ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The contemporaneous presence of immune defects and heart diseases in patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.3DS) might represent risk factors for severe coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19). OBJECTIVE: To analyze severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outcome in 22q11.2DS patients and immunogenicity of different doses of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. METHODS: Longitudinal observational study on SARS-CoV-2 outcome in 60 adults with 22q11.2DS (March 2020-June 2022). Anti-Spike, and anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) antibody responses, generation of Spike-specific memory B cells (MBCs) and Spike-specific T cells at different time points before and after the mRNA BNT162b2 vaccination were evaluated in 16 22q11.2DS patients. RESULTS: We recorded a 95% rate of vaccination, with almost all patients being immunized with the booster dose. Twenty-one patients had SARS-CoV-2 infection. Three patients were infected before vaccine availability, 6 after receiving 2 doses of vaccine, and 12 after one booster dose. The SARS-CoV-2- infection had a mild course, except in one unvaccinated patient with several comorbidities who died from acute respiratory distress syndrome (fatality rate 5%). Infected patients had more frequently moderate/severe intellectual disability, lymphopenia, and lower CD4+ count. Despite major congenital heart diseases, COVID-19 did not impact cardiological conditions. The BNT162b2 vaccine induced S1-immunoglobulin G (IgG) responses, low serum S1-IgA, and slightly impaired specific MBCs response. Specific T-cell responses observed were related to lymphocytes and CD4+ T cell counts. CONCLUSIONS: The SARS-CoV-2 infection had a mild course in most patients with 22q11.2DS, even in patients with major cardiovascular diseases. Immunization induced Spike-specific IgG responses and generated specific MBCs and memory T cells. The weaker memory responses in patients with lymphopenia suggested the need for additional doses.
ABSTRACT
World Health Organization (WHO) has assessed that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as an epidemic. However, an effective antiviral for COVID-19 is still uncertain. Since the onset of the outbreak, the scientific and clinical community keep proposing many agents that would have efficacy against COVID-19. Arbidol is an indole core with proven effectiveness against influenza over the past few years apart from critics. The concrete hypothesis of arbidol interaction with spike glycoprotein prevents the entry of virus. Further, demonstrated clinical efficiency of arbidol against RNA virus and broad-spectrum inhibition of influenza A and B virus, adenovirus, and other viruses, including hepatitis C virus, drives us to seek more understating of the molecule and its clinical possibilities. In this review, we attempt to describe the many possible hypotheses of arbidol against Covid-19.
ABSTRACT
Background: The two FDA approved mRNA-based SARS-CoV2 vaccines have shown >90% efficacy at preventing COVID and eliciting protective immunity in nearly all healthy individuals. However, the extent of vaccine induced antibody and T cell immunity in immunocompromised patients is not well known. Our study objective is to determine if patients with hematologic malignancies treated with B-cell targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies can mount antibody and T cell immune responses to SARS-CoV2 vaccines. A prospective single-center study to evaluate the SARS-CoV2 immune responses in immunocompromised individuals (COVAX Study) was initiated at University of Pennsylvania following the IRB guidelines. The study enrolled 8 healthy adults,12 patients are in remission after treatment (average of 40.6 months) with CART cells targeting either CD19 or CD19+CD22 and received both doses of SARS-CoV2 vaccine. Methods and Results: Serology to SARS-CoV2 spike-receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG, RBD-IgA, RBD-IgM and spike-specific T cell responses were measured prior to vaccination and serially up to 28 days after booster vaccination. RBD-IgG and RBD-IgA were detected in 8/8 and 7/8 healthy subjects compared to 5/12 and 2/12 CART patients, respectively (Figure A). In the CART cohort, several patients who demonstrated an induction of RBD-IgG (57.2/uL +/- 20.2) compared to those who were RBD-IgG-negative (9/uL +/- 10.1, ANOVA with multiple comparisons test p=0.017) have higher level of circulating B cells. No association was found with time since CART infusion, age, disease type, or vaccine manufacturer. All 8 healthy subjects demonstrated induction of SARS-Cov2 spike-specific CD4 + T cell immunity compared to 7 out of 11 CART patients (Figure B). RBD-IgG responses were not correlated with CD4 + T cell activation (Pearson correlation, R=0.21, p=0.53). Indeed, 3 CART patients demonstrated robust CD4 + T cell activation despite absence of antibody induction. Overall, 8/12 CART patients demonstrated induction of either or both humoral and T cell immune responses. Conclusions: We show that immune responses to SARS-CoV2 mRNA vaccines are induced in majority of patients who have been treated with CART therapies targeting B-cell lineage antigens. Induction of vaccine-specific antibody was strongly associated with the level of circulating B cells. However, in CART cohort patients despite severe humoral immune deficiency, strong CD4 + T cell responses were observed suggestive of a sufficient protective immunity. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Frey: Novartis: Research Funding;Sana Biotechnology: Consultancy;Kite Pharma: Consultancy;Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Garfall: Amgen: Honoraria;CRISPR Therapeutics: Research Funding;GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria;Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding;Novartis: Research Funding;Tmunity: Research Funding. Porter: American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy: Honoraria;Genentech: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months;ASH: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;DeCart: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Kite/Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;National Marrow Donor Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding;Tmunity: Patents & Royalties;Wiley and Sons Publishing: Honoraria. June: AC Immune, DeCART, BluesphereBio, Carisma, Cellares, Celldex, Cabaletta, Poseida, Verismo, Ziopharm: Consultancy;Tmunity, DeCART, BluesphereBio, Carisma, Cellares, Celldex, Cabaletta, Poseida, Verismo, Ziopharm: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company;Novartis: Patents & Royalties.