Tracking clinical resources for coronavirus disease 2019.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Assimilating and disseminating information during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been challenging. The purpose of this review is to identify specific threats to the validity of the COVID-19 literature and to recommend resources for practicing rheumatologists and their patients. RECENT FINDINGS: The COVID-19 literature has rapidly expanded and includes 17 998 publications through May of 2020, 1543 of which also address rheumatic disease-related topics. Specific obstacles to acquiring high-quality information have arisen, including 'pandemic research exceptionalism' and a 'parallel pandemic' of misinformation. Unique challenges to rheumatologists include specific interest in antirheumatic disease therapies and a paucity of rheumatology-specific information. Patients with rheumatic diseases have faced shortages of critical medications and a lack of information tailored to their health conditions and medications. SUMMARY: We recommend rheumatologists develop a system to acquire high-quality information and offer guiding principles for triaging specific resources, which include relevance, accessibility, credibility, timeliness, and trustworthiness. The same principles can be applied to selecting patient oriented resources. Specific trustworthy resources are recommended.

Influenza outcomes in patients with inflammatory joint diseases and DMARDs: how do they compare to those of COVID-19?

OBJECTIVES: To estimate absolute and relative risks for seasonal influenza outcomes in patients with inflammatory joint diseases (IJDs) and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). To contextualise recent findings on corresponding COVID-19 risks. METHODS: Using Swedish nationwide registers for this cohort study, we followed 116 989 patients with IJD and matched population comparators across four influenza seasons (2015-2019). We quantified absolute risks of hospitalisation and death due to influenza, and compared IJD to comparators via Cox regression. We identified 71 556 patients with IJD on active treatment with conventional synthetic DMARDs and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs)/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (tsDMARDs) at the start of each influenza season, estimated risks for the same outcomes and compared these risks across DMARDs via Cox regression. RESULTS: Per season, average risks for hospitalisation listing influenza were 0.25% in IJD and 0.1% in the general population, corresponding to a crude HR of 2.38 (95% CI 2.21 to 2.56) that decreased to 1.44 (95% CI 1.33 to 1.56) following adjustments for comorbidities. For death listing influenza, the corresponding numbers were 0.015% and 0.006% (HR=2.63, 95% CI 1.93 to 3.58, and HR=1.46, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.01). Absolute risks for influenza outcomes were half (hospitalisation) and one-tenth (death) of those for COVID-19, but relative estimates comparing IJD to the general population were similar. CONCLUSIONS: In absolute terms, COVID-19 in IJD outnumbers that of average seasonal influenza, but IJD entails a 50%-100% increase in risk for hospitalisation and death for both types of infections, which is largely dependent on associated comorbidities. Overall, bDMARDs/tsDMARDs do not seem to confer additional risk for hospitalisation or death related to seasonal influenza.

Real-world experience of rituximab biosimilar GP2013 in rheumatoid arthritis patients naïve to or switched from reference rituximab.

Randomized controlled trials showed high comparability of biosimilar rituximab (bs-RTX) GP2013 to biologic originator RTX (bo-RTX). Data on effectiveness of switching from bo-RTX to bs-RTX, starting therapy with bs-RTX, and bs-RTX drug survival in real-world setting are sparse. To explore long-term drug effectiveness and survival of bs-RTX GP2013 in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients both naïve to and mandatory switched from bo-RTX, and to clarify reasons for treatment cessation. Retrospective observational cohort study including RA outpatient clinic patients treated with bs-RTX between 2018 and 2021 in Norway. Patients were examined and monitored using recommended measures for disease activity and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). For description of population medians and interquartile range were used. Difference between observation times was assessed with Signed-Rank test, drug survival with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Reasons for discontinuation were ascertained. Among 110 patients, at baseline, 88 were mandatory switched from bo-RTX and 22 were RTX-naïve. During 2-year follow-up, disease activity and PROs measures remained stable in switchers subgroup and improved in subgroup starting bs-RTX for the first time. Overall drug survival was 80.0% after 1 year and 57.7% after 2 years and was significantly higher in bs-RTX-switched than in bs-RTX-naïve patients (p = 0.036). Two most frequently reported reasons for drug discontinuation were remission (38.6%) and doctor's decision (27.1%). RA patients treated with bs-RTX had satisfactory treatment response and drug retention rates which supports equivalence of bs-RTX GP2013 to bo-RTX, both in patients naïve to and mandatory switched from bo-RTX.

The impact of immunomodulating treatment on the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases compared to healthy controls. A Swedish nationwide study (COVID19-REUMA).

OBJECTIVES: To elucidate antibody responses after the second and third dose of COVID-19 vaccine in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) treated with biologic/targeted disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/ts DMARDs). METHODS: Antibody levels to antigens representing spike full length protein and spike S1 were measured before vaccination, 2-12 weeks after the second dose, before and after the third dose using multiplex bead-based serology assay. Positive antibody response was defined as antibody levels over cut off (seropositivity) in seronegative individuals or ≥ 4-fold increase in antibodies in individuals seropositive for both spike proteins. RESULTS: Patients (n = 414) receiving b/ts DMARDs (283 had arthritis, 75 systemic vasculitis and 56 other autoimmune diseases) and controls (n = 61) from five Swedish regions participated. Treatments groups were: rituximab (n = 145); abatacept (n = 22); Interleukin 6 receptor inhibitors [IL6i (n = 79)]; JAnus Kinase Inhibitors [JAKi (n = 58)], Tumour Necrosis Factor inhibitor [TNFi (n = 68)] and Interleukin12/23/17 inhibitors [IL12/23/17i (n = 42)]. Percentage of patients with positive antibody response after two doses was significantly lower in rituximab (33,8%) and abatacept (40,9%) (p < 0,001) but not in IL12/23/17i, TNFi or JAKi groups compared to controls (80,3%). Higher age, rituximab treatment and shorter time between last rituximab course and vaccination predicted impaired antibody response. Antibody levels collected 21-40 weeks after second dose decreased significantly (IL6i: p = 0,02; other groups: p < 0,001) compared to levels at 2-12 week but most participants remained seropositive. Proportion of patients with positive antibody response increased after third dose but was still significantly lower in rituximab (p < 0,001). CONCLUSIONS: Older individuals and patients on maintenance rituximab have an impaired response after two doses of COVID-19 vaccine which improves if the time between last rituximab course and vaccination extends and also after an additional vaccine dose. Rituximab patients should be prioritized for booster vaccine doses. TNFi, JAKi and IL12/23/17i does not diminished humoral response to primary and an additional vaccination.

The role of immunomodulatory medications in the treatment of COVID-19.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Given the role of inflammation in severe forms of COVID-19, glucocorticoids and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have been assessed as potential COVID-19 therapies. RECENT FINDINGS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that glucocorticoids reduce mortality in severe COVID-19. RCTs of DMARDs have shown mixed results varying on intervention and inclusion criteria. DMARDs, including colchicine or biologic agents, may improve COVID-19 outcomes in specific patient populations. SUMMARY: Glucocorticoids are an effective treatment for the management of severe COVID-19. Further studies are needed to better define the patient populations who could benefit from DMARD use, as well as provide guidance regarding the timing of these interventions.

COVID-19 and rheumatoid arthritis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) face unique challenges during the pandemic, including concerns regarding infection risk, drug shortages, limited access to care, social isolation, and mental health. This review will examine the multifaceted impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients living with RA. RECENT FINDINGS: In patients with RA, risk factors for severe COVID-19 outcomes include older age and comorbidities, similar to those in the general population. Glucocorticoids, but not other classes of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), appear to be associated with a higher risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes. RA patients have been affected by changes in access to care, telemedicine, drug shortages, anxiety, and social isolation, which may contribute to disease flares. SUMMARY: Glucocorticoids, but not other DMARDs, are associated with a higher risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes in RA patients. Further studies are needed to explore the impact of specific DMARDs on COVID-19 outcomes, understand the broader implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on RA disease activity, and optimize the use of telemedicine in RA management.

Antibody response to the COVID-19 ChAdOx1nCov-19 and BNT162b vaccines after temporary suspension of DMARD therapy in immune-mediated inflammatory disease: an extension study (RESCUE 2).

The persistence of immunogenicity in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) on disease-modifying antirheumatic therapy (DMARD) has been less well studied. This extension study evaluates the SARS-CoV2 antibody decay kinetics 6 months following two doses of ChAdO1nCov-19 (AZ) and BNT162b (Pfizer) and subsequent response following an mRNA booster. RESULTS: 175 participants were included. Six months after initial AZ vaccination, 87.5%, 85.4% and 79.2% (p=0.756) in the withhold, continue and control groups remained seropositive compared with 91.4%, 100% and 100% (p=0.226), respectively, in the Pfizer group. Both vaccine groups developed robust humoral immune responses following a booster with seroconversion rates being 100% for all three intervention categories. The mean SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels were significantly lower in the targeted synthetic DMARD (tsDMARD) group that continued therapy compared with the control (2.2 vs 4.8 U/mL, p=0.010). The mean time interval until loss of protective antibodies in the IMID group was 61 days for the AZ and 137.5 days for the Pfizer vaccine. Within each DMARD class the interval until loss of protective antibody titres in the csDMARD, bDMARD and tsDMARD groups were 68.3, 71.8 and 64.0 days in the AZ group and 185.5, 137.5 and 116.0 days in the Pfizer group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Antibody persistence was longer in the Pfizer group due to a higher peak antibody level following second vaccination with levels of protection in IMID on DMARD therapy similar to controls except in those on tsDMARDs where it was lower. A third mRNA vaccine booster can restore immunity in all groups.

Approaches to optimising access to NICE-approved biologic anti-TNFs for patients with rheumatoid arthritis with moderately active disease.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that is associated with joint pain and stiffness. Biologics represent some of the most effective treatments for RA, but previous guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has limited their use to patients with severely active disease. This has meant patients with moderately active RA have been treated as if they have an acceptable disease state, despite many cases where the inflammation has a major impact on joint damage, mobility, pain and quality of life. However, recent guideline changes (NICE TA715) have approved the use of three biologics - adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab - for the treatment of moderately active RA. MAIN BODY: In response to these changes, we have held discussions with medical teams from across the UK to consider the main implications for implementation of these new recommendations, as well as any differences in approach that may exist at a local level. Several key challenges were identified. These included establishing methods of educating both physicians and patients concerning the new availability of the biologic treatments, with suggestions of various organisations that could be approached to circulate informative material. Identifying which patients with moderately active RA stand to benefit was another discussion topic. Relying solely on scoring systems like Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints (DAS28) was acknowledged to have limitations, and alternative complementary approaches such as ultrasound, as well as assessing a patient's co-morbidities, could also be useful tools in determining those who could benefit from biologics. An additional challenge for the process of patient identification has been the increase in the use of telemedicine consultations in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. More use of patient-reported outcomes was raised as one possible solution, and the importance of maintaining up-to-date databases on patient disease scores and treatment history was also stressed. CONCLUSION: While challenges exist in education and identifying patients who may benefit from the use of biologics, the NICE TA715 recommendations hold great potential in addressing an unmet need for the treatment of moderate RA.

Accelerated waning of immune responses to a third COVID-19 vaccination in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.

BACKGROUND: A 3rd COVID-19 vaccination is currently recommended for patients under immunosuppression. However, a fast decline of antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein has been observed. Currently it remains unclear whether immunosuppressive therapy affects kinetics of humoral and cellular immune responses. METHODS: 50 patients under immunosuppression and 42 healthy controls (HCs) received a 3rd dose of an mRNA-based vaccine and were monitored over a 12-weeks period. Humoral immune response was assessed 4 and 12 weeks after 3rd dose. Antibodies were quantified using the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike immunoassay against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein. SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses were quantified by IFN-γ ELISpot assays. Adverse events, including SARS-CoV-2 infections, were monitored over a 12-week period. RESULTS: At week 12, reduced anti-RBD antibody levels were observed in IMID patients as compared to HCs (median antibody level 5345 BAU/ml [1781-10,208] versus 9650 BAU/ml [6633-16,050], p < 0.001). Reduction in relative antibody levels was significantly higher in IMID patients as compared to HCs at week 12 (p < 0.001). Lowest anti-RBD antibody levels were detected in IMID patients who received biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or a combination therapy with conventional synthetic and biological DMARDs. Number of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells against wildtype and Omicron variants remained stable over 12 weeks in IMID patients. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Due to a fast decline in anti-RBD antibodies in IMID patients an early 4th vaccination should be considered in this vulnerable group of patients.

Humoral and cellular immune responses in persons with rheumatoid arthritis after a third dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.

OBJECTIVE: Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) that treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may reduce immune responses to COVID-19 vaccination. We compared humoral and cell-mediated immunity before and after a 3rd dose of mRNA COVID vaccine in RA subjects. METHODS: RA patients that received 2 doses of mRNA vaccine enrolled in an observational study in 2021 before receiving a 3rd dose. Subjects self-reported holding or continuing DMARDs. Blood samples were collected pre- and 4 weeks after the 3rd dose. 50 healthy controls provided blood samples. Humoral response was measured with in-house ELISA assays for anti-Spike IgG (anti-S) and anti-receptor binding domain IgG (anti-RBD). T cell activation was measured after stimulation with SARS-CoV-2 peptide. Spearman's correlations assessed the relationship between anti-S, anti-RBD, and frequencies of activated T cells. RESULTS: Among 60 subjects, mean age was 63 years and 88% were female. 57% of subjects held at least 1 DMARD around the 3rd dose. 43% (anti-S) and 62% (anti-RBD) had a normal humoral response at week 4, defined as ELISA within 1 standard deviation of the healthy control mean. No differences in antibody levels were observed based on holding DMARDs. Median frequency of activated CD4 T cells was significantly greater post- vs. pre-3rd dose. Changes in antibody levels did not correlate with change in frequency of activated CD4 T cells. CONCLUSION: Virus-specific IgG levels significantly increased in RA subjects using DMARDs after completing the primary vaccine series, though fewer than two-thirds achieved a humoral response like healthy controls. Humoral and cellular changes were not correlated.

Effectiveness and safety of generic tofacitinib in spondyloarthritis: A real-world retrospective analysis from India.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trial evidence demonstrates the efficacy of tofacitinib in ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Real-world data from spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients are scarce; there are few reports of its effectiveness and safety from low- to middle-income countries like India, despite its widespread usage. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of clinical and laboratory records of 100 patients with SpA prescribed generic tofacitinib from a single center in Mumbai, India. Disease activity was measured using the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score C-Reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP) in all patients, along with disease-specific outcome measures in the subgroups. We used paired t test for response to tofacitinib. We compared Δ ASDAS-CRP in patients with active peripheral arthritis and in patients without. We defined clinical tofacitinib failure as the physician's decision to change or add a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD), and performed logistic regression to identify factors associated with tofacitinib failure. RESULTS: Among 100 patients (71 male, median age 42.5 years), 57 had axial SpA, 10 had peripheral SpA, 4 had inflammatory bowel disease-SpA and 29 had PsA. One-third had received biologic DMARDs previously. Patients received tofacitinib for a median of 192 days. There was a significant improvement in ASDAS-CRP in all types of SpA. Patients with active peripheral arthritis had a significantly greater fall in ASDAS-CRP. There were no serious adverse events, 19 patients had mild COVID-19; no patient had tuberculosis. Ten patients had tofacitinib failure; no baseline parameter could predict failure. INTERPRETATION: In the real-world setting, generic tofacitinib showed good effectiveness and tolerable safety profile in Indian patients with SpA.

Predictors of low spike antibody response in patients with systemic rheumatic disease after an initial course of COVID-19 vaccination.

BACKGROUND: Patients with rheumatic disease may mount a suboptimal serologic response to COVID-19 vaccination. We evaluated predictors of low antibody response in a clinic-based cohort. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study using electronic health record (EHR) data at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. Patients with systemic rheumatic disease that had SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody (Ab) tested using the Roche Elecsys immunoassay, February-August 2021, after 2 doses of mRNA vaccine or 1 dose of adenovirus vector vaccine were identified. Demographics, systemic rheumatic disease, vaccination dates, and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were extracted. The primary outcome was low spike Ab (≤ 200 U/mL). Logistic regression models estimated predictors of low spike Ab. RESULTS: Among 382 patients, the mean age was 57 years, 77% were female, and 37% had low spike Ab. Older age (OR 1.03, 95% CI [1.02, 1.05]), SLE (OR 4.81 [2.08, 8.43], reference: inflammatory arthritis), prednisone (OR 1.67 [1.03, 2.74]), and rituximab (OR 22.91 [9.85, 53.29]) were significantly associated with higher odds of low spike Ab. Use of csDMARD monotherapy (OR 0.12 [0.04, 0.33]) and JAK inhibitors (OR 0.41 [0.18, 0.92]) were associated with significantly lower odds for low spike Ab. After adjusting for systemic rheumatic disease and DMARDs, SLE and rituximab remained significantly associated with low spike Ab. CONCLUSIONS: Over a third of patients with systemic rheumatic disease with spike Ab tested in routine care had low spike Ab after 2 doses of mRNA or 1 dose of adenovirus vector COVID-19 vaccine. SLE and rituximab were significant risk factors for low spike Ab. KEY POINTS: • More than one-third of patients with systemic rheumatic disease that had spike Ab tested in routine care had low spike Ab after 2 doses of mRNA or 1 dose of adenovirus vector COVID-19 vaccine. • Diagnosis of SLE, use of prednisone, and use of rituximab were significantly associated with greater odds of low spike antibodies. • These data underscore the importance of additional doses of COVID-19 vaccine and prophylactic Evusheld in immunosuppressed patients with systemic rheumatic disease as recommended by the US Centers for Disease Control.

Comparative Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines Against COVID-19 Infection Among Patients With Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases on Immunomodulatory Medications.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of mRNA vaccines (BNT162b2 vs mRNA-1273) against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection among patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) on immunomodulatory medications. METHODS: We identified patients with SARDs being treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and/or glucocorticoids in the Mass General Brigham healthcare system who received either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 as their initial vaccine series. Patients were followed until positive SARS-CoV-2 test, death, or February 22, 2022. We compared the risk of breakthrough infection between BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccine recipients using time-stratified, overlap propensity score (PS)-weighted Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: We identified 9838 patients with SARDs who received BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar in both groups after overlap weighting: mean age 61 years, 75% female, 52% with rheumatoid arthritis, 74% receiving conventional synthetic DMARDs, and 43% receiving biologic DMARDs. Of 5516 BNT162b2 and 4322 mRNA-1273 recipients, 446 and 329 had a breakthrough infection, respectively. The corresponding time-stratified PS-weighted rate difference of breakthrough infection was 0.71 (95% CI -0.70 to 2.12) per 1000 person-months with a weighted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.12 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.39). When follow-up was censored prior to the Omicron wave, there was a trend toward higher breakthrough risk with BNT162b2 vs mRNA-1273 (weighted HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.98). CONCLUSION: Among patients with SARDs, the risk of breakthrough COVID-19 infection is similar after receiving either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273. Patients with SARDs initiating the vaccine series should be encouraged to receive whichever mRNA vaccine is available.

Possible relationship between hydroxychloroquine and electrocardiographic and echocardiographic abnormalities in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases--a monocentric study.

OBJECTIVE: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is used in the treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases and is considered a safe drug. The role of HCQ in the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted some deleterious cardiac effects of HCQ. We aim to evaluate the prevalence and development of cardiac-adverse events in HCQ-treated patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study where patients aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of inflammatory rheumatic disease currently exposed or not to hydroxychloroquine underwent electrocardiogram (ECG) and echocardiogram. Comparisons between groups were evaluated using chi-square, t test, and Mann-Whitney U test. Logistic regression was performed to determine predictors of changes in ECG and echocardiography. RESULTS: Eighty patients were included, 75 (93.8%) female, aged 52 ± 13 years. ECG changes were seen in higher proportion in patients with hypertension (40.6% vs 12.5%, p = .004) and higher median potassium levels-4.5 (4.1-4.8) versus 4.2 (4.0-4.4), p = .023. Echocardiography changes were seen in older patients (59 ± 11 vs 50 ± 13 years, p = .003) and in patients with higher cumulative dose-1752 (785-2190) versus 438 (328-1022) g, p = 0.008 - and time of exposure to HCQ - 12 (6-15) versus 4 (2-9) years, p = 0.028. HCQ cumulative dose (OR 1.001, CI95% 1.000-1.002, p = .033) and exposure time (OR 1.136, CI95% 1.000-1.289, p = .049) were predictors of echocardiography changes, but when adjusted for age, neither HCQ cumulative dose nor exposure time were predictors of echocardiography changes. CONCLUSION: No association was found between changes in ECG and echocardiogram in patients under HCQ, which remains a safe drug in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases.