ABSTRACT
SUMMARY: Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. healthcare sector was facing challenges that threatened the sustainability of its workforce. These challenges included changing demographics, competition from other employers, and burnout. Now in the wake of the pandemic, the labor market is seeing more disruption with the exacerbation of these issues. Healthcare organizations have a responsibility to prevent further labor shortages so that they can continue to deliver high quality care and achieve positive health outcomes. Given the changes in people's values and behaviors, healthcare leaders can consider four innovative strategies to meet the needs of their current and future employees: flexible work arrangements, alternative benefits packages, career pathways, and mental health services. Organizations need to take into account their employee populations and the ability to invest in these changes when considering how to move forward.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Health Workforce , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Humans , United States/epidemiologySubject(s)
Economics, Nursing/organization & administration , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Nursing/organization & administration , Economics, Nursing/trends , Health Workforce/economics , Health Workforce/statistics & numerical data , Health Workforce/trends , Humans , Nursing/statistics & numerical data , Nursing/trends , Personnel Selection/economics , Personnel Selection/organization & administration , Personnel Selection/statistics & numerical data , Personnel Selection/trends , Salaries and Fringe Benefits/statistics & numerical data , Salaries and Fringe Benefits/trends , United KingdomABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: One of the main forthcoming challenges of healthcare systems against preparedness and management of the pandemic is the challenge of procurement and recruitment of the human resources. This study is aimed to explore the health human resources challenges during COVID-19 pandemic in Iran. METHODS: This qualitative content analysis study was conducted in 2020. The study population includes all the Iranian human resources managers affiliated in Universities of Medical Sciences, hospitals and health centers managers and the health networks managers all over the country. 23 participants were included via purposeful sampling considering the inclusion criteria and were interviewed individually. After 23 semi-structured interviews, data were saturated. Then the data were analyzed through content analysis approach applying MAXQDA10. RESULTS: Three main themes of "organizational challenges", "legal challenges", and "personal challenges" were explored as the main challenges of health human resources management during COVID-19. On the one hand, organizational challenges include restricted financial resources, compensation discrimination, staffing distinction points, imbalance in the workload, weak organizational coordination, inefficient inter-sectoral relationships, parallel decisions, inefficient distribution of the human resources, lack of applied education, lack of integrated health protocols, lack of appropriate evaluation of performance, employee turnover, lack of clear approaches for staffing, and shortage of specialized manpower, and on the other hand, the personal challenges include insufficient knowledge of the employees, psychological disorders, reduction of self-confidence, burnout, workload increase, reduced level of job satisfaction, effects of colleague and patients bereavement and unsafety sense against the work place. Finally, the legal challenges that mostly related to the governments laws and regulations include lack of protocols for continuous supportive services, inappropriate approaches and instructions for teleworking, and lack of alternative plans and regulations for the human resources. CONCLUSION: Organizational, legal and personal challenges are among three main challenges of health human resources management during COVID-19 pandemic. Serious attention to these challenges should be considered by health policymakers in order to be prepared for facing new probable outbreaks and managing the present condition. The integrated comprehensive planning of human resources management for COVID-19 along with supportive packages for the personnel can be helpful.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Health Personnel , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Personnel Turnover , Developing Countries , Humans , Iran , Pandemics , Qualitative ResearchSubject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Mass Vaccination/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , State Medicine/organization & administration , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/virology , England/epidemiology , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Humans , Immunization, Secondary , Pandemics/prevention & control , WorkloadSubject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Medical, Graduate/organization & administration , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Education, Medical, Graduate/methods , Health Workforce/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Teaching/organization & administration , Humans , Internship and Residency , Pandemics , Salaries and Fringe Benefits , United StatesSubject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Disaster Planning/organization & administration , Pandemics/prevention & control , Public Health/standards , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Communication , Community Participation , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Female , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Human Rights/ethics , Humans , Organizational Objectives , Population Surveillance/methods , Psychosocial Support Systems , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Sexual and Gender Minorities/psychologySubject(s)
Burnout, Professional , COVID-19/psychology , Health Workforce , Medical Errors/prevention & control , Patient Care , Burnout, Professional/prevention & control , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Health Services Needs and Demand , Health Workforce/ethics , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Health Workforce/trends , Humans , Patient Care/psychology , Patient Care/standards , Physician's Role , Psychosocial Support Systems , Social ResponsibilityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although elective surgical procedures in the United States have been suspended because of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, orthopaedic surgeons are being recruited to serve patients with COVID-19 in addition to providing orthopaedic acute care. Older individuals are deemed to be at higher risk for poor outcomes with COVID-19. Although previous studies have shown a high proportion of older providers nationwide across medical specialties, we are not aware of any previous study that has analyzed the age distribution among the orthopaedic workforce. Therefore, the purposes of the present study were (1) to determine the geographic distribution of U.S. orthopaedic surgeons by age, (2) to compare the distribution with other surgical specialties, and (3) to compare this distribution with the spread of COVID-19. METHODS: Demographic statistics from the most recent State Physician Workforce Data Reports published by the Association of American Medical Colleges were extracted to identify the 2018 statewide proportion of practicing orthopaedic surgeons ≥60 years of age as well as age-related demographic data for all surgical specialties. Geospatial data on the distribution of COVID-19 cases were obtained from the Environmental Systems Research Institute. State boundary files were taken from the U.S. Census Bureau. Orthopaedic workforce age data were utilized to group states into quintiles. RESULTS: States with the highest quintile of orthopaedic surgeons ≥60 years of age included states most severely affected by COVID-19: New York, New Jersey, California, and Florida. For all states, the median number of providers ≥60 years of age was 105.5 (interquartile range [IQR], 45.5 to 182.5). The median proportion of orthopaedic surgeons ≥60 years of age was higher than that of all other surgical subspecialties, apart from thoracic surgery. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, the present report provides the first age-focused view of the orthopaedic workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic. States in the highest quintile of orthopaedic surgeons ≥60 years old are also among the most overwhelmed by COVID-19. As important orthopaedic acute care continues in addition to COVID-19 frontline service, special considerations may be needed for at-risk staff. Appropriate health system measures and workforce-management strategies should protect the subset of those who are most potentially vulnerable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Orthopedic Surgeons/supply & distribution , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Age Distribution , Age Factors , COVID-19 , Geographic Mapping , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Humans , Middle Aged , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Public health in the United States has long been challenged by budget cuts and a declining workforce. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the vulnerabilities left by years of neglecting this crucial frontline defense against emerging infectious diseases. In the early days of the pandemic, the University of Texas Medical Branch and the Galveston County Health District (GCHD) partnered to bolster Galveston County's public health response. We mobilized interprofessional teams of students and provided training to implement projects identified by GCHD as necessary for responding to the pandemic. We provided a safe outlet for students to contribute to their community by creating remote volunteer opportunities when students faced displacement from clinical rotations and in-person didactics converted to virtual formats. As students gradually returned to clinical rotations and didactic demands increased, it became necessary to expand volunteer efforts beyond what had initially been mostly hand-selected student teams. We have passed the initial emergency response phase of COVID-19 in Galveston County and are transitioning into more long-term opportunities as COVID-19 moves from pandemic to endemic. In this case study, we describe our successes and lessons learned.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Public Health Administration , Students, Medical , Volunteers , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Telephone , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Although the latest report on workforce equality shows positive changes, some improvements are marginal and the issue must be kept high on the agenda, says Sam Foster, Chief Nurse, Oxford University Hospitals.
Subject(s)
Health Workforce , Racism , State Medicine , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Humans , Racism/prevention & control , State Medicine/organization & administration , United KingdomSubject(s)
Child Health Services/organization & administration , Community Health Services/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/organization & administration , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , Child , Child Health Services/standards , Communicable Disease Control/organization & administration , Communicable Disease Control/standards , Community Health Services/standards , Health Services Accessibility/standards , Health Workforce/standards , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/standards , State Medicine/organization & administration , State Medicine/standards , United Kingdom/epidemiologyABSTRACT
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the rapid surge in demand for critical supplies and public health efforts needed to guard against virus transmission have placed enormous pressure on health systems worldwide. These pressures and the uncertainty they have created have impacted the health workforce in a substantial way. This paper examines the relationship between health supply chain capacity and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Canada's health workforce. The findings of this research also highlight the impact of the pandemic on health workers, specifically the relationship between the health supply chain and the autonomy of the health workforce.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Equipment and Supplies/supply & distribution , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Professional Autonomy , Canada/epidemiology , Decision Making, Organizational , Fear/psychology , Health Workforce/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Personal Protective Equipment/supply & distribution , Resource Allocation/organization & administration , UncertaintyABSTRACT
While policy-makers in many jurisdictions are paying increasing attention to health workforce issues, human resources remain at best only partially aligned with population health needs. This paper explores the governance of human resources during the pandemic, looking at the Quebec health system as a revelatory case. We identify three issues related to health human resource (HHR) policies: working conditions, recognition at work and scope of practice. We empirically probe these issues based on an analysis of popular media, policy reports and participant observation by the lead authors in various forums and research projects. Using an integrated model of HHR, we identify major vulnerabilities in this domain. Persistent labour shortages, endemic deficiencies in working environments and inequity across occupational categories limit the ability to address critical HHR issues. We propose three ways to eliminate HHR vulnerabilities: reorganize work through participatory initiatives, implement joint policy making to rebalance power across the health workforce, and invest in the development of capacities at all system levels.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Global Health , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Humans , Organizational Case Studies , Pandemics , Quebec , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Despite policies for addressing shortages and maldistribution of health professionals, sub-Saharan Africa continues to experience shortages and maldistribution of skilled health professionals. Policies such as return-of-service schemes or state-funded educational initiatives do not seem to be achieving their intended objectives, potentially due to poor design, implementation; and lack of monitoring and evaluation of the strategies. A focus by global health experts on strengthening and reformulating educational initiatives offers potential for producing, retaining and recruiting health professionals.
Subject(s)
Global Health , Health Workforce , Africa South of the Sahara , Health Policy , Health Workforce/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Healthcare Disparities , Humans , Models, OrganizationalABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Health professionals are considered a group vulnerable to developing mental health symptoms during a pandemic, with redeployment being a risk factor. However, previous literature suggests workplace communication can be a protective element. AIMS: An audit aimed to evaluate NHS research staff's experiences of redeployment in order to provide suggestions for future improvements in the process. METHODS: A questionnaire was disseminated to all staff in the clinical research directorate of an NHS trust. Responses were analysed using thematic analysis. FINDINGS: Over half the redeployed staff experienced perceived negative psychological outcomes. The main reported contributor to this was perceived lack of communication. CONCLUSION: Communication needs to be improved in future redeployments. Future research should consider a larger cohort and more input from team members who remained on the pre-COVID-19 studies in order to improve the transition back from redeployment.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Clinical Nursing Research , Health Workforce , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/nursing , Clinical Nursing Research/organization & administration , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Humans , United Kingdom/epidemiologySubject(s)
General Practice/standards , Remote Consultation/instrumentation , Triage/statistics & numerical data , Workload/statistics & numerical data , Appointments and Schedules , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Efficiency, Organizational , General Practice/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Humans , Remote Consultation/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , State Medicine/organization & administration , United Kingdom/epidemiologySubject(s)
COVID-19/mortality , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Surgery, Plastic/organization & administration , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , Global Burden of Disease , Health Personnel/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/trends , Health Workforce/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Safety , Surgery, Plastic/statistics & numerical data , Surgery, Plastic/trendsABSTRACT
Importance: The 2017-2018 influenza season in the US was marked by a high severity of illness, wide geographic spread, and prolonged duration compared with recent previous seasons, resulting in increased strain throughout acute care hospital systems. Objective: To characterize self-reported experiences and views of hospital capacity managers regarding the 2017-2018 influenza season in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this qualitative study, semistructured telephone interviews were conducted between April 2018 and January 2019 with a random sample of capacity management administrators responsible for throughput and hospital capacity at short-term, acute care hospitals throughout the US. Main Outcomes and Measures: Each participant's self-reported experiences and views regarding high patient volumes during the 2017-2018 influenza season, lessons learned, and the extent of hospitals' preparedness planning for future pandemic events. Interviews were recorded and transcribed and then analyzed using thematic content analysis. Outcomes included themes and subthemes. Results: A total of 53 key hospital capacity personnel at 53 hospitals throughout the US were interviewed; 39 (73.6%) were women, 48 (90.6%) had a nursing background, and 29 (54.7%) had been in the occupational role for more than 4 years. Participants' experiences were categorized into several domains: (1) perception of strain, (2) effects of influenza and influenza-like illness on staff and patient care, (3) immediate staffing and capacity responses to influenza and influenza-like illness, and (4) future staffing and capacity preparedness for influenza and influenza-like illness. Participants reported experiencing perceived strain associated with concerns about preparedness for seasonal influenza and influenza-like illness as well as concerns about staffing, patient care, and capacity, but future pandemic planning within hospitals was not reported as being a high priority. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this qualitative study suggest that during the 2017-2018 influenza season, there were systemic vulnerabilities as well as a lack of hospital preparedness planning for future pandemics at US hospitals. These issues should be addressed given the current coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.