ABSTRACT
This cross-sectional study aimed to analyze the association of religiosity with behaviors and perceptions in the context of social distancing measures during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as mental health outcomes, in a university community in Central-West Brazil. A sample of 1,796 subjects responded to an online form with socio-demographic questions and the DASS-21 and PWBS scales. Religion was associated with the frequency of interactions, perceptions of the duration of the social distancing measures, changes in emotional state and history of psychological illness. The prevalence of symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress was lower among people with religion and their scores in psychological well-being were higher. (AU)
Trata-se de um estudo transversal com o objetivo de analisar a associação entre religiosidade e comportamentos e percepções frente ao distanciamento social decorrente da pandemia de Covid-19 e estado de saúde mental em uma comunidade universitária do Centro-Oeste brasileiro. Participaram do estudo 1796 sujeitos, os quais responderam a um formulário online com questões sociodemográficas e às escalas DASS-21 e EBEP. Observou-se associação entre religião e frequência de interações, percepção sobre a duração do distanciamento social e mudanças no estado emocional e histórico de alterações psicológicas. Constatou-se menor prevalência de sintomas relacionados à depressão, à ansiedade e ao estresse e maiores escores de bem-estar psicológico entre aqueles com religião. (AU)
Se trata de un estudio transversal con el objetivo de analizar la asociación entre religiosidad, comportamientos y percepciones frente al distanciamiento social resultante de la pandemia Covid-19 y el estado de salud mental en una comunidad universitaria de la región Centro-Oeste de Brasil. Participaron en el estudio 1796 sujetos, que respondieron un formulario en línea con preguntas sociodemográficas y las escalas DASS-21 y EBEP. Se observó asociación entre religión y frecuencia de interacciones, la percepción de la duración del aislamiento social y los cambios en el estado emocional y el historial de cambios psicológicos. Se observó una menor prevalencia de síntomas relacionados con la depresión, la ansiedad y el estrés, y puntuaciones más altas de bienestar psicológico entre quienes profesaban una religión. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , Religion , Mental Health , Physical Distancing , COVID-19 , Chi-Square Distribution , Cross-Sectional Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Reproducibility of Results , Statistics as Topic , Analysis of Variance , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Faculty , Sociodemographic Factors , Psychological Well-BeingABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: This research explored the relationship between job satisfaction and intent to leave among physician assistant (PA) educators during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, the study aimed to identify differences in PA educators' job satisfaction within gender and their intention to stay at their current employment. METHODS: A nonexperimental, cross-sectional survey was conducted with 1788 PA educators at 232 accredited programs nationally. A Web-based survey was employed to measure job satisfaction and intent to leave and to collect demographic information. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the study population, and logistic regression was used to analyze the independent variables predicting faculty turnover. RESULTS: PA educators were generally satisfied with their jobs (51.2%, n = 251), with the nature of the work, quality of supervision, and collegial relationships contributing the most to job satisfaction. Males were generally more satisfied with their jobs than females. More than half of the PA educators (52.4%, n = 257) considered leaving academia in the past year. Job satisfaction (odds ratio [OR] = .945, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .936-.956) and individual facets-including the nature of the work (OR = .806, 95% CI = .731-.888); communication (OR = .926, 95% CI = .860-.997); and quality of supervision (OR = .904, 95% CI = .850-.960)-were predictive of intent to leave. Gender was not found to significantly affect the relationship between job satisfaction and intent to leave. DISCUSSION: The findings from the study suggest the need for faculty retention to be prioritized among program and institutional leadership. PA programs need experienced leadership to develop, guide, and mentor faculty. Lastly, program and institutional leadership should create a supportive work environment that communicates clear expectations.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Physician Assistants , Male , Female , Humans , Job Satisfaction , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pandemics , Physician Assistants/education , COVID-19/epidemiology , Faculty , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Restrictions due to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic impacted the ability of faculty and students in exercise science to work in lab settings with human participants. The purpose of this study was to determine how exercise science faculty were impacted by COVID-19 restrictions with respect to access and use of exercise science lab and research facilities. Of the 100 surveyed participants categorized as requiring access to people and lab spaces (lab-based faculty), 61% (n = 61) reported decreased research productivity with 87% (n = 53) of those faculty in one or more of the following subdisciplines: exercise physiology, clinical exercise physiology, or biomechanics. Of all lab-based faculty, 40% (n = 40) participants reported having access to students and lab spaces and 55% (n = 55) indicated they were allowed to conduct in-person research. Of tenure-track lab-based faculty, 80% (n = 20) reported a decrease in research productivity, of which 60.0% (n = 12) identified as female. Among faculty with 5 or less years of teaching experience (n = 23), 69.6% (n = 16) reported a decrease in productivity, with 68.8% (n = 11) of those being female. All exercise science faculty surveyed reported issues with safety and social distancing, modified lab and research procedures, faculty workload, and research productivity. This information can be leveraged to create better infrastructure to support faculty and develop and implement strategies to reduce workload inequities.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Efficiency , Faculty , Female , Humans , Laboratories , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
In September of 2020, a group of dental students (DDS) and motivated faculty at the University of Western Ontario came together in response to the pandemic and established a real-time feedback model. The goal of this model was to address technical challenges following the quick transition from in-person courses to a fully online format for student learning. This initial offering formed the foundation of the Students as Partners (SaP) program to identify and address technical and curricular issues. We used an action research approach to evaluate and refine the innovation's delivery. Preliminary data from the first cycle suggested that students were unaware of the impact of their feedback and the actionable items from their feedback. Thus, for the second iteration we focused on making the entire process more transparent by using Padlet as a way to streamline posting and responding to feedback. To evaluate the refined system, we distributed surveys to student and faculty participants to obtain feedback on their awareness and satisfaction and effectiveness of the program. For students who utilized the system, the majority indicated that they were informed of changes based on their feedback. Furthermore, students reported that our innovation provided a platform for the student voice. Faculty impressions were generally positive, and the majority of faculty respondents indicated that they implemented changes to their content/curriculum based on feedback. These results demonstrate that the SaP program's real-time feedback system closed the feedback loop and facilitated real-time improvements based on actionable feedback. To our knowledge, this is the first study to design, implement, and evaluate a real-time feedback system for the purpose of modifying how an instructor teaches.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Course feedback surveys at the end of term infrequently result in beneficial change. However, student feedback should be considered to develop meaningful learning. In response to this problem, we report on a novel Students as Partners innovation to address instructional issues in real time with a virtual bulletin board application embedded in the learning management system. Students and instructors valued the system's ability to close the feedback loop and provide transparent, actionable change.
Subject(s)
Learning , Students , Humans , Feedback , Faculty , CurriculumABSTRACT
As we pass the third anniversary of the World Health Organization's declaration of the SARS-CoV-2 global pandemic, it is beneficial to reflect upon how physiology education adapted to the challenges of the pandemic. At the initial stages of the pandemic, many educators were faced with the challenge of quickly transitioning to emergency remote teaching (ERT), requiring shifts in teaching methodology and laboratory structure to adapt to the pandemic normal. In this review, we provide a broad overview of the efforts made by the community of educators associated with the American Physiological Society during the pandemic to encourage best practices in teaching, maintain course and program goals during ERT, and innovate in physiology education. We also highlight diversity, equality, and inclusion work that was produced as the scientific community recommitted to tackling systemic and structural inequalities exacerbated by the pandemic and brought to the forefront by the Black Lives Matter movement. Finally, we examine the potentially long-lasting effects of the pandemic on education from both the student and faculty standpoints and how doubling down on what we learned can be beneficial to the future of physiology education.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This literature review examines and categorizes the repository of publications in physiology education that occurred during and related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , United States , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Learning , FacultyABSTRACT
Formaldehyde has carcinogenic properties. It is associated with nasopharyngeal cancer and causes irritation of the eyes, nose, throat, and respiratory system. Formaldehyde exposure is a significant health concern for those participating in the gross anatomy laboratory, but no learning method can substitute cadaver dissection. We performed a formaldehyde level study in 2018, which found that most of the breathing zone (S-level) and environment (R-level) formaldehyde levels during laboratory sessions at the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital exceeded international ceiling standards. In the academic year 2019, we adapted the engineering rationale of the NIOSH hierarchy of controls to facilitate formaldehyde clearance by opening the dissection table covers and increasing the area per dissection table, then measured formaldehyde ceiling levels by formaldehyde detector tube with a gas-piston hand pump during (1) body wall, (2) upper limb, (3) head-neck, (4) thorax, (5) spinal cord removal, (6) lower limb, (7) abdomen, and (8) organs of special senses dissection sessions and comparing the results with the 2018 study. The perineum region data were excluded from analyses due to the laboratory closure in 2019 from the COVID-19 outbreak. There were statistically significant differences between the 2018 and 2019 S-levels (p < 0.001) and R-levels (p < 0.001). The mean S-level decreased by 64.18% from 1.34 ± 0.71 to 0.48 ± 0.26 ppm, and the mean R-level decreased by 70.18% from 0.57 ± 0.27 to 0.17 ± 0.09 ppm. The highest formaldehyde level in 2019 was the S-level in the body wall region (1.04 ± 0.3 ppm), followed by the S-level in the abdomen region (0.56 ± 0.08 ppm) and the spinal cord removal region (0.51 ± 0.29 ppm). All 2019 formaldehyde levels passed the OSHA 15-min STEL standard (2 ppm). The R-level in the special sense region (0.06 ± 0.02 ppm) passed the NIOSH 15-min ceiling limit (0.1 ppm). Three levels for 2019 were very close: the R-level in the head-neck region (0.11 ± 0.08 ppm), the abdomen region (0.11 ± 0.08), the body wall region (0.14 ± 0.12 ppm), and the S-level in the special sense region (0.12 ± 0.04 ppm). In summary, extensive analysis and removal of factors impeding formaldehyde clearance can improve the general ventilation system and achieve the OSHA 15-min STEL standard.
Subject(s)
Air Pollution, Indoor , COVID-19 , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms , Occupational Exposure , Humans , Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis , Formaldehyde/analysis , Faculty , Laboratories , Occupational Exposure/analysisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic in parallel with concerns about bias in grading resulted in many medical schools adopting pass/fail clinical grading and relying solely on narrative assessments. However, narratives often contain bias and lack specificity. The purpose of this project was to develop asynchronous faculty development to rapidly educate/re-educate > 2000 clinical faculty spread across geographic sites and clinical disciplines on components of a well-written narrative and methods to minimize bias in the assessment of students. METHODS: We describe creation, implementation, and pilot data outcomes for an asynchronous faculty development curriculum created by a committee of volunteer learners and faculty. After reviewing the literature on the presence and impact of bias in clinical rotations and ways to mitigate bias in written narrative assessments, the committee developed a web-based curriculum using multimedia learning theory and principles of adult learning. Just-in-time supplemental materials accompanied the curriculum. The Dean added completion of the module by 90% of clinical faculty to the department chairperson's annual education metric. Module completion was tracked in a learning management system, including time spent in the module and the answer to a single text entry question about intended changes in behavior. Thematic analysis of the text entry question with grounded theory and inductive processing was used to define themes of how faculty anticipate future teaching and assessment as a result of this curricula. OUTCOMES: Between January 1, 2021, and December 1, 2021, 2166 individuals completed the online module; 1820 spent between 5 and 90 min on the module, with a median time of 17 min and an average time of 20.2 min. 15/16 clinical departments achieved completion by 90% or more faculty. Major themes included: changing the wording of future narratives, changing content in future narratives, and focusing on efforts to change how faculty teach and lead teams, including efforts to minimize bias. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a faculty development curriculum on mitigating bias in written narratives with high rates of faculty participation. Inclusion of this module as part of the chair's education performance metric likely impacted participation. Nevertheless, time spent in the module suggests that faculty engaged with the material. Other institutions could easily adapt this curriculum with provided materials.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Adult , Humans , Pandemics , Curriculum , Narration , Faculty , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methodsABSTRACT
RESUMEN: La pandemia por COVID-19 obligó a las universidades a impartir de forma abrupta sus asignaturas en un formato en línea o semi presencial. Es así como el uso del modelo educativo Hyflex surgió como alternativa. El objetivo del presente estudio fue conocer la percepción de los alumnos y docentes sobre la experiencia en el uso de Hyflex en anatomía. Estudio descriptivo de tipo mixto con una muestra por conveniencia de 115 alumnos y 7 docentes que participaban en Anatomía Aplicada durante el año 2021 en las Salas de Habilidades del Hospital de Simulación de la Universidad Andrés Bello, sede Viña del Mar, Chile. La recogida de datos fue a través de un cuestionario de auto aplicación con escala tipo Likert de 5 niveles y la realización de focus group con guión de 9 preguntas semi-estructuradas. Los datos cuantitativos fueron analizados con estadística descriptiva y la aplicación del test Mann- White para comparar entre grupos con un P < 0.05. Los datos cualitativos fueron analizados mediante teoría fundamentada para identificar las categorías principales y subcategorías. Tanto los docentes como estudiantes tuvieron una buena percepción sobre el uso de Hyflex. En ambos grupos lo más destacado fue que posibilitaba el acceso a contenidos y actividades en línea que complementaban las actividades presenciales. Sin embargo, ambos grupos coincidieron en que no aprenden más en el formato en línea que presencial. Además, en las entrevistas de focus group emergieron dos categorías principales, la satisfacción (destacando las subcategorías comprensión de contenidos, aspectos administrativos, acceso a la información) y modalidad (calidad de aprendizaje, rendimiento, participación, recepción de la información y aspectos sociales). Hyflex es una alternativa para impartir los contenidos de anatomía, aunque los estudiantes y docentes perciben que la presencialidad es fundamental para brindar una adecuada experiencia de aprendizaje.
SUMMARY: The COVID-19 pandemic forced universities to abruptly teach their subjects in an online or semi-face-to-face format. This is how the use of the Hyflex educational model emerged as an alternative. The objective of this study was to know the perception of students and teachers about the experience in the use of Hyflex in anatomy. Mixed-type descriptive study was carried out, with a convenience sample of 115 students and 7 teachers who participated in Applied Anatomy during the year 2021 in the Skills Rooms of the Simulation Hospital of the Andrés Bello University, Viña del Mar, Chile. Data collection was through a self-application questionnaire with a 5-level Likert-type scale and a focus group with a script of 9 semi-structured questions. The quantitative data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and the application of the Mann-White test to compare between groups with a P < 0.05. Qualitative data were analyzed using grounded theory to identify main categories and subcategories. Both teachers and students had a good perception of the use of Hyflex. In both groups, the highlight was that it enabled access to online content and activities that complemented face-to-face activities. However, both groups agreed that they do not learn more in the online format than in person. In addition, in the focus group interviews two main categories emerged, satisfaction (highlighting the subcategories content understanding, administrative aspects, access to information) and modality (quality of learning, performance, participation, reception of information and social aspects). Hyflex is an alternative to teach anatomy content, although students and teachers perceive that attendance is essential to provide an adequate learning experience.
Subject(s)
Humans , Students/psychology , Problem-Based Learning , Education, Distance , Faculty/psychology , Anatomy/education , Perception , Surveys and Questionnaires , Models, EducationalABSTRACT
Resumo Este dossiê temático reúne uma coletânea de artigos acerca das implicações pedagógicas do ensino de Educação Física (EF) durante a pandemia de COVID-19. A pandemia desafiou professores em todo o mundo a se adaptarem ao distanciamento social e às exigências do ensino remoto. Nosso objetivo nesta edição especial é compartilhar e refletir sobre esses desafios e ver que a questão não se trata apenas do uso de tecnologia, mas também de como professores lidam com as implicações para o ensino de uma disciplina como a EF. As histórias compartilhadas fornecem valiosos insights sobre como os professores se adaptam e aprendem novas estratégias e tecnologias para ensinar EF em tempos de distanciamento social.
Resumen Este dossier temático reúne una colección de artículos sobre las implicaciones pedagógicas de la enseñanza de la Educación Física (EF) durante la pandemia de COVID-19. La pandemia ha desafiado a los profesores de todo el mundo a adaptarse al distanciamiento social y a los requisitos de enseñanza en línea. Nuestro objetivo en esta edición especial es compartir y reflexionar sobre estos desafíos y ver que el problema no se trata solo del uso de la tecnología, sino también de cómo los profesores enfrentan con las implicaciones para enseñar una materia como la EF. Las historias compartidas brindan insights valiosos sobre como los profesores se adaptan y aprenden nuevas estrategias y tecnologías para enseñar EF en tiempos de distanciamiento social.
Abstract This "Focus Section" brings together a collection of papers that consider the pedagogical implications of teaching Physical Education (PE) during the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic has challenged teachers around the globe to adapt to social distancing and teaching online requirements. Our goal in this special edition is to share and reflect together on these challenges and see that the issue is not just about the use of technology, but also about how teachers navigate the implications for teaching a subject like PE. The shared stories provide valuable insights into how teachers adapt and learn new strategies and technologies for teaching PE in times of social distancing.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Physical Education and Training , Education, Distance , Faculty , Physical Distancing , COVID-19 , Teaching , PandemicsABSTRACT
Introduction: COVID-19 accelerated the use of telemedicine. Subsequently, clinical sites began conducting virtual visits. Academic institutions implemented telemedicine for patient care and simultaneously had to teach residents the logistics and best practices. To meet this need, we developed a training session for faculty focused on telemedicine best practices and teaching telemedicine in the pediatric realm. Methods: We designed this training session based on institutional and society guidelines and faculty experience with telemedicine. Objectives included telemedicine documentation, triage, counseling, and ethical issues in telemedicine. We conducted all sessions in a 60-minute or 90-minute format over a virtual platform for small and large groups using case scenarios with photos, videos, and interactive questions. A novel mnemonic ABLES (awake-background-lighting-exposure-sound) was created to guide providers during the virtual exam. Following the session, participants completed a survey evaluating content and presenter effectiveness. Results: We presented the training sessions between May 2020 and August 2021 to 120 participants. Participants included pediatric fellows and faculty, reaching 75 participants locally and 45 nationally (at Pediatric Academic Society and Association of Pediatric Program Directors meetings). Sixty evaluations (response rate: 50%) showed favorable results for general satisfaction and content. Discussion: This telemedicine training session was well received by pediatric providers and addressed the need for training faculty to teach telemedicine. Future directions include adapting the training session for medical students and developing a longitudinal curriculum that applies telehealth skills learned with patients in real time.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Internship and Residency , Telemedicine , Humans , Child , COVID-19/epidemiology , Curriculum , FacultyABSTRACT
Active learning in pharmacology education "pharmacology role-play," in which students pretend to be health professionals and patients and explain diseases and drug treatments. Because pharmacology role-play is based on cases presented in advance and active learning through communication, named Case & Communication based approach (C&C approach). Pharmacology role-play was started in 2010 at the University of Miyazaki, it has been shared by 28 schools in 4 faculties of medicine, pharmacy, dentistry, and nursing (23 medical schools, 1 pharmaceutical school, 2 dental schools, and 2 nursing universities) over the 13 years until 2022. Although it is a common program, it is implemented with diversity while devoting various ingenuity according to the characteristics of the University. Pharmacology role-play is effective in (1) understanding of medical treatment, (2) understanding patient's feelings, (3) improvement of mental attitude and motivation as health professionals (4) positive influence upon study attitude, regardless of universities that conducted the pharmacology role-play. Various efforts include combining with Personal Drugs, developing interprofessional education through joint role-playing by medical students and nursing students, and developing Oriental medicine education through the cases including Kampo medicine. In addition, there are online lectures in response to the Covid-19, and a joint implementation of two universities, all of which are highly effective. The advantage of the multi-institution common program is that a lot of information can be obtained at once, and it is easy to quickly reflect successful ideas. The flexibility and high resilience that can flexibly change the implementation method (face-to-face/remote) according to the situation are also great strengths.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Nursing , Pharmacy , Humans , Faculty , Pharmaceutical PreparationsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Mistrust in science and scientists may adversely influence the rate of COVID-19 vaccination and undermine public health initiatives to reduce virus transmission. METHODS: Students, staff and faculty responded to an email invitation to complete an electronic survey. Surveys included 21-items from the Trust in Science and Scientists Inventory questionnaire. Responses were coded so higher scores indicated a higher trust in science and scientists, A linear regression model including sex, age group, division, race and ethnicity, political affiliation, and history of COVID-19, was used to determine variables significantly associated with trust in science and scientists scores at the p < 0.05 level. RESULTS: Participants were mostly female (62.1%), Asian (34.7%) and White (39.5%) and students (70.6%). More than half identified their political affiliation as Democrat (65%). In the final regression model, all races and ethnicities had significantly lower mean trust in science and scientists scores than White participants [Black ([Formula: see text]= -0.42, 95% CI: -0.55, -0.43, p < 0.001); Asian ([Formula: see text]= -0.20, 95% CI: -0.24, -0.17, p < 0.001); Latinx ([Formula: see text]= -0.22, 95% CI: -0.27, -0.18, p < 0.001); Other ([Formula: see text]= -0.19, 95% CI: -0.26, -0.11, p < 0.001)]. Compared to those identifying as Democrat, all other political affiliations had significantly lower mean scores. [Republican ([Formula: see text] =-0.49, 95% CI: -0.55, -0.43, p < 0.0001); Independent ([Formula: see text] =-0.29, 95% CI: -0.33, -0.25, p < 0.0001); something else ([Formula: see text] =-0.19, 95% CI: -0.25, -0.12, p < 0.0001)]. Having had COVID-19 ([Formula: see text]= -0.10, 95% CI: -0.15, -0.06, p < 0.001) had significantly lower scores compared to those who did not have COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Despite the setting of a major research University, trust in science is highly variable. This study identifies characteristics that could be used to target and curate educational campaigns and university policies to address the COVID19 and future pandemics.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Science , Trust , Female , Humans , Male , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19 Vaccines , Faculty , Los Angeles , Pandemics , Students , UniversitiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To chart the global literature on gender equity in academic health research. DESIGN: Scoping review. PARTICIPANTS: Quantitative studies were eligible if they examined gender equity within academic institutions including health researchers. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes related to equity across gender and other social identities in academia: (1) faculty workforce: representation of all genders in university/faculty departments, academic rank or position and salary; (2) service: teaching obligations and administrative/non-teaching activities; (3) recruitment and hiring data: number of applicants by gender, interviews and new hires for various rank; (4) promotion: opportunities for promotion and time to progress through academic ranks; (5) academic leadership: type of leadership positions, opportunities for leadership promotion or training, opportunities to supervise/mentor and support for leadership bids; (6) scholarly output or productivity: number/type of publications and presentations, position of authorship, number/value of grants or awards and intellectual property ownership; (7) contextual factors of universities; (8) infrastructure; (9) knowledge and technology translation activities; (10) availability of maternity/paternity/parental/family leave; (11) collaboration activities/opportunities for collaboration; (12) qualitative considerations: perceptions around promotion, finances and support. RESULTS: Literature search yielded 94 798 citations; 4753 full-text articles were screened, and 562 studies were included. Most studies originated from North America (462/562, 82.2%). Few studies (27/562, 4.8%) reported race and fewer reported sex/gender (which were used interchangeably in most studies) other than male/female (11/562, 2.0%). Only one study provided data on religion. No other PROGRESS-PLUS variables were reported. A total of 2996 outcomes were reported, with most studies examining academic output (371/562, 66.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Reviewed literature suggest a lack in analytic approaches that consider genders beyond the binary categories of man and woman, additional social identities (race, religion, social capital and disability) and an intersectionality lens examining the interconnection of multiple social identities in understanding discrimination and disadvantage. All of these are necessary to tailor strategies that promote gender equity. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/8wk7e/.
Subject(s)
Faculty , Gender Equity , Pregnancy , Humans , Male , Female , Leadership , Salaries and Fringe Benefits , Workforce , Faculty, MedicalABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The rapid transition to online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic created additional stress and workload issues for nurse faculty. Burnout has been reported in nurse faculty who cite workplace factors that influence satisfaction and work-life balance as major contributing factors. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine life balance and professional quality of life among nurse faculty (N = 216) in 2021 during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic and to describe the challenges of delivering virtual learning experiences. METHODS: A cross-sectional design was utilized to survey nurse faculty using the Life Balance Inventory and the Professional Quality of Life Scale. Descriptive statistics and correlations were calculated. RESULTS: Nurse faculty reported an unbalanced life balance (median = 1.76), average compassion satisfaction (median = 40.00), average burnout (median = 24.00), and low secondary traumatic stress (median = 21.00). Narrative themes included (1) COVID-19 pandemic has made balance nearly impossible, (2) Intentional disconnection from work activities, (3) Challenging/changing priorities, (4) Promoting a healthy work environment, and (5) Moral distress and exhaustion. DISCUSSION: Understanding the factors that influence nurse faculty delivery of virtual learning experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic may provide opportunities to improve nurse faculty work-life balance and professional quality of life.
Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional , COVID-19 , Humans , Quality of Life , Work-Life Balance , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Faculty , Job Satisfaction , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is an important pandemic that affects the whole world. Another branch of the wreckage its devastating effects on the health care system is organ and cadaver donations. This article aimed to raise awareness about cadaver and organ donation during the COVID-19 period, with the support of student opinions. METHODS: Twelve opinions about cadaver and organ donation during the COVID-19 pandemic were presented to the fourth-, fifth-, and sixth-year students at the Kafkas University Faculty of Medicine. The answers were compared between male and female students using the χ2 test. RESULTS: It is seen that the data obtained about cadaver and organ donation are important. In addition, the storage conditions of cadavers and organs, the risk of disease transmission, and the risk of contamination are discussed with striking data. CONCLUSIONS: It is understood from the obtained data that awareness about cadaver and organ donation is always on the agenda. In particular, conferences and meetings should be held frequently to keep medicine faculty students informed. The handling of COVID-19 has also given a significant impetus to the research throughout.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Students, Medical , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Humans , Male , Female , Pandemics , Surveys and Questionnaires , COVID-19/epidemiology , Faculty , Cadaver , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeABSTRACT
At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, stay-at-home orders disrupted normal research operations. Principal investigators (PIs) had to make decisions about conducting and staffing essential research under unprecedented, rapidly changing conditions. These decisions also had to be made amid other substantial work and life stressors, like pressures to be productive and staying healthy. Using survey methods, we asked PIs funded by the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation (N = 930) to rate how they prioritized different considerations, such as personal risks, risks to research personnel, and career consequences, when making decisions. They also reported how difficult they found these choices and associated symptoms of stress. Using a checklist, PIs indicated those factors in their research environments that made their decisions easier (i.e., facilitators) or more difficult (i.e., barriers) to make. Finally, PIs also indicated how satisfied they were with their decisions and management of research during the disruption. Descriptive statistics summarize PIs' responses and inferential tests explore whether responses varied by academic rank or gender. PIs overall reported prioritizing the well-being and perspectives of research personnel, and they perceived more facilitators than barriers. Early-career faculty, however, rated concerns about their careers and productivity as higher priorities compared to their senior counterparts. Early-career faculty also perceived greater difficulty and stress, more barriers, fewer facilitators, and had less satisfaction with their decisions. Women rated several interpersonal concerns about their research personnel more highly than men and reported greater stress. The experience and perceptions of researchers during the COVID-19 pandemic can inform policies and practices when planning for future crises and recovering from the pandemic.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , United States/epidemiology , Male , Humans , Female , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Decision Making , Faculty , Health StatusABSTRACT
Preparing future physical education professionals to teach adapted physical education (APE) is a responsibility of physical education teacher education (PETE) programs. Furthermore, there is limited literature on practicum and/or field experiences as a part of APE courses from the perspective of faculty members. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore faculty views in relation to the practical experiences in undergraduate APE courses. Structured interviews were conducted with faculty members of higher education institutions in the U.S. There were five study participants in this study. Thematic analysis was employed for data analysis. The findings included three subthemes: (a) quality of quantity, (b) need for diversity in practical experiences, and (c) practical experience pertaining to APE courses. Practical experience in APE courses is an integral part of professional preparation for undergraduate students in kinesiology programs. There are no exact criteria for requirements across the states; however, students could maximize their learning by engaging in diverse APE practicum settings. The instructor of APE courses should provide clear guidelines and feedback for students. Instructors of APE courses must also consider the institutional and environmental context prior to planning and implementing practical experiences to provide successful learning experiences for students.
Subject(s)
Hominidae , Physical Education and Training , Humans , Animals , Faculty , Students , LearningABSTRACT
In this special interview series, we profile members of The FEBS Journal editorial board to highlight their research focus, perspectives on the journal and future directions in their field. Rudi Beyaert is Full Professor in Molecular Biology at the Department of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Faculty of Sciences, of the University of Ghent (Belgium). He also serves as Vice-Science Director of the Center for Inflammation Research of the VIB in Ghent, where he is heading the Unit of Molecular Signal Transduction in Inflammation. He has served as an Editorial Board Member of The FEBS Journal since 2016.
Subject(s)
Faculty , Molecular Biology , Humans , Inflammation , Male , Signal TransductionABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to provide information about immunity against COVID-19 along with risk factors and behavior among employees in day care facilities and preschools (DCS) in Denmark. In collaboration with the Danish Union of Pedagogues, during February and March 2021, 47,810 members were offered a point-of-care rapid SARS-CoV-2 antibody test (POCT) at work and were invited to fill in an electronic questionnaire covering COVID-19 exposure. Seroprevalence data from Danish blood donors (total Ig enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]) were used as a proxy for the Danish population. A total of 21,018 (45%) DCS employees completed the questionnaire and reported their POCT result {median age, 44.3 years (interquartile range [IQR], [32.7 to 53.6]); females, 84.1%}, of which 20,267 (96.4%) were unvaccinated and included in analysis. A total of 1,857 (9.2%) participants tested seropositive, significantly higher than a seroprevalence at 7.6% (risk ratio [RR], 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14 to 1.27) among 40,541 healthy blood donors (median age, 42 years [IQR, 28 to 53]; males, 51.3%). Exposure at work (RR, 2.9; 95% CI, 2.3 to 3.6) was less of a risk factor than exposure within the household (RR, 12.7; 95% CI, 10.2 to 15.8). Less than 25% of participants reported wearing face protection at work. Most of the participants expressed some degree of fear of contracting COVID-19 both at work and outside work. SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was slightly higher in DCS staff than in blood donors, but possible exposure at home was associated with a higher risk than at work. DCS staff expressed fear of contracting COVID-19, though there was limited use of face protection at work. IMPORTANCE Identifying at-risk groups and evaluating preventive interventions in at-risk groups is imperative for the ongoing pandemic as well as for the control of future epidemics. Although DCS staff have a much higher risk of being infected within their own household than at their workplace, most are fearful of being infected with COVID-19 or bringing COVID-19 to work. This represents an interesting dilemma and an important issue which should be addressed by public health authorities for risk communication and pandemic planning. This study design can be used in a strategy for ongoing surveillance of COVID-19 immunity or other infections in the population. The findings of this study can be used to assess the need for future preventive interventions in DCS, such as the use of personal protective equipment.