Assessment of COVID-19-Driven Changes in an Integrated OBGYN-Addiction Treatment Clinic and Future Implications.

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic prompted healthcare delivery changes, but the associated impacts on substance use disorder treatment outcomes among pregnant and parenting people are unknown. This study aims to (1) describe COVID-19-driven clinical practice changes, (2) evaluate clinic-level visit attendance patterns, and (3) compare patient-level treatment engagement outcomes across 3 COVID-19 pandemic phases in an OBGYN-addiction treatment clinic. METHODS: COVID-19 phases include pre-COVID-19 (August 2019-February 2020), early COVID-19 (March-December 2020), and COVID-19 vaccine (January-July 2021). OBGYN-addiction treatment clinical practice changes were summarized. Clinic-level attended medical provider visits were analyzed. Patient-level treatment engagement outcomes (buprenorphine continuation, visit attendance, and virtual visits) were assessed in a cohort of pregnant and parenting people enrolled in a clinic research registry. Mixed-level logistic regression models determined the relationship between the COVID-19 phases and the patient-level outcomes. RESULTS: The study site made several COVID-19-driven clinical practice changes, including implementing a hybrid virtual/in-person system for medical visits. Clinic-level medical provider appointments increased between the first and second COVID-19 phases and remained high in the third phase. Among participants included in patient-level outcome analyses (N = 27), there were no differences in the early COVID-19 phase compared with the pre-COVID-19 phase in buprenorphine continuation, any visits, or medical visits. There was a decrease in all patient-level outcomes in the COVID-19 vaccine phase compared with pre-COVID-19 ( P < 0.05). Virtual visits increased between the first 2 phases and remained high during the third. CONCLUSION: Within our OBGYN-addiction treatment clinic, implementation of tailored, patient-centered treatment strategies supported clinic- and patient-level treatment engagement throughout the pandemic.

Ambulatory Care Pharmacists' Perception of Telehealth Services in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Identifying Barriers and Best Practices for the Older Patient and Beyond.

Background Telehealth practice in the ambulatory care pharmacy setting has seen extensive expansion because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Historically, evaluations of pharmacy-driven telehealth services have shown positive patient outcomes and high patient satisfaction, but little was known about pharmacist provider satisfaction. Additionally, barriers to telehealth practice have been highlighted with the widespread expansion of telehealth. With the push to continue high rates of telehealth use postpandemic, evaluation of current ambulatory care pharmacist telehealth practices is needed. Objective This study aimed to evaluate ambulatory care pharmacists' perception of the telehealth services they provide, including barriers patients experience, solutions to address these barriers, and perceptions of the quality of care provided through telehealth. Methods Ambulatory care pharmacists in Washington State were recruited to participate in a 16-item key informant interview. The Technology Acceptance Model was the theoretical framework applied to the interview questions and used to evaluate common themes emerging from the interviews. Results Common themes from the interviews included positive and negative attributes to telehealth care, pharmacist preferences for a video telehealth platform, technology access and use barriers for patients accessing telehealth, technology support from the provider's organization as an avenue to address these barriers, and patient-specific characteristics allowing high-quality health care through telehealth. Conclusion Using these described common ideals, ambulatory care pharmacist telehealth best practices can be developed, including a personalized approach to this care. As we emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic, actively addressing common barriers as well as successfully identifying appropriate telehealth candidates will be essential in providing high-quality virtual care.

Audio or Video? Access to Pediatric Neurology Outpatient Services Varies by the Type of Telehealth, Especially for Black Children.

BACKGROUND: Children of minority race/ethnicity face barriers to accessing specialty services. During the COVID pandemic, health insurance companies reimbursed telehealth services. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of audio versus video visits on children's access to outpatient neurology services, particularly for Black children. METHODS: Using Electronic Health Record data, we collected information about children who had outpatient neurology appointments in a tertiary care children's hospital in North Carolina from March 10, 2020, to March 9, 2021. We used multivariable models to compare appointment outcomes (canceled vs completed, and missed vs completed) by visit type. We then conducted similar evaluation for the subgroup of Black children. RESULTS: A total of 1250 children accounted for 3829 scheduled appointments. Audio users were more likely to be Black and Hispanic, and to have public health insurance than video users. Adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for appointments completed versus canceled was 10 for audio and 6 for video, compared to in-person appointments. Audio visits were twice as likely as in-person visits to be completed versus missed; video visits were not different. For the subgroup of Black children, aOR for appointments completed versus canceled for audio was 9 and video was 5, compared to in-person appointments. For Black children, audio visits were 3 times as likely as in-person visits to be completed versus missed; video visits were not different. CONCLUSIONS: Audio visits improved access to pediatric neurology services, especially for Black children. Reversal of policies to reimburse audio visits could deepen the socioeconomic divide for children's access to neurology services.

Comparison of Transplant Pharmacist Treatment Decisions Between Telehealth and Clinic Visits.

Introduction: Implementation of telehealth in high-risk patient populations provides opportunities for continuous interactions and has previously been shown to positively impact practice. However, there is a paucity of studies focused on telehealth in the liver transplant population specific to pharmacist care. Project Aim: Describe the importance of transplant pharmacist treatment decisions between telehealth, in-clinic, and asynchronous (eg chart review and electronic message support) visit types. Design: This was a single-center comparative evaluation of adult liver transplant recipients transplanted between May 1, 2020 and October 31, 2020 with a transplant pharmacist visit between May 1, 2020 and November 30, 2020. The primary outcome was the average number of treatment decisions per encounter and the average number of important treatment decisions per encounter. The importance of these treatment decisions was determined by a panel of three clinicians. Results: Twenty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria with 85 in-clinic, 42 telehealth, and 55 asynchronous visits. For all treatment decisions, there was no statistical difference in average number of treatment decisions per encounter between telehealth visits and in-clinic visits with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.822 (95% CI, 0.674-1.000; P = 0.051). Similarly, for important treatment decisions, there was no statistical difference between telehealth visits and in-clinic visits (OR 0.847; 95% CI, 0.642-1.116; P = 0.238). Conclusion: Transplant pharmacists can deliver recommendations with similar importance via telehealth compared to in-clinic visits based on the number of total and important treatment decisions.

Mental distress of physicians in the outpatient care throughout the COVID-19 pandemic: emotional and supportive human relations matter - Cross-sectional results of the VOICE-study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the course of self-reported mental distress and quality of life (QoL) of physicians, working in the outpatient care (POC). Outcomes were compared with a control group of physicians working in the inpatient care (PIC), throughout the Corona Virus Disease (COVID)-19 pandemic. The impact of risk and protective factors in terms of emotional and supportive human relations on mental distress and perceived QoL of POC were of primary interest. METHODS: Within the largest prospective, multi-center survey on mental health of health care workers (HCW), conducted during the first (T1) and second (T2) wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe, we investigated the course of current burden (CB), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-2), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2) and QoL, cross-sectionally, in n = 848 POC (T1: n = 536, T2: n = 312). The primary outcomes were compared with an age- and gender-matchted control group of n = 458 PIC (T1: n = 262, T2: n = 196). COVID-19-, work-related, social risk and protective factors were examined. RESULTS: At T1, POC showed no significant differences with respect to CB, depression, anxiety, and QoL, after Bonferroni correction. Whereas at T2, POC exhibited higher scores of CB (Cohen´s d/ Cd = .934, p < .001), depression (Cd = 1.648, p < 001), anxiety (Cd = 1.745, p < .001), work-family conflict (Cd = 4.170, p < .001) and lower QoL (Cd = .891, p = .002) compared with PIC. Nearly all assessed parameters of burden increased from T1 to T2 within the cohort of POC (e.g. depression: CD = 1.580, p < .001). Risk factors for mental distress of POC throughout the pandemic were: increased work-family conflict (CB: ß = .254, p < .001, 95% CI: .23, .28; PHQ-2: ß = .139, p = .011, 95% CI: .09, .19; GAD-2: ß = .207, p < .001, 95% CI: .16, .26), worrying about the patients´ security (CB: ß = .144, p = .007, 95% CI: .07, .22; PHQ-2: ß = .150, p = .006, 95% CI: .00, .30), fear of triage situations (GAD-2: ß = .132, p = .010, 95% CI: -.04, .31) and burden through restricted social contact in spare time (CB: ß = .146, p = .003, 95% CI: .07, .22; PHQ-2: ß = .187, p < .001, 95% CI: .03, .34; GAD-2: ß = .156, p = .003, 95% CI: -.01, .32). Protective factors for mental distress and QoL were the perceived protection by local authorities (CB: ß = -.302, p < .001, 95% CI: -.39, -.22; PHQ-2: ß = -.190, p < . 001, 95% CI: -.36, -.02; GAD-2: ß = -.211, p < .001, 95% CI: -.40, -.03; QoL: ß = .273, p < .001, 95% CI: .18, .36), trust in colleagues (PHQ-2: ß = -.181, p < .001, 95% CI: -.34, -.02; GAD-2: ß = -.199, p < .001, 95% CI: -.37, -.02; QoL: ß = .124, p = .017, 95% CI: .04, .21) and social support (PHQ-2: ß = -.180, p < .001, 95% CI: -.22, -.14; GAD-2: ß = -.127, p = .014, 95% CI: -.17, -.08; QoL: ß = .211, p < .001, 95% CI: .19, .23). CONCLUSIONS: During the pandemic, the protective role of emotional and supportive human relations on the mental distress and quality of life of POC should be taken into account more thoroughly, both in practice and future research.

Telemedicine medical abortion service in Georgia: an evaluation of a strategy with reduced number of in-Clinic visits.

PURPOSE: To evaluate feasibility and acceptability of a medical abortion service that offers: a telemedicine visit (in place of an in-person visit) during a mandatory waiting period, and at-home follow-up with the use of multi-level pregnancy tests (MLPT). METHODS: Participants were screened for eligibility in clinic, and during the waiting period, received a telephone call to confirm desire to proceed with the service. Participants were mailed a study package containing mifepristone, misoprostol, two multi-level pregnancy tests, and instructions for their use. Follow-up consultation took place by phone to evaluate abortion completeness. The analysis was descriptive. RESULTS: One-hundred twenty-two participants were enrolled in the study, and 120 chose to proceed with the abortion after the waiting period and were sent a study package. One participant was lost to follow up. The majority of participants did not experience problems receiving the study package (94.1%, n = 112), took mifepristone (100%, n = 119), misoprostol (99.2%, n = 118), and MLPTs (99.1%, n = 116) as instructed, and forwent additional clinic visits (91.6%, n = 109). All participants were satisfied with the service. Most participants had a complete abortion without a procedure (95.8%, n = 114). CONCLUSIONS: The adapted telemedicine medical abortion service was feasible and satisfactory to participants and has the potential to make medical abortion more patient-centered where waiting periods are mandated.

Efficacy of Telehealth in Preoperative Pediatric Surgery Consultations.

INTRODUCTION: The Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic created a sudden need to transition outpatient pediatric surgical care to a telehealth platform, allotting little time to study the efficacy of these changes. In particular, the accuracy of telehealth preoperative assessment remains unclear. Therefore, we sought to study the prevalence of errors in diagnosis and procedure cancellations between preoperative in-person evaluations and telehealth evaluations. METHODS: We conducted a single institution, retrospective chart review of perioperative medical records at a tertiary children's hospital over a 2-year period. Data included patient demographics (age, sex, county, primary language, and insurance), preoperative diagnosis, postoperative diagnosis, and surgical cancellation rates. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact and chi-square tests. Alpha was set at 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 523 patients were analyzed, with 445 in-person visits and 78 telehealth visits. There were no demographic differences between the in-person and telehealth cohorts. The frequency of changes from the preoperative to the postoperative diagnosis was not significantly different between in-person preoperative visits and telehealth preoperative visits (0.99% versus 1.41%, P = 0.557). The frequency of case cancellations between the two consultation modalities was not significantly different (9.44% versus 8.97%, P = 0.899). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that preoperative pediatric surgical consultations held via telehealth were neither associated with a decrease in the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis, nor an increased rate of surgery cancellations, compared to those held in-person. Further study is needed to better determine the advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of telehealth in the delivery of pediatric surgical care.

Longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence among Employees in Outpatient Care Services in Hamburg.

The risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection is particularly high for healthcare workers during the pandemic. Home care workers visit many different households per shift. Encounters with mostly elderly patients and their relatives increase the potential for the undetected spread of SARS-CoV-2. In order to gain insight into the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and possible transmission risks in outpatient care, this follow-up study was conducted with nursing services in Hamburg. The aim was to estimate the dynamics of seroprevalence in this occupational group over a 12-month period, to identify occupation-specific risk factors, and to collect information on the vaccination status of the surveyed nursing staff. Antibody testing for SARS-CoV-2 IgG against the S1 domain (EUROIMUN Analyser I® Lübeck, Germany) was performed on participating healthcare workers with patient contact at a total of four time points within one year from July 2020 to October 2021 (baseline, follow-up after three, six and twelve months). The data were mostly analysed descriptively. Differences in IgG titres were analysed using variance analysis methods, particularly Tukey's range test. The seroprevalence was 1.2% (8/678) at baseline and 1.5% (9/581) at the three-month follow-up (T1). At the second follow-up (T2) after six months, vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 was available from January 2021 onwards. The prevalence rate of positive IgG antibodies relative to the S1 domain of the spike protein test among unvaccinated individuals was 6.5%. At (T3) after twelve months (July to October 2021), 482 participants were enrolled, and 85.7% of the workers were considered fully vaccinated at this time point, while 51 individuals were unvaccinated. The prevalence was 13.7% (7/51). In our study, a low seroprevalence was found among home care workers, which was lower than in our studies conducted in the clinical setting. Therefore, it can be assumed that the occupational risk of infection is rather low for both the nursing staff and the patients/clients cared for in the outpatient setting. The good provision of protective equipment and the high vaccination rate of the staff probably had a positive influence.

Evaluation of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health service utilization in China: A study using auto-regressive integrated moving average model.

Background: The outbreak of COVID-19 in early 2020 presented a major challenge to the healthcare system in China. This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on health services utilization in China in 2020. Methods: Health service-related data for this study were extracted from the China Health Statistical Yearbook. The Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average model (ARIMA) was used to forecast the data for the year 2020 based on trends observed between 2010 and 2019. The differences between the actual 2020 values reported in the statistical yearbook and the forecast values from the ARIMA model were used to assess the impact of COVID-19 on health services utilization. Results: In 2020, the number of admissions and outpatient visits in China declined by 17.74 and 14.37%, respectively, compared to the ARIMA model's forecast values. Notably, public hospitals experienced the largest decrease in outpatient visits and admissions, of 18.55 and 19.64%, respectively. Among all departments, the pediatrics department had the greatest decrease in outpatient visits (35.15%). Regarding geographical distribution, Beijing and Heilongjiang were the regions most affected by the decline in outpatient visits (29.96%) and admissions (43.20%) respectively. Conclusion: The study's findings suggest that during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, one in seven outpatient services and one in six admissions were affected in China. Therefore, there is an urgent need to establish a green channel for seeking medical treatment without spatial and institutional barriers during epidemic prevention and control periods.

Remote consultations: review of guiding themes for equitable and effective delivery.

The global coronavirus disease (COVID) -19 pandemic has led to a rapid transformation in the ways in which outpatient care is delivered. The need to minimise the risk of viral infection and transmission through social distancing resulted in the widespread adoption of remote consultations, traditional face-to-face appointments ceasing almost overnight in many specialties. The transition to remote consultations had taken place far faster than anticipated and under crisis conditions. As we work towards the "new normal", remote consultations have become an integral part of outpatient provision in secondary care. Adapting to this change in clinical practice requires a judicious approach to ongoing service development to ensure safe, effective, and equitable care for all patients. Medical societies have provided some initial guidance around effective delivery. In this article we discuss the potential benefits, limitations, types of remote consultations, and factors that require consideration when deciding on patient suitability for remote consultation in a hospital setting. We use cardiology as a specialty exemplar, although many of the principles will be equally applicable to other medical specialties.

Evaluating the impact of a virtual outpatient care programme in preventing hospitalizations, emergency department visits and mortality for patients with COVID-19: a matched cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of virtual care in preventing unnecessary healthcare visits for patients with SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective matched cohort study, evaluating the COVID-19 Expansion to Outpatients (COVIDEO) programme involving virtual assessments for all positive patients in the Sunnybrook assessment centre from January 2020 to June 2021, followed by risk-stratified routine follow-up, couriering of oxygen saturation devices, and 24 hour/day direct-to-physician pager for urgent questions. We linked COVIDEO data to province-wide datasets, matching each eligible COVIDEO patient to ≤10 other Ontario SARS-CoV-2 patients on age, sex, neighbourhood, and date. The primary outcome was emergency department (ED) visit, hospitalization or death within 30 days. Multivariable regression accounted for comorbidities, vaccination, and pre-pandemic healthcare utilization. RESULTS: Among 6508 eligible COVIDEO patients, 4763 (73.1%) were matched to ≥1 non-COVIDEO patient. COVIDEO care was protective against the primary composite outcome (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.91, 95% CI, 0.82-1.02), with a reduction in ED visits (7.8% vs. 9.6%; aOR 0.79, 95% CI, 0.70-0.89), but increase in hospitalizations (3.8% vs. 2.7%, aOR 1.37, 95% CI, 1.14-1.63) reflecting more direct-to-ward admissions (1.3% vs. 0.2%, p < 0.0001). Results were similar when matched comparators were limited to patients who had not received virtual care elsewhere with a decrease in ED visits (7.8 vs. 8.6%, aOR 0.86, 95% CI, 0.75-0.99) and an increase in hospitalizations (3.7 vs. 2.4%, aOR 1.45, 95% CI, 1.17-1.80). DISCUSSION: An intensive remote care programme can prevent unnecessary ED visits and facilitate direct-to-ward hospitalizations and thereby mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on the healthcare system.

Persistent Disparities in Pediatric Health Care Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted traditional health care, including pediatric health care. We described the impact of the pandemic on disparities in pediatric health care engagement. METHODS: Using a population-based cross-sectional time-series design, we compared monthly ambulatory care visit volume and completion rates (completed vs no-show and cancelled visits) among pediatric patients aged 0-21 years in 4 states in the mid-Atlantic United States during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020-February 2021) with the same period before the pandemic (March 2019-February 2020). We used unadjusted odds ratios, stratified by visit type (telehealth or in-person) and sociodemographic characteristics (child race and ethnicity, caregiver primary language, geocoded Child Opportunity Index, and rurality). RESULTS: We examined 1 556 548 scheduled ambulatory care visits for a diverse pediatric patient population. Visit volume and completion rates (mean, 70.1%) decreased during the first months of the pandemic but returned to prepandemic levels by June 2020. Disparities in in-person visit completion rates among non-Hispanic Black versus non-Hispanic White patients (64.9% vs 74.3%), patients from socioeconomically disadvantaged versus advantaged communities as measured by Child Opportunity Index (65.8% vs 76.4%), and patients in rural versus urban neighborhoods (66.0% vs 70.8%) were the same during the remainder of the first year of the pandemic as compared with the previous year. Concurrent with large increases in telehealth (0.5% prepandemic, 19.0% during the pandemic), telehealth completion rates increased. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in pediatric visit completion rates that existed before the pandemic persisted during the pandemic. These findings underscore the need for culturally tailored practices to reduce disparities in pediatric health care engagement.

Does the Doctor-Patient Relationship Affect Enrollment in Clinical Research?

PURPOSE: Recruiting patients for clinical research is challenging, especially for underrepresented populations, and may be influenced by patients' relationships with their physicians, care experiences, and engagement with care. This study sought to understand predictors of enrollment in a research study among socioeconomically diverse participants in studies of care models that promote continuity in the doctor-patient relationship. METHOD: A study of the effects of vitamin D levels and supplementation on COVID-19 risk and outcomes was implemented from 2020 to 2022 within 2 studies of care models at the University of Chicago that promoted continuity of inpatient and outpatient care from the same physician. Hypothesized predictors of vitamin D study enrollment included patient-reported measures of the care experience (quality of relationship with the doctor and their staff, timely receipt of care), engagement in care (scheduling and completing outpatient visits), and engagement with these "parent" studies (follow-up survey completion). The authors used univariate tests and multivariable logistic regression to examine the association of these predictors with enrollment in the vitamin D study among participants in the parent study intervention arms. RESULTS: Among 773 eligible participants, 351/561 (63%) in the parent study intervention arms enrolled in the vitamin D study, versus 35/212 (17%) in the control arms. Among intervention arm participants, vitamin D study enrollment was not associated with reported quality of communication with or trust in the doctor, or helpful/respectful office staff, but was associated with report of receiving timely care, more completed clinic visits, and higher parent study follow-up survey completion. CONCLUSIONS: Study enrollment may be high in care models with high levels of continuity in the doctor-patient relationship. Rates of clinic involvement, parent study engagement, and experience of receiving timely access to care may better predict enrollment than quality of the doctor-patient relationship.

Changes in clinic visits and diabetes and metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes during COVID-19 pandemic: A real world evidence.

PURPOSE: The study aim was to evaluate the effects of public lockdown during the covid-19 pandemic on glucose and metabolic parameters as well as body weight control in type 2 diabetic patients. METHODS: This study was conducted in two outpatient Diabetes Clinics and analyzed data available in database of Diabetes Clinic. Data related to a year before covid-19 pandemic and a year during covid-19 pandemic was collected from the database and analyzed. Patients with type 2 diabetes included in the analysis if they had referred to Diabetes Clinics both before and during covid-19 pandemic. Demographic information and data about metabolic status were collected from the records of previous outpatient Clinic visits and compared RESULTS: Finally 9440 patients with mean age of 61.08 ± 11.62 referred to Diabetes Clinics in both the year before and the year of the corona pandemic. Mean FBS and HbA1c in diabetes patients reduced significantly from 155.37 ± 62.93 and 7.97 ± 1.74 before pandemic, respectively to 138.77 ± 45.39 and 7.54 ± 1.34, respectively during covid-19 outbreak. During covid-19 pandemic, all metabolic parameters including glycemic and lipid profile (except for triglyceride) and BMI (body mass index) reduced significantly statistically, but, these changes were not clinically significant. However, triglyceride level increased statistically significantly but again it was not significant clinically. CONCLUSION: During COVID-19 lockdown, glycemic and metabolic control of diabetes patients have improved significantly except for triglycerides.

Increasing capacity in acute day care settings: patients' experiences of a pop-up day care unit.

The COVID-19 pandemic had considerable impact on paediatric ambulatory care. A pop-up paediatric day care unit for children with allergic and inflammatory bowel diseases was delivered from Nightingale Hospital Bristol (NHB) which was set up to treat patients during the pandemic. METHODOLOGY: The unit operated fortnightly between December 2020 and March 2021. Family feedback on the service was collated via an online survey. RESULTS: 72 respondents found NHB acceptable; 70 (97%) would be happy to return; 63 (90.3%) preferred the NHB to attending Bristol Royal Hospital for Children or had no preference for their appointments. Positive comments focused on service organisation and clinical environment. Families valued the availability of the close, free parking. The minimal negative comments related to travel directions, lack of catering facilities and the small number of toilets. CONCLUSION: The pop-up service model was highly acceptable to families. This highlights the need for appropriate hospital services to explore similar initiatives beyond traditional healthcare settings in order to ensure that the provision of equitable health care is in line with the NHS Long Term Plan.

Patterns of utilisation of specialist care after SARS-Cov-2 infection: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the pattern of health services utilisation of people who had had a documented SARS-Cov-2 infection. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: The Italian province of Reggio Emilia. PARTICIPANTS: 36 036 subjects who recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection during the period September 2020-May 2021. These were matched for age, sex and Charlson Index with an equal number of subjects never found positive at the SARS-Cov-2 swab test over the study period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital admissions for all medical conditions and for respiratory or cardiovascular conditions only; access to emergency room (for any cause); outpatient specialist visits (pneumology, cardiology, neurology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, rheumatology, dermatology, mental health) and overall cost of care. RESULTS: Within a median follow-up time of 152 days (range 1-180), previous exposure to SARS-Cov-2 infection was always associated with higher probability of needing access to hospital or ambulatory care, except for dermatology, mental health and gastroenterology specialist visits. Post-COVID subjects with Charlson Index≥1 were hospitalised more frequently for heart disease and for non-surgical reasons than subjects with Charlson index=0, whereas the opposite occurred for hospitalisations for respiratory diseases and pneumology visits. A previous SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with 27% higher cost of care compared with people never infected. The difference in cost was more evident among those with Charlson Index>1. Subjects who had anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination had lower probability of falling in the highest cost quartile. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reflect the burden of post-COVID sequelae, providing some specific insight on their impact on the extra-use of health services according to patients' characteristics and vaccination status. Vaccination is associated with lower cost of care following SARS-CoV-2 infection, highlighting the favourable impact of vaccines on the use of health services even when they do not prevent infection.