Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Int J Mycobacteriol ; 11(4): 343-348, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2163901

ABSTRACT

Mycobacterium tuberculosis is the leading cause of mortality worldwide due to a single bacterial pathogen. Of concern is the negative impact that the COVID-19 pandemic has had on the control of tuberculosis (TB) including drug-resistant forms of the disease. Antimicrobial resistance increases the likelihood of worsened outcomes in TB patients including treatment failure and death. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains, resistant to first-line drugs isoniazid and rifampin, and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains with further resistance to second-line drugs (SLD), threaten control programs designed to lower TB incidence and end the disease as a public health challenge by 2030, in accordance with UN Sustainable Development Goals. Tackling TB requires an understanding of the pathways through which drug resistance emerges. Here, the roles of acquired resistance mutation, and primary transmission, are examined with regard to XDR-TB. It is apparent that XDR-TB can emerge from MDR-TB through a small number of additional resistance mutations that occur in patients undergoing drug treatment. Rapid detection of resistance, to first-line drugs and SLD, at the initiation of and during treatment, and prompt adjustment of regimens are required to ensure treatment success in these patients. Primary transmission is predicted to make an increasing contribution to the XDR-TB caseload in the future. Much work is required to improve the implementation of the World Health Organization-recommended infection control practices and block onward transmission of XDR-TB patients to contacts including health-care workers. Finally, limiting background resistance to fluoroquinolones in pre-XDR strains of M. tuberculosis will necessitate better antimicrobial stewardship in the broader use of this drug class.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant , Humans , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/microbiology , Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapy , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/epidemiology , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/microbiology , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial
2.
Braz J Biol ; 84: e258258, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2054598

ABSTRACT

According to studies carried out, approximately 10 million people developed tuberculosis in 2018. Of this total, 1.5 million people died from the disease. To study the behavior of the genome sequences of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), the bacterium responsible for the development of tuberculosis (TB), an analysis was performed using k-mers (DNA word frequency). The k values ranged from 1 to 10, because the analysis was performed on the full length of the sequences, where each sequence is composed of approximately 4 million base pairs, k values above 10, the analysis is interrupted, as consequence of the program's capacity. The aim of this work was to verify the formation of the phylogenetic tree in each k-mer analyzed. The results showed the formation of distinct groups in some k-mers analyzed, taking into account the threshold line. However, in all groups, the multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains remained together and separated from the other strains.


Subject(s)
Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant , Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Cluster Analysis , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/genetics , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/genetics , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/microbiology , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Phylogeny , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapy , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/microbiology
3.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 204, 2022 Mar 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1779608

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There was a lack of information about prognostic accuracy of time to sputum culture conversion (SCC) in forecasting cure among extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) patients. Therefore, this study evaluated the prognostic accuracy of SCC at various time points in forecasting cure among XDR-TB patients. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 355 eligible pulmonary XDR-TB patients treated at 27 centers in Pakistan between 01-05-2010 and 30-06-2017. The baseline and follow-up information of patients from treatment initiation until the end of treatment were retrieved from electronic nominal recording and reporting system. Time to SCC was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between groups were compared through log-rank test. Predictors of time to SCC and cure were respectively evaluated by multivariate Cox proportional hazards and binary logistic regression analyses. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 226 (63.6%) and 146 (41.1%) patients respectively achieved SCC and cure. Median time to SCC was significantly shorter in patients who achieved cure, 3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.47-3.53), than those who did not (median: 10 months, 95% CI: 5.24-14.76) (p-value < 0.001, Log-rank test). Patient's age > 40 years (hazards ratio [HR] = 0.632, p-value = 0.004), baseline sputum grading of scanty, + 1 (HR = 0.511, p-value = 0.002), + 2, + 3 (HR = 0.523, p-value = 0.001) and use of high dose isoniazid (HR = 0.463, p-value = 0.004) were significantly associated with early SCC. Only SCC at 6 month of treatment had statistically significant association with cure (odds ratio = 15.603, p-value < 0.001). In predicting cure, the sensitivities of SCC at 2, 4 and 6 months were respectively 41.8% (95%CI: 33.7-50.2), 69.9% (95%CI: 61.7-77.2) and 84.9% (95%CI: 78.1-90.3), specificities were respectively, 82.8% (95%CI: 76.9-87.6), 74.6% (95%CI: 68.2-80.4) and 69.4% (95%CI: 62.6-75.5) and prognostic accuracies were respectively 65.9% (95%CI: 60.7-70.8), 72.7% (95%CI: 67.7-77.2) and 75.8% (95%CI: 71.0-80.1). CONCLUSION: In forecasting cure, SCC at month 6 of treatment performed better than SCC at 2 and 4 months. However, it would be too long for clinicians to wait for 6 months to decide about the regimen efficacy. Therefore, with somewhat comparable prognostic accuracy to that SCC at 6 month, using SCC at 4 month of treatment as a prognostic marker in predicting cure among XDR-TB patients can decrease the clinicians waiting time to decide about the regimen efficacy.


Subject(s)
Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary , Adult , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Humans , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Sputum , Treatment Outcome , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapy , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/diagnosis , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL