ABSTRACT
To address anatomy knowledge gaps exacerbated by the education constraints of a new shortened medical school curriculum and the COVID-19 pandemic, the Orthopedic Surgery Interest Group (OSIG) created a novel hybrid anatomy curriculum for students interested in orthopedic surgery. The main objectives were to determine (1) Does this elective supplement to the curriculum improve students' perceived confidence with regard to orthopedic anatomy? (2) What are the students' preferred formats for receiving this elective supplement to the curriculum? To determine this, we used a prospective study design to determine the impact of the OSIG's student-led hybrid anatomy sessions. A survey with a five-point Likert scale (1) Strongly disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither agree nor disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly agree; was used to quantify responses. Chi-squared tests, Fisher's exact tests and T-tests were used when appropriate. Our results show that participants without prior anatomy experience rated the course higher on average when compared with those with prior anatomy experience (4.27 vs. 3.67, respectively; p = 0.168). Most students (88.2%) prefer for anatomy sessions to be held more frequently and 76.4% enjoyed having virtual components. 82.4% of participants reported that this course improved their self-confidence regarding orthopedic anatomy, and 100% would recommend it to other students. Most students enjoyed the course and reported improved self-perceived anatomy knowledge after participating. Medical schools that have a shortened anatomy curriculum can consider using the present study as a model for an optional musculoskeletal anatomy supplement at their institution.
Subject(s)
Anatomy , COVID-19 , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Students, Medical , Humans , Schools, Medical , Prospective Studies , Pandemics , COVID-19/prevention & control , Curriculum , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Anatomy/educationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic changed the way we work, spend, live, and learn. The impact was felt in the health sector where hospitals cancelled elective surgery, put on hold outpatient services, and implemented new social distancing procedures and telehealth systems, to enable hospitals to increase bed capacity. For medical students, these factors meant significant disruption to their clinical placements, remote delivery of their education, cessation of international and interstate placements, complicated by significant travel restrictions and border closures. There were concerns that final year students might be unable to graduate that year due to this lack of clinical exposure. INNOVATION: As a result of this disruption in late March 2020 we developed an innovative 6 week 'COVID-19 e-lective' rotation, consisting of online modules, virtual clinical tutorials and a COVID project totalling the equivalent of 200 h of work. RESULTS: An evaluation was undertaken that found it to be remarkably successful in meeting the students' learning needs and alleviating concerns about disrupted placements. It was also conducted during 2021 for all Year 4 students to help expand clinical placement opportunities. OUTCOMES: This paper describes the e-lective, its innovations, its challenges, and its evaluation findings, for others to learn from.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Preceptorship , Students, Medical , Telemedicine , Humans , Pandemics , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methodsABSTRACT
After outbreaks in more than 110 countries, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic on the March 11, 2020, heralding unprecedented challenges in medical education. Our aim is to provide a descriptive overview of the impact of COVID-19 on medical education worldwide and to assess its future repercussions. Worldwide, medical students were removed from clerkship training. Clinical skills and practical procedure training transitioned to being online, and in some cases, postponed. Medical educators scrambled to convert the curriculum into online formats. Access to Internet, technology, and computer education posed resource allocation challenges in developing countries and further widened the disparities in medical education. Even in countries where the framework and funding were available to support the online transition, debatably, this arrangement can lead to disparities in clinical skills, bedside manner, and field experience among pre- and post-COVID-19 medical graduates. Challenges extend beyond undergraduate medical education to include the medical licensing process of international and national postgraduates. The international community of medical educators needs to collaborate to drive the future of medical education, as the world adapts to the "new normal."
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Distance , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Education, Medical , Students, Medical , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Curriculum , Education, Distance/methods , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Undergraduate medical curricula often fail to integrate experiential learning methodologies. Thus, a pilot series of interactive pathology lessons was designed and implemented in an attempt to promote experiential learning. METHODS: Thirty pre-graduate medical students voluntarily participated in the interactive study groups at the First Department of Pathology of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School. A questionnaire was designed to investigate the satisfaction of students regarding their participation in pathology study groups and to identify the characteristics that shape students' perceptions of the foundations of medical education. Descriptive statistics (mean values) were used to describe the students' evaluations of the pathology study groups, and thematic analysis was conducted to investigate the data collected using open-ended questions. RESULTS: Interactions with the professor and the option of co-observing the slides using dual-view optical microscopes and virtual slides were each evaluated as "Excellent" by â 95% of the students. Four overarching themes were identified regarding the core characteristics of medical education according to the students' perspectives: 1) educational background in medical education, 2) interaction with educators in medical education, 3) educational material in medical education and 4) assessment in medical education. CONCLUSIONS: The high rates of acceptance of the pathology study groups reflect the desire and need for active learning methodologies to be implemented in modern medical education. Nearly all the students mentioned the need for practical skill acquisition, the integration of theory into practice and ethics in medical education. The success of these optional pathology study groups highlights the need for similar modalities to be incorporated into the main medical education curriculum.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Education, Medical , Students, Medical , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Curriculum , Problem-Based Learning , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methodsABSTRACT
COVID-19 sparked massive educational change and dictated that traditional courses rapidly transitioned online. This presented a unique challenge for anatomy, a visually orientated subject that has conventionally relied heavily on face-to-face teaching. Near-peer teaching (NPT) is one method with the potential to address this challenge. When given more responsibility, student-teachers are more likely to deliver effective teaching sessions and include the most appropriate resources for the learners. Current literature surrounding the use of NPT in both frontline and supplementary settings have already demonstrated its potential, however, its efficacy in an online environment is still largely unknown. The Faculty of Medicine at the University of Southampton has a well-established NPT programme as part of its 5 year undergraduate course (BM5). A quasi-experimental cohort study was conducted to determine whether the benefits associated with NPT are preserved when delivered online. Two cohorts of second year BM5 students received cranial nerve NPT as part of their formal clinical neuroanatomy module, one face to face (N = 150) and the other online (N = 168). Knowledge tests were undertaken by participants to assess knowledge gain and retention, and an established Likert style survey instrument was administered to assess student perceptions. Both online and face-to-face NPT sessions resulted in significant increases in student knowledge gain (p < 0.0001), yet the difference between the two was insignificant (p = 0.2432). Subsequent knowledge retention tests were also shown to be similar (p = 0.7732). Students perceived both methods of NPT delivery positively but found online NPT less enjoyable (p < 0.0001) and considered it to be a more inefficient use of time (p = 0.0035). This research suggests that online NPT can be deployed without a detrimental risk to learning when compared to traditional NPT applications in pre-clinical neuroanatomy teaching.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Humans , Neuroanatomy/education , Cohort Studies , Peer Group , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methodsABSTRACT
The undergraduate medical programme at Newcastle University (NU) includes a fundamental 'Essentials of Medical Practice' (EOMP) phase comprising the first 2 years of study. This period is designed to support entrants in their transition from further education into the advanced study and practice of clinical medicine. The anatomical sciences of gross anatomy, histology and embryology, and life sciences including physiology, pharmacology and genetics are key disciplines taught within the integrated case-based EOMP curriculum. Learners apply basic science knowledge to clinical scenarios during training in practical examination, communication and reasoning skills. Within the modern pedagogic landscape, the development and introduction of technology-enhanced learning strategies have enhanced the provision of remote learning resources in pre-clinical education. However, the emergence of COVID-19 has resulted in widespread technological challenges for educators and learners, and has raised pedagogic, logistical and ethical concerns. Nonetheless, the pandemic has produced favourable conditions for the creation of valuable digital visualisation strategies for learning and teaching, and for developing and modernising universal approaches to remote education. Here, we describe our technology-enhanced adaptations to COVID-19 across the domains of teaching, learning and academic support for pre-clinical learners studying basic life sciences and clinical skills. Moreover, we outline research-informed digital visualisation solutions to pandemic-era challenges and reflect upon experiences gained within our own educational context. In doing so, we provide insights into the impacts and successes of our interventions. While providing a record of unprecedented contemporary circumstances, we also aim to utilise our observations and experiences of COVID-19 pedagogy when developing ongoing strategies for delivering curricula and futureproofing educational practice.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Humans , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Curriculum , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , LearningABSTRACT
To address anatomy knowledge gaps exacerbated by the education constraints of a new shortened medical school curriculum and the COVID-19 pandemic, the Orthopedic Surgery Interest Group (OSIG) created a novel hybrid anatomy curriculum for students interested in orthopedic surgery. The main objectives were to determine (1) Does this elective supplement to the curriculum improve students' perceived confidence with regard to orthopedic anatomy? (2) What are the students' preferred formats for receiving this elective supplement to the curriculum? To determine this, we used a prospective study design to determine the impact of the OSIG's student-led hybrid anatomy sessions. A survey with a five-point Likert scale (1) Strongly disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither agree nor disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly agree; was used to quantify responses. Chi-squared tests, Fisher's exact tests and T-tests were used when appropriate. Our results show that participants without prior anatomy experience rated the course higher on average when compared with those with prior anatomy experience (4.27 vs. 3.67, respectively; p = 0.168). Most students (88.2%) prefer for anatomy sessions to be held more frequently and 76.4% enjoyed having virtual components. 82.4% of participants reported that this course improved their self-confidence regarding orthopedic anatomy, and 100% would recommend it to other students. Most students enjoyed the course and reported improved self-perceived anatomy knowledge after participating. Medical schools that have a shortened anatomy curriculum can consider using the present study as a model for an optional musculoskeletal anatomy supplement at their institution.
Subject(s)
Anatomy , COVID-19 , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Students, Medical , Humans , Schools, Medical , Prospective Studies , Pandemics , COVID-19/prevention & control , Curriculum , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Anatomy/educationABSTRACT
COVID-19 had a tremendous effect on medical education. Most teaching sessions had to be shifted online, posing additional stress and potential isolation on medical students. However, it also offered the promotion of innovative digital teaching concepts. In this article, an approach to undergraduate mental health training is presented and evaluated. The curriculum was designed according to Kern's six-step approach and consisted of asynchronous online material as well synchronous digital teaching and was accompanied by a plethora of newly developed teaching material (videos, fact sheets, etc.). Content covered the whole spectrum of diseases seen in a service of psychosomatic medicine and psychotherapy (i.e. anxiety, depression, trauma, somatoform and eating disorders, as well as motivational interviewing). Feedback from participants was collected, and exam results (written and practical) were compared to pre-COVID-19 times using t-tests for dependent and independent samples. Students were highly satisfied with the teaching (rating of 1.3 ± 0.6, n = 139 students). There was no significant difference from course evaluations before COVID-19 (1.5 ± 0.5, p > .05). The teaching also received an award in the students' competition "best digital teaching concept in summer term 2020". In the written exams, there was no significant difference between before COVID-19 (2.4 ± 0.45) and during COVID-19 times (1.6 ± 0.39; p > .05). In the practical objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), there was also no significant difference between students' judgement of the difficulty of the station (1.9 ± 0.22 vs 1.9 ± 0.31; p > .05) or how well-prepared they felt for the exam (2.0 ± 0.24 vs 2.0 ± 0.31; p > .05). However, there was a significant difference in terms of grades, with the pre-COVID-19 grades being significantly better (2.7 ± 0.37 vs 2.0 ± 0.44; p < .05), which reflects the difficulty of transferring practical skills training to an online setting. Students particularly valued the possibility of self-directed learning combined with personal guidance by departmental experts, reflecting the importance of wellbeing-centred medical education. The pandemic triggered overnight challenges for teaching mental health that may also offer the opportunity to think about worldwide teaching standards with easily accessible material and courses online. This may offer the opportunity to enthral medical students to become mental health specialists themselves.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Students, Medical , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Mental Health , Clinical Competence , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methodsABSTRACT
Sudden shifts towards online education since the outbreak of Covid-19 propelled the unprepared changes in teaching and learning over the world. The impact of transferring Interpreter training from face-to-face instruction and practices to a fully online environment was viewed differently. Issues such as relatively inferior engagement in learning and dissatisfied performance in competence building were highlighted and compounded by the concern of academic burnout and learning stress caused by the abiding pandemic. To curb the unsatisfactory situation, alternative learning methods and innovative pedagogical approaches were advocated. The present study was a pioneering effort to integrate informal learning into remote interpreter training by developing and implementing an online informal learning communities for undergraduate interpreting trainees in a Chinese university. The researcher recruited 36 students (n = 36) from the institution as participants in the 1.5-year piloting project. The findings of the research revealed the impact of informal learning in supplementing formal education by engaging involved students. Student-centered learning supported by collaborative and experiential activities in an informal environment was well-received for its ability to galvanize student's engagement and academic achievements. The perceptions from participants revealed preference and expectation from students for expanded roles of trainers in interpreter training.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Distance , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Humans , Education, Distance/methods , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pilot Projects , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Pandemics/prevention & controlABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 disrupted undergraduate clinical education when medical schools removed students from clinical rotations following AAMC recommendations. Clerkship directors (CDs) had to adapt rapidly and modify clerkship curricula. However, the scope and effects of these modifications are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of the initial phase of COVID-19 on the internal medicine (IM) undergraduate clinical education. DESIGN: A nationally representative web survey. PARTICIPANTS: IM CDs from 137 LCME-accredited US medical schools in 2020. MAIN MEASURES: Items (80) assessed clerkship structure and curriculum, assessment in clerkships, post-clerkship IM clinical experiences, and CD roles and support. The framework of Understanding Crisis Response (Royal Society for Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures, and Commerce) was used to determine whether curricular modifications were "amplified," "restarted," "let go," or "ended." KEY RESULTS: Response rate was 74%. In response to COVID-19, 32% (32/101) of clerkships suspended all clinical activities and 66% (67/101) only in-person. Prior to clinical disruption, students spent a median of 8.0 weeks (IQR: 2) on inpatient and 2.0 weeks (IQR: 4) on ambulatory rotations; during clinical re-entry, students were spending 5.0 (IQR: 3) and 1.0 (IQR: 2) weeks, respectively. Bedside teaching and physical exam instruction were "let go" during the early phase. Students were removed from direct patient care for a median of 85.5 days. The sub-internship curriculum remained largely unaffected. Before the pandemic, 11% of schools were using a pass/fail grading system; at clinical re-entry 47% and during the survey period 23% were using it. Due to the pandemic, 78.2% of CDs assumed new roles or had expanded responsibilities; 51% reported decreased scholarly productivity. CONCLUSIONS: Curricular adaptations occurred in IM clerkships across US medical schools as a result of COVID-19. More research is needed to explore the long-term implications of these changes on medical student education and clinical learning environments.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Clinical Clerkship , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Students, Medical , Curriculum , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Humans , Internal Medicine/educationABSTRACT
SUMMARY: The availability of advanced telecommunication technology and the social restrictions introduced by a global pandemic have compelled the medical community to explore new avenues of surgical education. Although cadaver courses have long been a fundamental method for learning surgical anatomy and improving operative preparedness, the COVID-19 pandemic has made traditional dissections less practical. The need for quality virtual learning experiences motivated the authors to design and assess the feasibility of organizing a live, virtual upper extremity peripheral nerve cadaver dissection course. Three phases were critical when developing the course: preplanning, planning, and execution. The success of the live, virtual cadaver dissection depended not only on a detailed curriculum, but the technological audio-video-internet needs to effectively communicate and interact with the viewers. Virtual learning mitigates the risks of in-person dissection courses during a global pandemic and can be enhanced with interactive media (e.g., illustrations and schematics) to augment learning experiences.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Students, Medical , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cadaver , Curriculum , Dissection , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & controlABSTRACT
SUMMARY: The availability of advanced telecommunication technology and the social restrictions introduced by a global pandemic have compelled the medical community to explore new avenues of surgical education. Although cadaver courses have long been a fundamental method for learning surgical anatomy and improving operative preparedness, the COVID-19 pandemic has made traditional dissections less practical. The need for quality virtual learning experiences motivated the authors to design and assess the feasibility of organizing a live, virtual upper extremity peripheral nerve cadaver dissection course. Three phases were critical when developing the course: preplanning, planning, and execution. The success of the live, virtual cadaver dissection depended not only on a detailed curriculum, but the technological audio-video-internet needs to effectively communicate and interact with the viewers. Virtual learning mitigates the risks of in-person dissection courses during a global pandemic and can be enhanced with interactive media (e.g., illustrations and schematics) to augment learning experiences.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Students, Medical , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cadaver , Curriculum , Dissection , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & controlABSTRACT
Mobile electrocardiogram (ECG) devices are valuable tools for teaching ECG interpretation. The primary purpose of this follow-up study was to determine if an ECG active learning session could be safely and effectively performed during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic using a newly developed mobile 6-lead ECG device. Additionally, we examined the educational impact of these active learning sessions on student knowledge of cardiovascular physiology and the utility of the mobile 6-lead ECG device in a classroom setting. In this study, first-year medical students (MS1) performed four active learning activities using the new mobile 6-lead ECG device. Data were collected from 42 MS1s through a quantitative survey administered in September 2020. Overall, students felt the activity enhanced their understanding of the course material and that the activity was performed safely and in compliance with local COVID-19 guidelines. These results emphasize student preference for hands-on, small group learning activities in spite of the pandemic.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Students, Medical , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Electrocardiography , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Pandemics , Problem-Based Learning/methods , Self Concept , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic displaced medical students from their rotations and into virtual classrooms. The authors aimed to develop a virtual curriculum with the goals for students to gain knowledge in plastic surgery, to acquire technical skills, and to be able to promote community. METHODS: The authors developed a 4-week educational curriculum of topics in plastic surgery using the American Society of Plastic Surgeons Resident Education Curriculum and an online plastic surgery curriculum. Virtual flipped classroom case discussions and weekly surgical skills workshops were offered. Precourse and postcourse surveys were administered, and results were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 25.0. RESULTS: Three hundred three medical students and recent graduates enrolled in the course in June of 2020. One hundred eighty-two students completed the precourse survey (60 percent response rate), and of those, 50.0 percent ( n = 91) completed the postcourse survey for paired comparison. Students reported significant improvement in confidence discussing the relevant anatomy, workup, and surgical approaches to clinical cases, in addition to confidence in knowledge of all topic areas ( p < 0.001). Confidence in suturing and knot-tying techniques improved significantly among workshop participants ( p < 0.001). Students applying to residency programs this cycle felt significantly more prepared for subinternships ( p < 0.001) and significantly more connected to the community of applicants ( p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Virtual Curriculum improved knowledge, surgical skills, and community in the field among medical student participants. This course may serve to provide a framework for structured virtual learning activities for students interested in plastic surgery and may have significant long-lasting utility for students interested in the field.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Students, Medical , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Clinical Competence , Curriculum , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Humans , PandemicsABSTRACT
Covid-19 has altered medical education worldwide. Given recent events, UK Longitudinal Integrated Clerkships (LICs), which are relatively new innovations, may have changed in structure and delivery, or may have demonstrated resilience. Collating the responses and experiences of UK institutions may yield transferrable recommendations for institutions wishing to develop sustainable LICs. A mixed-methods survey concerning LIC prevalence, variety, and experiences of responses to Covid-19 was circulated to all 33 UK medical schools through academic networks. 25 survey responses were received, representing 20 institutions. 12 faculty completed follow up semi-structured interviews. 13 LICs were reported: 1 wasn't running during 2020, 5 were running unchanged, and 7 with alterations. 2 additional LICs were planned. Thematic analysis of free-text survey and interview responses revealed that relationships between faculty and institutions were central in facilitating recent adaptations to UK LICs. Given model flexibility, an increased drive to develop LICs was also evident. Barriers to adapting programmes included uncertainty regarding progression of Covid-19 restrictions and issues with secondary care access. Investing in faculty development and support networks could increase LIC sustainability. By highlighting the relative resilience of UK LIC placements during Covid-19, these findings offer important insight for the future delivery of sustainable LICs within, and beyond, the UK.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Clinical Clerkship , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Students, Medical , COVID-19/epidemiology , Clinical Clerkship/methods , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Humans , Schools, Medical , United Kingdom/epidemiologyABSTRACT
The present study evaluated the students' psychological well-being, experiences, performance, and perception of learning regional anatomy remotely. A regional anatomy remote learning curriculum was designed and learning materials were delivered virtually to 120 undergraduate medical students at Jinan University, China. All the students consented and voluntarily participated in this study by completing self-administered online questionnaires including the Zung's Self-Rating Anxiety and Depression Scales at the beginning and end of the learning session. A subset participated in focus group discussions. Most of the students (90.0%) positively evaluated the current distance learning model. More than 80% were satisfied with the content arrangement and coverage. Many students preferred virtual lectures (68.2%) and videos showing dissections (70.6%) during the distance learning sessions. However, writing laboratory reports and case-based learning were the least preferred modes of learning as they were only preferred by 23.2% and 14.1% of the students, respectively. There was no significant lockdown-related anxiety or depression reported by students using depression and anxiety scales as well as feedback from focus group discussions. The surveyed students' confidence scores in distance learning were significantly higher after 5 weeks than at the beginning of the session (3.05 ± 0.83 vs. 3.70 ± 0.71, P < 0.05). Furthermore, the present results showed no significant differences between the current group's academic performance in the unit tests as well as the final overall evaluation for different parts of the course compared to that of the previous year's cohort. The findings above were congruent with focus group discussion data that the use of the online teaching platform for regional anatomy significantly improved the students' confidence in virtual and self-directed learning and did not negatively affect their academic performance.
Subject(s)
Anatomy , COVID-19 , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Students, Medical , Anatomy/education , Anatomy, Regional/education , Communicable Disease Control , Curriculum , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Humans , Pandemics , Students, Medical/psychologyABSTRACT
Successive waves of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic lockdowns resulted in significant reduction in face-to-face teaching, with an adverse effect especially on sectors requiring direct skill acquisition. Despite the fact that augmented reality (AR) presents an equitable, cost-effective solution which reduces crowding in the confined spaces of the dissection theater, the benefits of AR-supported undergraduate medical education have been poorly investigated. We conducted a validated survey to explore the value of AR in the dissection theater and assess its impact from the learner's perspective. Further to a validated pilot (n = 30), a larger scale study (n = 130) was conducted to assess the introduction of AR across three different learning domains: retaining anatomy detail, perception of spatial anatomical relations, and speed of learning. A response rate of 85.4% was reported. Our results suggest that the use of AR technology leads to a significant enhancement of spatial relations, faster detailed material assimilation and assistance in understanding of key concepts. In addition, most participants opt to recommend AR as a valuable tool in the learning process. In view of the proposed added value of AR technology in various teaching aspects, we recommend that AR should be introduced as a standard practice in both pre- and postgraduate medical curricula and suggest further research regarding the use of this technology.
Subject(s)
Anatomy , Augmented Reality , COVID-19 , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Anatomy/education , Communicable Disease Control , Curriculum , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Humans , TeachingABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To explore the attitude and perception of undergraduate medical students and their staff towards the educational methods (conventional versus online) and to assess their performance accordingly. METHODS: It was a comparative cross sectional study, conducted at the Faculty of Medicine, Al- Imam University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia on May 30, 2020. A structured questionnaire was designed to collect the data from students and staff about conventional teaching, online teaching, conventional examination and online examination. It was in the form of 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 5-strongly agree, to 1-strongly disagree, in addition to age and gender. The results of conventional and online examination were recorded. RESULTS: The total sample reached 230 students and 20 staff. Mean scores for conventional teaching and examination were significantly higher than online. The mean values for grades of online final examination was significantly higher than those of midterm conventional examination. Most of the statements related to conventional teaching and examination attained a good response where students and their staff conveyed a negative perception pertinent to online examination. Students and staff showed a higher percentage of agreement in favor of online examination allowing immediate feedback. CONCLUSION: Conventional teaching was perceived as more effective, accessible, less technical difficulties and less fraud and cheating. Online learning, should be allowed in undergraduate medical education, by combining it with conventional learning, and students should be prepared to it.
Subject(s)
Attitude , COVID-19/epidemiology , Education, Distance , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Pandemics , Perception , Students, Medical/psychology , Academic Performance , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , SARS-CoV-2 , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Due to COVID-19 pandemic, Thanks giving ceremony to cadaver was different this year in two ways: the students were partially exposed to cadaveric dissections (for 7 months) and later learned Anatomy via online classes due to lockdown (for 5 months) and secondly it was not feasible to gather for the ceremony so virtual platform was preferred. The purpose of this study was to discern the gratitude for cadaver and to recognize the importance of cadaveric dissection from the reflection of students who experienced hybrid anatomy learning amidst COVID-19. METHODS: The study was conducted on 48 first year medical students who were admitted to the college in August 2019 and were willing to participate. An online invitation was sent to students to participate in virtual thanks giving to cadaver ceremony on the last day of their anatomy class (August 2020). RESULTS: Though the students partially studied gross anatomy with the aid of dissections on the cadaver; however, they expressed respect and gratitude to the silent mentor in the form of a card, poem, drawing or paragraph and shared it via google classroom platform. The students wished if they could continue their anatomy course in dissection hall as paused due to COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Reflection of these students may mark impact on future anatomy students who may or may not get the chance for dissections. The thanks-giving gesture will also help to bind medical science and humanity especially during the crisis of pandemic.
Subject(s)
Anatomy/education , COVID-19/prevention & control , Dissection/ethics , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/ethics , Students, Medical/psychology , Anatomy/ethics , Bioethical Issues , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/transmission , Cadaver , Communicable Disease Control/standards , Curriculum , Education, Distance/ethics , Education, Distance/methods , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Humanism , Humans , Learning , Pandemics/prevention & control , RespectABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted teaching in a variety of institutions, especially in medical schools. Electronic learning (e-learning) became the core method of teaching the curriculum during the pandemic. After 8 weeks of only online learning, a survey was conducted to investigate perception of this type of learning among medical students.A survey was conducted by distributing an online questionnaire to Polish medical students. Data gathered from the survey were analyzed with routine statistical software.Eight hundred four students answered the questionnaire. According to respondents' answers, the main advantages of online learning were the ability to stay at home (69%), continuous access to online materials (69%), learning at your own pace (64%), and comfortable surroundings (54%). The majority of respondents chose lack of interactions with patients (70%) and technical problems with IT equipment (54%) as the main disadvantages. There was no statistical difference between face-to-face and online learning in terms of opinions on the ability of the learning method to increase knowledge (Pâ=â.46). E-learning was considered less effective than face-to-face learning in terms of increasing skills (Pâ<â.001) and social competences (Pâ<â.001). Students assessed that they were less active during online classes compared to traditional classes (Pâ<â.001). E-learning was rated as enjoyable by 73% of respondents.E-learning is a powerful tool for teaching medical students. However, successful implementation of online learning into the curriculum requires a well thought-out strategy and a more active approach.