Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 84
Filter
1.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 22(1): 1568, 2022 Dec 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2196257

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In recent years, studies have shown that electronic WOM (eWOM) directly reflects consumers' post-purchase psychological perception and directly affects repurchase behavior. This information is valued by institutions in various fields. Within the scope of the evaluation of service characteristics, medical service is the least visible and most difficult service attribute to evaluate. Service organizations must have high trust attributes. Therefore, an eWOM review significantly influences people's decision-making process when choosing a healthcare provider. The purpose of this research is to combine eWOM reviews with the SERVQUAL scale in a comparative study of positive and negative eWOM reviews of a regional teaching hospital in Taiwan. METHODS: This research obtained data from publicly available eWOM reviews on Google Maps of a regional teaching hospital in Taiwan over the past 10 years (from June 24, 2011, to December 31, 2021) using website scraping technology. The semantic content analysis method was used in this study to classify eWOM reviews according to the revised PZB SERVQUAL scale. RESULTS: Statistical analysis was conducted. During the COVID-19 pandemic, positive reviews showed a downward trend. Among the five determinants of the SERVQUAL of PZB, positive eWOM reviews performed best in "assurance" with a positive review rate of 60.00%, followed by 42.11% for "reliability". For negative eWOM reviews, "assurance" performed the worst with a positive rate of 72.34%, followed by "responsiveness" at 28.37% and "reliability" at 26.95%. CONCLUSION: Since the onset of COVID-19 in 2020, negative eWOM has increased significantly and exceeded the amount of positive eWOM. Regardless of positive and negative reviews, what patients care most about is "assurance" of the professional attitude and skills of medical staff, which urgently needs to be strengthened. In addition, good "reliability" will help to develop positive eWOM. However, "responsiveness" as indicated by poor service waiting time can easily lead to the spread of negative eWOM. Hospital management should focus on these service-oriented qualities.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Humans , Taiwan/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospitals, Teaching , Mouth
2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 23(1): 11, 2023 Jan 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2196090

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of resistant hospital infections in the intensive care unit (ICU) increases mortality and antibiotic resistance. COVID-19 pandemic may have unintended impact on nosocomial infections (NI) and the prevalence of resistant microorganism. METHODOLOGY: The present non-interventional study was performed by a pre and a post survey each lasting 8 months before (March-October 2019) and after (March-October 2020) the onset of COVID-19 pandemic in three ICU's, not allocated to COVID-19 patients, in Nemazee Hospital, Shiraz, Iran. The rates of the following nosocomial infections were compared at pre- and post-pandemic period: ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), central line associated blood stream infection (CLABSI), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) and incidence of multiple drug resistance (MDR) pathogens. RESULTS: Pre-pandemic and pandemic incidence of VAP was 23.5 and 17.2 cases per 1000 device-days, respectively; an absolute decrease of 27%. The main reason for the decrease in the rate of VAP during the pandemic was a significant decrease in the rate of VAP caused by Acinetobacter baumannii; from 39 to 17% in total VAP episodes. The rate of VAP associated with other microorganisms remained relatively unchanged from 14.2 cases in pre-pandemic period to 14.3 cases per 1000 MV-days during the pandemic (P = 0.801). Pre-pandemic incidence of CLABSI was 7.3 cases and, in pandemic period, was 6.5 cases per 1000 device-days (IRR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.43-1.73, P = 0.703). Pre-pandemic incidence of CAUTI was 2 and in pandemic period, was 1.4 cases per 1000 device-days (IRR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.22-1.98, P = 0.469). CONCLUSION: The results of the present study showed a decrease in the incidence of VAP in critically ill non-COVID-19 patients during the pandemic compared to before the pandemic, especially regarding Acinetobacter baumannii.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter baumannii , COVID-19 , Catheter-Related Infections , Cross Infection , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Urinary Tract Infections , Humans , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Pandemics , Incidence , Prospective Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/epidemiology , Hospitals, Teaching , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Drug Resistance, Multiple , Catheters
3.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 101(52): e32561, 2022 Dec 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2191117

ABSTRACT

Novel corona virus disease 2019 is the major threat for human life nowadays worldwide. This study aims to assess the knowledge, attitude and practices regarding COVID-19 among patients with type 2 diabetes attending Abdullah Khalil diabetes center (Omdurman Teaching Hospital). A facility-based observational descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out between January and February 2021, using non-probability quota sampling technique in Abdullah-Khalil diabetes center via the use of a structured close-ended interview questionnaire. It consisted of 19, 10, and 10 questions pertaining to knowledge, attitude and practices towards COVID-19 respectively. A total of 249 patients with type 2 diabetes were included. Of them, 132 (53.0%) were females and the majority (53.0%) aged between 41 and 60 years old. Concerning their education and marital status, 70 (28.1%) were primary school level and 208 (83.5%) were married. 89.6% of participants reported mass media as main source of information regarding COVID-19. Patients with type 2 diabetes attending Abdullah-Khalil diabetes center have good knowledge, positive attitude and good prevention practices towards COVID-19. Most respondents had good knowledge, positive attitude and good practices as 78.7%, 97.6%, and 69.9%, respectively. Educational level and source of information showed statistically significant association with the knowledge, attitude. However, the practice showed only statistical association with the mass media as a source of information (P = .006).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Female , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Male , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Hospitals, Teaching
4.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 877, 2022 Nov 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2139181

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bacterial infections are a common complication in patients with seasonal viral respiratory tract infections and are associated with poor prognosis, increased risk of intensive care unit admission and 29-55% mortality. Yet, there is limited data on the burden of bacterial infections among COVID-19 patients in Africa, where underdeveloped healthcare systems are likely to play a pertinent role in the epidemiology of the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we evaluated the etiologies, antimicrobial resistance profiles, risk factors, and outcomes of bacterial infections in severely ill COVID-19 patients. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study design was adopted in severely ill COVID-19 patients at Kenyatta National Hospital, Kenya, from October to December 2021. We used a structured questionnaire and case report forms to collect sociodemographics, clinical presentation, and hospitalization outcome data. Blood, nasal/oropharyngeal swabs and tracheal aspirate samples were collected based on the patient's clinical presentation and transported to the Kenyatta National Hospital microbiology laboratory for immediate processing following the standard bacteriological procedures. RESULTS: We found at least one bacterial infection in 44.2% (53/120) of the patients sampled, with a 31.7% mortality rate. Pathogens were mainly from the upper respiratory tract (62.7%, 42/67), with gram-negative bacteria dominating (73.1%, 49/67). Males were about three times more likely to acquire bacterial infection (p = 0.015). Those aged 25 to 44 years (p = 0.009), immunized against SARS-CoV-2 (p = 0.027), and admitted to the infectious disease unit ward (p = 0.031) for a short length of stay (0-5 days, p < 0.001) were more likely to have a positive outcome. Multidrug-resistant isolates were the majority (64.3%, 46/67), mainly gram-negative bacteria (69.6%, 32/46). The predominant multidrug-resistant phenotypes were in Enterococcus cloacae (42.9%, 3/7), Klebsiella pneumonia (25%, 4/16), and Escherichia coli (40%, 2/5). CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight a high prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacterial infections in severely ill COVID-19 patients, with male gender as a risk factor for bacterial infection. Elderly Patients, non-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, intensive care unit admission, and long length of hospital stay were associated with poor outcomes. There is a need to emphasize strict adherence to infection and prevention at KNH-IDU and antimicrobial stewardship in line with local and global AMR control action plans.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections , COVID-19 , Male , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Cross-Sectional Studies , Kenya/epidemiology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Hospitals, Teaching , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacteria , Length of Stay , Referral and Consultation
5.
BMJ Open Qual ; 11(4)2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2137804

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: University Hospitals of Leicester (UHL) has co-developed and deployed a novel Electronic Prescribing and Medicines Administration (EPMA) application as part of the trust electronic patient record (EPR) programme that meets specific clinical demands and interoperability standards of the National Health Service (NHS) despite clinical pressures from the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Following an initial limited pilot deployment, a big-bang whole site-based approach allowed transition of 1844 acute adult inpatients beds from an existing standalone EMPA to the new system. This project used a frontline driven and agile management strategy. Clinical risk was managed using a combination of standard risk logs, robust clinical prototyping and robust disaster recovery plans. Early engagement with clinical teams allowed for advanced product configuration before live deployment and reduced the need for sustained transition support for clinical staff. RESULTS: An iterative, well-governed approach, led by a combination of information technology (IT) and clinical staff with a responsive vendor, enabled a complex new EPMA system in a large acute NHS trust to be deployed with limited resources despite the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. DISCUSSION: The development and deployment of EMPA and EPR systems across NHS trusts is a key enabler for better healthcare delivery. This case study shows it is possible to deploy a new clinical IT system at scale without interruption of clinical services and with a relatively modest deployment team. Sustainability of the project was also ensured through a clear clinically led governance structure to manage risk quickly and carry lessons learnt onto new developments.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Electronic Prescribing , Adult , Humans , State Medicine , Pandemics/prevention & control , Hospitals, Teaching
6.
West Afr J Med ; 39(11): 1119-1126, 2022 Nov 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2125655

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global pandemic. Older people and those with poorly controlled co-morbidities have higher risk of mortality. This study was conducted to highlight the clinical features, challenges of management and outcome for the patients we have seen in our centre over the past one year. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study involving all patients admitted in the COVID-19 Isolation unit of University of Uyo Teaching Hospital (UUTH) from June, 2020-May, 2021. Clinical and laboratory information were obtained from the patient case notes. Ethical clearance for the conduct of the study was obtained from the Ethics committee, UUTH, Uyo. Data was analysed with STATA version 13. RESULTS: Thirty-three (37.9%) patients were COVID-19 PCR positive. The mean ± SD age of COVID-19 PCR positive patients was 57.3 ± 13.4 years with majority (69.7%) being above 50 years. There was a male preponderance (75%). Eleven (34.4%) patients died while 21(65.6%) were discharged. The highest co-morbidity associated with COVID-19 mortality was diabetes mellitus (7 out of 11; 63.6%). There was a poor uptake of supportive investigations for the management of COVID-19 patients. A raised body temperature (P=0.0006), a low SPO2 (0.00004), high respiratory rate (0.0009) on admission and shorter duration of admission (0.0002), were associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: The presence of co-morbidities, fever, low SPO2 and high respiratory rates on admission are associated with increased mortality from COVID-19 disease. A paucity of supportive investigations was a major challenge to COVID-19 management. We therefore recommend the strengthening of our laboratory capacity.


CONTEXTE ET OBJECTIFS: La maladie de coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) est une pandémie mondiale. Les personnes âgées et celles qui présentent des comorbidités mal contrôlées ont un risque de mortalité plus élevé. Cette étude a été menée pour mettre en évidence les caractéristiques cliniques, les défis de la gestion et le résultat des patients que nous avons vus dans notre centre au cours de la dernière année. MÉTHODES: Il s'agissait d'une étude transversale rétrospective impliquant tous les patients admis dans l'unité d'isolement COVID- 19 de l'University of Uyo Teaching Hospital (UUTH) de juin 2020 à mai 2021. Les informations cliniques et de laboratoire ont été obtenues à partir des notes de cas des patients. L'autorisation éthique pour la réalisation de l'étude a été obtenue auprès du comité d'éthique de l'UUTH, Uyo. Les données ont été analysées avec STATA version 13. RÉSULTATS: Trente-trois (37,9%) patients étaient positifs à la PCR COVID-19. L'âge moyen ± SD des patients positifs au COVID-19 PCR était de 57,3 ± 13,4 ans, la majorité (69,7%) ayant plus de 50 ans. Il y avait une prépondérance masculine (75 %). Onze (34,4 %) patients sont décédés et 21 (65,6 %) sont sortis de l'hôpital. La comorbidité la plus importante associée à la mortalité de COVID-19 était le diabète miletus (7 sur 11 : 63 : 6 %). Les investigations de soutien pour la gestion des patients COVID-19 ont été peu utilisées. Une température corporelle élevée (P=0,0006), une faible SPO2 (0,00004), une fréquence respiratoire élevée (0,0009) à l'admission et une durée d'admission plus courte (0,0002) étaient associées à la mortalité. CONCLUSION: La présence de comorbidités, de fièvre, d'une faible SPO2 et d'une fréquence respiratoire élevée à l'admission est associée à une mortalité accrue de la maladie de COVID-19. Le manque d'investigations de soutien a été un défi majeur pour la gestion de la maladie COVID-19. Nous recommandons donc le renforcement de la capacité de nos laboratoires. Mots clés: COVID-19, défis, gestion des cas, Nigeria.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Male , Aged , Adult , Middle Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Case Management , Retrospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hospitals, Teaching , Fever
7.
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad ; 34(Suppl 1)(3): S703-S706, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2146944

ABSTRACT

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic is a viral infection that spreads through different mediums and has a high rate of mortality. At its initial stages, there is no particular medicine that can cure patients of COVID-19. The aim of the present study was to understand the COVID-19 knowledge, perception, and its effects in terms of anxiety and depression among frontline health care workers of Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad from June to July 2021 in which data was collected from 200 hospital healthcare workers who have performed duties in COVID isolation wards through standard questionnaire. SPSS version 24.0 was used for data analysis. Results: Out of 200 participants in the study 100 (50.0%) were male. Regarding safety measures taken during COVID -19, 144 (72.0%) individuals reported that they have not been given training to handle known or suspected cases of COVID-19. Moderate anxiety and depression was found in 153 (76.5%) healthcare workers, mild in 25 (12.5%) and 22 (11.0%) had severe anxiety and depression at the time of COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion: This study revealed that a significant anxiety and depression was found in frontline healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, a more extensive study should be conducted which involves many other hospitals like Ayub Teaching Hospital.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Male , Female , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Pakistan/epidemiology , Pandemics , Health Personnel , Hospitals, Teaching , Anxiety/epidemiology , Perception
8.
J Med Life ; 15(10): 1267-1271, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2146202

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 outbreak on emergencies and pain among orthodontic patients attending a teaching hospital. The study was conducted among orthodontic patients receiving active orthodontic treatment or in a retention period at the College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Iraq. Their participation was voluntary, and they filled out an Arabic-translated questionnaire. The survey included general information, orthodontic problems, and a numerical rating scale for pain assessment. We used descriptive and inferential statistics (frequencies and intersecting frequencies), chi-square test and linear regression. Out of 75 orthodontic patients, only 54 (15 males and 39 females) were included in the study. The most encountered orthodontic problem was broken or movable bracket (55.6%), followed by long pocking wire 35.2%. In addition, 55.6% of the participants preferred to wait for the next appointment to see their orthodontist, and only 5.6% tried to treat the problem personally. There was no significant relationship between pain level, gender and age, whereas a strong significant association was found between pain intensity and orthodontic problems or emergencies. COVID-19 had a negative impact on orthodontic follow-up visits. The intensity of pain was strongly correlated with orthodontic problems or emergencies. Therefore, more attention should be given to patients, focusing on teaching them how to manage orthodontic emergencies during situations such as an outbreak.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Female , Male , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Emergencies , Hospitals, Teaching , Pain/epidemiology , Pain/etiology , Pain Measurement
9.
Rev Diabet Stud ; 18(3): 152-156, 2022 Sep 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2141077

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated glycemic control among T1DM pediatric patients attending the endocrinology pediatrics clinics at King Fahd Hospital of the University (KFHU) prior to and during COVID-19 restraining regulations. In addition, we assessed the trends and variations in the incidence of T1DM during 2017-2021, including the COVID-19 years by identifying newly diagnosed patients presenting to pediatrics emergency department (ED) in KFHU. METHODS: To estimate the effect of COVID-19 on the incidence of T1DM, we identified newly diagnosed cases of T1DM among pediatric patients attending the ED during the years 2017- 2021. The participants' data were collected through electronic medical records. Information collected included patient age, sex, and HbA1c readings. Three HbA1c readings of interest that were defined and collected are pre-COVID reading, in-COVID reading, and post-COVID reading. RESULTS: The difference of female participants' readings was statistically non-significant (Z= -0.416, p = 0.678), with a pre- and post-COVID median of 10.70 (Q1= 9.00, Q3= 12.15), and 10.50 (Q1= 8.80, Q3= 12.35), respectively. In contrast, the difference was statistically significant among male participants (Z= -2.334, p = 0.02), with a pre- and post-COVID median of 10.20 (Q1= 8.70, Q3= 11.80), and 10.65 (Q1= 9.00, Q3= 12.70), respectively. There was a statistically significant increase in HbA1c of persons > 11 years old (Z= -2.471, p= 0.013), with a pre- and post-COVID median of 10.40 (Q1= 9.00, Q3= 12.10), and 10.90 (Q1= 9.00, Q3= 12.60), respectively. Conversely, persons ≤ 11 years old showed no statistically significant change in HbA1c (Z= -.457, p= 0.648), with a pre- and post-COVID median of 10.45 (Q1= 8.70, Q3= 11.85), and 10.20 (Q1= 8.40, Q3= 12.075), respectively. Disregarding any influence of time, the effect of sex showed no statistically significant difference in HbA1c between males and females [F (1,125) = 0.008, p = 0.930]. Meanwhile, the age effect on HbA1c, regardless of time influence, was statistically significant [F (1,125) = 4.993, p = 0.027]. There was no statistically significant interaction between time and sex on HbA1c levels [F (1.74, 217) = 0.096, p = 0.883] and between age and time [F (3.92,289.57) = 1.693, p = 0.190]. CONCLUSIONS: The number of visits to healthcare facilities dropped significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic, but the rate of newly diagnosed T1DM increased. There was a variable effect on HbA1c levels of those patients, which suggests that each demographic group in the population might have been affected differently by the pandemic. Future research should determine factors associated with better glycemic control and measures to sustain these changes the pandemic might have created.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Child , Humans , Male , Female , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Glycated Hemoglobin , Incidence , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Glycemic Control , Pandemics , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control , Hospitals, Teaching
10.
PLoS One ; 17(10): e0275500, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2079745

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the relationship between RNs and hospital-based medical specialties staffing levels with inpatient COVID-19 mortality rates. METHODS: We relied on data from AHA Annual Survey Database, Area Health Resource File, and UnitedHealth Group Clinical Discovery Database. In phase 1 of the analysis, we estimated the risk-standardized event rates (RSERs) based on 95,915 patients in the UnitedHealth Group Database 1,398 hospitals. We then used beta regression to analyze the association between hospital- and county- level factors with risk-standardized inpatient COVID-19 mortality rates from March 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. RESULTS: Higher staffing levels of RNs and emergency medicine physicians were associated with lower COVID-19 mortality rates. Moreover, larger teaching hospitals located in urban settings had higher COVID-19 mortality rates. Finally, counties with greater social vulnerability, specifically in terms of housing type and transportation, and those with high infection rates had the worst patient mortality rates. CONCLUSION: Higher staffing levels are associated with lower inpatient mortality rates for COVID-19 patients. More research is needed to determine appropriate staffing levels and how staffing levels interact with other factors such as teams, leadership, and culture to impact patient care during pandemics.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Emergency Medicine , Humans , Inpatients , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospitals, Teaching , Workforce
12.
PLoS One ; 17(9): e0273771, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2009708

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 has had adverse impacts on the health sector in Thailand and information on hospital costs is required for planning and budgeting. The aim of this study was to estimate costs that the pandemic imposed on a teaching hospital in the country, focusing on the first wave which took place in March-May 2020. A retrospective cost analysis was performed. Data on COVID-related activities, including when and where they were undertaken, were retrieved from existing sources and supplemented by in-depth interviews with the hospital's staff. The data collection period was January-October 2020, covering three distinct phases: before, during, and after the first wave of the pandemic. The total costs during the preparation phase in January-February, the pandemic phase in March-May, and the standby phase in June-October were 0.6, 3.9, and 1.2 million US dollars respectively. Costs related to treatment of COVID-19 patients were higher than those related to infection control in the first two phases but not in the standby phase, making up 82.09%, 75.23%, and 43.95% of the total costs in the three phases respectively. Costs were incurred in all areas of the hospital, including those that were set up to serve COVID patients, those serving non-COVID patients, and those serving both groups. Public donations were integral to the provision of services and made up 20.94% of the total cost during the pandemic phase. This study was the first to estimate hospital costs of COVID-19 in Thailand. It demonstrated high costs of a national outbreak and supported the establishment of a contingency fund for medical emergencies at the hospital level.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospital Costs , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Thailand/epidemiology
13.
Front Public Health ; 10: 879107, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2002504

ABSTRACT

To evaluate the use of asymptomatic surveillance, we implemented a surveillance program for asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in a voluntary sample of individuals at the College of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Minnesota. Self-collected anterior nasal samples were tested using real time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), in a 5:1 pooled testing strategy, twice weekly for 18 weeks. Positive pools were deconvoluted into individual tests, revealing an observed prevalence of 0.07% (3/4,525). Pooled testing allowed for large scale testing with an estimated cost savings of 79.3% and modeling demonstrated this testing strategy prevented up to 2 workplace transmission events, averting up to 4 clinical cases. At the study endpoint, antibody testing revealed 80.7% of participants had detectable vaccine antibody levels while 9.6% of participants had detectable antibodies to natural infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Animals , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Hospitals, Animal , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
14.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed) ; 40(6): 302-309, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2000389

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Hospital-wide SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence is rarely explored and can identify areas of unexpected risk. We determined the seroprevalence against SARS-CoV-2 in all health care workers (HCW) at a hospital. METHODS: Cross-sectional study (14-27/04/2020). We determined SARS-CoV-2 IgG by ELISA in all HCW including external workers of a teaching hospital in Madrid. They were classified by professional category, working area, and risk for SARS-CoV-2 exposure. RESULTS: Among 2919 HCW, 2590 (88,7%) were evaluated. The mean age was 43.8 years (SD 11.1), and 73.9% were females. Globally, 818 (31.6%) workers were IgG positive with no differences for age, sex or previous diseases. Of these, 48.5% did not report previous symptoms. Seropositivity was more frequent in high- (33.1%) and medium- (33.8%) than in low-risk areas (25.8%, p=0.007), but not for hospitalization areas attending COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients (35.5 vs 38.3% p>0.05). HWC with a previous SARS-CoV2 PCR-positive test were IgG seropositive in 90.8%. By multivariate logistic regression analysis seropositivity was significantly associated with being physicians (OR 2.37, CI95% 1.61-3.49), nurses (OR 1.67, CI95% 1.14-2.46), nurse assistants (OR 1.84, CI95% 1.24-2.73), HCW working at COVID-19 hospitalization areas (OR 1.71, CI95% 1.22-2.40), non-COVID-19 hospitalization areas (OR 1.88, CI95% 1.30-2.73), and at the Emergency Room (OR 1.51, CI95% 1.01-2.27). CONCLUSIONS: Seroprevalence uncovered a high rate of infection previously unnoticed among HCW. Patients not suspected of having COVID-19 as well as asymptomatic HCW may be a relevant source for nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 transmission.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Personnel , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Immunoglobulin G , Male , RNA, Viral , Seroepidemiologic Studies
15.
Wiad Lek ; 75(6): 1734-1740, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1994975

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim: To develop a quantitative tool to identify the cost and benefits of the appropriate and inappropriate laboratory tests. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study, conducted in Al Zahraa teaching hospital for children's health and maternity in a period between March 2021 to March 2022. We study the total laboratory investigation done in three years; before the COVID-19 era (1-3-2018 to 1-3-2019) and two consecutive years (1-3-2020 to 1-3-2021 and 1-3-2021 to 1-3-2022) to exclude the effect of COVID-19 pandemic on the results. And try to divide these test numbers according to each hospital department and the position of the test ordering doctor (senior or junior). We compare the total number of laboratory investigations with the total patient seeking medical care in Al Zahraa hospital, out or inpatient, i.e., ORDERING INDEX. Also, we calculate the (AVERAGE ORDERING INDEX) by dividing the number of all ordered tests by one specific test. RESULTS: Results: The total number of laboratory tests ordered in three (pre and peri COVID-19 pandemic) years show a significant increment in the last year (78249, 73600, and 1740249) respectively. Test ordering index, in the same way, shows significant increments over years (0.65, 0.64 Aand11.2) respectively. Biochemistry investigations constitute the largest proportion (50%) of all investigations that have been ordered last year. CBC is the most commonly ordered single test, in outpatient clinics, it is done 19510 times (Obstetrics and Gynecology 11850 vs Pediatric 7660). The positive (abnormal) results were only 4.8%. CONCLUSION: Conclusion: For more and more years, laboratory investigations have been overused. A large number of normal results indicate that the test order was chosen at random. The most commonly overused test is the complete blood count.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diagnostic Tests, Routine , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19 Testing , Child , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Iraq , Pandemics , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies
16.
Indian J Public Health ; 66(2): 147-151, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1954316

ABSTRACT

Background: Despite several efforts to limit the viral transmission, the COVID-19 vaccine has been the only "the ray of hope" to end the pandemic. However, vaccine hesitancy could reduce coverage and hinder herd immunity. People's intention to get vaccinated can be shaped by several factors, including risk perception which, in turn, is influenced by effect. The need to acquaint oneself to the beliefs, concerns, and circumstances of one's own population in the community becomes important for successful implementation of the program. Therefore, the present study was conducted to gain insights into perceptions of vaccination. Objectives: The objective is to understand the felicitating factors and hindering factors for acceptance of vaccines by the population among people aged 50 years in urban field practice area of the Department of Community Medicine in a Tertiary care teaching hospital, Hyderabad. Subjects and Methods: Data were extracted from audio recording of five focus group discussions that were conducted in the urban field practice care of a tertiary care teaching hospital in Hyderabad through open-ended questions. Categories, subcategories, and themes were created by deductive approach. Results: The motivating factors for vaccine acceptance were found to be fear of getting disease, wanting to return normalcy, and trust in treating doctors, whereas, barriers were fear of death due to vaccine, opacity in vaccine details, anxiety, and misinterpretation of adverse events. Conclusion: Having a clear understanding about the belief system of the target population could help in designing the guidelines for vaccination program to escalate the immunization and increase the acceptance.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccines , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Community Medicine , Focus Groups , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , India , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Phobic Disorders , Tertiary Healthcare , Vaccination
17.
Acad Med ; 97(11): 1592-1596, 2022 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1901255

ABSTRACT

Following medical school, most newly graduated physicians enter residency training. This period of graduate medical education (GME) is critical to creating a physician workforce with the specialized skills needed to care for the population. Completing GME training is also a requirement for obtaining medical licensure in all 50 states. Yet, crucial federal and state funding for GME is capped, creating a bottleneck in training an adequate physician workforce to meet future patient care needs. Thus, additional GME funding is needed to train more physicians. When considering this additional GME funding, it is imperative to take into account not only the future physician workforce but also the value added by residents to teaching hospitals and communities during their training. Residents positively affect patient care and health care delivery, providing intrinsic and often unmeasured value to patients, the hospital, the local community, the research enterprise, and undergraduate medical education. This added value is often overlooked in decisions regarding GME funding allocation. In this article, the authors underscore the value provided by residents to their training institutions and communities, with a focus on current and recent events, including the global COVID-19 pandemic and teaching hospital closures.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Internship and Residency , Physicians , Humans , United States , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Education, Medical, Graduate , Hospitals, Teaching
18.
BMJ Open ; 12(5): e056386, 2022 05 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1865172

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore how the COVID-19 pandemic affected access to antiretroviral therapy (ART) services from the perspective of the persons living with HIV (PLWH). DESIGN: The study adopted an exploratory-descriptive qualitative design that used in-depth interviews as the technique for the data collection. Data analysis was done using conceptual content analysis, following the traditions of Elo and Kyngäs on deductive and Hsieh on inductive content analysis. SETTING: ART clinic, Cape Coast Teaching Hospital, Ghana. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve participants who had at least 1 year history of accessing ART care before the COVID-19 pandemic and at least one clinic visit during the pandemic were purposively sampled from the ART clinic. RESULTS: Five concepts of accessing healthcare proposed by Penchansky and Thomas were explored: accessibility, availability, affordability, accommodation and acceptability. The ART unit in the study setting remained open for service delivery throughout the pandemic. However, fear of contracting the virus while patronising services affected the participants' decision to use the facility. Although all the participants in this study reportedly honoured their refill appointments, they indicated knowledge of other PLWH defaulting. With reference to the availability of resources, a shortage of antiretrovirals was reported, affecting the refill appointment intervals. In spite of the challenges, several strategies were implemented to accommodate the patients' needs while protecting them from contracting the virus by instituting the stipulated COVID-19 protocols. The study found that some of the strategies impacted the acceptability and affordability of the services as transportation costs increased. Varying levels of accessibility to health workers providing ART services in the study setting was also recorded. CONCLUSION: Strategies were implemented to accommodate the effects of the pandemic on ART provision. However, these had deficiencies that must be addressed using appropriate Differentiated Service Delivery (DSD) interventions that will ensure continuous access to service delivery in the ongoing and any similar future occurrences.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , HIV Infections , Anti-Retroviral Agents/therapeutic use , Ghana , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Health Services Accessibility , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Pandemics
19.
Front Public Health ; 9: 748666, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1690371

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Regular collection and monitoring of data describing the dynamics of the utilization of healthcare services, especially in teaching hospitals (TH), which provide model quality medical services, are critical for COVID-19 pandemic preparedness. METHODS: The researchers analyzed data and information derived from service statistics reports from June 1st to July 15th, 2020 in terms of hospital resources, as well as utilization patterns of beds, ICU, and ventilators, for 11 screening hospitals affiliated with the General Organization of Teaching Hospitals and institutes in Egypt assigned by the Ministry of Health and Population to provide medical care for COVID-19 patients. Hospital indicators in terms of COVID-19 screening services, as well as utilization patterns of inpatient beds, ICU beds, and ventilators were computed. RESULTS: A total of 78,869 non-medical personnel and 2,176 medical personnel were presented with COVID-19 triage symptoms. Investigations conducted in the targeted 11 hospitals delineated that 22.2% of non-medical personnel and 27.9% of medical personnel were COVID-19 PCR-confirmed cases. The inpatient bed occupancy rate was 70% for non-medical patients and 67% for medical staff patients. For ICU, the bed occupancy rate was 92 % for non-medical patients and 88% for medical patients. Among the confirmed cases, 38% of medical patients utilized a ventilator vs. 36% of medical personnel cases. Hospital ranking according to utilization pattern among non-medical personnel, Hospital H ranked first in terms of the high load of screening services. Hospital C ranked first regarding the number of confirmed cases, whereas Hospital D ranked first for high ICU utilization among all teaching hospital ICU cases. With respect to medical personnel, Hospital G ranked first for the high load of screening services for the total studied cases. Hospital G ranked first for the number of confirmed cases. Hospital B ranked first regarding high ICU utilization among all teaching hospital ICU cases. CONCLUSION: Teaching hospitals have demonstrated preparedness for the COVID-19 pandemic by maintaining an inpatient bed occupancy rate of 70% or less and ventilator utilization at <40% of confirmed cases. However, the ICU bed occupancy rate was more than 90% indicating a shortage of resources. In addition, there is variance across hospitals regarding caseload for resource reallocation decisions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Egypt/epidemiology , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Needs Assessment , Pandemics/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL