Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 65
Filter
1.
Indian J Med Res ; 151(5): 411-418, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2261643

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by a highly contagious RNA virus termed as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Ophthalmologists are at high-risk due to their proximity and short working distance at the time of slit-lamp examination. Eye care professionals can be caught unaware because conjunctivitis may be one of the first signs of COVID-19 at presentation, even precluding the emergence of additional symptoms such as dry cough and anosmia. Breath and eye shields as well as N95 masks, should be worn while examining patients with fever, breathlessness, or any history of international travel or travel from any hotspot besides maintaining hand hygiene. All elective surgeries need to be deferred. Adults or children with sudden-onset painful or painless visual loss, or sudden-onset squint, or sudden-onset floaters or severe lid oedema need a referral for urgent care. Patients should be told to discontinue contact lens wear if they have any symptoms of COVID-19. Cornea retrieval should be avoided in confirmed cases and suspects, and long-term preservation medium for storage of corneas should be encouraged. Retinal screening is unnecessary for coronavirus patients taking chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine as the probability of toxic damage to the retina is less due to short-duration of drug therapy. Tele-ophthalmology and artificial intelligence should be preferred for increasing doctor-patient interaction.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Health/standards , Ophthalmology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , COVID-19 , Conjunctivitis/virology , Corneal Transplantation , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Humans , Ophthalmology/methods , Personal Protective Equipment , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk Factors , Tears/virology , Telemedicine , Tissue and Organ Procurement/standards
2.
Curr Opin Ophthalmol ; 33(4): 296-305, 2022 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2257710

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Corneal graft rejection has been reported after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the literature regarding corneal graft rejection after vaccination, including rejection rates and risk factors. We aim to create a framework to identify patients who are at higher risk for graft rejection and may warrant consideration of prophylactic interventions. RECENT FINDINGS: Graft rejection has been reported following administration of mRNA, viral vector, and inactivated whole-virion COVID-19 vaccines. Most cases had additional risk factors associated with rejection. Vaccination increases circulation of proinflammatory cytokines, CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses, and antispike neutralizing antibody, all of which may contribute to graft rejection. Two prospective studies have found no relationship between recent vaccination and rejection but 20% of cornea specialists report to have seen a vaccine-associated rejection and 22% recommend delaying vaccination in certain circumstances. Many specialists recommend prophylactic topical corticosteroids before and after vaccination to mitigate rejection risk but there is no evidence to support this practice on a wider scale. SUMMARY: Our framework identified 96.8% of penetrating keratoplasty patients with vaccine-associated rejection as higher risk. Further research is needed in order to develop evidence-based guidelines.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Corneal Diseases , Corneal Transplantation , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Corneal Diseases/surgery , Humans , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Prospective Studies , Vaccination
3.
Cornea ; 42(3): 376-382, 2023 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2235719

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Keratoplasty patients require regular and timely follow-ups. During this COVID-19 pandemic which restricted global travel, we developed a novel real-time, hybrid teleophthalmology approach to comanage international keratoplasty patients between Singapore and Indonesia. METHODS: A retrospective consecutive observational study of 72 corneal patients (63 were postkeratoplasty) who attended a virtual corneal clinic (VCC) between June 2020 and April 2021 at JEC Eye Hospitals (JEC) in Jakarta, Indonesia. ZOOM Meeting software (Zoom Video Communication Inc, San Jose, CA) was used to simultaneously connect the Singapore corneal specialist at Eye & Cornea Surgeons (ECS), Singapore, using a real-time approach. Clinical examinations included full panels of video-linked corneal, glaucoma, and retinal imaging and investigations performed before real-time video-linked slit-lamp examination, with immediate clinical decision making between corneal specialists and patients. RESULTS: VCC enabled effective real-time clinical evaluation and collaborative clinical decisions, with full patient interaction, with the aim of maintenance of graft clarity, visual function, and management of comorbidities-a) topical and systemic medications were adjusted in 79.2% of patients; b) further referrals to glaucoma, retinal, and oculoplastic subspecialists were made in 16.6% of cases; c) additional adjunctive surgical procedures were performed at JEC in 6.9% cases; and d) government permission was obtained for 4 patients (5.6%) to fly to Singapore for urgent corneal surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The virtual corneal clinic is a novel real-time hybrid teleophthalmology approach which is effective in the comanagement of international keratoplasty patients and represents the advances in ophthalmic telemedicine.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Corneal Transplantation , Glaucoma , Ophthalmology , Telemedicine , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Keratoplasty, Penetrating/methods , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cornea
7.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 70(8): 3134-3136, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2055711

ABSTRACT

This report shows a case of corneal transplant rejection after vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), short after receiving the BNT162b2 vaccine, in a patient who had undergone keratoplasty more than 20 years ago, with no previous episodes of rejection and no other factor that could lead to the findings on his examinations. After treatment with high doses of topic, oral, and sub-conjunctival corticoids, the patient had a favorable therapeutic response. The signs of corneal transplant rejection must be oriented to the patients and the causing factors actively searched by ophthalmologists so that treatment is rapidly initiated and sequels are avoided. This report raises the question if these events are correlated and whether the patient should receive the second dose of the vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 or not.


Subject(s)
BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19 , Corneal Transplantation , Graft Rejection , BNT162 Vaccine/adverse effects , COVID-19/prevention & control , Graft Rejection/chemically induced , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
9.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 20(Suppl 4): 70-73, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2025258

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to analyze the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in its first year on corneal transplant outcomes performed at a tertiary eye care center in Turkey. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical records of patients who underwent corneal transplant between March 2020 and February 2021 (group A) at the Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, were analyzed retrospectively. Patient demographics, indications for transplant, type of transplant procedure (lamellar vs penetrating), follow-up duration, and postoperative complications were recorded. The same data were collected for cornea transplant patients who were seen the previous year, between March 2019 and February 2020 (group B). Data from the 2 groups were compared. In related samples, the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for statistical analysis, and a P value < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Six corneal transplants were performed between March 2020 and February 2021 (group A), and 48 corneal transplantations were performed in the previous year (group B). There was an 80% decline in total corneal transplant numbers when compared with the previous year, and lamellar surgeries were not performed at all during the first year of the pandemic. Indications during the pandemic were mainly urgent and limited to tectonic or therapeutic causes. Postoperative follow-up regimens were impaired, and the complication rate was significantly higher during the pandemic period compared with the previous year (67% in group A vs 16% in group B) (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: There was a steep decline in transplants in 2020, the first year of the pandemic. The prominent increase in complication rates can be attributed to the late diagnosis of corneal rejections due to impaired postoperative follow-up regimens.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Corneal Diseases , Corneal Transplantation , Cornea , Humans , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
10.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 70(9): 3289-3293, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2024722

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To describe the causes and trends of corneal donor mortality from eye bank data in India during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: This retrospective eye bank-based study included 13,529 donors who donated their cornea between January 2018 and December 2021. Donors in whom the cause of mortality was documented were included as cases. The data were collected from the eye bank records. Results: Overall, 13,529 corneal donors were included in the study. Most of the donors were males (69.71%). The mean age of the donors was 51.55 ± 20.54 years, whereas the median age was 51 (inter-quartile range: 35-68) years. The mean age of males (49.3 ± 19.47 years) was lesser than the mean age of females (56.72 ± 21.94 years) at the time of donation. The most common age group at the time of donation was during the sixth decade of life with 2,139 (15.81%) donors. The mean age of the donors decreased by a decade from 54.95 ± 20.51 years in 2018 to 44.35 ± 18.88 years in 2021. The most common cause of donor mortality was cardio-respiratory arrest in 5,190 (38.36%) donors and trauma in 3,469 (25.64%) donors, followed by suicide in 2,790 (20.62%) donors. The trend of cardio-respiratory arrest decreased from 53.01% to 9.5% (p = <0.00001), whereas the trends of trauma increased from 21.93% to 36% (p = <0.00001) and suicide increased from 12.71% to 36.41% (p = <0.00001) between 2018 and 2021. Conclusion: Corneal donors are more commonly males in their sixth decade of life. The most common cause of donor mortality was related to cardio-respiratory arrest with a concerning rising trend in suicide cases over the years seen significantly during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Corneal Transplantation , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Adult , Aged , Cornea , Eye Banks , Female , Humans , India , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Tissue Donors
11.
J Craniofac Surg ; 33(5): 1300-1302, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2008691

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: To report 2 successfully managed cases of graft rejection with acellular porcine corneal stroma (APCS) transplantation in patients with fungal corneal ulcer. Two patients were diagnosed with fungal corneal ulcer and received APCS transplantation. Graft rejection developed due to the lost follow-up during the period of coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak. Amniotic membranes transplantation and cauterization of neovascularization was performed, respectively. The graft failure resolved successfully after the procedure. To the best of our knowledge, amniotic membranes transplantation and cauterization of new vessels are the firstly reported in treating APCS graft failure. Amniotic membranes transplantation or cauterization of neovascularization appear to be a safe and costeffective method for treating graft failure.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Corneal Transplantation , Corneal Ulcer , Animals , Corneal Stroma/transplantation , Corneal Transplantation/methods , Graft Rejection , Pandemics , Swine
12.
13.
Cornea ; 41(12): 1536-1538, 2022 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1992380

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to present the rates of rejection from 2018 to 2021 and evaluate the purported association between COVID-19 vaccination and corneal graft rejection. METHODS: Cases of corneal graft rejection diagnosed between January 2018 and December 2021 were reviewed. The conditional Poisson regression model of the self-controlled case series method was used to estimate the incidence risk ratio of graft rejection after COVID-19 vaccination risk period compared with the control period. Based on outcomes of eyes that underwent keratoplasty from January 2018 to December 2020, Cox proportional hazard models were fitted with previous COVID-19 vaccination as a time-varying covariate. RESULTS: Over the past 4 years, the annual tally of diagnosed cases of graft rejection (19 cases in year 2018, 19 cases in year 2019, 21 cases in year 2020, and 18 cases in year 2021) has remained relatively stable. Using the conditional Poisson regression analysis, no significant increase in the incidence rate of rejection in the risk period after COVID-19 vaccination was found (incidence risk ratio = 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.13-2.28, P = 0.70). Fitted as a time-varying covariate, previous COVID-19 vaccination was not associated with graft rejection in both unadjusted (hazard ratio =0.77, 95% CI = 0.29-5.46, P = 0.77) and adjusted Cox models (hazard ratio = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.10-5.52, P = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: No notable increase in rates of corneal graft rejection was noted in year 2021 when COVID-19 vaccination was broadly implemented. The apparent temporal relationship between COVID vaccination and corneal graft rejection may not represent a causative association.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Corneal Diseases , Corneal Transplantation , Humans , Keratoplasty, Penetrating , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Corneal Diseases/surgery , Graft Rejection/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Graft Survival , Retrospective Studies
14.
BMJ Case Rep ; 15(7)2022 Jul 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1932652

ABSTRACT

A man in his 30s, with a history of two operated penetrating keratoplasty (PK), primarily for viral keratitis, presented with pain, redness and diminution of vision in his left eye of 4 days duration. Postoperatively, he was prescribed oral antivirals, topical steroid eyedrops, lubricants and antiglaucoma medications. Eight months after transplantation, an epithelial defect with heaped up margins was noted on anterior segment evaluation on a routine follow-up visit. On checking his medications, it was found that the patient was unknowingly using bromfenac drops in place of brimonidine tartrate for the past month. A diagnosis of neurotrophic keratitis was made in the setting of PK performed for viral keratitis, incited by use of topical bromfenac. The patient was prescribed preservative-free lubricants with immediate discontinuation of bromfenac drops. Topical steroid drops were withheld till the epithelial defect healed. Complete healing of the defect was noted after 4 weeks of therapy.


Subject(s)
Corneal Dystrophies, Hereditary , Corneal Transplantation , Keratitis , Trigeminal Nerve Diseases , Benzophenones , Bromobenzenes , Corneal Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Keratitis/chemically induced , Keratitis/drug therapy , Lubricants , Male
17.
Arq Bras Oftalmol ; 85(3): 277-285, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1841664

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The study aimed to evaluate the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and public policies on corneal donations and transplantations in Brazil and get reliable indicators to support effective measures for improving the system of obtaining, processing, distributing, using, and controlling donated ocular tissues. METHODS: A questionnaire was applied by the Brazilian office of the Pan-American Association of Eye Banks (APABO) to Brazilian Eye Banks to collect data from January to August 2020 and generate reliable indicators about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on corneal donations and transplantations in Brazil. RESULTS: Data from 37 Eye Banks showed that 76.1% of the 3,060 donations and 74.5% of the 3,167 transplants occurred in the pre-pandemic period. From the 6,052 processed corneas, 71.8% were provided for therapeutic purposes: 72.9% were transplanted, 26.1% ended up being discarded (45% of which qualified for optical transplantation), and 1% remained in stock in glycerin. Of the 1,706 corneas that could not be eligible for therapeutic use, 47.9% were excluded due to tissue conditions, 43.6% for serological reasons, 6.7% due to contraindications found in clinical history after retrieval, and 1.8% for other factors. CONCLUSIONS: The negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on corneal donations and transplantations in Brazil resulted from the recommendation of the Health Ministry to suspend the retrieval of ocular tissues from donors in cardiopulmonary arrest for almost six months. The indicators reveal the compelling requirement for updating both the classification and cornea provision criteria by the Eye Banks and improving the Brazilian corneal distribution system.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Corneal Transplantation , Brazil/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cornea/surgery , Eye Banks , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Public Policy , Tissue Donors
18.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 70(5): 1817-1818, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1835133

ABSTRACT

A 28-year-old female who underwent an uneventful femtosecond laser enabled keratoplasty (FLEK) in her left eye presented with pain, redness, and blurring of vision in the operated eye two weeks after getting immunized with COVID-19 vector vaccine (ChAdOx1 nCoV19 Vaccine Recombinant COVISHIELD, AstraZeneca). Slit-lamp examination showed donor stromal edema with Descemet's membrane folds and Khodadoust line (KP's on endothelium) with anterior chamber cells and flare. The patient was diagnosed with acute corneal graft rejection and advised hourly topical steroids with cycloplegics and oral steroids. The patient responded to treatment and there was progressive reversal of graft rejection with the patient achieving best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) of 20/30 after five weeks of treatment. Our case highlights possible immune corneal graft rejection after COVID19 vaccination and the need to step up topical steroids before vaccination.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Corneal Diseases , Corneal Transplantation , Adult , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Corneal Diseases/surgery , Corneal Transplantation/adverse effects , Endothelium , Female , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Humans , Immunization , Postoperative Complications , Steroids , Vaccination , Visual Acuity
19.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 237: 235-240, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1797286

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To report outcomes of tape splint tarsorrhaphy (TST) for persistent corneal epithelial defects (PCED). DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional case series. METHODS: The study population was consecutive patients with a PCED (14 days or longer) treated at a tertiary cornea clinic with TST. Patients with a corneal epithelial defect that did not respond to treatment with a bandage contact lens were included. Patients with a follow-up time of less than 3 months were excluded. Time to PCED resolution was the main outcome measure. RESULTS: Thirty-four eyes of 33 patients (mean age 62.9 ± 17.8 years; range, 27-90 years) were included in this study. The main etiologies of the PCED were post keratoplasty (n = 15), herpes simplex virus (n = 4), superficial keratectomy (n = 3), neurotrophic cornea (n = 4), fungal keratitis (n = 2), exposure keratopathy (n = 2), failed graft (n = 1), peripheral ulcerative keratitis (n = 1), rosacea (n = 1), and stitch abscess (n = 1). Mean ± SD time from PCED presentation to TST was 58.9 ± 106.3 days (range, 14-390 days). The mean ± SD area of the PCED was 25.1 ± 15.7 mm2 (range, 0.50-42.0 mm2). After TST, resolution of the PCED was achieved in 29/34 eyes (85.3%) without the need for additional interventions within 22.5 ± 24.3 days (range, 2-105 days). The mean ± SD logMAR best-corrected visual acuity improved significantly from 1.11 ± 0.41 to 0.83 ± 0.70 (P = .02). There were no complications attributed to TST and 2 patients elected to discontinue due to discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: TST achieved resolution of PCEDs secondary to various etiologies in 85.3% of eyes, with significant improvement in vision demonstrated. This simple, inexpensive, noninvasive technique may be considered for patients with PCEDs.


Subject(s)
Corneal Diseases , Corneal Transplantation , Corneal Ulcer , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cornea/surgery , Corneal Diseases/therapy , Corneal Transplantation/adverse effects , Corneal Ulcer/surgery , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Splints , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL