ABSTRACT
The availability of pangenotypic direct-acting antivirals for treatment of hepatitis C (HCV) has provided an opportunity to simplify patient pathways. Recent clinical practice guidelines have recognised the need for simplification to ensure that elimination of HCV as a public health concern remains a priority. Despite the move towards simplified treatment algorithms, there remains some complexity in the recommendations for the management of genotype 3 patients with compensated cirrhosis. In an era where additional clinical trial data are not anticipated, clinical guidance should consider experience gained in real-world settings. Although more experience is required for some pangenotypic therapeutic options, on the basis of published real-world data, there is already sufficient evidence to consider a simplified approach for genotype 3 patients with compensated cirrhosis. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted the need to minimise the need for complex patient pathways and clinical practice guidelines need to continue to evolve in order to ensure that patient outcomes remain optimised.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Communicable Disease Control , Critical Pathways , Disease Eradication , Hepatitis C , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Communicable Disease Control/organization & administration , Critical Pathways/standards , Critical Pathways/trends , Disease Eradication/methods , Disease Eradication/organization & administration , Global Health/trends , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/therapy , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , SARS-CoV-2Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Health/standards , Occupational Medicine/organization & administration , Pandemics , COVID-19/transmission , Clinical Audit , Critical Pathways/organization & administration , Critical Pathways/standards , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Health Occupations/education , Health Occupations/standards , Health Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Medicine/methods , Occupational Medicine/standards , Occupational Medicine/trends , Preventive Health Services/methods , Preventive Health Services/organization & administration , Preventive Health Services/standards , Return to Work , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Work Capacity EvaluationABSTRACT
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic may have affected cancer management. We aimed to evaluate changes in every oncology care pathway essential step, from screening to treatment, during the pandemic. Monthly oncological activity differences between 2019 and 2020 (screening tests, histopathological analyzes, multidisciplinary tumor board meetings (MTBMs), diagnostic announcement procedures (DAPs), and treatments were calculated in two French areas experiencing different pandemic intensity (Reims and Colmar). COVID-19 has had a dramatic impact in terms of screening (-86% to -100%), diagnosis (-39%), and surgical treatment (-30%). This global decrease in all essential oncology care pathway steps contrasted with the relative stability of chemotherapy (-9%) and radiotherapy use (-16%). Outbreak occurred earlier and with more intensity in Colmar but had a comparable impact in both areas regarding MTMBs and DAPs. The current ONCOCARE-COV study is still in progress and with a longer follow-up to analyze postlockdown situation.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Infection Control/standards , Medical Oncology/trends , Neoplasms/therapy , Pandemics/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Testing/standards , Critical Pathways/standards , Critical Pathways/statistics & numerical data , Critical Pathways/trends , France/epidemiology , Humans , Mass Screening/standards , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/trends , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Medical Oncology/standards , Medical Oncology/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/immunology , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/standards , Patient Care Team/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Telemedicine/standardsABSTRACT
The ability of health systems to cope with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) cases is of major concern. In preparation, we used clinical pathway models to estimate healthcare requirements for COVID-19 patients in the context of broader public health measures in Australia. An age- and risk-stratified transmission model of COVID-19 demonstrated that an unmitigated epidemic would dramatically exceed the capacity of the health system of Australia over a prolonged period. Case isolation and contact quarantine alone are insufficient to constrain healthcare needs within feasible levels of expansion of health sector capacity. Overlaid social restrictions must be applied over the course of the epidemic to ensure systems do not become overwhelmed and essential health sector functions, including care of COVID-19 patients, can be maintained. Attention to the full pathway of clinical care is needed, along with ongoing strengthening of capacity.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/transmission , Hospital Bed Capacity/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics/prevention & control , Surge Capacity/organization & administration , Australia/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Contact Tracing , Critical Pathways/standards , Humans , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Physical Distancing , Public Health , Quarantine/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Several physiological abnormalities that develop during COVID-19 are associated with increased mortality. In the present study, we aimed to develop a clinical risk score to predict the in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients, based on a set of variables available soon after the hospitalisation triage. SETTING: Retrospective cohort study of 516 patients consecutively admitted for COVID-19 to two Italian tertiary hospitals located in Northern and Central Italy were collected from 22 February 2020 (date of first admission) to 10 April 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients≥18 years admitted for COVID-19. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Simple clinical and laboratory findings readily available after triage were compared by patients' survival status ('dead' vs 'alive'), with the objective of identifying baseline variables associated with mortality. These were used to build a COVID-19 in-hospital mortality risk score (COVID-19MRS). RESULTS: Mean age was 67±13 years (mean±SD), and 66.9% were male. Using Cox regression analysis, tertiles of increasing age (≥75, upper vs <62 years, lower: HR 7.92; p<0.001) and number of chronic diseases (≥4 vs 0-1: HR 2.09; p=0.007), respiratory rate (HR 1.04 per unit increase; p=0.001), PaO2/FiO2 (HR 0.995 per unit increase; p<0.001), serum creatinine (HR 1.34 per unit increase; p<0.001) and platelet count (HR 0.995 per unit increase; p=0.001) were predictors of mortality. All six predictors were used to build the COVID-19MRS (Area Under the Curve 0.90, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.93), which proved to be highly accurate in stratifying patients at low, intermediate and high risk of in-hospital death (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19MRS is a rapid, operator-independent and inexpensive clinical tool that objectively predicts mortality in patients with COVID-19. The score could be helpful from triage to guide earlier assignment of COVID-19 patients to the most appropriate level of care.
Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , Coronavirus Infections , Critical Care , Critical Pathways , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Risk Assessment/methods , Triage , Aged , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/blood , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Coronavirus Infections/physiopathology , Critical Care/methods , Critical Care/statistics & numerical data , Critical Pathways/organization & administration , Critical Pathways/standards , Female , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonia, Viral/blood , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Pneumonia, Viral/physiopathology , Prognosis , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Triage/methods , Triage/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with COVID-19 (PIMS-TS) is a novel condition that was first reported in April, 2020. We aimed to develop a national consensus management pathway for the UK to provide guidance for clinicians caring for children with PIMS-TS. A three-phase online Delphi process and virtual consensus meeting sought consensus over the investigation, management, and research priorities from multidisciplinary clinicians caring for children with PIMS-TS. We used 140 consensus statements to derive a consensus management pathway that describes the initial investigation of children with suspected PIMS-TS, including blood markers to help determine the severity of disease, an echocardiogram, and a viral and septic screen to exclude other infectious causes of illness. The importance of a multidisciplinary team in decision making for children with PIMS-TS is highlighted throughout the guidance, along with the recommended treatment options, including supportive care, intravenous immunoglobulin, methylprednisolone, and biological therapies. These include IL-1 antagonists (eg, anakinra), IL-6 receptor blockers (eg, tocilizumab), and anti-TNF agents (eg, infliximab) for children with Kawasaki disease-like phenotype and non-specific presentations. Use of a rapid online Delphi process has made it possible to generate a national consensus pathway in a timely and cost-efficient manner in the middle of a global pandemic. The consensus statements represent the views of UK clinicians and are applicable to children in the UK suspected of having PIMS-TS. Future evidence will inform updates to this guidance, which in the interim provides a solid framework to support clinicians caring for children with PIMS-TS. This process has directly informed new PIMS-TS specific treatment groups as part of the adaptive UK RECOVERY trial protocol, which is the first formal randomised controlled trial of therapies for PIMS-TS globally.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Critical Pathways/standards , Disease Management , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/therapy , Child , Consensus , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/epidemiology , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/immunology , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/therapy , United KingdomSubject(s)
Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Critical Care/organization & administration , Critical Pathways/organization & administration , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Vascular Surgical Procedures/organization & administration , Algorithms , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/standards , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Critical Care/standards , Critical Pathways/standards , Elective Surgical Procedures/standards , Humans , Infection Control/organization & administration , Infection Control/standards , Patient Selection , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Vascular Diseases/surgery , Vascular Surgical Procedures/standardsABSTRACT
During the current pandemic scenario, maxillofacial rehabilitation specialists involved with supportive care in cancer must transform its practice to cope with COVID-19 and improve protocols that could quickly return the oral function of complex cancer patients who cannot wait for surgical complex rehabilitation. This includes the role of the maxillofacial prosthodontist for the rehabilitation of surgically treated patients with maxillary cancers by the means of filling obturator prostheses that are considered an optimal scientific-based strategy to reduce hospital stay with excellent pain control, oral function (speech, swallowing, mastication, and facial esthetics), psychologic and quality of life outcomes for the patients following intraoral cancer resection. Therefore, the aim of this commentary was to bring new lights to the strategic use of obturator prostheses for the rehabilitation of oral cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic as well as to present a protocol for managing such cases.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Critical Pathways/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Maxillofacial Prosthesis , Mouth Neoplasms/rehabilitation , Palatal Obturators , Ambulatory Care/methods , Ambulatory Care/organization & administration , Critical Pathways/standards , Dental Prosthesis Design/standards , Esthetics , Humans , Mandibular Reconstruction/instrumentation , Mandibular Reconstruction/methods , Mandibular Reconstruction/standards , Maxillofacial Prosthesis/statistics & numerical data , Mouth Neoplasms/surgery , Orthodontics/methods , Orthodontics/organization & administration , Orthodontics/standards , Palatal Obturators/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , Pathology, Oral/organization & administration , Pathology, Oral/standards , Quality of Life , SARS-CoV-2 , WorkflowSubject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Critical Pathways/standards , Diabetic Foot/therapy , Foot Ulcer/therapy , Time-to-Treatment/standards , Amputation, Surgical , Critical Pathways/organization & administration , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Diabetic Foot/epidemiology , Foot Ulcer/epidemiology , Humans , International Agencies/standards , Pandemics , Societies, Medical/standards , Time-to-Treatment/organization & administrationSubject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Critical Care , Critical Pathways , Evidence-Based Medicine , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/physiopathology , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Critical Care/ethics , Critical Care/methods , Critical Care/standards , Critical Care Outcomes , Critical Illness/therapy , Critical Pathways/ethics , Critical Pathways/standards , Empirical Research , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Evidence-Based Medicine/organization & administration , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/physiopathology , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Respiration, Artificial/standards , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/etiology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Standard of CareSubject(s)
Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Endoscopy, Digestive System/standards , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnosis , Infection Control/standards , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Critical Pathways/organization & administration , Critical Pathways/standards , Humans , Infection Control/instrumentation , Infection Control/organization & administration , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient/prevention & control , Italy/epidemiology , Personal Protective Equipment/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2Subject(s)
Critical Pathways , Health Personnel , Needs Assessment , Pandemics , Physician's Role , Uncertainty , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , Clinical Decision-Making , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/psychology , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Critical Pathways/ethics , Critical Pathways/standards , Emotional Intelligence , Family/psychology , Health Personnel/ethics , Health Personnel/psychology , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/psychology , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Prognosis , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Novel coronavirus-19 disease (COVID-19) is an escalating, highly infectious global pandemic that is quickly overwhelming healthcare systems. This has implications on standard cardiac care for ST-elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs). In the setting of anticipated resource scarcity in the future, we are forced to reconsider fibrinolytic therapy in our management algorithms. We encourage clinicians to maintain a high level of suspicion for STEMI mimics, such as myopericarditis which is a known, not infrequent, complication of COVID-19 disease. Herein, we present a pathway developed by a multidisciplinary panel of stakeholders at NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center for the management of STEMI in suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients.