Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Biomedicines ; 11(3)2023 Mar 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2261229

ABSTRACT

Risk prediction models are fundamental to effectively triage incoming COVID-19 patients. However, current triaging methods often have poor predictive performance, are based on variables that are expensive to measure, and often lead to hard-to-interpret decisions. We introduce two new classification methods that can predict COVID-19 mortality risk from the automatic analysis of routine clinical variables with high accuracy and interpretability. SVM22-GASS and Clinical-GASS classifiers leverage machine learning methods and clinical expertise, respectively. Both were developed using a derivation cohort of 499 patients from the first wave of the pandemic and were validated with an independent validation cohort of 250 patients from the second pandemic phase. The Clinical-GASS classifier is a threshold-based classifier that leverages the General Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Severity (GASS) score, a COVID-19-specific clinical score that recently showed its effectiveness in predicting the COVID-19 mortality risk. The SVM22-GASS model is a binary classifier that non-linearly processes clinical data using a Support Vector Machine (SVM). In this study, we show that SMV22-GASS was able to predict the mortality risk of the validation cohort with an AUC of 0.87 and an accuracy of 0.88, better than most scores previously developed. Similarly, the Clinical-GASS classifier predicted the mortality risk of the validation cohort with an AUC of 0.77 and an accuracy of 0.78, on par with other established and emerging machine-learning-based methods. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of accurate COVID-19 mortality risk prediction using only routine clinical variables, readily collected in the early stages of hospital admission.

2.
Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity ; 12(5):859-868, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2227673

ABSTRACT

In our study, we aimed to evaluate the significance of specific cytokines in blood plasma as predictive markers of COVID-associated mortality. Materials and methods. In plasma samples of 29 patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 we measured the concentrations of 47 molecules. These molecules included: interleukins and selected pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1alpha, IL-1beta, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-9, IL-12 (p40), IL-12 (p70), IL-13, IL-15, IL-17A/CTLA8, IL-17-E/IL-25, IL-17F, IL-18, IL-22, IL-27, IFNalpha2, IFNgamma, TNFalpha, TNFbeta/Lymphotoxin-alpha(LTA));chemokines (CCL2/MCP-1, CCL3/MIP-1alpha, CCL4/MIP-1beta, CCL7/MCP-3, CCL11/Eotaxin, CCL22/MDC, CXCL1/GROalpha, CXCL8/IL-8, CXCL9/MIG, CXCL10/IP-10, CX3CL1/Fractalkine);anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1Ra, IL-10);growth factors (EGF, FGF-2/FGF-basic, Flt-3 Ligand, G-CSF, M-CSF, GM-CSF, PDGF-AA, PDGFAB/BB, TGFalpha, VEGF-A);and sCD40L. We used multiplex analysis based on xMAP technology (Luminex, USA) using Luminex MagPix. As controls, we used plasma samples of 20 healthy individuals. Based on the results, we applied Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis and Area Under Curve (AUC) values to compare two different predictive tests and to choose the optimal division point for disease outcome (survivors/non-survivors). To find optimal biomarker combinations, we as used cytokines concentrations as dependent variables to grow a regression tree using JMP 16 Software.Results. Out of 47 studied cytokines/chemokines/growth factors, we picked four pro-inflammatory cytokines as having high significance in evaluation of COVID-19 outcome: IL-6, IL-8, IL-15, and IL-18. Based on the results received, we assume that the highest significance in terms of predicting the outcome of acute COVID-19 belongs to IL-6 and IL-18. Conclusion. Analyzing concentrations of IL-6 and IL-18 before administering treatment may prove valuable in terms of outcome prognosis. Copyright © Arsentieva N.A. et al., 2022.

3.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ; 81:927-928, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2008837

ABSTRACT

Background: Comorbidities, particularly cardio-metabolic disorders, are highly prevalent in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and they were associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, which have been associated with higher morbidity and mortality. Whether PsA enhances the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection or affects the disease outcome remains to be ascertained. Objectives: To describe the sociodemographic, clinical and treatment characteristics of patients with PsA with confrmed SARS-CoV-2 infection from the SAR-COVID registry and to identify the variables associated with poor COVID-19 outcomes, comparing them with those with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Cross-sectional observational study including patients ≥18 years old, with diagnosis of PsA (CASPAR criteria) and RA (ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria), who had confrmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (RT-PCR or serology) from the SAR-COVID registry. Recruitment period was between August 13, 2020 and July 31, 2021. Sociodemographic variables, comorbidities, and treatments were analyzed. To assess the severity of the infection, the ordinal scale of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)1 was used, and it was considered that a patient met the primary outcome, if they presented criteria of categories 5 or higher on the severity scale. For this analysis, Chi2 test, Fisher's test, Student's test or Wilcoxon test, and binomial logistic regression using NIAID>=5 as dependent variable were performed. Results: A total of 129 PsA patients and 808 with RA were included. Clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. Regarding PsA treatment, 12.4% of PsA were receiving IL-17 inhibitors, 5.4% IL12-23 inhibitors, one patient apremilast and one abatacept. The frequency of NIAID≥5 was comparable between groups (PsA 19.5% vs RA 20.1%;p=0.976). (Figure 1). PsA patients with NIAID≥5 in comparison with NIAID<5 were older (58.6±11.4 vs 50±12.5;p=0.002), had more frequently hypertension (52.2% vs 23%;p=0.011) and dyslipidemia (39.1% vs 15%;p=0.017). In the multivariate analysis, age (OR 1.06;95% CI 1.02-1.11) was associated with a worse outcome of the COVID-19 (NIAID≥5) in patients with PsA, while those who received methotrexate (OR 0.34;95% CI 0.11-0.92) and biological DMARDs (OR 0.28;95% CI 0.09-0.78) had a better outcome. Conclusion: Although PsA patients have a higher frequency of cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities than those with RA, the COVID-19 severity was similar. Most of the patients had mild SARS-CoV-2 infection and a low death rate.

4.
Journal of Hepatology ; 77:S889, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1996651

ABSTRACT

Background and aims: The global pandemic has inevitably diverted resources away from management of chronic diseases, including cirrhosis, where up to 40% of patients are readmitted with new cirrhosis decompensation events. Whilst there is increasing knowledge on COVID-19 infection in liver cirrhosis, little is described on the impact of the pandemic on decompensated cirrhosis admissions and outcomes, which was the aim of this study. Method: A single-centre, retrospective study, evaluated decompensated cirrhosis admissions to a tertiary London hepatology and transplantation centre, from October 2018 to February 2021. Patients were included if they had an admission with cirrhosis decompensation defined as new onset jaundice or ascites, infection, encephalopathy, portal hypertensive bleeding or renal dysfunction. Admissions were excluded if they lasted <24 hours,were elective or occurred post liver-transplant. Results: Therewere 351 admissions in the pre-COVID period (October 2018 to February 2020) and 240 admissions during the COVID period (March 2020 to February 2021), with an average of 20.4 admissions per month throughout. Patients transferred in from secondary centres had consistently higher severity scores during the COVID period (UKELD 58 versus 54;p = 0.007, MELD Na 22 versus 18;p = 0.006, AD score 55.0 versus 51.0;p = 0.055). The proportion of ITU admissions pre versus during-COVID stayed constant (22.9% versus 19.2%), but there was a trend towards increased ICU admissions with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) (73.9% versus 63.8% prepandemic). Of those admitted to the intensive care without ACLF, there was a significant increase in EF-CLIF acute decompensation (AD) scores during the COVID period (58 versus 48, p = 0.009). In addition, there was a trend towards increased hospital re-admission rates during the COVID period (29.5% versus 21.5%, p = 0.067). When censored at 30 days, time to death post discharge was significantly reduced during the COVID period (p < 0.05) with a median time to death of 35 days compared to 62 days pre-COVID.(Figure Presented)Conclusion: This study provides a unique perspective on the impact that the global pandemic had on the clinical course and characteristics of decompensated cirrhosis admissions. The findings of increased early mortality and re-admissions, and higher AD scores, indicating increased disease morbidity, highlight the need to maintain resourcing on providing high-level hepatology care. Given that COVID-19 will likely be a chronic issue, alternative care pathways such as remote monitoring may need adoption to facilitate continuity of care post-discharge and to reduce readmission rates and morbidity in the future

5.
Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology ; 15(4):1653-1658, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1929143

ABSTRACT

World Health Organization (WHO) has assessed that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as an epidemic. However, an effective antiviral for COVID-19 is still uncertain. Since the onset of the outbreak, the scientific and clinical community keep proposing many agents that would have efficacy against COVID-19. Arbidol is an indole core with proven effectiveness against influenza over the past few years apart from critics. The concrete hypothesis of arbidol interaction with spike glycoprotein prevents the entry of virus. Further, demonstrated clinical efficiency of arbidol against RNA virus and broad-spectrum inhibition of influenza A and B virus, adenovirus, and other viruses, including hepatitis C virus, drives us to seek more understating of the molecule and its clinical possibilities. In this review, we attempt to describe the many possible hypotheses of arbidol against Covid-19.

6.
Natural Volatiles & Essential Oils ; 9(1):861-876, 2022.
Article in English | GIM | ID: covidwho-1787449

ABSTRACT

Since its inception in 2019 from China, the novel Coronavirus has caused an unprecedented havoc in the economic and public health sector. Many countries were forced to close their borders and cross-border interactions in order to limit the spread of the disease. Furthermore, many economic and commercial activities were adversely affected as many businesses had to close. The only ones that the pandemic spared were the ones providing essential services. By March 2020, many public healthcare facilities had already been overrun. Other governments devised alternative means of managing significant cases of COVID-19, such as introducing home-based care to give room for more critical cases to be taken care of in intensive care units. It is imperative to identify the disease's risk factors to mitigate the unexpected devastation caused by the SARS-CoV-2. Global epidemiological results indicate that men, especially the elderly, are more susceptible to Coronavirus infection. The number of reported Coronavirus cases varies by gender, and this disparity continues to grow in favor of male participants until they reach the age of 60. Other studies have also established that men more than women are susceptible to coronavirus infection. Further, male patients diagnosed with coronavirus infection were shown to have an elevated mortality rate. SARS-CoV-2 is the Covid-19 pathogen that is transmitted via respiratory globules, through indirect or direct interaction. Evaluation of the genome has revealed that SARS-CoV-2 is 79% similar to SARS-CoV-2;they employ ACE2 receptors to attack cells, meanwhile it has been established that TMPRSS2 promotes ACE2, therefore causing more severe reactions in comparison to the other types of coronaviruses. Studies describe ACE2 as a gateway for viruses to enter cells. It is directly associated with the COVID-19 clinical symptoms. Research has shown that TMPRSS2 and ACE2 are expressed in the male reproductive system tract and testis and are controlled by testosterone. Thus, the male reproductive system has all the mechanism needed to bid SARs-CoV-2, and these possibilities raise the capability of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 as potential vectors of COVID-19. This review examines how the novel Coronavirus find its way into the human cells through known receptors such as ACE2, antibody Fcy R, etc. The examination is also done on the mechanisms of its spike proteins transition with the help of proteases such as cathepsins, Furin, and TMPRSS2. The study reviewed six articles selected based on PRISMA criteria.

7.
Blood ; 138:511, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1582347

ABSTRACT

On behalf of the GRAALL group, the Czech Republic ALL group, the Finland ALL group and the EWALL group. Introduction. Treatment of older patients (pts) with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) remains an unmet medical need. Inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO), an anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, is approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL in adults, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) being the major adverse event associated with INO. A previous first line study conducted by the MDACC in pts 60 years or older successfully used INO in combination with a lower intensity version of the hyper-CVAD (mini-hyper-CVD). Due to the occurrence of SOS, the total doses were fixed at 1.3 mg/m² for cycle 1 followed by 3 cycles at 1 mg/m² (Kantarjian H et al. Lancet Oncol, 2018). Here, we aimed to assess the activity and safety of fractionated INO at a reduced dosage in combination with low-intensity chemotherapy as frontline therapy for older pts with CD22+ Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-neg) BCP-ALL. Methods. EWALL-INO is a single arm prospective phase 2 multicentric study conducted in European centers belonging to the EWALL group. Eligibility criteria were pts aged 55y or older, performance status ≤2, and newly diagnosed CD22+ (20% or more of positive blast cells) Ph-neg BCP-ALL without central nervous system involvement. After a prephase including 5 days (D) of dexamethasone (DEX) 10mg per D and a single intrathecal injection (IT), the induction regimen was begun and split in 2 parts. Induction part I (Induc1) consisted of one triple IT, vincristine (VCR) 2 mg (1 mg over 70y) D1 D8 D15 D22 and DEX 20 mg D1D2 D8D9 D15D16 D22D23 combined with 3 injections of INO (0.8 mg/m² D1, 0.5 mg/m² D8 and D15). Induction part II (Induc2) was offered to pts in CR or CRp (CR with platelets < 100 G/l) after Induc1 or as salvage therapy. Induc2 consisted of DEX 20mg D1D8, cyclophosphamide (CY) 300 mg/m² D1 to D3, one triple IT D2 and 2 injections of INO (0.5 mg/m² D1 and D8). Pts in CR/CRp were programmed to receive 6 blocks of consolidation (Ara-C 1.5g/m²/12h adapted to renal clearance D1D2 and DEX 10mg/12h D1D2, cycles 1 and 4;Methotrexate (MTX) 1.5 g/m² over 24h D1, VCR 1 or 2 mg D1, one triple IT D2 and 6-mercaptopurin (6-MP) D1 to D7, cycles 2 and 5;CY 500 mg/m² D1D2, VP16 75 mg/m² D1D2, one triple IT D2 and MTX 25 mg/m² D1, cycles 3 and 6) followed by a POMP maintenance (VCR, 6-MP, MTX, DEX) during 18 months. Allograft was allowed after at least 3 blocks of consolidation at the discretion of the investigators. The evaluable population was pts who received at least 1 dose of INO. Analyses were by modified intention to treat and performed JUN 28, 2021. All pts gave informed consent. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the NCT number: NCT03249870. Results. Between DEC 29, 2017 and JUN 22, 2021, 115 pts (out of 130 planned pts) were enrolled including 6 pts with screen failure. The first 90 eligible pts (up to MAR 1, 2021) were considered for this analysis to obtain a minimum of 4 months follow-up. Median age was 69y (range 55-84) and median follow-up for alive pts was 1.18 years (range 0.3-3.5). At time of analysis, 90 and 88 pts had started induc1 and induc2, respectively. Treatment related mortality was 2.2% (2/90) and CR/CRp rate was 85.5% (77/90, 6 CRp) after induc1. Three cases relapsed between induc1 and induc2 and 5 pts were salvaged by induc2 allowing to a CR/CRp rate of 87.7% (79/90, 8 CRp) after induc2. One pts died from refractory disease during induc2. One, 2, 3 4 and 5 injections of INO were administered to 2 (2.2%), 2(2.2%), 11 (12.2%), 2 (2.2%) and 73 pts (81.1%) respectively. Only 6 pts were allografted. One-year OS was estimated to be 78.5% (95%CI 68-85.9) and median OS was not reached. One-year relapse free survival was 74.5% (95CI 63.5-82.6) (Figure 1). Grade 3-4 liver toxicity was observed in 8 pts (8.8%) during the study including 3 pts (3.3%) developing SOS, 2 related to INO during induc1 and one occurred after transplant. Twenty-nine pts died during the follow-up, 16 from relapses (overall incidence 18%) and 13 from adverse events (overall incidence 14.4%), including one COVID19 fatal infection during consolidation. Conclusion. Fractionated inotuzumab ozogamicin at reduced doses (0.8/0.5/0.5/0.5 mg/m²) combined with low-intensity chemotherapy is a very active and well tolerated frontline therapy for older patients with CD22+ Ph-neg BCP-ALL. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Doubek: Janssen-Cilag, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Gilead, Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Huguet: Novartis: Other: Advisor;Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisor;Celgene: Other: Advisor;BMS: Other: Advisor;Amgen: Other: Advisor;Pfizer: Other: Advisor. Raffoux: ABBVIE: Consultancy;PFIZER: Consultancy;CELGENE/BMS: Consultancy;ASTELLAS: Consultancy. Boissel: CELGENE: Honoraria;Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria;Incyte: Honoraria;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding;PFIZER: Consultancy, Honoraria;JAZZ Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding;SANOFI: Honoraria. Dombret: Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding;Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding;Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding;Novartis: Research Funding;Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding;Servier: Research Funding;Abbvie: Honoraria;BMS-Celgene: Honoraria;Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria. Rousselot: Incyte, Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Inotuzumab ozogamicin as first line therapy in newly diagnosed CD22+ Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL