Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 127
Filter
4.
Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur ; 25(1)2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1744721

Subject(s)
Editorial Policies
5.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 116(12): 2313-2315, 2021 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1675292
7.
Gynecol Endocrinol ; 38(1): 1, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1621371
8.
Pediatr Radiol ; 52(1): 1-2, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1603078
9.
J Comp Neurol ; 529(1): 3-7, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1574546
10.
Neurol Sci ; 42(12): 4861-4863, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1561596

Subject(s)
Editorial Policies , Humans
12.
Nat Microbiol ; 6(12): 1467-1468, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1532058
13.
BMJ ; 374: n1883, 2021 07 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1495212
14.
BMJ ; 374: n1771, 2021 08 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1495166
16.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 479(8): 1665-1668, 2021 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1462532
17.
18.
Women Health ; 61(1): 1-2, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1440519
19.
Am J Surg ; 222(6): 1104-1111, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1439837

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic exposed racism as a public health crisis embedded in structural processes. Editors of surgical research journals pledged their commitment to improve structure and process through increasing diversity in the peer review and editorial process; however, little benchmarking data are available. METHODS: A survey of editorial board members from high impact surgical research journals captured self-identified demographics. Analysis of manuscript submissions from 2016 to 2020 compared acceptance for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)-focused manuscripts to overall rates. RESULTS: 25.6% of respondents were female, 2.9% Black, and 3.3% Hispanic. There was variation in the diversity among journals and in the proportion of DEI submissions they attract, but no clear correlation between DEI acceptance rates and board diversity. CONCLUSIONS: Diversity among board members reflects underrepresentation of minorities seen among surgeons nationally. Recruitment and retention of younger individuals, representing more diverse backgrounds, may be a strategy for change. DEI publication rates may benefit from calls for increasing DEI scholarship more so than changes to the peer review process.


Subject(s)
Cultural Diversity , General Surgery , Peer Review , Periodicals as Topic , Adult , African Americans/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors , Aged , Biomedical Research , Editorial Policies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Peer Review/methods , Sex Factors , United States , /statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL