ABSTRACT
Patients with hematologic conditions have a higher risk of severe COVID-19 and COVID-19-related death. This is related to immune deficiencies induced by hematologic conditions and/or the treatment thereof. Prospective vaccine immunogenicity studies have demonstrated that in the majority of patients, a 3-dose COVID-19 vaccination schedule leads to antibody concentrations comparable to levels obtained in healthy adults after a 2-dose schedule. In B cell depleted patients, humoral responses are poor, however vaccination did induce potent cellular immune responses. The effect of 3-dose vaccination schedules and COVID-19 booster vaccinations on the protection of patients with hematologic malignancies against severe COVID-19 and COVID-19 related death remains to be confirmed by population-based vaccine effectiveness studies.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Hematologic Neoplasms , Adult , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Immunity, Cellular , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Background: To evaluate the benefits of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in cancer patients it is relevant to understand the adaptive immune response elicited after vaccination. Patients affected by hematologic malignancies are frequently immune-compromised and show a decreased seroconversion rate compared to other cancer patients or controls. Therefore, vaccine-induced cellular immune responses in these patients might have an important protective role and need a detailed evaluation. Methods: Certain T cell subtypes (CD4, CD8, Tfh, γδT), including cell functionality as indicated by cytokine secretion (IFN, TNF) and expression of activation markers (CD69, CD154) were assessed via multi-parameter flow cytometry in hematologic malignancy patients (N=12) and healthy controls (N=12) after a second SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dose. The PBMC of post-vaccination samples were stimulated with a spike-peptide pool (S-Peptides) of SARS-CoV-2, with CD3/CD28, with a pool of peptides from the cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus and influenza A virus (CEF-Peptides) or left unstimulated. Furthermore, the concentration of spike-specific antibodies has been analyzed in patients. Results: Our results indicate that hematologic malignancy patients developed a robust cellular immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination comparable to that of healthy controls, and for certain T cell subtypes even higher. The most reactive T cells to SARS-CoV-2 spike peptides belonged to the CD4 and Tfh cell compartment, being median (IQR), 3.39 (1.41-5.92) and 2.12 (0.55-4.14) as a percentage of IFN- and TNF-producing Tfh cells in patients. In this regard, the immunomodulatory treatment of patients before the vaccination period seems important as it was strongly associated with a higher percentage of activated CD4 and Tfh cells. SARS-CoV-2- and CEF-specific T cell responses significantly correlated with each other. Compared to lymphoma patients, myeloma patients had an increased percentage of SARS-CoV-2-specific Tfh cells. T-SNE analysis revealed higher frequencies of γδT cells in patients compared to controls, especially in myeloma patients. In general, after vaccination, SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells were also detectable in patients without seroconversion. Conclusion: Hematologic malignancy patients are capable of developing a SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4 and Tfh cellular immune response after vaccination, and certain immunomodulatory therapies in the period before vaccination might increase the antigen-specific immune response. A proper response to recall antigens (e.g., CEF-Peptides) reflects immune cellular functionality and might be predictive for generating a newly induced antigen-specific immune response as is expected after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections , Hematologic Neoplasms , Multiple Myeloma , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines , SARS-CoV-2 , Leukocytes, Mononuclear , COVID-19/prevention & control , Herpesvirus 4, Human , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , VaccinationABSTRACT
COVID-19 and our armamentarium of strategies to combat it have evolved dramatically since the virus first emerged in late 2019. Vaccination remains the primary strategy to prevent severe illness, although the protective effect can vary in patients with hematologic malignancy. Strategies such as additional vaccine doses and now bivalent boosters can contribute to increased immune response, especially in the face of evolving viral variants. Because of these new variants, no approved monoclonal antibodies are available for pre-exposure or postexposure prophylaxis. Patients with symptomatic, mild-to-moderate COVID-19 and risk features for developing severe COVID-19, who present within 5-7 days of symptom onset, should be offered outpatient therapy with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NR) or in some cases with intravenous (IV) remdesivir. NR interacts with many blood cancer treatments, and reviewing drug interactions is essential. Patients with severe COVID-19 should be managed with IV remdesivir, tocilizumab (or an alternate interleukin-6 receptor blocker), or baricitinib, as indicated based on the severity of illness. Dexamethasone can be considered on an individual basis, weighing oxygen requirements and patients' underlying disease and their perceived ability to clear infection. Finally, as CD19-targeted and B-cell maturation (BCMA)-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies become more heavily used for relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies, viral infections including COVID-19 are increasingly recognized as common complications, but data on risk factors and prophylaxis in this patient population are scarce. We summarize the available evidence regarding viral infections after CAR T-cell therapy.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematologic Neoplasms , Virus Diseases , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Virus Diseases/etiology , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/adverse effectsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The patient's age, gender and the presence of certain concomitant diseases have been reported to play a part in the course and progression of COVID-19 in the literature. In this study, we aimed to compare the comorbidities causing mortality in critically ill Intensive Care Unit (ICU)-patients diagnosed with COVID-19. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data as regards the COVID-19 cases followed up in the ICU were retrospectively reviewed. 408 COVID-19 patients with positive PCR test were included in the study. In addition, a subgroup analysis was performed in patients treated with invasive mechanical ventilation. While the primary aim of this study was to evaluate the difference in survival rates due to comorbidities in critical COVID-19 patients, we also aimed to assess the comorbidities in severely intubated COVID-19 patients in terms of mortality. RESULTS: A statistically significant increase in mortality was observed in patients with underlying hematologic malignancy and chronic renal failure (p=0.027, 0.047). Body mass index value in the mortal group was significantly higher in both the general study group and subgroup analysis (p=0.004, 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Advanced age and comorbidities such as chronic renal failure and hematologic malignancy in COVID-19 patients are associated with poor survival prognosis in critically ill COVID-19 patients.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematologic Neoplasms , Kidney Failure, Chronic , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Critical Illness , Intensive Care Units , Disease ProgressionABSTRACT
CAR T-cells have revolutionized the treatment of many hematological malignancies. Thousands of patients with lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and multiple myeloma have received this "living medicine" and achieved durable remissions. Their place in therapy continues to evolve, and there is ongoing development of new generation CAR constructs, CAR T-cells against solid tumors and CAR T-cells against chronic infections like human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B. A significant fraction of CAR T-cell recipients, unfortunately, develop infections. This is in part due to factors intrinsic to the patient, but also to the treatment, which requires lymphodepletion (LD), causes neutropenia and hypogammaglobulinemia and necessarily increases the state of immunosuppression of the patient. The goal of this review is to present the infectious complications of CAR T-cell therapy, explain their temporal course and risk factors, and provide recommendations for their prevention, diagnosis, and management.
Subject(s)
Hematologic Neoplasms , Multiple Myeloma , Receptors, Chimeric Antigen , Humans , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/adverse effects , T-Lymphocytes/pathology , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Multiple Myeloma/pathologyABSTRACT
SUMMARY: In patients with multiple myeloma, completion of mRNA-based vaccination schemes failed to yield detectable SARS-CoV-2 Omicron-neutralizing antibodies and S1-RBD-specific CD8+ T cells in approximately 60% and 80% of the cases, respectively. Patients who develop breakthrough infections exhibited very low levels of live-virus neutralizing antibodies and the absence of follicular T helper cells. See related article by Azeem et al., p. 106 (9). See related article by Chang et al., p. 1684 (10).
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematologic Neoplasms , Multiple Myeloma , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Breakthrough Infections , mRNA Vaccines , COVID-19/prevention & control , Antibodies, Neutralizing , CD8-Positive T-LymphocytesABSTRACT
Immunocompromised hematology patients are vulnerable to severe COVID-19 and respond poorly to vaccination. Relative deficits in immunity are, however, unclear, especially after 3 vaccine doses. We evaluated immune responses in hematology patients across three COVID-19 vaccination doses. Seropositivity was low after a first dose of BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 (â¼26%), increased to 59%-75% after a second dose, and increased to 85% after a third dose. While prototypical antibody-secreting cells (ASCs) and T follicular helper (Tfh) cell responses were elicited in healthy participants, hematology patients showed prolonged ASCs and skewed Tfh2/17 responses. Importantly, vaccine-induced expansions of spike-specific and peptide-HLA tetramer-specific CD4+/CD8+ T cells, together with their T cell receptor (TCR) repertoires, were robust in hematology patients, irrespective of B cell numbers, and comparable to healthy participants. Vaccinated patients with breakthrough infections developed higher antibody responses, while T cell responses were comparable to healthy groups. COVID-19 vaccination induces robust T cell immunity in hematology patients of varying diseases and treatments irrespective of B cell numbers and antibody response.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematologic Neoplasms , Humans , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-beta , COVID-19 Vaccines , SARS-CoV-2 , BNT162 Vaccine , CD8-Positive T-LymphocytesABSTRACT
Adoptive cell transfer (ACT) therapies have gained renewed interest in the field of immunotherapy following the advent of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) technology. This immunological breakthrough requires immune cell engineering with an artificial surface protein receptor for antigen-specific recognition coupled to an intracellular protein domain for cell activating functions. CAR-based ACT has successfully solved some hematological malignancies, and it is expected that other tumors may soon benefit from this approach. However, the potential of CAR technology is such that other immune-mediated disorders are beginning to profit from it. This review will focus on CAR-based ACT therapeutic areas other than oncology such as infection, allergy, autoimmunity, transplantation, and fibrotic repair. Herein, we discuss the results and limitations of preclinical and clinical studies in that regard.
Subject(s)
Hematologic Neoplasms , Neoplasms , Receptors, Chimeric Antigen , Humans , T-Lymphocytes , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/methods , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapyABSTRACT
In this study, we aim to report the outcome of COVID-19 in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. HCT recipients (n = 32) with hematological disease and hospitalized for COVID-19 were included in the study. A cohort of age and comorbid disease-matched hospitalized COVID-19 patients with hematological malignancy but not underwent HCT (n = 465), and another cohort of age and comorbid disease-matched hospitalized COVID-19 patients without cancer (n = 497) were also included in the study for comparison. Case fatality rate (CFR) was 5.6% in patients without cancer, 11.8 in patients with hematological malignancy and 15.6% in HCT recipients. The CFR in HCT recipients who were not receiving immunosuppressive agents at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis was 11.5%, whereas it was 33% in HCT recipients who were receiving an immunosuppressive agent at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis. In conclusion, our study reveals that for the current pandemic, HCT recipients, especially those receiving immunosuppressive drugs, constitute a special population of cancer patients.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/mortality , Hematologic Neoplasms/mortality , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Transplant Recipients , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosageABSTRACT
Importance: Patients with cancer are known to have increased risk of COVID-19 complications, including death. Objective: To determine the association of COVID-19 vaccination with breakthrough infections and complications in patients with cancer compared to noncancer controls. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective population-based cohort study using linked administrative databases in Ontario, Canada, in residents 18 years and older who received COVID-19 vaccination. Three matched groups were identified (based on age, sex, type of vaccine, date of vaccine): 1:4 match for patients with hematologic and solid cancer to noncancer controls (hematologic and solid cancers separately analyzed), 1:1 match between patients with hematologic and patients with solid cancer. Exposures: Cancer diagnosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes occurring 14 days after receipt of second COVID-19 vaccination dose: primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection; secondary outcomes were emergency department visit, hospitalization, and death within 4 weeks of SARS-CoV-2 infection (end of follow-up March 31, 2022). Multivariable cumulative incidence function models were used to obtain adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and 95% CIs. Results: A total of 289â¯400 vaccinated patients with cancer (39â¯880 hematologic; 249â¯520 solid) with 1â¯157â¯600 matched noncancer controls were identified; the cohort was 65.4% female, and mean (SD) age was 66 (14.0) years. SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection was higher in patients with hematologic cancer (aHR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.20-1.46; P < .001) but not in patients with solid cancer (aHR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.96-1.05; P = .87). COVID-19 severe outcomes (composite of hospitalization and death) were significantly higher in patients with cancer compared to patients without cancer (aHR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.42-1.63; P < .001). Risk of severe outcomes was higher among patients with hematologic cancer (aHR, 2.51; 95% CI, 2.21-2.85; P < .001) than patients with solid cancer (aHR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.24-1.64; P < .001). Patients receiving active treatment had a further heightened risk for COVID-19 severe outcomes, particularly those who received anti-CD20 therapy. Third vaccination dose was associated with lower infection and COVID-19 complications, except for patients receiving anti-CD20 therapy. Conclusions and Relevance: In this large population-based cohort study, patients with cancer had greater risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and worse outcomes than patients without cancer, and the risk was highest for patients with hematologic cancer and any patients with cancer receiving active treatment. Triple vaccination was associated with lower risk of poor outcomes.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematologic Neoplasms , Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Aged , Male , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Breakthrough Infections , Cohort Studies , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Vaccination , Ontario/epidemiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: SARS-CoV-2 has caused over 200 million documented infections, more than 4 million deaths, and unprecedented consequences worldwide. The cycle threshold (Ct), the number of amplification cycles required to obtain a product detectable through fluorescence during a quantitative RT-PCR test, is an indirect measurement of viral load. Patients with hematologic malignancies have an increased risk of death by the SARS-CoV-2. CASES PRESENTATION: We conducted a retrospective, observational, descriptive analysis of the Ct obtained from patients with history of hematologic malignancies who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in our hospital, from March 3rd, 2020, to August 17th, 2021. We used the mean Ct at diagnosis. 15 adults, with previous diagnosis of lymphomas, acute leukemias and chronic lymphocytic leukemia, were included. 9 of the 15 patients (60 %) developed pneumonia, 6 of them required supplementary oxygen and 5 mechanical ventilation. 5 patients died between 7-86 days from symptom onset. Ct was lower among the group of patients who died (15.5 cycles; SD= 2.28, CI95%= 9.17-21.86) compared with those who survived (20.2 cycles; SD= 8.87, CI95%= 13.9-26.6). Ct was also lower in the pneumonia group (18.2 cycles; SD= 2.28, CI95%= 12.98-23.51) than in the no-pneumonia group (19.3 cycles; SD= 4.11; CI95%= 8.73-29.9). DISCUSSION: Ct was lowest in severe forms of CoViD-19. Further studies with larger populations of patients with hematologic malignancies could establish the validity of Ct as a quantitative laboratory determination as a course-prediction and infectivity tool.
Introducción: SARS-CoV-2 ha causado más de 200 millones de infecciones documentadas, más de 4 millones de muertes, y consecuencias sin precedentes globalmente. El umbral de ciclado (Ct), número de ciclos de amplificación requerido para obtener un producto detectable durante una prueba cuantitativa de RT-PCR, es una medida indirecta de la carga viral. Los pacientes con enfermedades oncohematológicas tienen mayor riesgo de muerte por SARS-CoV-2. Presentación de casos: Realizamos un estudio observacional, retrospectivo y descriptivo de los valores de Ct obtenidos de pacientes con enfermedades oncohematológicas que resultaron positivos para SARS-CoV-2 en nuestro hospital, desde el 3 de marzo de 2020, hasta el 17 de agosto de 2021. Empleamos el Ct promedio al diagnóstico. Fueron incluidos 15 adultos, con diagnóstico de linfomas, leucemias agudas y leucemia linfocítica crónica. 9 pacientes (60 %) desarrollaron neumonía, 6 requirieron oxígeno suplementario y 5 ventilación mecánica. 5 murieron a los 7-86 días desde el inicio de síntomas. Ct fue menor entre los pacientes que murieron (15.5 ciclos; DS= 2.28, IC95%= 9.17-21.86), comparado con los que sobrevivieron (20.2 ciclos; DS= 8.87, IC95%= 13.9-26.6). La misma tendencia se observó en el grupo de los que desarrollaron neumonía (18.2 ciclos; DS= 2.28, IC95%= 12.98-23.51), comparado con lo que no tuvieron neumonía (19.3 ciclos; DS= 4.11; IC95%= 8.73-29.9). Discusión: El valor de Ct fue más bajo en las formas más graves de CoViD-19. Estudios adicionales con poblaciones mayores de pacientes con enfermedades oncohematológicas podrían establecer la validez de Ct como determinación cuantitativa de laboratorio útil como predictora de evolución e infectividad.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematologic Neoplasms , Adult , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Retrospective Studies , HospitalsABSTRACT
There is scant information on the clinical progression, end-of-life decisions, and cause of death of patients with cancer diagnosed with COVID-19. Therefore, we conducted a case series of patients admitted to a comprehensive cancer center who did not survive their hospitalization. To determine the cause of death, 3 board-certified intensivists reviewed the electronic medical records. Concordance regarding cause of death was calculated. Discrepancies were resolved through a joint case-by-case review and discussion among the 3 reviewers. During the study period, 551 patients with cancer and COVID-19 were admitted to a dedicated specialty unit; among them, 61 (11.6%) were nonsurvivors. Among nonsurvivors, 31 (51%) patients had hematologic cancers, and 29 (48%) had undergone cancer-directed chemotherapy within 3 months before admission. The median time to death was 15 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.8 to 18.2). There were no differences in time to death by cancer category or cancer treatment intent. The majority of decedents (84%) had full code status at admission; however, 53 (87%) had do-not-resuscitate orders at the time of death. Most deaths were deemed to be COVID-19 related (88.5%). The concordance between the reviewers for the cause of death was 78.7%. In contrast to the belief that COVID-19 decedents die because of their comorbidities, in our study only 1 of every 10 patients died of cancer-related causes. Full-scale interventions were offered to all patients irrespective of oncologic treatment intent. However, most decedents in this population preferred care with nonresuscitative measures rather than full support at the end of life.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematologic Neoplasms , Neoplasms , Humans , Cause of Death , Medical OncologyABSTRACT
Outcome of early treatment of COVID-19 with antivirals or anti-spike monoclonal antibodies (MABs) in patients with haematological malignancies (HM) is unknown. A retrospective study of HM patients treated for mild/moderate COVID-19 between March 2021 and July 2022 was performed. The main composite end-point was treatment failure (severe COVID-19 or COVID-19-related death). We included 328 consecutive patients who received MABs (n = 120, 37%; sotrovimab, n = 73) or antivirals (n = 208, 63%; nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, n = 116) over a median of two days after symptoms started; 111 (33.8%) had non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL); 89 (27%) were transplant/CAR-T (chimaeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy) recipients. Most infections (n = 309, 94%) occurred during the Omicron period. Failure developed in 31 patients (9.5%). Its independent predictors were older age, fewer vaccine doses, and treatment with MABs. Rate of failure was lower in the Omicron versus the pre-Omicron period (7.8% versus 36.8%, p < 0.001). During the Omicron period, predictors of failure were age, fewer vaccine doses and diagnosis of acute myeloid leukaemia/myelodysplastic syndrome (AML/MDS). Independent predictors of longer viral shedding were age, comorbidities, hospital admission at diagnosis, NHL/CLL, treatment with MABs. COVID-19-associated mortality was 3.4% (n = 11). The mortality in those who developed severe COVID-19 after early treatment was 26% in the Omicron period. Patients with HM had a significant risk of failure of early treatment, even during the Omicron period, with high mortality rate.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematologic Diseases , Hematologic Neoplasms , Humans , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Only few studies have analyzed the efficacy of tixagevimab/cilgavimab to prevent severe Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and related complications in hematologic malignancies (HM) patients. Here, we report cases of breakthrough COVID-19 after prophylactic tixagevimab/cilgavimab from the EPICOVIDEHA registry). We identified 47 patients that had received prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab in the EPICOVIDEHA registry. Lymphoproliferative disorders (44/47, 93.6%) were the main underlying HM. SARS-CoV-2 strains were genotyped in 7 (14.9%) cases only, and all belonged to the omicron variant. Forty (85.1%) patients had received vaccinations prior to tixagevimab/cilgavimab, the majority of them with at least two doses. Eleven (23.4%) patients had a mild SARS-CoV-2 infection, 21 (44.7%) a moderate infection, while 8 (17.0%) had severe infection and 2 (4.3%) critical. Thirty-six (76.6%) patients were treated, either with monoclonal antibodies, antivirals, corticosteroids, or with combination schemes. Overall, 10 (21.3%) were admitted to a hospital. Among these, two (4.3%) were transferred to intensive care unit and one (2.1%) of them died. Our data seem to show that the use of tixagevimab/cilgavimab may lead to a COVID-19 severity reduction in HM patients; however, further studies should incorporate further HM patients to confirm the best drug administration strategies in immunocompromised patients.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematologic Neoplasms , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal , Immunization, Passive , RegistriesABSTRACT
Patients with hematological malignancies who experience severe infections are at risk of developing dangerous complications due to excessive inflammatory cytokines. To improve the prognosis, it is crucial to identify better ways to manage the systemic inflammatory storm after infection. In this study, we evaluated four patients with hematological malignancies who developed severe bloodstream infections during the agranulocytosis phase. Despite receiving antibiotics, all four patients presented elevated serum IL-6 levels as well as persistent hypotension or organ injury. Adjuvant therapy with tocilizumab, an IL-6-receptor antibody, was administered, and three of the four patients showed significant improvement. Unfortunately, the fourth patient died due to multiple organ failure caused by antibiotic resistance. Our preliminary experience suggests that tocilizumab, as an adjuvant therapy, may help alleviate systemic inflammation and reduce risk of organ injury in patients with elevated IL-6 levels and severe infection. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the effectiveness of this IL-6 targeting approach.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematologic Neoplasms , Humans , Interleukin-6 , SARS-CoV-2 , Cytokine Release Syndrome , Treatment Outcome , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Transplant and hematologic malignancy patients have high Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mortality and impaired vaccination responses. Omicron variant evades several monoclonal antibodies previously used in immunocompromised patients. Polyclonal COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) may provide broader neutralizing capacity against new variants at high titers. Vaccination increases severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) titer in convalescent donors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of hospitalized immunocompromised patients with COVID-19 who received high-titer CCP during the first omicron surge, collected from vaccinated donors within 6 months of pre-omicron COVID-19. Data on safety and outcomes were extracted. RESULTS: A total of 44 immunocompromised patients were included, 59.1% with solid organ transplant, 22.7% with hematopoietic cell transplant, 11.4% with hematologic malignancy, and 6.8% with autoimmune disease. Overall, 95% of CCP units transfused were from recently recovered and vaccinated donors and had SARS-CoV-2 antibody results 8- to 37-fold higher than the Food and Drug Administration's cutoff for high-titer CCP. There were two mild transfusion reactions. A total of 30-day mortality was 4.5%. There were no differences in 100-day mortality by underlying diagnosis, levels of immunosuppression, and timing of CCP administration. Patients with higher immunosuppression had significantly higher mean World Health Organization clinical progression scores at 30-day post-CCP compared to those with lower immunosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: CCP is a safe, globally available treatment for immunocompromised patients with COVID-19. Mortality was lower in our cohort than that of COVID-19 patients with similar immunocompromising conditions. Post-vaccine CCP with very high titers should be prioritized for study in immunocompromised patients. Post-vaccine CCP has the potential to keep pace with new variants by overcoming mutations at sufficiently high titer.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematologic Neoplasms , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Vaccines , Humans , COVID-19/therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19 Serotherapy , Immunocompromised Host , Antibodies, Viral , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Antibodies, NeutralizingABSTRACT
Immunocompromised patients, such as those with a haematological malignancy, are at higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, severe outcomes and mortality. Tixagevimab/cilgavimab is a monoclonal antibody combination which binds to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. The PROVENT phase III clinical trial reported that tixagevimab/cilgavimab prophylaxis significantly reduced the risk of COVID-19 infection in immunocompromised participants. However, the trial was conducted before the Omicron variant became prevalent. This systematic review and meta-analysis provide an up-to-date summary of the real-world effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab in immunocompromised patients, including patients with haematological malignancies. Clinical studies from 1 January 2021 to 1 October 2022, which reported breakthrough COVID-19 infections after tixagevimab/cilgavimab, were included. COVID-19-related hospitalisations, intensive care admissions and mortality were also assessed. A meta-analysis was performed to ascertain overall clinical effectiveness. Eighteen studies, with 25 345 immunocompromised participants, including 5438 patients with haematological pathologies, were included in the review. The overall clinical effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab against COVID-19 breakthrough infection, hospitalisation, intensive care admission and COVID-19-specific mortality was 40.54%, 66.19%, 82.13% and 92.39%, respectively. This review highlights the clinical effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab at reducing COVID-19 infection and severe outcomes for immunosuppressed individuals, including patients with a haematological malignancy, during the Omicron-predominant era. Real-world studies are important to provide ongoing certainty of the clinical benefit for immunocompromised patients against new SARS-CoV-2 variants.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematologic Neoplasms , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome , Antibodies, Monoclonal , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Immunocompromised HostABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The use of virtual care rapidly increased during the COVID-19 pandemic and has persisted as a routine method of care delivery. Much of the literature on virtual care in oncology has focused on solid tumors, and little is known about its application in malignant hematology. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with hematologic malignancies at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre from October 2019 to March 2021 to determine the use of virtual care during this period, cost-savings associated with virtual visits, and patient satisfaction. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the Your Voice Matters survey, a provincially administered survey to evaluate patient experience. RESULTS: Overall, 12.1% (1,122/9,295) of patients had a virtual visit during the study period (0% from October 2019 to February 2020, 36% from March to August 2020, and 30% from September 2020 to March 2021), of which 36% were in the lymphoma clinic and 46% were in the myeloma clinic. The mean two-way opportunity cost for an in-person visit was $168.00 CAD per person with public transit, and $120.40 CAD per person driving. Responses to the Your Voice Matters survey indicated that patients with a virtual visit reported that physical symptoms were discussed appropriately (mean 4.73/5), and were more likely to ask for a follow-up virtual visit compared with patients with in-person visits (mean 4.50/5 v 3.02/5, respectively; P < .01). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that virtual care may be a feasible and well-received tool for delivering care to a substantial proportion of patients with hematologic malignancies, while enabling substantial cost-savings to patients.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematologic Neoplasms , Multiple Myeloma , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Multiple Myeloma/epidemiology , Multiple Myeloma/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with hematologic malignancies are considered at high risk for COVID-19 infection either from the disease or the treatment. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, one of the approved therapies for hematologic malignancies, was performed worldwide during the COVID-19 era with some regulations, such as COVID-19 testing, before proceeding with transplantation or cellular therapy. To the authors' knowledge, none have reported the result of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in an active COVID-19 patient. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a successful clinical course of autologous bone marrow transplantation for 2 lymphoma patients who tested positive for COVID-19. A thorough discussion was conducted between multidisciplinary hemato-oncology, intensive care, and infectious diseases teams. The decision was to proceed toward bone marrow transplantation with some modifications in the transplantation protocol and close patient monitoring. CONCLUSION: Our cases lend credence that successful autologous bone marrow transplantation is possible among active COVID-19 patients. The obstacles we faced could be overcome with collaboration between a highly qualified multidisciplinary team. Despite the potential complications, the benefits of bone marrow transplantation among patients with a high risk of relapse and who are still COVID-19-positive outweigh the risks. However, further studies are still recommended to support our inference.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematologic Neoplasms , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Bone Marrow Transplantation/adverse effects , COVID-19 Testing , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/etiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Transplantation, AutologousABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The immune dysregulation during SARS-CoV-2 has the potential to worsen immune homeostasis after recovery. Patients with hematological malignancies with COVID-19 have changes both in the innate and adaptive immune responses. Little is known about the severity of immune dysfunction following recovery from COVID-19 in hematological patients. METHODS: Here, we performed a comprehensive analysis of the lymphocyte subsets in peripheral blood mononuclear cells by FACS Canto II in 55 patients, including 42 with hematological malignancies 4-6 weeks after COVID-19. RESULTS: Hematological COVID-19 convalescents had deep reduction in CD3+ T cells, including helper T cells (CD3 + CD4+), naïve helper T cells (CD3 + CD4 + CD45RA+), and memory CD4+ T cells among with extremely low levels of Treg cells and decreased expression of both TCRα/ß and TCRγ/δ. Severe immune dysregulation in hematological convalescents was expressed by increased activation of T lymphocytes, both as elevated levels of activated T cells (CD3 + HLA-DR+) and activated cytotoxic T cells (CD3 + CD8 + HLA-DR+). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed a profound impairment of the adaptive immune response in hematological convalescents which might be a result of persistent activation of T cells. Convalescents with lymphoid malignancies showed more pronounced depletion of key T lymphocytes subpopulations in creating an effective adaptive response and immune memory.