Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 273
Filter
1.
J Urol ; 205(4): 1207, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20241435

Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Robotics , Humans
3.
Int Braz J Urol ; 49(4): 462-468, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20236176

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of the standardized laparoscopic simulation training program in pyeloplasty, following its implementation and during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, a tertiary referral center in south Brazil, in which 151 patients underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed by residents between 2006-2021. They were divided into three groups: before and after adoption of a standardized laparoscopic simulation training program and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The main outcome was a combined negative outcome of conversion to open surgery, major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo III or higher) or unsuccessful procedure, defined as need for redo pyeloplasty. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in the combined negative outcome (21.1% vs 6.3%), surgical time (mean 200.0 min vs 177.4 min) and length of stay (median 5 days vs 3 days) after the adoption of simulation training program. These results were maintained during the COVID-19 pandemic (combined negative outcome of 6.3%, mean surgical time of 160.1 min and median length of stay of 3 days) despite a reduction in 55.4% of the surgical volume. CONCLUSION: A structured laparoscopic simulation program can improve outcomes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty during the learning curve.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Internship and Residency , Laparoscopy , Simulation Training , Ureteral Obstruction , Humans , Kidney Pelvis/surgery , Pandemics , Ureteral Obstruction/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Urologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Treatment Outcome , COVID-19/complications , Laparoscopy/methods , Tertiary Care Centers
4.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 59(5)2023 May 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20235843

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: Groin hernia repair surgery (GHRS) is among the most common elective interventions. The aim of this three-year nationwide study on GHRS is to provide a thorough analysis of the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic had on the Romanian Health System in regard to elective procedures. Materials and Methods: 46,795 groin hernia cases obtained between 2019 and 2021 from the DRG database using ICD-10 diagnostic codes. The data were collected from all 261 GHRS performing hospitals nationwide, including 227 public hospitals (PbH) and 34 private hospitals (PvH). The 42 variables taken into account were processed using Microsoft Excel 2021, applying Chi square, F-Test Two-Sample for variances, and Two Sample t-Test. The significance threshold considered was p < 0.001. Results: Of the grand total of cases, 96.2% were inguinal hernias, 86.8% were performed on men, 15.2% were laparoscopic procedures, and 6.88% were in PvH. Overall, due to the pandemic, the total number of GHRS decreased with 44.45% in 2020 and with 29.72% in 2021 compared to pre-pandemic year 2019. April 2020 shows the steepest decrease in GHRS (91 procedures nationwide). In the private sector, there was an opposite trend with increases in the number of cases by 12.21% and a 70.22% in both pandemic years. The mean admission period (MAP) for all procedures was 5.5 days. There was a significant difference between PbH and PvH (5.75 vs. 2.8 days, p < 0.0001). During the pandemic, the MAP in PbH decreased (6.02 in 2019, 5.82 in 2020 and 5.3 in 2021), remaining stable for PvH (2.9 days in 2019, 2.85 days in 2020 and 2.74 days in 2021). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly reduced the overall number of GHRS performed in Romania in 2020 and 2021, compared to 2019. However, the private sector thrived with an actual increase in the number of cases. There was a significant lower MAP in the PvH compared to PbH throughout the three-year period.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hernia, Inguinal , Laparoscopy , Male , Humans , Hernia, Inguinal/epidemiology , Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Pandemics , Romania/epidemiology , Herniorrhaphy/methods , Groin/surgery , COVID-19/epidemiology , Laparoscopy/methods
5.
Obes Surg ; 33(6): 1955-1956, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2319400

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: GERD and Achalasia are two known complications after sleeve gastrectomy. Treatment towards each of these complications varies and requires a tailored approach. METHODS: We present a 55-year-old female with class II obesity and a previous history of sleeve gastrectomy who developed significant gastroesophageal reflux disease refractory to medical management. After a covid infection in fall of 2020, she began to report new symptoms of dysphagia that progressed from solids to liquids. She underwent extensive workup including upper endoscopy, upper GI barium swallow, manometry, pH impedence, and EndoFlip leading to a diagnosis of Achalasia type II as well as a paraesophageal hernia. RESULTS: Given these findings, she underwent a combined paraesophageal hernia repair with conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric diversion and an intra-operative peroral endoscopic myotomy. Intraoperatively, she was noted to have significant lower abdominal adhesions leading to performing the Roux-en-Y reconstruction through a supramesocolic defect in a retrocolic fashion. CONCLUSIONS: While the development of heartburn and achalasia after sleeve gastrectomy is rare, it requires interventions dedicated towards each etiology. This case demonstrates treatment of both these symptoms is feasible in a single operation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Esophageal Achalasia , Gastric Bypass , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Hernia, Hiatal , Laparoscopy , Myotomy , Obesity, Morbid , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Gastric Bypass/adverse effects , Hernia, Hiatal/surgery , Hernia, Hiatal/complications , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Esophageal Achalasia/surgery , Esophageal Achalasia/complications , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Gastroesophageal Reflux/etiology , Gastrectomy/adverse effects , Myotomy/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies
6.
J Chin Med Assoc ; 86(5): 506-514, 2023 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2317966

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The appropriateness of hysterectomy has gained an interest in scrutiny and debate. Periodic audits of the prevailing clinical practices are imperative for insight, and to formulate recommendations and guidelines. We report the temporal trends of hysterectomies, over the last 10 years in a teaching hospital. METHODS: Present study involved all patients who underwent hysterectomy at a teaching hospital, from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2021. Patients were identified by medical record tracking using International Classification of Diseases-9 codes. Case records were reviewed for demography, indication for surgery, approach, complications, hospital stay, and histopathological correlation. RESULTS: Over the years the absolute number of hysterectomies in our hospital has ranged from 414 to 597 (mean 476), barring the coronavirus 19 pandemic year. The proportion of hysterectomy among all gynaecological admissions has ranged from 6% to 9%, except in 2020 where this proportion dropped down to 4%. The indications, age distribution, surgical approach, and complications have remained almost same. CONCLUSION: We report a static trend in hysterectomy over the past 10 years. This audit provides an insight for the need of shifting the abdominal to vaginal route, in carefully chosen patients. This will be beneficial for the patients, and for the trainees, where they can learn under supervision. Availability and patient education about the nonsurgical management options for benign gynecological conditions, as well as awareness about sequelae of hysterectomy, will bring down the rate in countries such as India.


Subject(s)
Genital Diseases, Female , Laparoscopy , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy , Hospitals, Teaching , Abdomen , Retrospective Studies
7.
Surg Endosc ; 37(5): 3926-3933, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2302272

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) is an internationally recognized educational and certification program designed to teach the knowledge and skills required for basic laparoscopic surgery. Previously, our institution has organized an FLS boot-camp to teach PGY1 residents the FLS manual skills. During the COVID-19 pandemic, in-person sessions were not possible. The purpose of this study was to utilize telesimulation as an education solution for teaching FLS technical skills to PGY1 residents during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A virtual FLS program was established. A complete, easily portable FLS kit was distributed to participants and instructors to set up an FLS box and connect remotely using telesimulation. The program was delivered by three senior residents using the Zoom™ platform. Participants were split into groups of 3-4 individuals, each receiving three 1-h sessions. Sessions were structured with initial demonstration of tasks followed by individual coaching of participants in 'break-out' rooms. The official FLS exam was administered in-person on the 4th week. Pre- and post-course surveys were administered to participants gauging self-reported proficiency with FLS tasks and overall course feedback. Anonymized FLS exam results were collected. RESULTS: A total of 14 residents participated, and 11 responded to the survey. Participants reported that their overall FLS skills proficiency significantly improved on a 5-point likert scale from 1.5 ± 0.5 pre-course to 4.0 ± 0.5 post-course (mean ± SD). Participants unanimously stated that having the FLS box at home was valuable and enabled them to practice more. On the FLS exam, 13 of 14 participants passed the manual skills component. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a telesimulation hands-on FLS course as an alternative to in-person training. The course was practical and effective and was preferred to traditional methods by participants. With ever-expanding technological solutions, virtual telesimulation education is an attractive and underutilized tool, not only in the setting of COVID-19, but also more broadly across current educational programs.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Internship and Residency , Laparoscopy , Humans , Pandemics , Clinical Competence , COVID-19/epidemiology , Laparoscopy/education
8.
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann ; 31(3): 253-258, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2302087

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study was aimed at reporting the surgical outcomes and evaluating the safety and feasibility of robotic repair of Morgagni's repair in adults. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of seven cases of Morgagni's hernia in adults, managed by robotic method in a tertiary-level thoracic surgery centre over 9 years. A detailed analysis of all perioperative variables including complications was carried out. RESULTS: A total of seven patients underwent Robotic Morgagni's hernia repair during the study period. Males (71.4%) were predominant in the patient cohort. Median age group was 33 years (range: 28-78 years). All patients were pre-obese with median body mass index of 29.4 (range: 27.5-29.9). All patients underwent robotic-assisted hernia repair with no conversions. Omentum was the most common hernial content (100%). In all cases, the defect was reinforced with a composite mesh. Median operative time was 140 min (range: 120-160). Median hospital stay of 3 days (range: 2-4 days). No post-procedural complications. All the patients had complete resolution of presenting symptoms. No recurrence was noted in the median follow-up period of 32 months (range: 6-78 months). CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted surgical repair of Morgagni's hernia in adults is safe, feasible and effective. However, studies with larger sample size and multi-institutional collaboration are recommended for further conclusions.


Subject(s)
Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital , Laparoscopy , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Male , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital/diagnostic imaging , Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital/surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Herniorrhaphy/adverse effects , Herniorrhaphy/methods , Surgical Mesh
10.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 30(4): 329-334, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2301396

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify characteristics indicating preoperatively the presence of diaphragmatic endometriosis (DE). DESIGN: Comparison of characteristics of patients with diaphragmatic endometriosis (DE) with characteristics of patients with abdominal endometriosis without diaphragmatic involvement, in a prospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center; endometriosis center. PATIENTS: A total of 1372 patients with histologically proven endometriosis. INTERVENTIONS: Surgery performed laparoscopically under general anesthesia. All patients with suspected endometriosis underwent a complete bilateral inspection of the diaphragm. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Demographic and clinical pathologic characteristics were evaluated using basic descriptive statistics (comparison of the groups using the χ2 test and the Mann-Whitney t test). A logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship (hazard ratio) between symptoms and the presence of DE. DE was diagnosed in 4.7% of the patients (65 of 1372). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (patients with abdominal endometriosis with or without DE) with regard to typical endometriosis pain (dysmenorrhea, dyschezia, dysuria, and/or dyspareunia). However, in the DE group, diaphragmatic pain was present significantly more often preoperatively (27.7% vs 1.8%, p <.001). Four DE patients (6.1 %) were asymptomatic (with infertility the indication for surgery). In the DE group, 78.4 % had advanced stages of endometriosis (revised American Fertility Society III° or IV°); the left lower pelvis was affected in more patients (73.8%). In cases of ovarian endometriosis, patients with DE showed a significantly higher prevalence of left ovaries involvement (left 63% vs right 35.7%, p <.001). Patients with DE had a significantly higher rate of infertility (49.2% vs 28.7%, p <.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with shoulder pain, infertility, and/or endometriosis in the left pelvis have a significant higher risk of DE and therefore need specific preoperative counseling and if indicated surgical treatment.


Subject(s)
Diaphragm , Endometriosis , Laparoscopy , Female , Humans , Dysmenorrhea/surgery , Endometriosis/complications , Endometriosis/epidemiology , Endometriosis/surgery , Pelvic Pain/surgery , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Diaphragm/pathology
11.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech ; 33(2): 99-107, 2023 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2300562

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (L-DP) is the standard procedure for treating left-sided pancreatic tumors. Stapler closure of the pancreas is the preferred method for L-DP; however, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a challenging problem. The present study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of staple closure using a reinforcing stapler (RS) and transection using an ultrasonic dissector followed by hand-sewn (HS) closure in a fish-mouth manner in pure L-DP and to determine independent perioperative risk factors for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among the 85 patients who underwent pure L-DP between February 2011 and August 2021, 80 of whom the pancreatic stump was closed with RS (n = 59) or HS (n = 21) were retrospectively investigated. Associations between potential risk factors and POPF were assessed using univariate analysis. The factors, of which the P value was determined to be <0.1 by univariate analysis, were entered into a multivariate regression analysis to ascertain independent predictive factors. RESULTS: The surgery time and estimated blood loss were not significantly different between the two groups. Overall, 13 patients (16.3%) developed CR-POPF ( B = 12 and C = 1). The rate of CR-POPF was lower in RS than in HS; however, the difference was not statistically significant (RS vs HS: 11.9% vs 28.9%, P = 0.092). Consistent with the results for CR-POPF, the rate of Clavien-Dindo IIIa or more postoperative complications and the length of hospital stay were also not significantly different between the two groups (RS vs HS: 10.2, 12% vs 14.3%, 14 d). In the univariate analysis of risk factors for CR-POPF, the pancreatic thickness at the transection site, procedure for stump closure, and estimated blood loss were associated with a significantly higher rate of CR-POPF. The multivariate analysis revealed that the pancreatic thickness at the transection site (cutoff: 12 mm) was the only independent risk factor for CR-POPF (odds ratio: 6.5l, 95% CI: 1.4-30.4, P = 0.018). The rate of CR-POPF was much lower in RS than in HS for pancreatic thickness <12 mm (RS vs HS: 4.1% vs 28.6%), whereas that was rather higher in RS than in HS for pancreatic thickness ≥12 mm (RS vs HS: 50% vs 28.6%). CONCLUSIONS: RS closure was superior to HS closure for pancreatic thickness <12 mm and for prevention of CR-POPF after pure L-DP. It is necessary to seek more reliable procedures for pancreatic stump closure in patients with a pancreatic thickness of ≥12 mm.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Pancreatectomy , Humans , Pancreatectomy/adverse effects , Pancreatectomy/methods , Pancreatic Fistula/etiology , Pancreatic Fistula/prevention & control , Pancreatic Fistula/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Pancreas/surgery , Pancreas/pathology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Risk Factors , Laparoscopy/adverse effects
12.
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol ; 62(2): 363-368, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2298796

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Heterotopic pregnancy (HP) is the coexistence of extra- and intrauterine gestation implantation sites. A rare case of a second-trimester ruptured cornual HP (CHP) treated with laparoscopic cornual resection with the primary repair is presented. Risk factors, clinical presentations, treatments, and outcomes of CHPs are also reviewed. CASE REPORT: A 35-year-old pregnant woman with CHP presented with lower abdominal pain with hemoperitoneum and her hemoglobin level dropped. Laparoscopic management of a ruptured HP was performed, leaving the surplus intrauterine fetus intact. She delivered a 2360 g male infant via cesarean section at 34 weeks' gestation due to preterm premature rupture of membranes. We found a well-healed wound over the left uterine cornua during the cesarean section. CONCLUSION: Ruptured CHP is a rare but life-threatening complication of an obstetric emergency. Although the pregnant uterus becomes congested and fragile, using reliable laparoscopic energy devices and barbed sutures, successful treatment is feasible.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Pregnancy, Cornual , Pregnancy, Heterotopic , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Male , Female , Adult , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Pregnancy, Heterotopic/surgery , Cesarean Section , Live Birth , Pregnancy, Cornual/surgery
13.
J Anesth ; 37(2): 234-241, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2304942

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The cuff pressure of a tracheal tube may increase during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for prostatectomy (RALP), which requires pneumoperitoneum in a steep head-down position, but there have been no studies which confirmed this. METHODS: In study 1, we studied how frequently the cuff pressure significantly increased during anesthesia for the RALP. In study 2, we studied if the SmartCuff (Smiths Medical Japan, Tokyo) automatic cuff pressure controller would minimize the changes in the intracuff pressure. With approval of the study by the research ethics committee (approved number: 20115), we measured the cuff pressures in anesthetized patients undergoing RALP and in those undergoing gynecological laparotomy (as a reference cohort), with and without the use of the SmartCuff. RESULTS: In 21 patients undergoing RALP, a clinically meaningful increase (5 cmH2O or greater) was observed in all the 21 patients (P = 0.00; 95% CI for difference: 86-100%), whereas in 23 patients undergoing gynecological laparotomy, a clinically meaningful decrease (5 cmH2O or greater) was observed in 21 of 23 patients (91%, P < 0.0001; 95% CI for difference: 72-99%). With the use of the SmartCuff, there was no significant increase in the incidence of a clinically meaningful change in the intracuff pressure in either cohort. CONCLUSION: The cuff pressure of a tracheal tube would frequently increase markedly in patients undergoing RALP, whereas it would frequently decrease markedly in patients undergoing gynecological laparotomy. The SmartCuff may inhibit the changes in the cuff pressure during anesthesia.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia , Laparoscopy , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Male , Intubation, Intratracheal , Pressure , Prostatectomy
15.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 49(5): 1418-1423, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2282904

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive hysterectomy is a common gynecologic procedure. Numerous studies have found that a same day discharge (SDD) is safe following this procedure. Research has found that SDDs decrease resource strain, nosocomial infections, and financial burden for both the patient and healthcare system. Due to the recent COVID-19 pandemic, the safety of hospital admissions and elective surgeries was called into question. OBJECTIVE: To assess the rates of SDD among patients who underwent a minimally invasive hysterectomy before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review was performed from September 2018 to December 2020 on 521 patients, who met inclusion criteria. Descriptive analysis, chi-square tests of association, and multivariable logistic regression were used for analysis. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between rate of SDDs pre-COVID-19 (12.5%) versus during the COVID-19 period (28.6%) (p < 0.001). Surgical complexity was predictive of not being discharged the same day of surgery (odds ratio [OR] = 4.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.2-8.8), as was surgical completion time after 4 p.m. (OR = 5.2, 95% CI = 1.1-25.2). There was no difference in readmissions (p = 0.209) and emergency department (ED) visits (p = 0.973) between SDD and overnight stay. CONCLUSION: Rates of SDD for patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy were significantly increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. SDDs are safe; the number of readmissions and ED visits did not increase among patients who were discharged on the same day.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Laparoscopy , Humans , Female , Patient Discharge , Retrospective Studies , Pandemics , Hysterectomy/methods , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Laparoscopy/methods
16.
J Pediatr Surg ; 58(7): 1285-1290, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2287683

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a protocol was adopted by our department on antibiotics treatment for Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis (AUA). Our study aimed to determine the feasibility and safety of non-operative treatment (NOT), compared to upfront laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), for AUA in children during the pandemic. METHOD: Our prospective comparative study was conducted from May 1, 2020 to January 31, 2021. Patient selection criteria included: age ≥5 years, abdominal pain duration ≤48 h, ultrasound (US)/Computered Tomography scan confirmation of AUA, US appendiceal diameter 6-11 mm with no features of perforation/abscess collection and no faecolith. For NOT patients, intravenous antibiotics were administered for 24-48 h followed by oral for 10-day course. Comparison was performed between patients whose parents preferred NOT to those who opted for up-front appendectomy. Primary outcomes were NOT success at index admission, early and late NOT failure rates till 27 months. Secondary outcomes were differences in complication rate, hospital length of stay (LOS) and cost between groups. RESULTS: 77 patients were recruited: 43 (55.8%) underwent NOT while 34 (44.2%) patients opted for LA. Success of NOT at index admission was 90.7% (39/43). Overall, NOT failure rate at 27 months' follow-up was 37.2% (16/43). Of the NOT failures, 1 appendix was normal on histology while only 1 was perforated. There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes between both groups except for LOS of late NOT failure. Cost for upfront LA was nearly thrice that of NOT. CONCLUSION: Our stringent COVID protocol together with shared decision-making with parents is a safe and feasible treatment option during a crisis situation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Treatment study, Level II.


Subject(s)
Appendicitis , COVID-19 , Laparoscopy , Child , Humans , Child, Preschool , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Appendicitis/drug therapy , Appendicitis/surgery , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , Laparoscopy/methods , Appendectomy/methods , Treatment Outcome , Acute Disease
17.
BMJ Open Qual ; 12(1)2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2286317

ABSTRACT

Elective surgeries within the National Health Service are frequently cancelled due to shortages of inpatient beds due to acute emergency admissions, and more recently, the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this quality improvement project was to initiate a day case hysterectomy pathway, prospectively collecting data on a group of selected motivated patients to assess its feasibility and safety. Interventions to maximise the chance of same day discharge included preoperative education and hydration, alterations in anaesthetic and surgical techniques and collaborative working between surgeons and recovery nurses to safely discharge patients. In change cycle 1, 93% of patients were discharged on the same day as surgery. In change cycle 2, 100% of patients were discharged on the same day as surgery. In a patient questionnaire, 90% of patients would recommend a day case hysterectomy to their friends or family. Day case hysterectomy was safely introduced to our unit, through leaders actively encouraging contributions and feedback throughout the initiation of the pathway from different components of the multidisciplinary team, from conception to roll out of the guideline for use by other gynaecological surgical teams within the trust.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Laparoscopy , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Pandemics , State Medicine , Hysterectomy/methods
18.
BMC Surg ; 23(1): 43, 2023 Feb 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2285853

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare systems throughout the world. We examine whether appendectomy outcomes in 2020 and 2021 were affected by the pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 30-day appendectomy outcomes using the ACS-NSQIP database from 2019 through 2021. Logistic regression and linear regression analyses were performed to create models of post-operative outcomes. RESULTS: There were no associations between the time period of surgery and death, readmission, reoperation, deep incisional SSI, organ space SSI, sepsis, septic shock, rate of complicated appendicitis, failure to wean from the ventilator, or days from admission to operation. During the first 21 months of the pandemic (April 2020 through December 2021), there was a decreased length of hospital stay (p = 0.016), increased operative time (p < 0.001), and increased likelihood of laparoscopic versus open surgery (p < 0.001) in compared to 2019. CONCLUSIONS: There were minimal differences in emergent appendectomy outcomes during the first 21 months of the pandemic when compared to 2019. Surgical systems in the US successfully adapted to the challenges presented by the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Appendicitis , COVID-19 , Laparoscopy , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Pandemics , Appendicitis/surgery , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/complications , Length of Stay , Appendectomy , Acute Disease , Treatment Outcome
19.
PLoS One ; 18(2): e0279923, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2284523

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for type 2 diabetes and morbid obesity. This paper analyses the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of patients treated through the Bariatric Surgery Initiative, a health system collaboration providing bariatric surgery as a state-wide public service in Queensland, Australia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A longitudinal prospective cohort study was undertaken. Eligible patients had type 2 diabetes and morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2). Following referral by specialist outpatient clinics, 212 patients underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy. Outcomes were tracked for a follow-up of 12-months and included body weight, BMI, HbA1c, comorbidities, health-related quality of life, eating behaviour, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Following surgery, patients' average body weight decreased by 23.6%. Average HbA1c improved by 24.4% and 48.8% of patients were able to discontinue diabetes-related treatment. The incidence of hypertension, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, and renal impairment decreased by 37.1%, 66.4%, and 62.3%, respectively. Patients' emotional eating scores, uncontrolled eating and cognitive restraint improved by 32.5%, 20.7%, and 6.9%, respectively. Quality of life increased by 18.8% and patients' overall satisfaction with the treatment remained above 97.5% throughout the recovery period. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed previous work demonstrating the efficacy of publicly funded bariatric surgery in treating obesity, type 2 diabetes and related comorbidities, and improving patients' quality of life and eating behaviour. Despite the short follow-up period, the results bode well for future weight maintenance in this cohort.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Gastric Bypass , Laparoscopy , Obesity, Morbid , Humans , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/surgery , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Glycated Hemoglobin , Bariatric Surgery/methods , Gastric Bypass/methods , Treatment Outcome , Gastrectomy/methods , Laparoscopy/methods
20.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 42(8): 3685-3691, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2289095

ABSTRACT

Mental practice (MP) is a method of enhancing surgical training by rehearsal of a task without physical action. The primary objective of the study was to develop and validate a MP tool for laparoscopic salpingectomy (LS). An imagery script for LS was developed and used to facilitate a structured MP session for trainees in Obstetrics and Gynaecology and expert gynaecologists across three teaching hospitals in the UK. A virtual platform was used for one trainee group to assess its feasibility compared to a face-to-face approach. Pre- and post-session assessments were conducted to evaluate the impact of the script on motivation, confidence, preparedness and quality of imagery and demonstrated a significant improvement in global imagery scores for both novice groups. The expert group scored significantly higher than the face-to-face novice group on all items both before and after MP, indicating construct validity. There were no significant differences demonstrated between the two novice groups, thus demonstrating the virtual platform to be a non-inferior approach - an important consideration in the current COVID era.


Subject(s)
Internship and Residency , Laparoscopy , Salpingectomy , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Clinical Competence , COVID-19 , Education, Medical, Graduate/methods , Laparoscopy/education , Salpingectomy/education , Competency-Based Education
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL