ABSTRACT
COVID-19, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, initially identified as a respiratory illness, has increasingly been linked to a broader range of organ complications. This systematic review explores the impact of COVID-19 on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular health, focusing on thromboembolic events in post-COVID patients. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar databases up to July 2023, utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies meeting eligibility criteria were analyzed for outcomes and associations between COVID-19 and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. The review includes 6 studies involving over 12 million patients, demonstrating a strong connection between COVID-19 and elevated risks of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular thromboembolic events. The risk of these events is evident in conditions such as ischemic heart disease, stroke, and cardiac arrhythmias. The burden of these events beyond the acute phase of the disease is concerning, warranting further exploration of long-term implications. Variability in event rates among different cohorts and healthcare settings underscores the need for understanding underlying factors influencing these differences. Potential mechanisms behind these events include endothelial dysfunction, systemic inflammation, and viral invasion. Implications for public health policies, clinical guidelines, and future research directions are discussed. This review serves as a valuable resource for healthcare providers, policymakers, and researchers to enhance patient care, outcomes, and preparedness for future waves of COVID-19 infections. However, there remain unexplored aspects of the COVID-19 and thromboembolic events relationship, urging further investigations into mechanistic insights and potential therapeutic interventions.
Subject(s)
Ischemia , Respiratory Insufficiency , Stroke , Inflammation , Thromboembolism , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome , COVID-19 , Arrhythmias, Cardiac , Heart DiseasesABSTRACT
ImportanceThe overall effects of vaccination on the risk of cardiac, and venous and arterial thromboembolic complications following COVID-19 remain unclear. ObjectiveWe studied the association between COVID-19 vaccination and the risk of acute and subacute COVID-19 cardiac and thromboembolic complications. DesignMultinational staggered cohort study, based on national vaccination campaign rollouts. SettingNetwork study using electronic health records from primary care records from the UK, primary care data linked to hospital data from Spain, and national insurance claims from Estonia. ParticipantsAll adults with a prior medical history of [≥]180 days, with no history of COVID-19 or previous COVID-19 vaccination at the beginning of vaccine rollout were eligible. ExposureVaccination status was used as a time-varying exposure. Vaccinated individuals were classified by vaccine brand according to the first dose received. Main OutcomesPost COVID-19 complications including myocarditis, pericarditis, arrhythmia, heart failure (HF), venous (VTE) and arterial thromboembolism (ATE) up to 1 year after SARS-CoV-2 infection. MeasuresPropensity Score overlap weighting and empirical calibration based on negative control outcomes were used to minimise bias due to observed and unobserved confounding, respectively. Fine-Gray models were fitted to estimate sub-distribution Hazard Ratios (sHR) for each outcome according to vaccination status. Random effect meta-analyses were conducted across staggered cohorts and databases. ResultsOverall, 10.17 million vaccinated and 10.39 million unvaccinated people were included. Vaccination was consistently associated with reduced risks of acute (30-day) and subacute post COVID-19 VTE and HF: e.g., meta-analytic sHR 0.34 (95%CI, 0.27-0.44) and 0.59 (0.50-0.70) respectively for 0-30 days, sHR 0.58 (0.48 - 0.69) and 0.71 (0.59 - 0.85) respectively for 90-180 days post COVID-19. Additionally, reduced risks of ATE, myocarditis/pericarditis and arrhythmia were seen, but mostly in the acute phase (0-30 days post COVID-19). ConclusionsCOVID-19 vaccination reduced the risk of post COVID-19 complications, including cardiac and thromboembolic outcomes. These effects were more pronounced for acute (1-month) post COVID-19 outcomes, consistent with known reductions in disease severity following breakthrough vs unvaccinated SARS-CoV-2 infection. RelevanceThese findings highlight the importance of COVID-19 vaccination to prevent cardiovascular outcomes after COVID-19, beyond respiratory disease. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSWhat is the impact of COVID-19 vaccination to prevent cardiac complications and thromboembolic events following a SARS-CoV-2 infection? FindingsResults from this multinational cohort study showed that COVID-19 vaccination reduced risk for acute and subacute COVID-19 heart failure, as well as venous and arterial thromboembolic events following SARS-CoV-2 infection. MeaningThese findings highlight yet another benefit of vaccination against COVID-19, and support the recommendations for COVID-19 vaccination even in people at high cardiovascular risk.
Subject(s)
Pericarditis , Thromboembolism , Venous Thromboembolism , COVID-19 , Arrhythmias, Cardiac , Cardiovascular Diseases , Heart Failure , Myocarditis , Respiratory Tract DiseasesABSTRACT
The ongoing coronavirus infection-2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic has had devastating impacts on the global population since 2019. Cardiac complications are a well-documented sequala of COVID-19, with exposed patients experiencing complications such as myocardial infarction, myocarditis, and arrythmias. This article aims to review prominent literature regarding COVID-19 and its link with arrhythmias, as well as to discuss some of the possible mechanisms by which arrhythmogenesis may occur in patients with COVID-19.
Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/chemically induced , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/physiopathology , Azithromycin/adverse effects , COVID-19/physiopathology , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/adverse effects , Intensive Care Units , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , COVID-19 Drug TreatmentABSTRACT
Abstract An acute respiratory syndrome caused by SARS-CoV2 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. Current data in the world and in Brazil show that approximately 40% of patients who died have some type of cardiac comorbidity. There are also robust reports showing an increase in IL-6 / IL-1B / TNF-alpha and the presence of lymphopenia in patients with COVID-19. Our team and others have shown that increased cytokines are the link between arrhythmias/Left ventricular dysfunction and the immune system in different diseases. In addition, it has been well demonstrated that lymphopenia can not only be a good marker, but also a factor that causes heart failure. Thus, the present review focused on the role of the immune system upon the cardiac alterations observed in the SARS-CoV2 infection. Additionally, it was well described that SARS-CoV-2 is able to infect cardiac cells. Therefore, here it will be reviewed in deep.
Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/complications , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , COVID-19/complications , Heart Failure/etiology , Myocardium/immunology , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/physiopathology , Cytokines , Cytokines/immunology , Coronavirus/pathogenicity , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathology , Myocytes, Cardiac/pathology , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome , Heart Failure/complications , Lymphopenia/complicationsABSTRACT
Acute viral myocarditis is a serious complication of viral infectious diseases, including coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). To better understand the pathogenesis of acute viral myocarditis, we retrospectively analyzed the incidence and prognostic significance of hypocalcemia among patients with acute myocarditis, most of whom were considered to have acute viral myocarditis. We retrospectively reviewed the demographic and clinical data of patients with clinically confirmed acute myocarditis treated in our hospital over a 13-year period from 2006 to 2019, including laboratory results, cardiac imaging findings, and clinical outcomes. These data were compared between lower, middle, and higher calcium groups depending on the minimum calcium level measured during hospitalization. Among the 288 patients with acute myocarditis included, the hypocalcemia group (lower calcium group) had poorer clinical and laboratory results, received more medications and device support, and experienced poorer outcomes, including heart failure, arrhythmias, and death. Specifically, the left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly lower, and the length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the hypocalcemia group than in the other two groups. Furthermore, the incidence rates of atrioventricular block, ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation, cardiogenic shock, and mortality were significantly higher in the hypocalcemia group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified hypocalcemia as an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality in patients with acute myocarditis. In conclusion, the clinical evidence provided by the present study indicates that hypocalcemia is a risk factor for poorer outcomes in patients with acute myocarditis that should be considered carefully in the diagnosis and treatment of these patients.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hypocalcemia , Myocarditis , Humans , Stroke Volume , Hypocalcemia/epidemiology , Hypocalcemia/complications , Calcium , Ventricular Function, Left , Myocarditis/complications , Myocarditis/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/complications , Prognosis , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/etiology , Ventricular Fibrillation , Acute DiseaseSubject(s)
Brugada Syndrome , COVID-19 , Tachycardia, Ventricular , Humans , Brugada Syndrome/diagnosis , Brugada Syndrome/therapy , COVID-19/prevention & control , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/etiology , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy , Vaccination/adverse effects , ElectrocardiographyABSTRACT
Sudden unexpected infant death (SUDI) is reported to be an extraordinarily high burden in sub-Saharan Africa, with the incidence rate in South Africa among the highest in the world. It is common for the cause of many such infant deaths to remain unexplained even after a full medico-legal death investigation, and then to be categorised as a sudden unexplained infant death (SUID). Fortunately, advances in molecular-based diagnostics allow researchers to identify numerous underlying inherited cardiac arrhythmogenic disorders in many SUDI cases, with a predominance of variants identified in the SCN5A gene. Such cardiac arrhythmogenic-related sudden deaths generally present with no structural alterations of the heart that are macroscopically identifiable at autopsy, therefore highlighting the importance of post mortem genetic testing. We report on a significant genetic finding that was made on a SUDI case in which the cause was ascribed to an acute bacterial pneumonia but it was still subjected to post mortem genetic testing of the SCN5A gene. The literature shows that many SUDI cases diagnosed with inherited cardiac arrhythmogenic disorders have demonstrated a viral prodrome within days of their death. It is therefore not uncommon for these cardiac disorders in infants to be mistaken for flu, viral upper respiratory tract infection or pneumonia, and without the incorporation of post mortem genetic testing, any other contributory causes of these deaths are often disregarded. This study highlights the need for research reporting on the genetics of inherited cardiac disorders in Africa.
Subject(s)
Heart Diseases , Sudden Infant Death , Infant , Humans , Sudden Infant Death/diagnosis , Sudden Infant Death/epidemiology , Sudden Infant Death/genetics , Autopsy , Death, Sudden, Cardiac , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/genetics , South Africa/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Background Disease from Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) remains the third leading cause of death in the United States, after cancer and heart disease. Many patients infected with this virus develop later cardiovascular complications including myocardial infarctions, stroke, arrhythmia, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death (20–28%). The purpose of this study is to understand the primary mechanism of myocardial injury in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2.Methods We investigated a consecutive cohort of 48 medical examiner cases who died with PCR-positive SARS-CoV-2 (COVpos) infection in 2020. We compared them to a consecutive cohort of 46 age and sex-matched controls who were PCR-negative for SARS-CoV-2 (COVneg). Clinical information available at postmortem examination was reviewed on each patient. Formalin-fixed sections were examined using antibodies directed against CD42 (platelets), CD15 (myeloid cells), CD68 (monocytes), C4d, Fibrin, CD34 (stem cell antigen), CD56 (natural killer cells), and Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (neutrophils and NETs). We used a Welch 2-sample T-test to determine significance. A cluster analysis of marker distribution was also done.Results We found a significant difference between COVpos and COVneg samples for all markers, all of which were significant at p < 0.001. The most prominent features were neutrophils (CD15, MPO) and MPO positive debris suggestive of NETS. A similar distribution of platelets, monocytes, fibrin and C4d was seen in COVpos cases. Clinical features were similar in COVpos and COVneg cases for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI).Conclusion These findings suggest an autoinflammatory process is likely involved in cardiac damage during these infections.
Subject(s)
Stroke , Neoplasms , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome , Hereditary Autoinflammatory Diseases , Arrhythmias, Cardiac , Death, Sudden, Cardiac , Death , Heart Failure , Myocardial Infarction , Cardiomyopathies , Heart DiseasesABSTRACT
-529391451442Citation: To be added by editorial staff during production. Academic Editor: Firstname Lastname Received: date Revised: date Accepted: date Published: date Copyright: © 2023 by the authors. Submitted for possible open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).0Citation: To be added by editorial staff during production. Academic Editor: Firstname Lastname Received: date Revised: date Accepted: date Published: date Copyright: © 2023 by the authors. Submitted for possible open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Abstract: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination offered the opportunity to get out of the pandemic and thereby worldwide health, social, and economic disasters. However, in addition to efficacy, safety is an important issue for any vaccine. The mRNA-based vaccine platform is considered to be safe but side effects are being reported more frequently as more and more people around the world become treated. Myo-pericarditis is the major, but not the only cardiovascular complication of this vaccine, hence it is important not to underestimate other side effects. We report a case series of patients affected by cardiac arrhythmias post mRNA vaccine from our clinical practice and the literature. Reviewing the official vigilance database emerged that heart rhythm disorders after Covid vaccination are not uncommon and deserve more clinical and scientific attention. Since Covid vaccine is the only vaccination to have been related to this side effect questions arose about whether these vaccines could affect heart conduction. Although the risk-benefit is clearly in favor of vaccination heart rhythm disorders are not a negligible issue and there are red flags in the literature about the risk of post-vaccination malignant arrhythmias in some predisposed patients. In light of these findings, we investigated the potential mechanism for the Covid vaccine to impact on cardiac electrophysiology and cause heart rhythm disorders.
Subject(s)
Pericarditis , COVID-19 , Arrhythmias, Cardiac , Heart DiseasesABSTRACT
Abstract Background In Brazil the factors involved in the risk of death in patients with COVID-19 have not been well established. Objective To analyze whether elevations of high-sensitivity troponin I (hTnI) levels influence the mortality of patients with COVID-19. Methods Clinical and laboratory characteristics of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were collected upon hospital admission. Univariate and binary logistic regression analyzes were performed to assess the factors that influence mortality. P-value<0.05 was considered significant. Results This study analyzed192 patients who received hospital admission between March 16 and June 2, 2020 and who were discharged or died by July 2, 2020. The mean age was 70±15 years, 80 (41.7%) of whom were women. In comparison to those who were discharged, the 54 (28.1%) who died were older (79±12 vs 66±15years; P=0.004), and with a higher Charlson´s index (5±2 vs 3±2; P=0.027). More patients, aged≥60years (P <0.0001), Charlson´s index>1 (P=0.004), lung injury>50% in chest computed tomography (P=0.011), with previous coronary artery disease (P=0.037), hypertension (P=0.033), stroke (P=0.008), heart failure (P=0.002), lymphocytopenia (P=0.024), high D-dimer (P=0.024), high INR (P=0.003), hTnI (P<0.0001), high creatinine (P<0.0001), invasive mechanical ventilation (P<0.0001), renal replacement therapy (P<0.0001), vasoactive amine (P<0.0001), and transfer to the ICU (P=0.001), died when compared to those who were discharged. In logistic regression analysis, elevated hTnI levels (OR=9.504; 95% CI=1.281-70.528; P=0.028) upon admission, and the need for mechanical ventilation during hospitalization (OR=46.691; 95% CI=2.360-923.706; P=0.012) increased the chance of in-hospital mortality. Conclusion This study suggests that in COVID-19 disease, myocardial injury upon hospital admission is a harbinger of poor prognosis.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , Troponin I/blood , COVID-19/mortality , Myocarditis/complications , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/complications , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Cohort Studies , COVID-19/complicationsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Brugada syndrome (BrS) has a dynamic ECG pattern that might be revealed by certain conditions such as fever. We evaluated the incidence and management of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) related to COVID-19 infection and vaccination among BrS patients carriers of an implantable loop recorder (ILR) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and followed by remote monitoring. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective study. Patients were carriers of devices with remote monitoring follow-up. We recorded VAs 6 months before COVID-19 infection or vaccination, during infection, at each vaccination, and up to 6-month post-COVID-19 or 1 month after the last vaccination. In ICD carriers, we documented any device intervention. RESULTS: We included 326 patients, 202 with an ICD and 124 with an ILR. One hundred and nine patients (33.4%) had COVID-19, 55% of whom developed fever. Hospitalization rate due to COVID-19 infection was 2.76%. After infection, we recorded only two ventricular tachycardias (VTs). After the first, second, and third vaccines, the incidence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) was 1.5%, 2%, and 1%, respectively. The incidence of VT was 1% after the second dose. Six-month post-COVID-19 healing or 1 month after the last vaccine, we documented NSVT in 3.4%, VT in 0.5%, and ventricular fibrillation in 0.5% of patients. Overall, one patient received anti-tachycardia pacing and one a shock. ILR carriers had no VAs. No differences were found in VT before and after infection and before and after each vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: From this large multicenter study conducted in BrS patients, followed by remote monitoring, the overall incidence of sustained VAs after COVID-19 infection and vaccination is relatively low.
Subject(s)
Brugada Syndrome , COVID-19 , Defibrillators, Implantable , Tachycardia, Ventricular , Humans , Brugada Syndrome/diagnosis , Brugada Syndrome/epidemiology , Brugada Syndrome/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Incidence , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/epidemiology , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy , Tachycardia, Ventricular/diagnosis , Tachycardia, Ventricular/epidemiology , Tachycardia, Ventricular/therapy , Registries , Vaccination , Follow-Up StudiesABSTRACT
The causes of cardiac inflammation during the COVID-19 pandemic are manifold and complex, and may have changed with different virus variants and vaccinations. The underlying viral etiology is self-evident, but its role in the pathogenic process is diverse. The view of many pathologists that myocyte necrosis and cellular infiltrates are indispensable for myocarditis does not suffice and contradicts the clinical criteria of myocarditis, i.e., a combination of serological evidence of necrosis based on troponins or MRI features of necrosis, edema, and inflammation based on prolonged T1 and T2 times and late gadolinium enhancement. The definition of myocarditis is still debated by pathologists and clinicians. We have learned that myocarditis and pericarditis can be induced by the virus via different pathways of action such as direct viral damage to the myocardium through the ACE2 receptor. Indirect damage occurs via immunological effector organs such as the innate immune system by macrophages and cytokines, and then later the acquired immune system via T cells, overactive proinflammatory cytokines, and cardiac autoantibodies. Cardiovascular diseases lead to more severe courses of SARS-CoV2 disease. Thus, heart failure patients have a double risk for complicated courses and lethal outcome. So do patients with diabetes, hypertension, and renal insufficiency. Independent of the definition, myocarditis patients benefitted from intensive hospital care, ventilation, if needed, and cortisone treatment. Postvaccination myocarditis and pericarditis affect primarily young male patients after the second RNA vaccine. Both are rare events but severe enough to deserve our full attention, because treatment according to current guidelines is available and necessary.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Myocarditis , Pericarditis , Humans , Male , SARS-CoV-2 , Autoimmunity , Pandemics , Contrast Media , Gadolinium/therapeutic use , Inflammation , Pericarditis/therapy , Arrhythmias, Cardiac , Cytokines , VaccinationABSTRACT
Background and Aims: The relationship between SARS-CoV-2 infection and ICD shock remains unclear. We analyzed the characteristics of patients received shocks after SARS-CoV-2 infection to explore causes of these shocks to provide information for subsequent treatment. Methods: : We retrospectively analyzed data from seven patients who hospitalized the First People’s Hospital of Yunnan Province between December 2022 and January 2023 after experiencing ICD shock or ventricular arrhythmias following SARS-CoV-2 infection. We collected baseline information i.e., age and sex, device type, arrhythmia type, comorbidities, etc to analyze the causes of electrical shocks. Results: : All patients’ devices were implanted in our hospital. The patients’ mean age was 67±10 years. Four underwent implantation for primary prevention, and three for secondary prevention. These patients received 80 ICD shocks after SARS-CoV-2 infection, 71 (88.75%) nine (11.25%) of which were treatment for ventricular tachycardia and atrial fibrillation, respectively. There were 54 antitachycardia pacing(ATP) treatments, which forty-eight arrhythmic events were terminated through antitachycardia pacing and six not. Laboratory tests conducted upon admission revealed that six patients had blood potassium levels below 4.0 mmol/L. Five patients had blood calcium levels below 2.11 mmol/L. Four of seven patients had elevated troponin concentrations (0.030–0.297 ng/mL). All patients had significantly elevated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels (608.8–25,758 pg/mL). Six patients had a QT interval of > 440 ms and a mean QT interval of 460±46 ms. Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 infection may be associated with ICD shock. Clinicians should pay close attention to patients with implanted devices after SARS-CoV-2 infection and actively eliminate arrhythmogenic triggers to minimize the likelihood of ICD shock.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Tachycardia, Ventricular , Atrial Fibrillation , Arrhythmias, CardiacABSTRACT
The onset and widespread dissemination of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 in late 2019 impacted the world in a way not seen since the 1918 H1N1 pandemic, colloquially known as the Spanish Flu. Much like the Spanish Flu, which was observed to disproportionately impact young adults, it became clear in the early days of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic that certain groups appeared to be at higher risk for severe illness once infected. One such group that immediately came to the forefront and garnered international attention was patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease. Here, we examine the available literature describing the interaction of COVID-19 with a myriad of cardiovascular conditions and diseases, paying particular attention to patients diagnosed with arrythmias, heart failure, and coronary artery disease. We further discuss the association of acute COVID-19 with de novo cardiovascular disease, including myocardial infarction due to coronary thrombosis, myocarditis, and new onset arrhythmias. We will evaluate various biochemical theories to explain these findings, including possible mechanisms of direct myocardial injury caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 virus at the cellular level. Finally, we will discuss the strategies employed by numerous groups and governing bodies within the cardiovascular disease community to address the unprecedented challenges posed to the care of our most vulnerable patients, including heart transplant recipients, end-stage heart failure patients, and patients suffering from acute coronary syndromes, during the early days and height of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiovascular Diseases , Heart Failure , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Influenza Pandemic, 1918-1919 , History, 20th Century , Humans , COVID-19/complications , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/complications , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Heart Failure/complications , MyocardiumABSTRACT
Aim To study changes in cardiohemodynamic alterations of the myocardium and heart rhythm disorders at 3 and 6 months following the coronavirus infection.Material and methods EchoCG, ECG Holter monitoring, and Doppler ultrasonography of hepatolienal blood vessels were performed for 77 patients (mean age, 35.9 years) at 3 and 6 months after coronavirus infection. The patients were divided into the following groups: group 1, with injury of the upper respiratory tract; group 2, with bilateral pneumonia (CТ1, 2), and group 3, with severe pneumonia (CТ3, 4). Statistical analysis was performed with a SPSS Statistics Version 25.0 software package.Results At 6 months after the disease onset, the patients noted an improvement of their general condition. In patients with moderate pneumonia, early peak diastolic velocity (p=0.09), right ventricular isovolumic diastolic time (Ñ=0.09), and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (Ñ=0.005) where decreased, while tricuspid annular peak systolic velocity was, in contrast, increased (Ñ=0.042). Both segmental systolic velocity of the LV mid-inferior segment (Ñ=0.006) and the mitral annular Emâ/âAm ratio were decreased. In patients with severe disease at 6 months, right atrial indexed volume was reduced (Ñ=0.036), tricuspid annular Emâ/âAm was decreased (Ñ=0.046), portal and splenic vein flow velocities were decreased, and inferior vena cava diameter was reduced. Late diastolic transmitral flow velocity was increased (Ñ=0.027), and LV basal inferolateral segmental systolic velocity was decreased (Ñ=0.046). In all groups, the number of patients with heart rhythm disorders was decreased, and parasympathetic autonomic influences prevailed.Conclusion At 6 months after coronavirus infection, practically all patients noted improvement of their general condition; incidence rate of arrhythmia and cases of pericardial effusion were decreased; and autonomic nervous system activity recovered. In patients with moderate and severe disease, morpho-functional parameters of the right heart and the hepatolienal blood flow were normalized, however, occult disorders of LV diastolic function remained, and LV segmental systolic velocity was reduced.
Subject(s)
Atrial Appendage , Coronavirus Infections , Humans , Adult , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/etiology , Angiography , Autonomic Nervous SystemABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recently, antivirals, including remdesivir, have been repurposed to treat COVID-19 infections. Initial concerns have been raised about the adverse renal and cardiac events associated with remdesivir. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyse the adverse renal and cardiac events associated with remdesivir in patients with COVID-19 infections using the US FDA adverse event reporting system. METHOD: A case/non-case method was used to determine adverse drug events associated with remdesivir as the primary suspect drug between January 1, 2020, and November 11, 2021, for patients with COVID-19 infections. Cases were reports for remdesivir with ≥1 ADEs as preferred terms included in the Medical Dictionary of Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system organ classes 'Renal and urinary disorders' or 'cardiac' disorders. To measure disproportionality in reporting of ADEs, frequentist approaches, including the proportional reporting ratio (PRR) and reporting odds ratio (ROR), were used. The empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean (EBGM) score and information component (IC) value were calculated using a Bayesian approach. A signal was defined as the lower limit of 95% confidence intervals of ROR ≥ 2, PRR ≥ 2, IC > 0, and EBGM > 1 for ADEs with ≥4 reports. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken by excluding reports for non-Covid indications and medications strongly associated with AKI and cardiac arrhythmias. RESULTS: In the main analysis for remdesivir use in patients with COVID-19 infections, we identified 315 adverse cardiac events comprising 31 different MeDRA PTs and 844 adverse renal events comprising 13 different MeDRA PTs. Regarding adverse renal events, disproportionality signals were noted for "renal failure" (ROR = 2.8 (2.03-3.86); EBGM = 1.92 (1.58-2.31), "acute kidney injury" (ROR = 16.11 (12.52-20.73); EBGM = 2.81 (2.57-3.07), "renal impairment" (ROR = 3.45 (2.68-4.45); EBGM = 2.02 (1.74-2.33). Regarding adverse cardiac events, strong disproportionality signals were noted for "electrocardiogram QT prolonged" (ROR = 6.45 (2.54-16.36); EBGM = 2.04 (1.65-2.51), "pulseless electrical activity" (ROR = 43.57 (13.64-139.20); EBGM = 2.44 (1.74-3.33), "sinus bradycardia" (ROR = 35.86 (11.16-115.26); EBGM = 2.82 (2.23-3.53), "ventricular tachycardia" (ROR = 8.73 (3.55-21.45); EBGM = 2.52 (1.89-3.31). The risk of AKI and cardiac arrythmias were confirmed by sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: This hypothesis-generating study identified AKI and cardiac arrhythmias associated with remdesivir use in patients with COVID-19 infections. The relationship between AKI and cardiac arrhythmias should be further investigated using registries or large clinical data to assess the impact of age, genetics, comorbidity, and the severity of Covid infections as potential confounders.
Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , COVID-19 , Heart Diseases , United States , Humans , Bayes Theorem , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Acute Kidney Injury/chemically induced , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/chemically induced , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/epidemiology , United States Food and Drug Administration , PharmacovigilanceABSTRACT
Outcomes of congenital heart disease have improved markedly over the past 20 years, with survival to adulthood now close to 90%. The mean age of admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) is 40 years. The incidence of hospital and critical care admissions have increased significantly as a consequence of this improved survival. Intensivists are now confronted with the management not only of complex adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) lesions from a cardiac perspective, but also of extracardiac organ consequences of years of abnormal circulation after surgical or palliative correction. Kidney and liver dysfunction and respiratory and hematologic abnormalities are very common in this population. ACHD patients can present to the ICU for a vast number of reasons, classified in this review as medical noncardiac, medical cardiac, and surgical. Community/hospital-acquired infections, cerebrovascular accidents, and respiratory failure, alongside arrhythmias and heart failure, are responsible for medical admissions. Surgical admissions include postoperative management after correction or palliation, but also medical optimisation and work-up for advanced therapies. ICU management of this large heterogeneous group requires a thorough understanding of the pathophysiology in order to apply conventional adult critical care modalities; left ventricular or right ventricular dysfunction, pulmonary hypertension, intracardiac, extracardiac, and palliative surgical shunts can be present and require additional consideration. This review focuses on the pathophysiology, long-term sequelae, and different treatment modalities to supply a framework for the ICU physician caring for these patients. Successful outcome, especially in complex lesions, depends on early involvement of specialised ACHD centres.
Subject(s)
Heart Defects, Congenital , Heart Failure , Humans , Adult , Heart Defects, Congenital/epidemiology , Critical Care , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Heart Failure/etiology , Heart Failure/therapy , Intensive Care Units , Arrhythmias, CardiacABSTRACT
Researchers have recently proposed the Comprehensive In-vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) to analyze medicines' TdP risks. Using the TdP metric known as qNet, numerous single-drug effects have been studied to classify the medications as low, intermediate, and high-risk. Furthermore, multiple medication therapies are recognized as a potential method for curing patients, mainly when limited drugs are available. This work expands the TdP risk assessment of drugs by introducing a CiPA-based in silico analysis of the TdP risk of combined drugs. The cardiac cell model was simulated using the population of models approach incorporating drug-drug interactions (DDIs) models on several ion channels for various drug pairs. Action potential duration (APD90), qNet, and calcium duration (CaD90) were computed and analyzed as biomarker features. The drug combination maps were also used to illustrate combined medicines' TdP risk. We found that the combined drugs alter cell responses in terms of biomarkers such as APD90, qNet, and CaD90 in a highly nonlinear manner. The results also revealed that combinations of high-risk with low-risk and intermediate-risk with low-risk drugs could result in compounds with varying TdP risks depending on the drug concentrations.