ABSTRACT
Background: Functional Somatic Disorders (FSDs) are characterized by persistent physical symptoms that cannot be explained by other somatic or psychiatric conditions. Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) is a non-allergic FSD characterized by odour intolerance and various somatic symptoms being attributed to the influence of toxic environmental chemicals in low, usually harmless doses. The pathophysiology of FSDs are still not clear. Smell and taste complaints were also among the notable symptoms characterizing the covid epidemic and the latest evidence suggests overlaps between long COVID and FSDs. Method(s): The study includes advanced analysis of MRI-derived functional and structural connectomes acquired on a 3 T MR scanner. Furthermore, it includes questionnaires and paraclinical tests, e.g. the Sniffin' Stick olfactory test, Mini-Mental State Examination, and Sino-Nasal Outcome test 22. The pilot part of the project included 6 MCS patients who were compared with 6 matched healthy participants. Later follow-up included analysis of 8 multiorgan FSD and 4 post-COVID patients. Result(s): The MCS group showed important brain structural connectivity differences in 34 tracts. Notably, for MCS patients, the olfactory cortex (especially in the right hemisphere) showed decreased connectivity with regions in the emotional system. Conclusion(s): We plan to extend these findings with whole-brain modelling of the functional connectivity in the patient groups. Long-term this could be used as a 'fingerprint' which could help with diagnosis and treatment monitoring in FSDs as well as with new diagnoses such as long-COVID.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Background: Face mask is the first line to protect the respiratory mucosa from the coronavirus particles in aerocells and droplets and without this, the exposure of the mucosa to the virus and allergens trigger the immune and inflammatory system. These lead to Allergic Rhinitis (AR) symptoms or virus infection. Aim: This study discusses about the effects of face mask on the severity of AR symptoms using the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) in AR cases during the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Method: In this cross-sectional study, 54 cases previously diagnosed as moderate and severe AR based on Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma and Visual Analog Scale score referred to the tertiary allergy clinic were involved, while 5 of them were excluded. AR symptoms before and during the pandemic were compared based on the SNOT-22 questionnaire. Demographics, AR severity, and comorbidities were registered. Results: The mean age was 31.4 ± 13.5 years with the male-female ratio of 1.4. The mean SNOT-22 score was 36.1 ± 20.3 before and 29.5 ± 16.8 during the pandemic. Although 36.7% (n: 18) of all participants had severe symptoms before the pandemic, 10.2% (n: 5) had severe AR symptoms during the pandemic. 53.0% (n: 26) of patients had moderate AR symptoms, and 36.7% (n: 18) had mild AR symptoms in the pandemic. There was no significant difference between each paired subgroup in AR symptom changes but the symptom improvement was significant in most of the subgroups when compared to the pre-pandemic period. Smoking had an adverse effect on AR symptoms (p: 0.034). Conclusion: Face mask affects the quality of life in AR patients and improves the severity of AR symptoms during COVID-19 pandemic. Smoking worsens this severity. Age, gender, pet ownership, underlying conditions, and previous COVID-19 infection were not associated with AR symptoms severity and alteration in the AR individuals' quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION. Two-thirds of patients with COVID-19 developed smell and taste dysfunction, of whom half experienced improvement within the first month. After six months, 5-15% still suffered from significant olfactory dysfunction (OD). Before COVID-19, olfactory training (OT) was proved to be effective in patients with post-infectious OD. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the progress of olfactory recovery with and without OT in patients with long COVID-19. METHODS. Consecutive patients with long COVID-19 referred to the Flavour Clinic at Godstrup Regional Hospital, Denmark, were enrolled. The diagnostic set-up at the first visit and follow-up included smell and taste tests, questionnaires, ENT examination and instructions in OT. RESULTS. From January 2021 to April 2022, 52 patients were included due to long COVID-19-related OD. The majority of patients complained of distorted sensory quality, in particular, parosmia. Two-thirds of the patients reported a subjective improvement of their sense of smell and taste along with a significant decline in the negative impact on quality of life (p = 0.0001). Retesting at follow-up demonstrated a significant increase in smell scores (p = 0.023) where a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in smell scores was found in 23% of patients. Full training compliance was significantly associated with the probability of MCID improvement (OR = 8.13;p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS. The average effect of OT is modest;however, full training compliance was significantly associated with an increased probability of a clinically relevant olfactory improvement. FUNDING. none. TRIAL REGISTRATION. not relevant.Copyright © 2023, Almindelige Danske Laegeforening. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
In our study, we aimed to evaluate the significance of specific cytokines in blood plasma as predictive markers of COVID-associated mortality. Materials and methods. In plasma samples of 29 patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 we measured the concentrations of 47 molecules. These molecules included: interleukins and selected pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1alpha, IL-1beta, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-9, IL-12 (p40), IL-12 (p70), IL-13, IL-15, IL-17A/CTLA8, IL-17-E/IL-25, IL-17F, IL-18, IL-22, IL-27, IFNalpha2, IFNgamma, TNFalpha, TNFbeta/Lymphotoxin-alpha(LTA));chemokines (CCL2/MCP-1, CCL3/MIP-1alpha, CCL4/MIP-1beta, CCL7/MCP-3, CCL11/Eotaxin, CCL22/MDC, CXCL1/GROalpha, CXCL8/IL-8, CXCL9/MIG, CXCL10/IP-10, CX3CL1/Fractalkine);anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1Ra, IL-10);growth factors (EGF, FGF-2/FGF-basic, Flt-3 Ligand, G-CSF, M-CSF, GM-CSF, PDGF-AA, PDGFAB/BB, TGFalpha, VEGF-A);and sCD40L. We used multiplex analysis based on xMAP technology (Luminex, USA) using Luminex MagPix. As controls, we used plasma samples of 20 healthy individuals. Based on the results, we applied Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis and Area Under Curve (AUC) values to compare two different predictive tests and to choose the optimal division point for disease outcome (survivors/non-survivors). To find optimal biomarker combinations, we as used cytokines concentrations as dependent variables to grow a regression tree using JMP 16 Software.Results. Out of 47 studied cytokines/chemokines/growth factors, we picked four pro-inflammatory cytokines as having high significance in evaluation of COVID-19 outcome: IL-6, IL-8, IL-15, and IL-18. Based on the results received, we assume that the highest significance in terms of predicting the outcome of acute COVID-19 belongs to IL-6 and IL-18. Conclusion. Analyzing concentrations of IL-6 and IL-18 before administering treatment may prove valuable in terms of outcome prognosis. Copyright © Arsentieva N.A. et al., 2022.
ABSTRACT
Background: Comorbidities, particularly cardio-metabolic disorders, are highly prevalent in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and they were associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, which have been associated with higher morbidity and mortality. Whether PsA enhances the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection or affects the disease outcome remains to be ascertained. Objectives: To describe the sociodemographic, clinical and treatment characteristics of patients with PsA with confrmed SARS-CoV-2 infection from the SAR-COVID registry and to identify the variables associated with poor COVID-19 outcomes, comparing them with those with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Cross-sectional observational study including patients ≥18 years old, with diagnosis of PsA (CASPAR criteria) and RA (ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria), who had confrmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (RT-PCR or serology) from the SAR-COVID registry. Recruitment period was between August 13, 2020 and July 31, 2021. Sociodemographic variables, comorbidities, and treatments were analyzed. To assess the severity of the infection, the ordinal scale of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)1 was used, and it was considered that a patient met the primary outcome, if they presented criteria of categories 5 or higher on the severity scale. For this analysis, Chi2 test, Fisher's test, Student's test or Wilcoxon test, and binomial logistic regression using NIAID>=5 as dependent variable were performed. Results: A total of 129 PsA patients and 808 with RA were included. Clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. Regarding PsA treatment, 12.4% of PsA were receiving IL-17 inhibitors, 5.4% IL12-23 inhibitors, one patient apremilast and one abatacept. The frequency of NIAID≥5 was comparable between groups (PsA 19.5% vs RA 20.1%;p=0.976). (Figure 1). PsA patients with NIAID≥5 in comparison with NIAID<5 were older (58.6±11.4 vs 50±12.5;p=0.002), had more frequently hypertension (52.2% vs 23%;p=0.011) and dyslipidemia (39.1% vs 15%;p=0.017). In the multivariate analysis, age (OR 1.06;95% CI 1.02-1.11) was associated with a worse outcome of the COVID-19 (NIAID≥5) in patients with PsA, while those who received methotrexate (OR 0.34;95% CI 0.11-0.92) and biological DMARDs (OR 0.28;95% CI 0.09-0.78) had a better outcome. Conclusion: Although PsA patients have a higher frequency of cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities than those with RA, the COVID-19 severity was similar. Most of the patients had mild SARS-CoV-2 infection and a low death rate.
ABSTRACT
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the nasal findings in patients who tested positive for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and objectively evaluate the amount of nasal secretion and nasal clearance. Methods: The study included 40 patients who tested positive and 40 volunteers who tested negative for COVID-19 infection. The self-administered Turkish version of the sinonasal outcome test -22 (SNOT-22) questionnaire was used to evaluate the sinonasal findings, the nasal Schirmer test was used to evaluate the amount of nasal secretion, and the saccharin test was used to evaluate nasal clearance. The results of both groups were compared. Results: The SNOT-22 score averages were 23.3±14.5 and 11.2±11.7 for the COVID-19-positive group and COVID-19-negative controls, respectively. In the COVID-19 positive group, SNOT-22 results were statistically significantly higher than those of the controls (p≤0.001). The nasal Schirmer and nasal saccharin test results in the COVID-19-positive group were statistically significantly higher than those of the controls (p≤0.002 and p≤0.001). Conclusion: In patients who tested positive for COVID-19 infection, increased amounts of nasal secretion and prolonged nasal clearance time were observed. They also had higher SNOT-22 scores than those of the negative controls. Although these findings demonstrate that there may be changes in nasal functions in patients positive for COVID-19 infection, new studies are needed to elucidate the nasal effects in detail.
ABSTRACT
Sudden loss of smell and/or taste has been identified as an early symptom of SARS-CoV-2 2019 (COVID-19) infection, and presents an effective target for prompt self-isolation and reducing community spread. The current study sought to develop and test a novel, rapid, self-administered test to objectively measure smell and taste losses associated with COVID-19, and administered self-report questionnaires to characterise symptoms associated with COVID-19 in Singapore. Participants (N = 99) completed questionnaires to record recent changes in smell and taste ability. This was followed by the 'Singapore Smell and Taste Test' (SSTT), a personal, objective testing kit for daily self-assessment of smell and taste function at their place of residence. Seventy-two recruited participants were confirmed as COVID-19 positive at baseline, of which 58 completed the SSTT at home. Of these, 36.2% had objectively measured smell and/or taste loss. The SSTT measures of smell and taste function were positively associated with participants' self-reported smell and taste acuity, and rated smell intensity of 6 common household items. This study presents the first application of the SSTT as a rapid, cost-effective, objective tool to self-monitor smell and taste function in a residential setting, and ensures comparability across individuals through the use of standardised stimuli. The SSTT has potential for future application in populations with limited access to formal COVID-19 testing as a self-administered objective method to monitor sudden changes in smell and taste, and to prompt early self-isolation, in order to reduce community transmission of COVID-19.