ABSTRACT
Probiotics have been widely used in gastroenteritis due to acute and chronic illnesses. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness of probiotics in different health conditions are inconclusive and conflicting. The aim of the study was to review existing literature on the effects of probiotics in gastroenteritis among adults. Only original articles on clinical trials that demonstrated the effects of probiotics in adults with gastroenteritis were used for this analysis. Multiple databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE and Scopus databases were searched for the data. The study followed standard procedures for data extraction using PRISMA flow chart. A quality appraisal of the selected studies was conducted using CADIMA. Finally, a meta-analysis was conducted. Thirty-five articles met the selection criteria; of them, probiotics were found effective in the treatment and/or prevention of chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) including ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease in 17 (49%), and the treatment of pouchitis in 4 (11.4%), antibiotic-induced diarrhea in 3 (8.6%), Helicobacter pylori infection in 2 (5.7%) and diverticulitis in 1 (2.9%), while the remaining 7 (20%) were ineffective and 1 study results were inconclusive. Meta-analysis, on the contrary, didn’t demonstrate any significant protective effects of probiotics. Having a τ² value of zero and I² of 6%, the studies were homogeneous and had minimum variances. Further studies are suggested to evaluate the beneficial effects of probiotics in IBDs and other chronic bowel diseases.
Subject(s)
Chronic Disease , Diverticulitis , Diarrhea , Pouchitis , Colitis, Ulcerative , Gastroenteritis , Crohn Disease , Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesABSTRACT
Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) presents distinct challenges during pregnancy due to its influence on maternal health and pregnancy outcomes. This literature review aims to dissect the existing scientific evidence on pregnancy in women with IBD and provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical management. A comprehensive search was conducted across scientific databases, selecting clinical studies, systematic reviews, and other pertinent resources. Numerous studies have underscored an increased risk of complications during pregnancy for women with IBD, including preterm birth, low birth weight, neonates small for gestational age, and congenital malformations. Nevertheless, it's evident that proactive disease management before and throughout pregnancy can mitigate these risks. Continuation of IBD treatment during pregnancy and breastfeeding is deemed safe with agents like thiopurines, anti-TNF, vedolizumab, or ustekinumab. However, there's a call for caution when combining treatments due to the heightened risk of severe infections in the first year of life. For small molecules, their use is advised against in both scenarios. Effective disease management, minimizing disease activity, and interdisciplinary care are pivotal in attending to women with IBD. The emphasis is placed on the continual assessment of maternal and infant outcomes and an expressed need for further research to enhance the understanding of the ties between IBD and adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Subject(s)
Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesABSTRACT
Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is a chronic and progressive inflammatory disorder affecting the gastrointestinal tract (GT) caused by a wide range of genetic, microbial, and environmental factors. IBD is characterized by chronic inflammation, decreased gut microbial diversity and dysbiosis, with a lower amount of beneficial bacteria and a concomitant increase of pathogenic species. It is well known that dysbiosis is closely related to the induction of inflammation and oxidative stress, this last caused by an imbalance between reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and cellular antioxidant capacity that leads to cellular ROS accumulation. ROS are responsible for the intestinal epithelium oxidative damage and the increased intestinal permeability found in IBD patients and their reduction could represent a potential therapeutic strategy to limit the IBD progression and alleviate its symptom. Recent evidence highlighted that dietary polyphenols, natural antioxidants, are able to maintain redox equilibrium in the GT preventing gut dysbiosis, intestinal epithelium damage and radical inflammatory responses. Here, we suggest that the relatively new foodomics approaches, together with new technologies for promoting the antioxidative properties of dietary polyphenols, including novel delivery systems, chemical modifications and combination strategies, may provide critical insight to determine the clinical value of polyphenols for IBD therapy and a comprehensive perspective for implementing natural antioxidants as potential IBD candidate treatment.
Subject(s)
Dysbiosis , Inflammation , Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesABSTRACT
Immune-mediated bowel diseases (IMBD), including Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, represent a significant global health burden with their complex etiology and increasing prevalence. The connection between intestinal parasites and the gut microbiome in immune-mediated bowel disease is a complex and evolving field of research. Several studies have demonstrated that intestinal parasites can modulate the composition and function of the gut microbiome. Parasitic infections can result in alterations in the gut microbial community, including changes in microbial diversity, abundance, and metabolic activity. These changes can influence the immune response and contribute to the development of IMBDs. In contrast, the gut microbiome serves a pivotal function in maintaining intestinal homeostasis and immune regulation. Dysbiosis, characterized by changes in the gut microbial composition, has been associated with the pathogenesis of IMBDs. Imbalances in the gut microbiota can result in increased gut permeability, chronic inflammation, and aberrant immune responses, all of which are hallmarks of IMBDs. The bidirectional interaction between intestinal parasites and the gut microbiome further complicates the understanding of immune-mediated bowel diseases. Certain parasites, such as hookworms and Necator americanus, have been found to downregulate immune responses and may have therapeutic potential in treating celiac disease. On the other hand, infections with parasites like Strongyloides stercoralis and Blastocystis have been shown to mimic the symptoms of IBD, highlighting the intricate relationship between parasites and the pathogenesis of these diseases. Additional investigation is required to comprehensively elucidate the mechanisms that underlie the association between intestinal parasites and the gut microbiome in immune-mediated bowel disease. This knowledge could potentially lead to the development of targeted therapeutic strategies that aim to restore gut microbiota homeostasis and alleviate the symptoms of these debilitating conditions. By understanding and harnessing the complex interplay between parasites, the gut microbiome, and the host immune system, researchers may uncover novel approaches for the management and treatment of immune-mediated bowel diseases.
Subject(s)
Lung Diseases, Parasitic , Blastocystis Infections , Dysbiosis , Celiac Disease , Colitis, Ulcerative , Inflammation , Crohn Disease , Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesABSTRACT
SARS COV 2 is the virus responsible for COVID-19, a disease that has been blamed for inducing or exacerbating symptoms in patients with autoimmune diseases. Crohn's disease (CD) is an inflammatory bowel disease that affects genetically susceptible patients who develop an abnormal mucosal immune response to the intestinal microbiota. Patients who underwent Hematopoietic Stem cell Transplantation are considered at risk for COVID-19. The objective of this report was to describe for the first time the impact of COVID-19 in a group of 50 patients with Crohn's Disease (CD, 28 females, and 22 male) with a mean age of 38 years, previously submitted to Autologous, non-myeloablative, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (Auto HSCT) between 2013 and 2021. In this series, 19 patients were diagnosed with positive COVID-19. In two (2) patients there was a report of the occurrence of two infectious episodes. Parameters related to HSCT, such as time elapsed since the procedure, vaccination status, CD status before and after infection, and clinical manifestations resulting from COVID-19, were evaluated. Among the patients with COVID-19, in three, submitted to Auto HSCT less than six (6) months ago, there was a change in the CD status, and one of them, in addition to the CD symptoms, started to present thyroid impairment with positive anti-TPO. Only one of the patients required hospitalization for five days to treat COVID-19 and remained in CD clinical remission. Nine patients reported late symptoms that may be related to COVID-19. There were no deaths, and the statistical evaluation of the series of COVID-19 patients after HSCT and those who did not present an infectious episode did not present significant data regarding the analyzed parameters. Despite the change in CD status in three patients and the presence of nine patients with late symptoms, we can conclude that there was no significant adverse impact concerning COVID-19 in the evaluated patients who underwent HSCT to treat CD. Key Words: Inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn Disease, SARs COV 2, COVID - 19, Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Stem Cell Therapy.
Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases , Thyroiditis , COVID-19 , Crohn Disease , Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesABSTRACT
Background this article presents a noteworthy case of SARS-CoV-2-associated inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in an elderly individual who endured three hospitalizations without favorable response to conventional treatment. Ultimately, the patient's symptoms subsided following the administration of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg).Case presentation : the patient, an elderly individual, experienced short-term fever and sore throat after encountering the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite receiving a three-dose inactivated COVID-19 vaccine, the patient tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 antigen and developed worsening symptoms, including diarrhea and recurrent fever. Initial antibiotic treatment for bacterial enteritis proved ineffective. Further evaluation, including endoscopy and pathology, confirmed the diagnosis of IBD with concurrent multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS) in adults. Following lower-dose IVIg administration, the patient's symptoms improved, with resolution of fever, diarrhea, and inflammation.Conclusions the case highlights the complexity of diagnosis and treatment in geriatric with IBD and MIS, emphasizing the importance of early intervention with IVIg. Further research is needed to explore the relationship between COVID-19 infection, MIS, and acute autoimmune diseases, as well as the efficacy of IVIg in these conditions.
Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases , Diarrhea , Inflammation , Cryopyrin-Associated Periodic Syndromes , COVID-19 , Fever , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Bacterial InfectionsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasingly prevalent, but diagnosis can still be challenging. Diagnostic delay is particularly deleterious in this age group. OBJECTIVE: This study explores the evolution of diagnostic delay in pediatric IBD and the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Retrospective study including all pediatric IBD patients diagnosed during 2014, 2019 and 2020 in a tertiary hospital. Diagnostic delay, time to first medical visit, time to pediatric gastroenterologist (PG) visit and time to diagnosis were calculated and compared within a gap of five years (2019 and 2014) and with the year of onset of the pandemic (2020 and 2019). RESULTS: A total of 93 participants were included (2014: 32, 2019: 30, 2020: 31). No significant differences were observed in diagnostic delay, time to first medical visit in Crohn's disease (CD), time to PG visit and time to diagnosis when comparing 2019-2014 and 2020-2019. Time to first visit in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Undetermined-IBD increased in 2019 (P=0.03), with new decrease in 2020 (P=0.04). Diagnostic delay was longer in DC compared to UC plus Undetermined-IBD. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic delay is still an important matter in pediatric IBD, with no significant change over the last years. The time to the first PG visit and the time for diagnosis seem to have the greatest impact on diagnostic delay. Thus, strategies to enhance recognition of IBD symptoms among first-line physicians and to improve communication, facilitating referral, are of utmost importance. Despite the restraints in the health care system caused by the pandemic, time to diagnosis in pediatric IBD was not impaired during 2020 in our center.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Colitis, Ulcerative , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Humans , Child , Delayed Diagnosis , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/diagnosis , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/epidemiology , Colitis, Ulcerative/diagnosis , COVID-19 TestingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive therapy used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is known to reduce vaccine immunogenicity. AIMS: This study aimed to 1) predict the humoral response elicited by SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in IBD patients based on their ongoing treatment and other relevant patient and vaccine characteristics and 2) assess the humoral response to a booster dose of mRNA vaccine. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in adult IBD patients. Anti-spike (S) IgG antibodies were measured after initial vaccination and again after one booster dose. A multiple linear regression model was created to predict anti-S antibody titer following initial complete vaccination in different therapeutic groups (no immunosuppression, anti-TNF, immunomodulators and combination therapy). A two-tailed Wilcoxon test for two dependent groups was performed to compare anti-S values before and after the booster dose. RESULTS: Our study included 198 IBD patients. The multiple linear regression identified anti-TNF and combination therapy (versus no immunosuppression), current smoking, viral vector (versus mRNA) vaccine and interval between vaccination and anti-S measurement as statistically significant predictors of the log anti-S antibody levels (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found between no immunosuppression and immunomodulators (p = 0.349) and between anti-TNF and combination therapy (p = 0.997). Statistically significant differences for anti-S antibody titer before and after the booster dose of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine were found, both for non-anti-TNF and anti-TNF groups. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-TNF treatment (either alone or in combination therapy) is associated with lower anti-S antibody levels. Booster mRNA doses seem to increase anti-S both in non-anti-TNF and anti-TNF treated patients. Special attention should be paid to this group of patients when planning vaccination schemes.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Adult , Humans , Adjuvants, Immunologic , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , Immunoglobulin G , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Necrosis , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 virus (SARS-CoV-2), various complications have been reported. Although most COVID-19 cases exhibited flu-like symptoms, COVID-19 may dysregulate the immune response and promote overwhelming levels of inflammation in some patients. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is caused by dysregulated or inappropriate immune responses to environmental factors in a genetically susceptible host, and a SARS-CoV-2 infection may act as a possible cause of IBD. This paper describes two pediatric patients who developed Crohn's disease following a SARS-CoV-2 infection. They were previously healthy before the SARS-CoV-2 infection. On the other hand, they started to develop fever and gastrointestinal symptoms several weeks after recovery from the infection. They were diagnosed with Crohn's disease by imaging and endoscopic studies, and their symptoms improved after treatment with steroids and azathioprine. This paper suggests that a SARS-CoV-2 infection may trigger IBD in predisposed patients.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Crohn Disease , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Humans , Child , SARS-CoV-2 , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/epidemiology , InflammationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Switching from originator infliximab (IFX) to biosimilar IFX is effective and safe. However, data on multiple switching are scarce. The Edinburgh inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) unit has undertaken three switch programmes: (1) Remicade to CT-P13 (2016), (2) CT-P13 to SB2 (2020), and (3) SB2 to CT-P13 (2021). OBJECTIVE: The primary endpoint of this study was to assess CT-P13 persistence following switch from SB2. Secondary endpoints included persistence stratified by the number of biosimilar switches (single, double and triple), effectiveness and safety. METHODS: We performed a prospective, observational, cohort study. All adult IBD patients on IFX biosimilar SB2 underwent an elective switch to CT-P13. Patients were reviewed in a virtual biologic clinic with protocol driven collection of clinical disease activity, C-reactive protein (CRP), faecal calprotectin (FC), IFX trough/antibody levels, and drug survival. RESULTS: 297 patients (CD n = 196 [66%], ulcerative colitis/inflammatory bowel disease unclassified n = 101, [34%]) were switched (followed-up: 7.5 months [6.8-8.1]). This was the third, second and first IFX switch for 67/297 (22.5%), 138/297 (46.5%) and 92/297 (31%) of the cohort respectively. 90.6% of patients remained on IFX during follow-up. The number of switches was not independently associated with IFX persistence after adjusting for confounders. Clinical (p = 0.77), biochemical (CRP ≤5 mg/ml; p = 0.75) and faecal biomarker (FC<250 µg/g; p = 0.63) remission were comparable at baseline, week 12 and week 24. CONCLUSION: Multiple successive switches from IFX originator to biosimilars are effective and safe in patients with IBD, irrespective of the number of IFX switches.
Subject(s)
Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Adult , Humans , Infliximab/therapeutic use , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Gastrointestinal Agents/adverse effects , Drug Substitution , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Leukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexABSTRACT
Chronic inflammatory gastrointestinal diseases such as Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are known as inflammatory bowel disorders (IBD). Patients with inflammatory bowel illnesses are more susceptible to viral infections. In people with IBD, viral infections have emerged as a significant issue. Viral infections are often difficult to identify and have a high morbidity and fatality rate. We reviewed studies on viral infections and IBD, concentrating on Cytomegalovirus (CMV), SARS-CoV-2, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), enteric viruses, and hepatitis B virus (HBV). Also, the effect of IBD on these viral infections is discussed. These data suggest that patients with IBD are more likely to get viral infections. As a result, practitioners should be aware of the increased risk of viral infections in inflammatory bowel disease patients.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Virus Diseases , Humans , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections/complications , Herpesvirus 4, Human , SARS-CoV-2 , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/complications , Virus Diseases/complicationsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The purpose of this study was to present data on the safety of anti- severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination in a cohort of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients of an ongoing multicenter study (ESCAPE-IBD) sponsored by the Italian Group for the study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04769258). METHODS: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was administrated to 809 IBD patients. Interviews were conducted to report adverse events related to vaccination. Of these 809, 346 patients were surveyed on the pandemic burden and the main reason for hesitancy in coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination. The chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between disease-related characteristics and the onset of adverse events. RESULTS: About 45% of patients had at least one side effect, following the first dose (10%), the second (15%), and both doses (19%). All the adverse events were mild and lasted only a few days. Logistic regression analysis revealed that female sex ( P â <â 0.001), younger age ( P â =â 0.001), seroconversion ( P â =â 0.002), and comorbidity ( P â <â 0.001) were significantly associated with adverse events. The survey showed that the main concerns were the possibility of adverse event (33%). Almost all patients (99%) felt safer having been vaccinated at their IBD reference center. CONCLUSION: The vaccine reactions experienced in IBD patients were mostly self-limited. We found high acceptance and good safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in our cohort.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Humans , Female , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/epidemiology , Vaccination/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Vedolizumab (VDZ) can be used to treat refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). We assessed whether there are differences in treating UC vs CD with VDZ. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Mayo score in UC and the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) in CD scored the clinical activity. Achievement and maintenance of clinical remission during the follow-up, and safety were the primary endpoints. RESULTS: 729 patients (475 with UC and 254 with CD), median follow-up of 18 (IQR 6-36) months, were enrolled. Clinical remission at the 6th month of treatment was achieved in 488 (66.9%) patients (74.4% in CD vs 62.9% in UC, p<0.002) while, during the follow-up, no difference was found (81.5% in the UC group and 81.5% pts in the CD group; p=0.537). The clinical remission at the 6th month of treatment (p=0.001) and being naïve to biologics (p<0.0001) were significantly associated with prolonged clinical remission. The clinical response was significantly higher in UC (90.1%) vs CD (84.3%) (p=0.023), and surgery occurred more frequently in CD (1.9% in UC vs 5.1% in CD, p=0.016). CONCLUSION: We found differences when using VDZ in UC vs CD in real life. These parameters can help the physician predict this drug's longterm efficacy.
Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative , Crohn Disease , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Humans , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Remission Induction , Italy , Gastrointestinal Agents/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Retrospective Studies , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapyABSTRACT
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with biologic and/or immunosuppressant drugs are at increased risk for opportunistic infections. Seroprevalence studies can confirm the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infections as well as the associated risk factors. This is a descriptive study which primary endpoints were to highlight the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in a cohort of IBD patients in March 2021, and to analyze seroconversion in patients with known COVID-19 infection and its relationship with IBD treatments. Patients filled in a questionnaire about symptoms of COVID-19 infection and clinical information about their IBD. All included patients were tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. 392 patients were included. Among patients with clinical infection, 69 patients (17,65%) were IgG-positive, 286 (73,15%) IgG-negative and 36 (9,21%) indeterminate. In relation to seroconversion among patients under biologic treatment, 13 patients of the 23 with a previous positive CRP developed antibodies (56.5%). However, when the influence of immunosuppressive treatment on the probability of developing antibodies was analyzed, no significant differences were seen between those patients with or without treatment (77.8% vs. 77.1%, p = 0.96). In our cohort of IBD patients, after one year of pandemic, there were 18.64% IgG positive patients, a higher prevalence than the general population (15.7%).
Subject(s)
Biological Products , COVID-19 , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Seroepidemiologic Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Antibodies, Viral , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/epidemiology , Immunoglobulin G , Biological Products/therapeutic useABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: There are limited data on the safety profile of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 vaccine among patients taking immunosuppressive medications. Our aim was to evaluate the adverse events related to the vaccines in a nationwide cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease on diverse immunosuppressive medications. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using data from the Veterans Health Administration. The primary outcome was any adverse event of special interest (cerebrovascular accident, venous thromboembolism, acute myocardial infarction, Bell palsy) within 90 days of vaccination. RESULTS: A total of 17,201 patients were included, and 12,351 patients (71.8%) received at least 1 vaccine dose. The most common adverse events were acute myocardial infarction and venous thromboembolism. In inverse probability treatment weighting-adjusted logistic regression, full vaccination was not significantly associated with increased adverse events through 90 days, relative to unvaccinated patients. DISCUSSION: Full severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 vaccination was not associated with an increased rate of key adverse events relative to unvaccinated individuals among patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Myocardial Infarction , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapyABSTRACT
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are both caused by a disordered immune response and have direct and profound impacts on health care services. In this study, we implemented transcriptomic and single-cell analysis to detect common molecular and cellular intersections between COVID-19 and IBD that help understand the linkage of COVID-19 to the IBD patients. Methods: Four RNA-sequencing datasets (GSE147507, GSE126124, GSE9686 and GSE36807) from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database are extracted to detect mutual differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for IBD patients with the infection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) to find shared pathways, candidate drugs, hub genes and regulatory networks. Two single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-eq) datasets (GSE150728, PRJCA003980) are used to analyze the immune characteristics of hub genes and the proportion of immune cell types, so as to find common immune responses between COVID-19 and IBD. Results: A total of 121 common DEGs were identified among four RNA-seq datasets, and were all involved in the functional enrichment analysis related to inflammation and immune response. Transcription factors-DEGs interactions, miRNAs-DEGs coregulatory networks, and protein-drug interactions were identified based on these datasets. Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) was built and 59 hub genes were identified. Moreover, scRNA-seq of peripheral blood monocyte cells (PBMCs) from COVID-19 patients revealed a significant increase in the proportion of CD14+ monocytes, in which 38 of 59 hub genes were highly enriched. These genes, encoding inflammatory cytokines, were also highly expressed in inflammatory macrophages (IMacrophage) of intestinal tissues of IBD patients. Conclusions: We conclude that COVID-19 may promote the progression of IBD through cytokine storms. The candidate drugs and DEGs-regulated networks may suggest effective therapeutic methods for both COVID-19 and IBD.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , MicroRNAs , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , InflammationABSTRACT
Background: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often require immunosuppressive therapy and are hence susceptible to various opportunistic viral and bacterial infections. In this regard, many studies on IBD and COVID-19 have been conducted. However, no bibliometric analysis has been performed. This study provides a general overview of IBD and COVID-19. Methods: Publications about IBD and COVID-19 from 2020 to 2022 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database. Bibliometric analysis was performed using VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and HistCite. Results: A total of 396 publications were retrieved and considered in this study. The maximum number of publications were from the United States, Italy, and England, and the contributions of these countries were significant. Kappelman ranked first in article citations. The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases were the most prolific affiliation and journal, respectively. The most influential research topics were "management", "impact", "vaccination", and "receptor". The following keywords represented research frontiers: "depression", "the quality of life of IBD patients", "infliximab", "COVID-19 vaccine", and "second vaccination". Conclusions: Over the past 3 years, most studies on IBD and COVID-19 have focused on clinical research. In particular, topics such as "depression", "the quality of life of IBD patients", "infliximab", "COVID-19 vaccine", and "second vaccination" were noted to have received much attention recently. Future research should focus on our understanding of the immune response to COVID-19 vaccination in biologically treated patients, the psychological impact of COVID-19, IBD management guidelines, and the long-term impact of COVID-19 in IBD patients. This study will provide researchers with a better understanding of research trends on IBD during COVID-19.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Humans , Bibliometrics , COVID-19 Vaccines , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus represents an unprecedented global health crisis. Safe and effective vaccines were rapidly developed and deployed that reduced COVID-19-related severe disease, hospitalization, and death. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease are not at increased risk of severe disease or death from COVID-19, and data from large cohorts of patients with inflammatory bowel disease demonstrate that COVID-19 vaccination is safe and effective. Ongoing research is clarifying the long-term impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on patients with inflammatory bowel disease, long-term immune responses to COVID-19 vaccination, and optimal timing for repeated COVID-19 vaccination doses.