding;Servier: Research Funding;Abbvie: Honoraria;BMS-Celgene: Honoraria;Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria. Rousselot: Incyte, Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Inotuzumab ozogamicin as first line therapy in newly diagnosed CD22+ Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Adoptive Immune Responses to Sars-Cov2 Vaccination in CART19 Treated Patients

Background: The two FDA approved mRNA-based SARS-CoV2 vaccines have shown >90% efficacy at preventing COVID and eliciting protective immunity in nearly all healthy individuals. However, the extent of vaccine induced antibody and T cell immunity in immunocompromised patients is not well known. Our study objective is to determine if patients with hematologic malignancies treated with B-cell targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies can mount antibody and T cell immune responses to SARS-CoV2 vaccines. A prospective single-center study to evaluate the SARS-CoV2 immune responses in immunocompromised individuals (COVAX Study) was initiated at University of Pennsylvania following the IRB guidelines. The study enrolled 8 healthy adults,12 patients are in remission after treatment (average of 40.6 months) with CART cells targeting either CD19 or CD19+CD22 and received both doses of SARS-CoV2 vaccine. Methods and Results: Serology to SARS-CoV2 spike-receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG, RBD-IgA, RBD-IgM and spike-specific T cell responses were measured prior to vaccination and serially up to 28 days after booster vaccination. RBD-IgG and RBD-IgA were detected in 8/8 and 7/8 healthy subjects compared to 5/12 and 2/12 CART patients, respectively (Figure A). In the CART cohort, several patients who demonstrated an induction of RBD-IgG (57.2/uL +/- 20.2) compared to those who were RBD-IgG-negative (9/uL +/- 10.1, ANOVA with multiple comparisons test p=0.017) have higher level of circulating B cells. No association was found with time since CART infusion, age, disease type, or vaccine manufacturer. All 8 healthy subjects demonstrated induction of SARS-Cov2 spike-specific CD4 + T cell immunity compared to 7 out of 11 CART patients (Figure B). RBD-IgG responses were not correlated with CD4 + T cell activation (Pearson correlation, R=0.21, p=0.53). Indeed, 3 CART patients demonstrated robust CD4 + T cell activation despite absence of antibody induction. Overall, 8/12 CART patients demonstrated induction of either or both humoral and T cell immune responses. Conclusions: We show that immune responses to SARS-CoV2 mRNA vaccines are induced in majority of patients who have been treated with CART therapies targeting B-cell lineage antigens. Induction of vaccine-specific antibody was strongly associated with the level of circulating B cells. However, in CART cohort patients despite severe humoral immune deficiency, strong CD4 + T cell responses were observed suggestive of a sufficient protective immunity. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Frey: Novartis: Research Funding;Sana Biotechnology: Consultancy;Kite Pharma: Consultancy;Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Garfall: Amgen: Honoraria;CRISPR Therapeutics: Research Funding;GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria;Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding;Novartis: Research Funding;Tmunity: Research Funding. Porter: American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy: Honoraria;Genentech: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months;ASH: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;DeCart: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Kite/Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;National Marrow Donor Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding;Tmunity: Patents & Royalties;Wiley and Sons Publishing: Honoraria. June: AC Immune, DeCART, BluesphereBio, Carisma, Cellares, Celldex, Cabaletta, Poseida, Verismo, Ziopharm: Consultancy;Tmunity, DeCART, BluesphereBio, Carisma, Cellares, Celldex, Cabaletta, Poseida, Verismo, Ziopharm: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company;Novartis: Patents & Royalties.