ABSTRACT
Respiratory tract viruses are the second leading cause of olfactory dysfunction. Between 2019 to 2022, the world has been plagued by the problem of olfaction caused by the COVID-19. As we learn more about the impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2ï¼SARS-CoV-2ï¼, with the recognition that olfactory dysfunction is a key symptom of this disease process, there is a greater need than ever for evidence-based management of postinfectious olfactory dysfunctionï¼PIODï¼. The Clinical Olfactory Working Group has proposed theconsensus on the roles of PIOD. This paper is the detailed interpretation of the consensus.
Subject(s)
Asthma , COVID-19 , Hypersensitivity , Olfaction Disorders , Humans , United States , Smell , COVID-19/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Olfaction Disorders/etiology , Olfaction Disorders/therapy , Consensus , Hypersensitivity/complications , Asthma/complicationsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Kounis syndrome is a rare clinical condition characterized by the occurrence of an acute coronary event induced by an acute allergic episode. The ongoing pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has contributed to an increase in the incidence of allergic reactions to a certain extent, thereby increasing the incidence of Kounis syndrome. Timely diagnosis and effective management of this disease are important in clinical practice. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a 43-year-old woman who developed generalized pruritus, breathlessness, paroxysmal precordial crushing pain, and dyspnea after receiving the third dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. After anti-allergic treatment and therapy for acute myocardial ischemia, her symptoms resolved with improvement in cardiac function and resolution of ST-segment changes. The prognosis was satisfactory, and the final diagnosis was type I Kounis syndrome. CONCLUSION: This patient with type I Kounis syndrome rapidly developed acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after an acute allergic reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine. âTimely diagnosis of acute allergic reaction and ACS, and targeted treatment based on the relevant guidelines are the key to successful treatment of the syndrome.â.
Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , COVID-19 , Hypersensitivity , Kounis Syndrome , Humans , Female , Adult , COVID-19 Vaccines , China , Chest Pain , Dyspnea , Rare DiseasesABSTRACT
Allergic diseases arise from a complex interplay between immune system and environmental factors. A link between the pathogenesis of allergic diseases and type 2 immune responses has become evident, with conventional and pathogenic type 2 helper T (Th2) cells involved in both. Recently, there has been a significant development in therapeutic agents for allergic diseases: IL-5 and IL-5 receptor antagonists, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). Mepolizumab, an IL-5, and Benralizumab, an IL-5 receptor antagonist, modulate eosinophilic inflammation mediated by IL-5-producing Th2 cells. Delgocitinib shows that JAK-associated signaling is essential for the inflammatory reaction in atopic dermatitis, one of the common allergic diseases. SLIT has a significant effect on allergic rhinitis by reducing pathogenic Th2 cell numbers. More recently, novel molecules that are involved in pathogenic Th2 cell-mediated allergic diseases have been identified. These include calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging machinery regulated by the Txnip-Nrf2-Blvrb axis, and myosin light chain 9 (Myl9), which interacts with CD69. This review provides an updated view of the recent research on treatment of allergic diseases and their cause: conventional and pathogenic Th2 cells.
Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic , Hypersensitivity , Humans , Cytokines , Interleukin-5/therapeutic use , Hypersensitivity/drug therapy , Th2 CellsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The mass immunization campaign against Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has resulted in more patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with concern for a vaccine reaction. CASE REPORT: A 68-year-old man presented to the ED reporting an allergic reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine. He initially noted swelling of his face, neck, and right arm after receiving the first dose of the vaccine. After his second dose of the vaccine, the swelling became more pronounced and prompted him to seek care. On examination, he had fullness of the neck and engorgement of the left external jugular vein, which were exacerbated when the patient raised his arms above his head, consistent with Pemberton's sign. Apart from the swelling of the head and neck, there were no other findings consistent with an allergic reaction. The presence of Pemberton's sign prompted a computed tomography scan of the chest with contrast, which revealed a paratracheal mass measuring 4.5 × 2.0 cm with marked narrowing of the superior vena cava (SVC). The patient was admitted to the hospital for SVC syndrome, and further workup revealed a non-small cell lung cancer. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Patients may misattribute their symptoms to a COVID vaccine reaction when they are, in fact, experiencing a more serious underlying disease. This case highlights the importance of a thorough physical examination and maintaining a broad differential diagnosis. In this case, the presence of Pemberton's sign raised suspicion for SVC syndrome, and prompted further workup.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Hypersensitivity , Lung Neoplasms , Superior Vena Cava Syndrome , Aged , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Superior Vena Cava Syndrome/diagnosis , Superior Vena Cava Syndrome/etiology , Vena Cava, SuperiorABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Cyanoacrylate glue closure was first used in humans 10 years ago to treat venous reflux of the axial veins. Studies have since shown its clinical efficacy in vein closure. However, great need exists to elucidate further the types of specific adverse reactions that cyanoacrylate glue can cause for better patient selection and to minimize these events. In the present study, we systematically reviewed the literature to identify the types of reported reactions. In addition, we explored the pathophysiology contributing to these reactions and proposed the mechanistic pathway with inclusion of actual cases. METHODS: We searched the literature for reports of reactions following cyanoacrylate glue use in patients with venous diseases between 2012 and 2022. The search was performed using MeSH (medical subject headings) terms. The terms included cyanoacrylate, venous insufficiency, chronic venous disorder, varicose veins, vein varicosities, venous ulcer, venous wound, CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, pathophysiologic), vein, adverse events, phlebitis, hypersensitivity, foreign body granuloma, giant cell, endovenous glue-induced thrombosis, and allergy. The search was limited to the literature reported in English. These studies were evaluated for the type of product used and the reactions noted. A systematic review, in accordance with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) method, was performed. Covidence software (Melbourne, VC, Australia) was used for full-text screening and data extraction. Two reviewers reviewed the data, and the content expert served as the tiebreaker. RESULTS: We identified 102, of which, 37 reported on cyanoacrylate use other than in the context of chronic venous diseases and were excluded. Fifty-five reports were determined appropriate for data extraction. The adverse reactions to cyanoacrylate glue were phlebitis, hypersensitivity, foreign body granuloma, and endovenous glue-induced thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: Although cyanoacrylate glue closure for venous reflux is generally a safe and clinically effective treatment choice for patients with symptomatic chronic venous disease and axial reflux, some adverse events could be specific to the properties of the cyanoacrylate product. We propose mechanisms for how such reactions can occur based on histologic changes, published reports, and case examples; however, further exploration is necessary to confirm these theories.
Subject(s)
Granuloma, Foreign-Body , Hypersensitivity , Phlebitis , Varicose Veins , Venous Insufficiency , Humans , Cyanoacrylates/adverse effects , Granuloma, Foreign-Body/chemically induced , Granuloma, Foreign-Body/pathology , Saphenous Vein , Varicose Veins/diagnostic imaging , Varicose Veins/therapy , Varicose Veins/pathology , Venous Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Venous Insufficiency/therapy , Venous Insufficiency/pathology , Treatment Outcome , Phlebitis/chemically induced , Hypersensitivity/pathologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe the development of a website and the creation of a social network account about pediatric allergy/immunology with reliable information, to promote education and have a channel for patient-doctor contact. METHODS: This is a descriptive study. A survey was conducted with 93 patients (12 years and older) and caregivers of a Pediatric Allergy/Immunology outpatient clinic, to assess internet usage patterns of potential users. A webpage in Portuguese and an Instagram® account were launched in which it was created an area for patient-doctor communication in the pandemic context. RESULTS: Among 93 participants, 77% were female, 82% caregivers. Median age was 33.2 years, family income 403 dollars/month. The internet was accessed via smartphone by 81,7% of the participants; 76% reported using internet to access health information but 72% did not trust on the information from the internet, and 96% believed that an institutional site could provide meaningful information. From the website release in November 6, 2018 to January 20, 2022, it was counted 10,062 page views by 4,896 users; 55% were 18-34 years old, 70.2% female. Instagram® account gathered 882 followers. Website went through a period of instability during which access were not counted. Due to social isolation during COVID-19 pandemic, the website served as a tool for first response to help patients and doctors. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and caregivers of the Pediatric Allergy/Immunology service, consulted about digital tools, considered the information supported by a teaching/research institution timely and relevant. The website and Instagram® account have both performed well and shown good return in relation to hits, and results are continuously being evaluated. During COVID-19 pandemic, the website has been connecting patients/families and doctors.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hypersensitivity , Humans , Female , Child , Adult , Adolescent , Young Adult , Male , Pandemics , Brazil/epidemiology , Parents , Social NetworkingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Inducible laryngeal obstruction (ILO) refers to respiratory disorders caused by airflow limitation in the larynx, including vocal cord dysfunction, and may sometimes be misdiagnosed as bronchial asthma (BA). Here, we report the case of an 11-year-old boy diagnosed with BA in infancy. He was referred to our Allergy Center and was taking a high dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) due to frequent coughing from the age of 10 years and persistent coughing following COVID-19 infection at the age of 11. However, the patient continued to experience frequent coughing attacks and repeated visits to the emergency department after inhalation of ß2-stimulants failed to improve his cough. We admitted him to the allergy center for examinations to assess the BA severity. In the airway hypersensitiveness test, saline inhalation performed prior to methacholine inhalation caused expiratory stridor and respiratory distress in the larynx, which worsened with ß2-stimulant inhalation. Based on these results, we ruled out BA and diagnosed ILO. We instructed him on breathing maneuvers, and he was able to respond appropriately when symptoms appeared. We then started reducing his ICS dose.
Subject(s)
Airway Obstruction , Asthma , COVID-19 , Hypersensitivity , Laryngeal Diseases , Humans , Male , Child , COVID-19/complications , Asthma/therapy , Asthma/drug therapy , Airway Obstruction/diagnosis , Airway Obstruction/etiology , Laryngeal Diseases/complications , Laryngeal Diseases/diagnosis , Laryngeal Diseases/therapy , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Hypersensitivity/complications , COVID-19 TestingABSTRACT
Introduction: Among adverse events following immunization (AEFIs), allergic reactions elicit the most concern, as they are often unpredictable and can be life-threatening. Their estimates range from one in 1,000,000 to one in 50,000 vaccine doses. This report describes allergic events following immunization reported from 2020 to 2021 in Puglia, a region in the South-East of Italy with around 4 million inhabitants. Its main objective is to describe the allergic safety profile of currently employed vaccines. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective observational study. The study period spanned from January 2020 to December 2021, and the whole Apulian population was included in the study. Information regarding AEFIs reported in Puglia during the study period was gathered from the Italian Drug Authority's pharmacovigilance database (National Pharmacovigilance Network, RNF). The overall number of vaccine doses administered was extrapolated by the Apulian online immunization database (GIAVA). Reporting rates were calculated as AEFIs reported during a certain time span/number of vaccine doses administered during the same period. Results: 10,834,913 vaccine doses were administered during the study period and 95 reports of allergic AEFIs were submitted to the RNF (reporting rate 0.88/100,000 doses). 27.4% of the reported events (26/95) were classified as serious (reporting rate 0.24/100,000 doses). 68 out of 95 (71.6%) adverse events were at least partially resolved by the time of reporting and none of them resulted in the subject's death. Conclusions: Allergic reactions following vaccination were rare events, thus confirming the favourable risks/benefits ratio for currently marketed vaccines.
Subject(s)
Hypersensitivity , Vaccines , Humans , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , Vaccination/adverse effects , Immunization/adverse effects , Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Hypersensitivity/etiology , Vaccines/adverse effects , Italy/epidemiologySubject(s)
COVID-19 , Hypersensitivity , Humans , Pandemics , Hypersensitivity/complications , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Respiratory SystemSubject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Hypersensitivity , Adult , Child , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Skin TestsABSTRACT
Despite the success of mRNA-based vaccines against infectious diseases (including COVID-19), safety concerns have been raised relating to the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) used to deliver the mRNA cargo. Antibodies against the polyethylene glycol (PEG) coating on these non-viral vectors are present in the general population and can in some instances induce allergic reactions. Furthermore, treatment with PEGylated therapeutics may increase the plasma concentration of such anti-PEG antibodies. The widespread use of PEGylated nanoparticles for mRNA vaccines concerns researchers and clinicians about a potential rise in future cases of allergic reactions against mRNA vaccines and cross-reactions with other PEGylated therapeutics. To determine if vaccination with Comirnaty increased the plasma concentration of antibodies against LNPs, we investigated the blood plasma concentration of anti-LNP antibodies in healthy individuals before and after vaccination with the mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine Comirnaty (BNT162b2). Blood samples were acquired from 21 healthy adults before vaccination, 3-4 weeks after the first vaccination dose but before the second dose, and 2-6 months after the second (booster) dose. The blood plasma concentration of antibodies recognizing the LNPs was analyzed using a microscopy-based assay capable of measuring antibody-binding to individual authentic LNPs. No significant increase in anti-LNP antibodies was observed after two doses of Comirnaty. The LNPs used for intramuscular delivery of mRNA in the vaccine against COVID-19, Comirnaty, do, therefore, not seem to induce the generation of anti-vector antibodies.