Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epilepsy , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Epilepsy/therapy , Epilepsy/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Objective: Seizure following immunization, especially in persons with epilepsy (PwE), has long been a concern, and seizure aggravation followed by Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines is a serious issue for PwE. The immunization rate in PwE has been lower compared to same-age controls due to vaccine hesitancy and concerns about seizure control. Herein, we systematically reviewed the seizure activity-related events in PwE following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: Four search engines were searched from inception until January 31, 2023, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses was followed. Random- and fixed-effect models using the logit transformation method were used for meta-analysis. The quality of the studies was evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Outcomes of interest included (a) pooled proportion of increased seizure frequency and (b) pooled incidence proportion of status epilepticus (SE) in PwE receiving COVID-19 vaccines. Results: Of the 2207 studies identified, 18 met eligibility criteria, of which 16 entered the meta-analysis. The pooled proportion of increased seizure frequency (16 studies-4197 PwE) was 5% (95CI: 3%-6%, I2 =57%), further subcategorized into viral vector (3%, 95CI: 2%-7%, I2 =0%), mRNA (5%, 95CI: 4%-7%, I2 =48%), and inactivated (4%, 95CI: 2%-8%, I2 =77%) vaccines. The pooled incidence proportion of SE (15 studies-2480 PwE) was 0.08% (95CI: 0.02%-0.32%, I2 =0%), further subcategorized into the viral vector (0.00%, 95CI: 0.00%-1.00%, I2 =0%), mRNA (0.09%, 95CI: 0.01%-0.62%, I2 =0%), and inactivated (0.00%, 95CI: 0.00%-1.00%, I2 =0%) vaccines. No significant difference was observed between mRNA and viral vector vaccines (5 studies, 1122 vs. 198 PwE, respectively) regarding increased seizure frequency (OR: 1.10, 95CI: 0.49-2.50, p-value=0.81, I2 =0%). Significance: The meta-analysis proposed a 5% increased seizure frequency following COVID-19 vaccination in PwE, with no difference between mRNA and viral vector vaccines. Furthermore, we found a 0.08% incidence proportion for SE. While this safety evidence is noteworthy, this cost should be weighed against vaccination benefits.
Subject(s)
Status Epilepticus , Epilepsy , COVID-19 , SeizuresABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The on-scene time of Emergency Medical Services (EMS), including time for hospital selection, is critical for people in an emergency. However, the outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) led to longer delays in providing immediate care for individuals with non-COVID-19-related emergencies, such as epileptic seizures. This study aimed to examine factors associated with on-scene time delays for people with epilepsy (PWE) with seizures needing immediate amelioration. MATERIALS & METHODS: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study for PWE transported by EMS between 2016 and 2021. We used data from the Hiroshima City Fire Service Bureau database, divided into three study periods: "Pre period", the period before the COVID pandemic (2016-2019); "Early period", the early period of the COVID pandemic (2020); and "Middle period", the middle period of the COVID pandemic (2021). We performed linear regression modeling to identify factors associated with changes in EMS on-scene time for PWE during each period. In addition, we estimated the rate of total EMS call volume required to maintain the same on-scene time for PWE transported by EMS during the pandemic expansion. RESULTS: Among 2,205 PWE transported by EMS, significant differences in mean age and prevalence of impaired consciousness were found between pandemic periods. Total EMS call volume per month for all causes during the same month <5,000 (-0.55 min, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.02 - -0.08, p = 0.022) and transport during the Early period (-1.88 min, 95%CI -2.75 - -1.00, p < 0.001) decreased on-scene time, whereas transport during the Middle period (1.58 min, 95%CI 0.70 - 2.46, p < 0.001) increased on-scene time for PWE transported by EMS. The rate of total EMS call volume was estimated as 0.81 (95%CI -0.04 - 1.07) during the expansion phase of the pandemic to maintain the same degree of on-scene time for PWE transported by EMS before the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: On-scene time delays on PWE in critical care settings were observed during the Middle period. When the pandemic expanded, the EMS system required resource allocation to maintain EMS for time-sensitive illnesses such as epileptic seizures. Timely system changes are critical to meet dramatic social changes.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Emergency Medical Services , Epilepsy , Humans , Emergencies , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , Seizures/epidemiology , Seizures/therapy , Epilepsy/epidemiology , Epilepsy/therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Adolescents with epilepsy are at heightened risk for suboptimal anti-seizure medication (ASM) adherence; however, there is a paucity of adherence interventions for this age group. The current study aimed to identify a comprehensive and novel set of predictors of objective, electronically-monitored ASM adherence in adolescents with epilepsy. METHODS: Participants included 104 adolescents (13-17 years old; M = 15.36 ± 1.40), diagnosed with epilepsy and their caregivers. Cross-sectional data were collected from adolescents, caregivers, healthcare providers, and medical chart reviews, including demographics (i.e., age, race/ethnicity, sex, insurance status), the COVID-19 pandemic (i.e., participation before versus during), seizure characteristics (i.e., presence and severity), ASM side effects (Pediatric Epilepsy Side Effects Questionnaire), adherence motivation (1-item 6-point Likert scale item), and adherence barriers (Pediatric Epilepsy Medication Self-Management Questionnaire). Electronically-monitored adherence data was collected via the AdhereTechTM pill bottle or the Vaica SimpleMedTM pillbox over 30 days. RESULTS: Adolescents demonstrated suboptimal adherence at 78 ± 31.6%, despite high ASM adherence motivation (M = 4.43 ± .94) and minimal adherence barriers (M = 35.64 ± 3.78). Hierarchical multiple regression, which included non-modifiable sociodemographic and medical variables (Block 1) and behaviorally modifiable psychosocial variables (Block 2) was significant, F(12,87) = 3.69, p < .001. Specifically, having private insurance (versus Medicaid or public insurance; t = -2.11, p = .038) and higher adherence motivation (t = 2.91, p = .005) predicted higher objective ASM adherence. CONCLUSION: Routine assessment of adherence predictors is vital for the promotion of adherence among adolescents with epilepsy. Adolescent adherence motivation may be an important element of multi-component interventions focused on improving ASM adherence in adolescents with epilepsy.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epilepsy , Humans , Child , Adolescent , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Motivation , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pandemics , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Epilepsy/epidemiology , Epilepsy/psychology , Medication Adherence/psychologyABSTRACT
The purpose of our study was to explore how people with epilepsy fared during two of the most stringent 4-month society-wide COVID-19-related pandemic restrictions in Ireland, in 2020 and one year later in 2021. This was in the context of their seizure control, lifestyle factors, and access to epilepsy-related healthcare services. A 14-part questionnaire was administered to adults with epilepsy during virtual specialist epilepsy clinics in a University Hospital in Dublin, Ireland at the end of the two lockdowns. People with epilepsy were questioned on their epilepsy control, lifestyle factors, and quality of epilepsy-related medical care, compared to pre-COVID times. The study sample consisted of two separate cohorts of those diagnosed with epilepsy (100 (51.8%) in 2020, and 93 (48.2%) in 2021, with similar baseline characteristics. There was no significant change in seizure control or lifestyle factors from 2020 to 2021, except for deterioration in anti-seizure medication (ASM) adherence in 2021 compared to 2020 (pâ¯=â¯0.028). There was no correlation between ASM adherence and other lifestyle factors. Over the two years, poor seizure control was significantly associated with poor sleep (pâ¯<â¯0.001) and average seizure frequency in a month (pâ¯=â¯0.007). We concluded that there was no significant difference between seizure control or lifestyle factors between the two most stringent lockdowns in Ireland, in 2020 and 2021. Furthermore, people with epilepsy reported that throughout the lockdowns access to services was well maintained, and they felt well supported by their services. Contrary to the popular opinion that COVID lockdowns greatly affected patients with chronic diseases, we found that those with epilepsy attending our service remained largely stable, optimistic, and healthy during this time.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epilepsy , Adult , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Communicable Disease Control , Epilepsy/complications , Epilepsy/epidemiology , Epilepsy/therapy , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Onchocerciasis-associated epilepsy (OAE) is an important but neglected public health problem in onchocerciasis-endemic areas with insufficient or inadequate onchocerciasis control. Hence, there is a need for an internationally accepted, easy-to-use epidemiological case definition of OAE to identify areas of high Onchocerca volvulus transmission and disease burden requiring treatment and prevention interventions. By including OAE as a manifestation of onchocerciasis, we will considerably improve the accuracy of the overall onchocerciasis disease burden, which is currently underestimated. Hopefully, this will lead to increased interest and funding for onchocerciasis research and control interventions, notably the implementation of more effective elimination measures and treatment and support for affected individuals and their families.
Subject(s)
Epilepsy , Nodding Syndrome , Onchocerciasis , Humans , Onchocerciasis/complications , Onchocerciasis/diagnosis , Onchocerciasis/epidemiology , Nodding Syndrome/epidemiology , Epilepsy/epidemiology , Epilepsy/etiology , Public Health , Cost of Illness , PrevalenceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Albeit primarily a disease of respiratory tract, the 2019 coronavirus infectious disease (COVID-19) has been found to have causal association with a plethora of neurological, neuropsychiatric and psychological effects. This review aims to analyze them with a discussion of evolving therapeutic recommendations. METHODS: PubMed and Google Scholar were searched from 1 January 2020 to 30 May 2020 with the following key terms: "COVID-19", "SARS-CoV-2", "pandemic", "neuro-COVID", "stroke-COVID", "epilepsy-COVID", "COVID-encephalopathy", "SARS-CoV-2-encephalitis", "SARS-CoV-2-rhabdomyolysis", "COVID-demyelinating disease", "neurological manifestations", "psychosocial manifestations", "treatment recommendations", "COVID-19 and therapeutic changes", "psychiatry", "marginalised", "telemedicine", "mental health", "quarantine", "infodemic" and "social media". A few newspaper reports related to COVID-19 and psychosocial impacts have also been added as per context. RESULTS: Neurological and neuropsychiatric manifestations of COVID-19 are abundant. Clinical features of both central and peripheral nervous system involvement are evident. These have been categorically analyzed briefly with literature support. Most of the psychological effects are secondary to pandemic-associated regulatory, socioeconomic and psychosocial changes. CONCLUSION: Neurological and neuropsychiatric manifestations of this disease are only beginning to unravel. This demands a wide index of suspicion for prompt diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 to prevent further complications and mortality.
Les impacts neurologiques et neuropsychiatriques d'une infection à la COVID-19. CONTEXTE: Bien qu'il s'agisse principalement d'une maladie des voies respiratoires, la maladie infectieuse à coronavirus apparue en 2019 (COVID-19) s'est avérée avoir un lien de causalité avec une pléthore d'impacts d'ordre neurologique, neuropsychiatrique et psychologique. Cette étude entend donc analyser ces impacts tout en discutant l'évolution des recommandations thérapeutiques se rapportant à cette maladie. MÉTHODES: Les bases de données PubMed et Google Scholar ont été interrogées entre les 1er janvier et 30 mai 2020. Les termes clés suivants ont été utilisés : « COVID-19 ¼, « SRAS CoV-2 ¼, « Pandémie ¼, « Neuro COVID ¼, « AVC COVID ¼, « Épilepsie COVID ¼, « COVID encéphalopathie ¼, « SRAS CoV-2 encéphalite ¼, « SRAS CoV-2 rhabdomyolyse ¼, « COVID maladie démyélinisante ¼, « Manifestations neurologiques ¼, « Manifestations psychosociales ¼, « Recommandations thérapeutiques ¼, « COVID-19 et changement thérapeutiques ¼, « Psychiatrie ¼, « Marginalisés ¼, « Télémédecine ¼, « Santé mentale ¼, « Quarantaine ¼, « Infodémique ¼ et « Médias sociaux ¼. De plus, quelques articles de journaux relatifs à la pandémie de COVID-19 et à ses impacts psychosociaux ont également été ajoutés en fonction du contexte. RÉSULTATS: Il appert que les manifestations neurologiques et neuropsychiatriques des infections à la COVID-19 sont nombreuses. Les caractéristiques cliniques d'une implication des systèmes nerveux central et périphérique sautent désormais aux yeux. Ces caractéristiques ont fait l'objet d'une brève analyse systématique à l'aide de publications scientifiques. En outre, la plupart des impacts d'ordre psychologique de cette pandémie se sont révélés moins apparents que les changements réglementaires, socioéconomiques et psychosociaux. CONCLUSION: Les manifestations neurologiques et neuropsychiatriques de cette maladie ne font que commencer à être élucidées. Cela exige donc une capacité accrue de vigilance en vue d'un diagnostic rapide, et ce, afin de prévenir des complications additionnelles et une mortalité accrue.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/physiopathology , Nervous System Diseases/physiopathology , Ageusia/etiology , Ageusia/physiopathology , Alzheimer Disease/therapy , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 , Anosmia/etiology , Anosmia/physiopathology , Brain Diseases , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Cerebellar Ataxia/etiology , Cerebellar Ataxia/physiopathology , Cerebrovascular Disorders/etiology , Cerebrovascular Disorders/physiopathology , Comorbidity , Delivery of Health Care , Demyelinating Diseases/therapy , Disease Management , Dizziness/etiology , Dizziness/physiopathology , Epilepsy/therapy , Guillain-Barre Syndrome/etiology , Guillain-Barre Syndrome/physiopathology , Headache/etiology , Headache/physiopathology , Humans , Hypoxia, Brain/physiopathology , Inflammation/physiopathology , Meningoencephalitis/etiology , Meningoencephalitis/physiopathology , Muscular Diseases/etiology , Muscular Diseases/physiopathology , Myelitis, Transverse/etiology , Myelitis, Transverse/physiopathology , Myoclonus/etiology , Myoclonus/physiopathology , Nervous System Diseases/epidemiology , Nervous System Diseases/etiology , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Polyneuropathies/etiology , Polyneuropathies/physiopathology , SARS-CoV-2 , Seizures/etiology , Seizures/physiopathology , Stroke/therapy , Viral TropismABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Clinical and psychophysiological assessment of the dynamics of the condition of patients with epilepsy in 4-6 months after the coronavirus infection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An open controlled prospective comparative outpatient clinical and physiological study of patients diagnosed with epilepsy after suffering from COVID-19 (after 4-6 months) of moderate severity (n=16), patients diagnosed with epilepsy who did not suffer from COVID-19 (n=7), a control group (n=11) after confirmed COVID-19 (after 4-6 months). All groups were in the age range 23 to 50 years. Clinical/neurological and somatic research included: anamnesis, neurological examination, questioning, ECG, EEG, clinical and psychometric tests. RESULTS: There was an increase in the representation of epileptiform activity in the background EEG and more pronounced activity in provoking samples compared with background recording in 26.5% of patients who had suffered COVID-19 compared with the group of patients with epilepsy who had not suffered COVID-19. The detection of rare epileptic seizures in 18.8% of cases in the group of epilepsy patients, who underwent COVID-19, indicates an increase in epileptogenesis and a decrease in therapeutic control over seizures. At the same time, 87.5% of patients in this group showed a statistically significant increase in the influence of the sympathetic nervous system on the regulation of heart rhythm and an increase in anxiety and depression. CONCLUSION: The results can complement the understanding of the neuropsychiatric status of patients with epilepsy after COVID-19, which provides prerequisites for the development of optimal recovery directions in the rehabilitation period to maintain drug remission of epilepsy and reduce the possible progression of the disease.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epilepsy , Humans , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , COVID-19/complications , Electroencephalography , Epilepsy/etiology , Epilepsy/diagnosis , Seizures/diagnosisABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Current dietary therapies for epilepsy have side effects and are low in nutrients, which would make an alternative dietary treatment, which addresses these issues, advantageous. One potential option is the low glutamate diet (LGD). Glutamate is implicated in seizure activity. Blood brain barrier permeability in epilepsy could enable dietary glutamate to reach the brain and contribute to ictogenesis. OBJECTIVE: to assess the LGD as an adjunct treatment for pediatric epilepsy. METHODS: This study was a nonblinded, parallel, randomized clinical trial. The study was conducted virtually due to COVID-19 and registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04545346). Participants were eligible if they were between the ages of 2 and 21 with ≥4 seizures per month. Baseline seizures were assessed for 1-month, then participants were allocated via block randomization to the intervention month (N=18), or a wait-listed control month followed by the intervention month (N=15). Outcome measures included seizure frequency, caregiver global impression of change (CGIC), non-seizure improvements, nutrient intake, and adverse events. RESULTS: Nutrient intake significantly increased during the intervention. No significant differences in seizure frequency were observed between intervention and control groups. However, efficacy was assessed at 1-month compared to the standard 3-months in diet research. Additionally, 21% of participants were observed to be clinical responders to the diet. Overall health (CGIC) significantly improved in 31%, 63% experienced ≥1 non-seizure improvements, and 53% experienced adverse events. Clinical response likelihood decreased with increasing age (0.71 [0.50-0.99], p=0.04), as did the likelihood of overall health improvement (0.71 [0.54-0.92], p=0.01). DISCUSSION: This study provides preliminary support for the LGD as an adjunct treatment before epilepsy becomes drug resistant, which is in contrast to the role of current dietary therapies in drug resistant epilepsy.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Drug Resistant Epilepsy , Epilepsy , Child , Humans , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Glutamic Acid/therapeutic use , Pilot Projects , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Seizures/drug therapy , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/drug therapy , Diet , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic useABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of phenosanoic acid therapy on the frequency of seizures, asthenia and quality of life of adult patients with focal epilepsy who had a new coronavirus infection caused by SARS-CoV-2. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data of 20 patients with focal epilepsy who suffered COVID-19 and received therapy with phenosanic acid (Dibufelon) were studied. The frequency of epileptic seizures, the severity of asthenia and the quality of life were evaluated according to clinical scales. RESULTS: Significant decrease in the frequency of bilateral tonic-clonic seizures and focal seizures with loss of consciousness was recorded. There was a significant improvement in the quality of life. There was no significant dynamics of asthenia against the background of taking the drug phenosanic acid in patients. CONCLUSION: The preparation of phenosanic acid can be an effective means of add-on therapy in patients with epilepsy who have undergone COVID-19.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epilepsies, Partial , Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic , Epilepsy , Adult , Humans , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Asthenia/drug therapy , Quality of Life , SARS-CoV-2 , Seizures/drug therapy , Epilepsies, Partial/drug therapy , Epilepsy/drug therapyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Caregivers of adults with epilepsy face unique challenges, yet most studies focus on the impact of epilepsy on those living with the condition, rather than the impact on caregivers. Our objective was to evaluate whether caregivers' pandemic-related changes and experiences - namely those related to their health, healthcare access, and well-being - were associated with their caregiving burden. METHODS: Caregivers of adults with epilepsy (n = 261) were recruited through Qualtrics Panels to participate in an online survey examining health, well-being, COVID-19 experiences, and caregiver burden from October-December, 2020. The burden was measured using the Zarit 12-item measure; the clinically significant burden was defined as a score greater than 16. Adjustments were made to account for burden scores related to exposures of interest. Chi-square tests, t-tests, and generalized linear regression models were used to compare cross-sectional associations between COVID-19 experiences and burden. RESULTS: Over half (57.9%) of caregivers had clinically significant caregiver burden. Most reported increased anxiety (65%), stress (64%), and sense of social isolation (58%) during the pandemic. Many caregivers reported that their sense of control over their life (44%) and their use of healthcare changed (88%) due to COVID-19. In adjusted models, caregivers who reported increased anger, increased anxiety, decreased sense of control, or changes in healthcare utilization during COVID-19 had about twice the odds of having clinically significant caregiver burden compared to caregivers who did not report changes. DISCUSSION: Changes experienced by caregivers of adults with epilepsy during the pandemic were strongly associated with clinically significant levels of caregiver burden. These findings demonstrate the link between mass-level events, such as a pandemic, the burden caregivers of adults with epilepsy may carry, and subsequent psychological outcomes. CONCLUSION: Caregivers of adults with epilepsy may need support to reduce the negative impact of COVID-19-related experiences and should be connected to healthcare and resources that can help alleviate their burden.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epilepsy , Adult , Humans , Caregivers/psychology , Caregiver Burden/epidemiology , Cost of Illness , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Epilepsy/epidemiologyABSTRACT
The new coronavirus infection spread around the world in a very short time and turned into a pandemic with a wave-like flow for more than two years. COVID-19infection affects selectively various organs and systems, including the nervous system; neurological manifestations have been reported, including anosmia, encephalopathy, stroke, epileptogenic disorders, which necessitates studies of the course of brain diseases, among which epilepsy occupies a significant place.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epilepsy , Nervous System Diseases , Stroke , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Epilepsy/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Given that seizures may be triggered by vaccination, this study aimed to evaluate the risk and correlative factors of seizures in patients with epilepsy (PWE) after being vaccinated against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: This study retrospectively enrolled PWE who were vaccinated against COVID-19 in the epilepsy centers of 11 hospitals in China. We divided the PWE into two groups as follows: (1) patients who developed seizures within 14 days of vaccination were assigned to the SAV (with seizures after vaccination) group; (2) patients who were seizure-free within 14 days of vaccination were assigned to the SFAV (seizure-free after vaccination) group. To identify potential risk factors for seizure reccurence, the binary logistic regression analysis was performed. Besides, 67 PWE who had not been vaccinated were also included for elucidating the effects of vaccination on seizures recurrence, and binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether vaccination would affect the recurrence rate of PWE who had drug reduction or withdrawal. RESULTS: The study included a total of 407 patients; of which, 48 (11.8%) developed seizures within 14 days after vaccination (SAV group), whereas 359 (88.2%) remained seizure-free (SFAV group). The binary logistic regression analysis revealed that duration of seizure freedom ( P â<â0.001) and withdrawal from anti-seizure medications (ASMs) or reduction in their dosage during the peri-vaccination period were significantly associated with the recurrence of seizures (odds ratioâ=â7.384, 95% confidence intervalâ=â1.732-31.488, P â=â0.007). In addition, 32 of 33 patients (97.0%) who were seizure-free for more than three months before vaccination and had a normal electroencephalogram before vaccination did not have any seizures within 14 days of vaccination. A total of 92 (22.6%) patients experienced non-epileptic adverse reactions after vaccination. Binary logistic regression analysis results showed that vaccine did not significantly affect the recurrence rate of PWE who had the behavior of ASMs dose reduction or withdrawal ( P â=â0.143). CONCLUSIONS: PWE need protection from the COVID-19 vaccine. PWE who are seizure-free for >3 months before vaccination should be vaccinated. Whether the remaining PWE should be vaccinated depends on the local prevalence of COVID-19. Finally, PWE should avoid discontinuing ASMs or reducing their dosage during the peri-vaccination period.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epilepsy , Humans , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Epilepsy/drug therapy , VaccinationABSTRACT
Introduction: The aim of this study is to explore the ways that parents with children or adolescents with epilepsy (CAWE) experienced the restrictive measures, as well as the stressors and challenges that they had to face. Methods: We employed an experiential approach and fifteen Greek-speaking parents answered to an in-depth semi-structured interview, during the second lockdown period. Data were analyzed through the Thematic Analysis (TA). Results: The emerging themes were the challenges encountered in terms of medical monitoring, the "stay-home" impact on their everyday lives as a family, their psycho-emotional responses. More specifically, parents identified the irregular doctor appointments and their struggle to access the hospital services as the most important challenges. Moreover, parents reported that the "stay-home" impact has disrupted their children's daily routines among others. Finally, parents highlighted their emotional strain and worries experienced during the lockdown along with the positive changes that occurred.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epilepsy , Adolescent , Humans , Child , Communicable Disease Control , Parents/psychology , Emotions , Epilepsy/psychologyABSTRACT
Telemedicine is a method of health care delivery well suited for epilepsy care, where there is an insufficient supply of trained specialists. The telemedicine "Hub and Spoke" approach allows patients to visit their local health clinic ('Spokes') to establish appropriate care and monitoring for their seizure disorder or epilepsy, and remotely connect with epileptologists or neurologists at centralized centers of expertise ('Hubs'). The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an expansion of telemedicine capabilities and use, with favorable patient and provider experience and outcomes, allowing for its wide scale adoption beyond COVID-19.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epilepsy , Telemedicine , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Epilepsy/diagnosis , Epilepsy/therapyABSTRACT
We present an autopsy case of a 19-year-old man with a history of epilepsy whose unwitnessed sudden death occurred unexpectedly in the night. About 4 years before death, he was diagnosed with unilateral optic neuritis (ON). Demyelinating disease was suspected, but he was lost to follow up after the recovery. Six months before death, he received a second dose of mRNA coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine. Three months before death, he experienced epileptic seizures for the first time. Seventeen days before death, he was infected with COVID-19, which showed self-limited course under home isolation. Several days before death, he complained of seizures again at night. Autopsy revealed multifocal gray-tan discoloration in the cerebrum. Histologically, the lesions consisted of active and inactive demyelinated plaques in the perivenous area of the white matter. Perivascular lymphocytic infiltration and microglial cell proliferation were observed in both white matter and cortex. The other major organs including heart and lung were unremarkable. Based on the antemortem history and postmortem findings, the cause of death was determined to be multiple sclerosis with suspected exacerbation. The direct or indirect involvement of cortex and deep gray matter by exacerbated multiple sclerosis may explain the occurrence of seizures. Considering the absence of other structural abnormalities except the inflammatory demyelination of the cerebrum, fatal arrhythmia or laryngospasm in the terminal epileptic seizure may explain his sudden unexpected death in the benign circumstances. In this case, the onset of seizure was preceded by COVID-19 vaccination, and the exacerbation of seizure was preceded by COVID-19 infection, respectively. Literature reporting first manifestation or relapse of multiple sclerosis temporally associated with COVID-19 vaccination or infection are reviewed.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epilepsy , Multiple Sclerosis , Humans , Male , Young Adult , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Death, Sudden/etiology , Epilepsy/complications , Multiple Sclerosis/complications , Seizures/complications , Vaccination/adverse effects , Fatal OutcomeABSTRACT
Introduction: Growing evidence demonstrated the occurrence of neurological complications such as ischemic stroke, epilepsy, and autoimmune encephalitis ( AE ) associated with COVID − 19 infection. The purpose of this review was to summarize the clinical symptoms, treatment, and outcome of COVID-19-associated AE. Methods: We searched case reports and case series of AE associated with COVID-19 between January 1, 2020, and March 31, 2023, using Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. After screening and further evaluation, irrelevant articles were excluded. Information related to treatment, clinical manifestations, comorbidities, and outcomes was extracted and summarized. Results: 36 studies were included in this review, 34 of which were case reports and 2 were case series. A total of 39 patients with AE were included, including 18 (46%) cases of unknown type of AE, 10 (26%) cases of anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) encephalitis, 4 (10%) cases of limbic encephalitis, 3 (8%) cases of anti-myelin-oligodendrocyte-glycoprotein (MOG) encephalitis, and other type of AE. In addition, the clinical manifestations of AE are mainly disturbance of consciousness, seizure and psychiatric symptoms. Although the symptoms of AE are varied, most patients could recover completely, with a few having residual symptoms of neurological damage. Conclusions: In this systematic review, the characteristics of COVID-19-associated AE are summarized, including neurological manifestations, treatment, types, and outcomes. Although COVID−19-associated AE can sometimes be life-threatening, most AE is reversible if treated promptly.
Subject(s)
Epilepsy , Mental Disorders , Nervous System Diseases , Seizures , Stroke , Encephalitis , COVID-19ABSTRACT
Objectives Characterization of tissue laxity and dysautonomia symptoms in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) uncovered similarities with those of post-infectious SARS-CoV-2 or long COVID19, prompting detailed comparison of their findings and influencing genes. Methods Holistic assessment of 1261 EDS outpatients for 120 history-physical findings populated a deidentified database that includes 568 patients with 317 variant genes obtained by commercial NextGen sequencing. Findings were compared to 15 of long COVID19 compiled in an extensive review, genes to 104 associated with COVID19 severity in multiple molecular studies. Results Fifteen symptoms common to Ehlers-Danlos versus long COVID19 ranged from brain fog (27-80 versus 30-70%), chronic fatigue (38-91; 30-60%), dyspnea (32-52; 29-52%) to irritable bowel (67-89; 14-78%), muscle weakness (22-49; 15-25%), and arthritis (32-94; 15-27%). Genes relevant to EDS included 6 identical to those influencing COVID19 severity (F2, LIFR, NLRP3, STAT1, T1CAM1, TNFRSF13B) and 18 similar including POLG-POLD4, SLC6A2-SLC6A20, and NFKB1-NFKB2. Both gene sets had broad genomic distribution, many mitochondrial genes influencing EDS and many involved with immunity-inflammation modifying COVID19 severity. Recurring DNA variants in EDS that merit evaluation in COVID19 resistance include those impacting connective tissue elements--51 in COL5 (joint), 29 in COL1/2/9/11 (bone), 13 in COL3 (vessel), and 18 in FBN1 (vessel-heart)--or neural function--93 in mitochondrial DNA, 28 in COL6/12, 16 in SCN9A/10A/11A, 14 in POLG, and 11 in genes associated with porphyria. Conclusions Holistic ascertainment of finding pattern and exome variation in EDS defined tissue laxity, neuromuscular, and autonomic correlations that transcend single abnormalities or types. Implied networks of nuclear and mitochondrial genes are linked to findings like brain fog, fatigue, and frailty in EDS, their similarity to long COVID19 supporting shared therapies for disorders affecting a minimum 0.1% of the global population.