Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Intern Med J ; 53(4): 619-624, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2272984

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in immunocompromised patients can lead to severe and prolonged illness. Data are limited with regard to management of COVID-19 in this setting, particularly in persistent or recrudescent infection. The authors conducted an online survey among infectious diseases doctors to determine current approaches to treatment across Australasia. There was marked variability in responses relating to the diagnostic modalities and use of antiviral agents in patients with immunocompromise, highlighting the need for high-quality studies to guide treatment decisions in this group.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Immunocompromised Host , Surveys and Questionnaires , Australasia/epidemiology
3.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 36(6): 629-640, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1265531

ABSTRACT

We estimated the impact of a comprehensive set of non-pharmeceutical interventions on the COVID-19 epidemic growth rate across the 37 member states of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic and between October and December 2020. For this task, we conducted a data-driven, longitudinal analysis using a multilevel modelling approach with both maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimation. We found that during the early phase of the epidemic: implementing restrictions on gatherings of more than 100 people, between 11 and 100 people, and 10 people or less was associated with a respective average reduction of 2.58%, 2.78% and 2.81% in the daily growth rate in weekly confirmed cases; requiring closing for some sectors or for all but essential workplaces with an average reduction of 1.51% and 1.78%; requiring closing of some school levels or all school levels with an average reduction of 1.12% or 1.65%; recommending mask wearing with an average reduction of 0.45%, requiring mask wearing country-wide in specific public spaces or in specific geographical areas within the country with an average reduction of 0.44%, requiring mask-wearing country-wide in all public places or all public places where social distancing is not possible with an average reduction of 0.96%; and number of tests per thousand population with an average reduction of 0.02% per unit increase. Between October and December 2020 work closing requirements and testing policy were significant predictors of the epidemic growth rate. These findings provide evidence to support policy decision-making regarding which NPIs to implement to control the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Masks/statistics & numerical data , Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development , Physical Distancing , Quarantine/statistics & numerical data , Asia/epidemiology , Australasia/epidemiology , Europe/epidemiology , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , North America/epidemiology , Pandemics , Quarantine/methods , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Respirology ; 26(4): 322-333, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1124645

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 has hit the world by surprise, causing substantial mortality and morbidity since 2020. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of the epidemiology, induced impact, viral kinetics and clinical spectrum of COVID-19 in the Asia-Pacific Region, focusing on regions previously exposed to outbreaks of coronavirus. COVID-19 progressed differently by regions, with some (such as China and Taiwan) featured by one to two epidemic waves and some (such as Hong Kong and South Korea) featured by multiple waves. There has been no consensus on the estimates of important epidemiological time intervals or proportions, such that using them for making inferences should be done with caution. Viral loads of patients with COVID-19 peak in the first week of illness around days 2 to 4 and hence there is very high transmission potential causing community outbreaks. Various strategies such as government-guided and suppress-and-lift strategies, trigger-based/suppression approaches and alert systems have been employed to guide the adoption and easing of control measures. Asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic transmission is a hallmark of COVID-19. Identification and isolation of symptomatic patients alone is not effective in controlling the ongoing outbreaks. However, early, prompt and coordinated enactment predisposed regions to successful disease containment. Mass COVID-19 vaccinations are likely to be the light at the end of the tunnel. There is a need to review what we have learnt in this pandemic and examine how to transfer and improve existing knowledge for ongoing and future epidemics.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Communicable Disease Control , SARS-CoV-2 , Asia/epidemiology , Australasia/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/physiopathology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/virology , Civil Defense/organization & administration , Communicable Disease Control/legislation & jurisprudence , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Communicable Disease Control/organization & administration , Communicable Disease Control/statistics & numerical data , Government Regulation , Humans , International Cooperation , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , SARS-CoV-2/physiology
5.
J Med Internet Res ; 23(2): e25454, 2021 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1058365

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound global impact on governments, health care systems, economies, and populations around the world. Within the East Asia and Pacific region, some countries have mitigated the spread of the novel coronavirus effectively and largely avoided severe negative consequences, while others still struggle with containment. As the second wave reaches East Asia and the Pacific, it becomes more evident that additional SARS-CoV-2 surveillance is needed to track recent shifts, rates of increase, and persistence associated with the pandemic. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to provide advanced surveillance metrics for COVID-19 transmission that account for speed, acceleration, jerk, persistence, and weekly shifts, to better understand country risk for explosive growth and those countries who are managing the pandemic successfully. Existing surveillance coupled with our dynamic metrics of transmission will inform health policy to control the COVID-19 pandemic until an effective vaccine is developed. We provide novel indicators to measure disease transmission. METHODS: Using a longitudinal trend analysis study design, we extracted 330 days of COVID-19 data from public health registries. We used an empirical difference equation to measure the daily number of cases in East Asia and the Pacific as a function of the prior number of cases, the level of testing, and weekly shift variables based on a dynamic panel model that was estimated using the generalized method of moments approach by implementing the Arellano-Bond estimator in R. RESULTS: The standard surveillance metrics for Indonesia, the Philippines, and Myanmar were concerning as they had the largest new caseloads at 4301, 2588, and 1387, respectively. When looking at the acceleration of new COVID-19 infections, we found that French Polynesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines had rates at 3.17, 0.22, and 0.06 per 100,000. These three countries also ranked highest in terms of jerk at 15.45, 0.10, and 0.04, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Two of the most populous countries in East Asia and the Pacific, Indonesia and the Philippines, have alarming surveillance metrics. These two countries rank highest in new infections in the region. The highest rates of speed, acceleration, and positive upwards jerk belong to French Polynesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines, and may result in explosive growth. While all countries in East Asia and the Pacific need to be cautious about reopening their countries since outbreaks are likely to occur in the second wave of COVID-19, the country of greatest concern is the Philippines. Based on standard and enhanced surveillance, the Philippines has not gained control of the COVID-19 epidemic, which is particularly troubling because the country ranks 4th in population in the region. Without extreme and rigid social distancing, quarantines, hygiene, and masking to reverse trends, the Philippines will remain on the global top 5 list of worst COVID-19 outbreaks resulting in high morbidity and mortality. The second wave will only exacerbate existing conditions and increase COVID-19 transmissions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Asia, Southeastern/epidemiology , Australasia/epidemiology , COVID-19/transmission , Asia, Eastern/epidemiology , Health Policy , Humans , Indonesia/epidemiology , Longitudinal Studies , Malaysia/epidemiology , Pandemics , Philippines/epidemiology , Polynesia/epidemiology , Public Health , Public Health Surveillance , Registries , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Intern Med J ; 50(10): 1267-1271, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-780902

ABSTRACT

During a pandemic when hospitals are stretched and patients need isolation, the role of hospital-in-the-home (HITH) providing acute medical care at home has never been more relevant. We aimed to define and address the challenges to acute home care services posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Planning for service operation involves staffing, equipment availability and cleaning, upskilling in telehealth and communication. Planning for clinical care involves maximising cohorts of patients without COVID-19 and new clinical pathways for patients with COVID-19. The risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, specific COVID-19 clinical pathways and the well-being of patients and staff should be addressed in advance.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Home Care Services/organization & administration , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Australasia/epidemiology , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Communication , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/supply & distribution , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Humans , Infection Control/organization & administration , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Pandemics , Patient-Centered Care/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2 , Workload
7.
J Surg Educ ; 78(1): 308-314, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-613920

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To synthesise the current evidence of pandemic-related impact on surgical training internationally and describe strategies that have been put in place to mitigate disruption. DESIGN: Rapid scoping review of publically available published web-literature. SETTING: Five large English speaking countries; United States (US), United Kingdom (UK), Canada, Australia and New Zealand (NZ). RESULTS: Recruitment and selection to residency programmes in the US, Australia and NZ has been largely unaffected. Canada has implemented video-conferencing in lieu of face-to-face interviews. The UK has relied upon trainee self-assessment for selection. Widespread postponement and cancellation of surgical board examinations was seen across the studied countries. Resident assessment-in-training and certification procedures have been heavily modified. Most didactics have moved online, with some courses and conferences cancelled where this has not been possible. None of the studied countries had a central mandate on resident operating privileges during Covid-19. CONCLUSIONS: The collective response by international surgical training bodies to the dual challenges of safeguarding residents whilst minimising disruption to training has been agile and resident centred. The pandemic has exposed weaknesses in existing training systems and has highlighted opportunity for future improvement.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Education, Medical , General Surgery/education , Australasia/epidemiology , Canada/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , United Kingdom/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
8.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; 14(6): e26-e30, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-59743

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To clarify the pandemic status in Western Pacific countries or territories. METHODS: The WHO's daily situation reports of COVID-19 were reviewed from January 20, 2020, to March 24, 2020. Changes in the infections, deaths, and the case fatality rate (CFR) in Western Pacific countries or territories were counted. RESULTS: As of March 24, a total of 17 countries or territories had reported the presence of COVID-19 in the Western Pacific Region, 96,580 people have been infected and a total of 3502 deaths. Fifty-three percent (9/17) of these countries or territories had their first case within 2 wk since the WHO's first report, most are China's neighbors with a large and dense population. No other country or territory in this region reported a new infection from January 30 to February 28. However, 8 (47.0%) countries or territories have reported the first cases in 3 wk since February 28, almost all are islands. Many countries maintained a small number of infections for a long time after the first report, but a rapid increase occurred later. Deaths occurred in 8 countries with a total CFR of 3.63%, and the CFR varies widely, from 0.39% (Singapore) to 7.14% (Philippines). CONCLUSIONS: The regional spread of COVID-19 urgently requires an aggressive preparedness for the Western Pacific Islands.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Asia, Southeastern/epidemiology , Australasia/epidemiology , COVID-19/mortality , Asia, Eastern/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL