ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 imposed dramatic changes on ENT service delivery. Pre-pandemic, such changes would have been considered potentially unsafe. This study outlines the impact of lockdown on the incidence and management of ENT emergencies at a large UK centre. METHODS: After modification of pre-pandemic guidelines, ENT emergency referrals data during the UK lockdown were prospectively captured. A comparative analysis was performed with retrospective data from a corresponding period in 2019. RESULTS: An overall reduction (p < 0.001) in emergency referrals (n = 119) and admissions (n = 18) occurred during the lockdown period compared to the 2019 period (432 referrals and 290 admissions). Specifically, there were reduced admission rates for epistaxis (p < 0.0001) and tonsillar infection (p < 0.005) in the lockdown period. During lockdown, 90 per cent of patients requiring non-dissolvable nasal packing were managed as out-patients. CONCLUSIONS: Coronavirus disease 2019 compelled modifications to pre-pandemic ENT guidelines. The enforced changes to emergency care appear to be safe and successfully adopted. Arguably, the measures have both economic and patient-related implications post-coronavirus disease 2019 and during future similar pandemics and lockdowns.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19 , Epistaxis/therapy , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Peritonsillar Abscess/therapy , Tonsillitis/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ear , Ear Diseases/epidemiology , Ear Diseases/therapy , Emergencies , Emergency Service, Hospital , Epistaxis/epidemiology , Female , Foreign Bodies/epidemiology , Foreign Bodies/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases/epidemiology , Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases/therapy , Peritonsillar Abscess/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Referral and Consultation/trends , SARS-CoV-2 , Tonsillitis/epidemiology , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Within Neurotology, special draping systems have been devised for mastoid surgery recognizing that drilling of middle ear mucosa is an aerosol generating medical procedure (AGMP) which can place surgical teams at risk of COVID-19 infection. We provide a thorough description of a barrier system utilized in our practice, along with work completed by our group to better quantify its effectiveness. Utilization of a barrier system can provide near complete bone dust and droplet containment within the surgical field and prevent contamination of other healthcare workers. As this is an early system, further adaptations and national collaborations are required to ultimately arrive at a system that seamlessly integrates into the surgical suite. While these barrier systems are new, they are timely as we face a pandemic, and can play a crucial role in safely resuming surgery.
Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Ear Diseases/epidemiology , Mastoid/surgery , Otologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Skull Base/surgery , COVID-19 , Comorbidity , Ear Diseases/surgery , Humans , Pandemics , Personal Protective Equipment , SARS-CoV-2Subject(s)
Contrast Media , Coronavirus Infections/diagnostic imaging , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Ear Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnostic imaging , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Audiology/methods , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Ear Diseases/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Sensitivity and Specificity , Time Factors , Ultrasonography, Doppler/methods , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate small-particle aerosolization from mastoidectomy relevant to potential viral transmission and to test source-control mitigation strategies. STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric simulation. SETTING: Surgical simulation laboratory. METHODS: An optical particle size spectrometer was used to quantify 1- to 10-µm aerosols 30 cm from mastoid cortex drilling. Two barrier drapes were evaluated: OtoTent1, a drape sheet affixed to the microscope; OtoTent2, a custom-structured drape that enclosed the surgical field with specialized ports. RESULTS: Mastoid drilling without a barrier drape, with or without an aerosol-scavenging second suction, generated large amounts of 1- to 10-µm particulate. Drilling under OtoTent1 generated a high density of particles when compared with baseline environmental levels (P < .001, U = 107). By contrast, when drilling was conducted under OtoTent2, mean particle density remained at baseline. Adding a second suction inside OtoTent1 or OtoTent2 kept particle density at baseline levels. Significant aerosols were released upon removal of OtoTent1 or OtoTent2 despite a 60-second pause before drape removal after drilling (P < .001, U = 0, n = 10, 12; P < .001, U = 2, n = 12, 12, respectively). However, particle density did not increase above baseline when a second suction and a pause before removal were both employed. CONCLUSIONS: Mastoidectomy without a barrier, even when a second suction was added, generated substantial 1- to 10-µm aerosols. During drilling, large amounts of aerosols above baseline levels were detected with OtoTent1 but not OtoTent2. For both drapes, a second suction was an effective mitigation strategy during drilling. Last, the combination of a second suction and a pause before removal prevented aerosol escape during the removal of either drape.
Subject(s)
Aerosols/adverse effects , COVID-19/epidemiology , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Ear Diseases/surgery , Mastoidectomy/methods , Otologic Surgical Procedures/standards , Personal Protective Equipment , Cadaver , Comorbidity , Ear Diseases/epidemiology , Humans , Mastoid/surgery , Otologic Surgical Procedures/methods , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
SARS-CoV-2, the novel coronavirus resulting in the present COVID-19 pandemic, has increased the otolaryngologist's reliance on telemedicine to manage outpatient pathology. The nature of telemedicine, however, limits a provider's ability to obtain a comprehensive physical examination, specifically of the tympanic membrane. Various smartphone-based otoscopic attachments are now available that facilitate patient-obtained otoscopic image capture of the tympanic membrane. Here, we present 3 cases in which a patient-purchased, over-the-counter otoscope was utilized to alter otologic management during the time of social distancing. Further research is necessary to improve our understanding the safety and efficacy of patient-based "at-home" otoscopic examination and to optimize the use of these devices.