Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 28
Filter
1.
Clin Imaging ; 97: 50-54, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2270150

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Patients with COVID-19 infection are frequently found to have pulmonary barotrauma. Recent work has identified the Macklin effect as a radiographic sign that often occurs in patients with COVID-19 and may correlate with barotrauma. METHODS: We evaluated chest CT scans in COVID-19 positive mechanically ventilated patients for the Macklin effect and any type of pulmonary barotrauma. Patient charts were reviewed to identify demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: The Macklin effect on chest CT scan was identified in a total of 10/75 (13.3%) COVID-19 positive mechanically ventilated patients; 9 developed barotrauma. Patients with the Macklin effect on chest CT scan had a 90% rate of pneumomediastinum (p < 0.001) and a trend toward a higher rate of pneumothorax (60%, p = 0.09). Pneumothorax was most frequently omolateral to the site of the Macklin effect (83.3%). CONCLUSION: The Macklin effect may be a strong radiographic biomarker for pulmonary barotrauma, most strongly correlating with pneumomediastinum. Studies in ARDS patients without COVID-19 are needed to validate this sign in a broader population. If validated in a broad population, future critical care treatment algorithms may include the Macklin sign for clinical decision making and prognostication.


Subject(s)
Barotrauma , COVID-19 , Lung Injury , Mediastinal Emphysema , Pneumothorax , Humans , Pneumothorax/epidemiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/diagnostic imaging , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/epidemiology , COVID-19/complications , Barotrauma/epidemiology
2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 23(1): 137, 2023 Mar 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2268335

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the novel coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic, a considerable number of pneumothorax (PNX)/pneumomediastinum (PNM) associated with COVID-19 have been reported, and the incidence is higher in critically ill patients. Despite using a protective ventilation strategy, PNX/PNM still occurs in patients on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). This matched case-control study aims to identify the risk factors and clinical characteristics of PNX/PNM in COVID-19. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled adult patients with COVID-19, admitted to a critical care unit from March 1, 2020, to January 31, 2022. COVID-19 patients with PNX/PNM were compared, in a 1-2 ratio, to COVID-19 patients without PNX/PNM, matched for age, gender, and worst National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ordinal scale. Conditional logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the risk factors for PNX/PNM in COVID-19. RESULTS: 427 patients with COVID-19 were admitted during the period, and 24 patients were diagnosed with PNX/PNM. Body mass index (BMI) was significantly lower in the case group (22.8 kg/m2 and 24.7 kg/m2; P = 0.048). BMI was statistically significant risk factor for PNX/PNM in univariate conditional logistic regression analysis [odds ratio (OR), 0.85; confidence interval (CI), 0.72-0.996; P = 0.044]. For patients on IMV support, univariate conditional logistic regression analysis showed the statistical significance of the duration from symptom onset to intubation (OR, 1.14; CI, 1.006-1.293; P = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Higher BMI tended to show a protective effect against PNX/PNM due to COVID-19 and delayed application of IMV might be a contributive factor for this complication.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Pneumothorax , Adult , Humans , Case-Control Studies , Pneumothorax/epidemiology , Pneumothorax/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Mediastinal Emphysema/epidemiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , COVID-19/complications
3.
Crit Care ; 26(1): 350, 2022 11 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2115659

ABSTRACT

Spontaneous pneumomediastinum (SP) has been described early during the COVID-19 pandemic in large series of patients with severe pneumonia, but most patients were receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) at the time of SP diagnosis. In this retrospective multicenter observational study, we aimed at describing the prevalence and outcomes of SP during severe COVID-19 with pneumonia before any IMV, to rule out mechanisms induced by IMV in the development of pneumomediastinum.Among 549 patients, 21 patients (4%) developed a SP while receiving non-invasive respiratory support, after a median of 6 days [4-12] from ICU admission. The proportion of patients requiring IMV was similar. However, the time to tracheal intubation was longer in patients with SP (6 days [5-13] vs. 2 days [1-4]; P = 0.00002), with a higher first-line use of non-invasive ventilation (n = 11; 52% vs. n = 150; 28%; P = 0.02). The 21 patients who developed a SP had persisting signs of severe lung disease and respiratory failure with lower ROX index between ICU admission and occurrence of SP (3.94 [3.15-5.55] at admission vs. 3.25 [2.73-4.02] the day preceding SP; P = 0.1), which may underline potential indirect signals of Patient-self inflicted lung injury (P-SILI).In this series of critically ill COVID-19 patients, the prevalence of SP without IMV was not uncommon, affecting 4% of patients. They received more often vasopressors and had a longer ICU length of stay, as compared with their counterparts. One pathophysiological mechanism may potentially be carried out by P-SILI related to a prolonged respiratory failure, as underlined by a delayed use of IMV and the evolution of the ROX index between ICU admission and the day preceding SP.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Respiratory Insufficiency , Humans , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/therapy , Pandemics , Critical Illness/epidemiology , Critical Illness/therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Mediastinal Emphysema/epidemiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/therapy , Respiration, Artificial , Retrospective Studies
4.
Chirurgia (Bucur) ; 117(3): 317-327, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1969937

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Abstract COVID-19 (Coronavirus-19 disease), a new clinical entity caused by SARS-COV-2 infection, could explain the physiopathology of cervicothoracic air collections (pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and subcutaneous emphysema). Material and Methods: We conducted an 8-months retrospective analysis of a single-center SARS-CoV-2 cases associating pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and subcutaneous emphysema, either alone or combined. Results: All non-intubated patients with the complications cited above had a favorable outcome after pleural drainage, percutaneous drainage, and/or conservative treatment, while the intubated patients, with multiple comorbidities, have had an unfavorable outcome, regardless the chosen treatment. Pleural drainage was used for pneumothorax cases; pneumomediastinum with subcutaneous emphysema required insertion of subcutaneous needles or angio-catheters with manual decompressive massage. Conservative methods of treatment were used for patients with pneumomediastinum and medium or severe respiratory disfunction. Conclusions: Etiopathogenic classification of pneumothorax should include SARS-CoV-2 infection as a possible cause of secondary spontaneous pneumothorax due to COVID-19 pneumonia. Survival rate after the occurrence of these complications was small (18,75%), 4 of the patients were cured, 2 had a favorable outcome and 26 have died. Pleural drainage which is mandatory to do for patients with pneumothorax complication in COVID -19 pneumonia, doesn't change the prognosis for those with severe affecting lungs, because the prolonged ventilation and the other comorbidities have led to death in most of these cases.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Pneumothorax , Subcutaneous Emphysema , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/therapy , Humans , Mediastinal Emphysema/epidemiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/therapy , Pneumothorax/epidemiology , Pneumothorax/etiology , Pneumothorax/therapy , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Subcutaneous Emphysema/complications , Subcutaneous Emphysema/therapy , Treatment Outcome
5.
Chirurgia (Bucur) ; 117(3): 312-327, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1924866

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Mechanical ventilation is a last resort solution for patients presenting with acute respiratory distress syndrome produced by SARS-CoV-2. Spontaneous pneumomediastinum is a rare pathology associated with invasive mechanical ventilation. The objective of our research was to highlight the increased incidence of spontaneous pneumomediastinum during the COVID-19 pandemics in our hospital. Material and method: A retrospective review of the cases in our hospital requiring surgical evaluation was performed. Electronic health records from our institution were searched for nontraumatic pneumomediastinum from October to November 2021. All patients that were identified with pneumomediastinum were included in the review. Results: We identified 12 mechanical ventilated patients that presented with free air in the mediastinum on a computed tomography during the study period. All of the patients had SARS-CoV-2 bronchopneumonia with extensive pulmonary involvement. The mortality rate among these patients was 58.33%. Conclusions: The main take-home message of our study is that the incidence of mechanically ventilation-associated pneumomediastinum was exponentially higher during the fourth wave of COVID-19. There is a need for multicenter data in this pathology for a better approach and to define surgical management options for these patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Hospitals , Humans , Incidence , Mediastinal Emphysema/diagnostic imaging , Mediastinal Emphysema/epidemiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , Pandemics , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome
6.
Clin Imaging ; 90: 71-77, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1906895

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of barotrauma (pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema) in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients. To describe the chest radiography patterns of barotrauma and understand the development in relation to mechanical ventilation and patient mortality. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 363 patients with COVID-19 from March 1 to April 8, 2020. Primary outcomes were pneumomediastinum or subcutaneous emphysema with or without pneumothorax, pneumoperitoneum, or pneumoretroperitoneum. The secondary outcomes were length of intubation and death. In patients with pneumomediastinum and/or subcutaneous emphysema, we conducted an imaging review to determine the timeline of barotrauma development. RESULTS: Forty three out of 363 (12%) patients developed barotrauma radiographically. The median time to development of either pneumomediastinum or subcutaneous emphysema was 2 days (IQR 1.0-4.5) after intubation and the median time to pneumothorax was 7 days (IQR 2.0-10.0). The overall incidence of pneumothorax was 28/363 (8%) with an incidence of 17/43 (40%) in the barotrauma cohort and 11/320 (3%) in those without barotrauma (p ≤ 0.001). In total, 257/363 (71%) patients died with an increase in mortality in those with barotrauma 33/43 (77%) vs. 224/320 (70%). When adjusting for covariates, barotrauma was associated with increased odds of death (OR 2.99, 95% CI 1.25-7.17). CONCLUSION: Barotrauma is a frequent complication of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients. In comparison to intubated COVID-19 patients without barotrauma, there is a higher rate of pneumothorax and an increased risk of death.


Subject(s)
Barotrauma , COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Pneumothorax , Subcutaneous Emphysema , Barotrauma/complications , Barotrauma/etiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Mediastinal Emphysema/diagnostic imaging , Mediastinal Emphysema/epidemiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , Pneumothorax/diagnostic imaging , Pneumothorax/epidemiology , Pneumothorax/etiology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Subcutaneous Emphysema/diagnostic imaging , Subcutaneous Emphysema/epidemiology , Subcutaneous Emphysema/etiology
7.
Clin Med (Lond) ; 22(3): 271-275, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1856276

ABSTRACT

Pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax are recognised complications encountered in COVID-19 before or during invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). The clinical course of patients developing pneumomediastinum before IMV is yet to be evaluated.Four-thousand, one-hundred and thirty-one patients hospitalised with COVID-19 over a 12-month period were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate for incidence, clinical characteristics and outcomes. A subgroup analysis was done to identify any clinical traits between survivors and non-survivors. The overall incidence of pneumomediastinum prior to IMV was 0.92% (n=38) and was seen at admission or during non-invasive respiratory support. Thirty-seven per cent had associated pneumothorax most commonly unilateral (right side). The median (interquartile range (IQR)) duration from admission to developing pneumomediastinum was 7 days (3-11) and complete resolution was seen in 53% of patients; median (IQR) duration to resolution was 8 days (4-17). The in-hospital mortality associated with pneumomediastinum in patients with SARS-CoV-2 (PneumoCoV) was 55%. Increasing age (68 ± 12 years vs 56 ± 14 years; p=0.01), higher body mass index (31 ± 5 kg/m2 vs 28 ± 5 kg/m2; p=0.04), lack of resolution of pneumomediastinum (67% vs 24%; p=0.01; odds ratio (OR) 6.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-27.5), presence of concurrent pneumothorax (65% vs 14%; p=0.002; OR 11; 95% CI 2.2-53.1) and elevated procalcitonin levels (>0.5 ng/mL; 81% vs 41%; p=0.01; OR 6; 95% CI 1.4-26) were significant features in those who did not survive.The incidence of PneumoCoV, despite being low, is associated with increased mortality. It is a hallmark of moderate to severe disease with multifaceted contributory factors. Both demographic and clinical factors predict survival.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Pneumothorax , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/therapy , Humans , Mediastinal Emphysema/epidemiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/therapy , Middle Aged , Pneumothorax/epidemiology , Pneumothorax/etiology , Pneumothorax/therapy , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
8.
Respir Med ; 197: 106853, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1796148

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To validate the role of Macklin effect on chest CT imaging in predicting subsequent occurrence of pneumomediastinum/pneumothorax (PMD/PNX) in COVID-19 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is an observational, case-control study. Consecutive COVID-19 patients who underwent chest CT scan at hospital admission during the study time period (October 1st, 2020-April 31st, 2021) were identified. Macklin effect accuracy for prediction of spontaneous barotrauma was measured in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV). RESULTS: Overall, 981 COVID-19 patients underwent chest CT scan at hospital arrival during the study time period; 698 patients had radiological signs of interstitial pneumonia and were considered for further evaluation. Among these, Macklin effect was found in 33 (4.7%), including all 32 patients who suffered from barotrauma lately during hospital stay (true positive rate: 96.9%); only 1/33 with Macklin effect did not develop barotrauma (false positive rate: 3.1%). No barotrauma event was recorded in patients without Macklin effect on baseline chest CT scan. Macklin effect yielded a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 89.1-100), a specificity of 99.85% (95% CI: 99.2-100), a PPV of 96.7% (95% CI: 80.8-99.5), a NPV of 100% and an accuracy of 99.8% (95% CI: 99.2-100) in predicting PMD/PNX, with a mean advance of 3.2 ± 2.5 days. Moreover, all Macklin-positive patients developed ARDS requiring ICU admission and, in 90.1% of cases, invasive mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: Macklin effect has high accuracy in predicting PMD/PNX in COVID-19 patients; it is also an excellent predictor of disease severity.


Subject(s)
Barotrauma , COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Pneumothorax , Barotrauma/complications , Barotrauma/diagnostic imaging , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Mediastinal Emphysema/diagnostic imaging , Mediastinal Emphysema/epidemiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , Pneumothorax/epidemiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
9.
Postgrad Med J ; 99(1172): 570-575, 2023 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1794456

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Various complications have been reported in patients with COVID-19 including pneumomediastinum. METHODS: The primary objective of the study was to determine the incidence of pneumomediastinum in COVID-19 positive patients who underwent CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA). The secondary objectives were to analyse if the incidence of pneumomediastinum changed between March and May 2020 (peak of the first wave in the UK) and January 2021 (peak of the second wave in the UK) and to determine the mortality rate in patients with pneumomediastinum. We undertook an observational, retrospective, single-centre, cohort study of patients with COVID-19 admitted to Northwick Park Hospital. RESULTS: 74 patients in the first wave and 220 patients in the second wave met the study criteria. Two patients during the first wave and eleven patients during the second wave developed pneumomediastinum. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of pneumomediastinum changed from 2.7% during the first wave to 5% during the second wave and this change was not statistically significant (p value 0.4057). The difference in mortality rates of patients with pneumomediastinum in both waves of COVID-19 (69.23%) versus patients without pneumomediastinum in both waves of COVID-19 (25.62%) was statistically significant (p value 0.0005). Many patients with pneumomediastinum were ventilated, which could be a confounding factor. When controlling for ventilation, there was no statistically significant difference in the mortality rates of ventilated patients with pneumomediastinum (81.81%) versus ventilated patients without pneumomediastinum (59.30%) (p value 0.14).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Mediastinal Emphysema/diagnostic imaging , Mediastinal Emphysema/epidemiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , COVID-19/complications , Angiography , Computed Tomography Angiography
10.
J Intensive Care Med ; 37(8): 1015-1018, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1775172

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pneumothorax (PTX) and pneumomediastinum (PM), collectively termed here "air leak", are now well described complications of severe COVID-19 pneumonia across several case series. The incidence is thought to be approximately 1% but is not definitively known. OBJECTIVES: To report the incidence and describe the demographic features, risk factors and outcomes of patients with air leak as a complication of COVID-19. METHODS: A retrospective observational study on all adult patients with COVID-19 admitted to Watford General Hospital, West Hertfordshire NHS Trust between March 1st 2020 and Feb 28th 2021. Patients with air leak were identified after reviewing both chest radiographs (CXRs) and axial imaging (CT Thorax) with confirmatory radiology reports inclusive of the terms PTX and/or PM. RESULTS: Air leak occurred with an incidence of 0.56%. Patients with air leak were younger and had evidence of more severe disease at presentation, including a higher median CRP and number of abnormal zones affected on chest radiograph. Asthma was a significant risk factor in the development of air leak (OR 13.4 [4.7-36.4]), both spontaneously and following positive pressure ventilation. CPAP and IMV were also associated with a greater than six fold increase in the risk of air leak (OR 6.4 [2.5-16.6] and 9.8 [3.7-27.8] respectively). PTX, with or without PM, in the context of COVID-19 pneumonia was almost universally fatal whereas those with alone PM had a lower risk of death. CONCLUSION: Despite the global vaccination programme, patients continue to develop severe COVID-19 disease and may require respiratory support. This study demonstrates the importance of identifying that deterioration in such patients may be resultant from PTX or PM, particularly in asthmatics and those managed with positive pressure ventilation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Pneumothorax , Adult , COVID-19/complications , Humans , Incidence , Mediastinal Emphysema/diagnostic imaging , Mediastinal Emphysema/epidemiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , Pneumothorax/diagnostic imaging , Pneumothorax/epidemiology , Pneumothorax/etiology , Risk Factors
11.
J Nepal Health Res Counc ; 19(3): 460-466, 2021 Dec 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1687865

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pneumomediastinum, an uncommon entity, has been on the rise with increasing cases of COVID-Acute respiratory distress syndrome. It has been unclear whether this entity represents an indicator of poor clinical outcome or not. The aims of this study were to find out the incidence of pneumomediastinum in COVID-Acute respiratory distress syndrome patients, describe their clinical characteristics and try to explain its plausible mechanisms.. METHODS: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was carried out in the ICU of our hospital among 280 patients admitted with COVID-Acute respiratory distress syndrome over a period of 6 months. Demographics along with various clinical, laboratory, and radiological parameters were analyzed. Relevant statistical analyses were done to summarize our findings. RESULTS: The incidence of pneumomediastinum in COVID-ARDS patients was 2.8%. All patients were male, none had pulmonary co-morbidities and six of them (60%) were on invasive mechanical ventilation. All intubated patients were on lung protective mechanical ventilation. The median PEEP, peak airway pressure and plateau pressure were 10 (IQR: 4), 29 (IQR: 8) and 28 (IQR: 4) respectively. The mean CT severity score was 22.7 (SD: 1.64). Five patients died after 6.8 days (SD: 4.8) of diagnosis. The average hospital stay was of 34 days. CONCLUSIONS: Pneumomediastinum is a possible complication of COVID-Acute respiratory distress syndrome which could signify the disease severity and vice versa. Furthermore, it could be an indicator of relatively poor prognosis and therefore requires larger studies to establish the association.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Male , Mediastinal Emphysema/diagnostic imaging , Mediastinal Emphysema/epidemiology , Nepal/epidemiology , Respiration, Artificial , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2
12.
Drug Discov Ther ; 15(6): 310-316, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1622789

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 is associated with rarer extra-parenchymal manifestations, namely pneumothorax (PTX) and pneumomediastinum (PM) leading to complications and increased mortality. The study aims to describe the prevalence, risk factors for mortality, radiological characteristics and outcome of PTX/PM in patients admitted with COVID-19. This was a retrospective, single-centre, observational study in patients with confirmed COVID-19 presenting with non-iatrogenic PTX/PM from April 2020 to May 2021. Details pertaining to demographics, presentation, radiological characteristics, management and outcome were collected. Cases were classified into spontaneous and barotraumatic PTX/PM and a between-group comparison was performed using Chi-square and t-test. A total of 45 cases (mean age: 53.2 years, 82% males) out of 8,294 confirmed COVID-19 patients developed PTX/PM, the calculated incidence being 0.54%. 29 cases had spontaneous PTX/PM and the remaining 17 cases were attributed to barotrauma. The most common comorbidities were diabetes-mellitus (65.3%) and hypertension (42.3%). The majority of the cases had large PTX (62.1%) with tension in 8 cases (27.5%). There were predominant right-sided pneumothoraces and five were diagnosed with bronchopleural fistula. 37.7% of cases had associated subcutaneous emphysema. The median duration of PTX/PM from symptom onset was delayed at 22.5 and 17.6 days respectively. The mean CT severity score (CTSS) was 20.5 (± 4.9) with fibrosis (53.8%), bronchiectatic changes (50%) and cystic-cavitary changes (23%). There was no statistically significant difference between the spontaneous and barotrauma cohort. 71% of cases died and the majority belonged to the barotrauma cohort. It is imperative to consider the possibility of PTX/PM in patients having COVID-19, especially in those with deterioration in the disease course, both in spontaneously breathing and mechanically ventilated patients. These patients may also have a high incidence of death, reflecting the gravity of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Pneumothorax , Female , Humans , Male , Mediastinal Emphysema/diagnostic imaging , Mediastinal Emphysema/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Pneumothorax/diagnostic imaging , Pneumothorax/epidemiology , Pneumothorax/etiology , Respiration, Artificial , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Tertiary Healthcare
13.
Clin Med (Lond) ; 21(6): e615-e619, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1551858

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There are limited data regarding the incidence of pneumothorax in COVID-19 patients as well as the impact of the same on patient outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of the medical records at three large tertiary care hospitals in Mumbai was performed to identify patients hospitalised with COVID-19 from March 2020 to October 2020. The presence of pneumothorax and/or pneumomediastinum was noted when chest radiographs or CT scans were performed. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who developed air leak were recorded. RESULTS: 4,906 patients with COVID-19 were admitted, with 1,324 (27%) having severe COVID-19 disease. The overall incidence of pneumothorax and/or pneumomediastinum in patients with severe disease was 3.2% (42/1,324). Eighteen patients had pneumothorax, 16 had pneumomediastinum and 8 patients had both. Fourteen patients (33.3%) developed this complication breathing spontaneously, 28 patients (66.6%) developed it during mechanical ventilation. Overall mortality in this cohort was 74%, compared with 17% in the COVID-19 patients without pneumothorax (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that air leaks occur with a higher frequency in patients with COVID-19 than in other ICU patients. When present, such air leaks contributed to poor outcomes with almost 74% mortality rates in these patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Pneumothorax , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Mediastinal Emphysema/diagnostic imaging , Mediastinal Emphysema/epidemiology , Pneumothorax/diagnostic imaging , Pneumothorax/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
14.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ; 34(6): 1031-1037, 2022 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1545947

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to establish risk factors for primary spontaneous pneumomediastinum associated with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and reveal those which are significant. METHODS: The study included 62 patients with primary spontaneous pneumomediastinum who presented to our hospital between 11 March 2020, the date of the first-reported COVID-19 case in our country, and 3 January 2021. Of these, 14 patients (22.6%) had COVID-19 and 48 patients (77.4%) did not have COVID-19. RESULTS: Of the 62 patients included in the study, 41 (66.1%) were male and 21 (33.9%) were female. The mean age was 28.90 ± 16.86 (range, 16-84) years. The most common symptom at admission was chest pain (54.8%). The mean age of the patients with COVID-19 was 39.35 ± 23.04 years and that of the patients without COVID-19 was 25.85 ± 13.45 years (P < 0.001). In receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, the area under the curve for age was 0.785 (95% confidence interval: 0.648-0.922) and the optimal cut-off value was 24 years for COVID-19-positive patients. The highest sensitivity and specificity values were 0.857 and 0.729. Twelve (85.79%) of the COVID-19-positive primary spontaneous pneumomediastinum patients were aged 24 years or older (P < 0.001). Five patients (8.1%) had positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 polymerase chain reaction test but no abnormal findings on computed tomography. CONCLUSIONS: Having an age of more than 24 years was associated with a higher prevalence of pneumomediastinum in COVID-19 patients and emerged as an important risk factor. Multicentre studies with more cases are needed to determine whether pneumomediastinum is associated with additional other risk factors related to COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Adolescent , Adult , COVID-19/complications , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Mediastinal Emphysema/diagnostic imaging , Mediastinal Emphysema/epidemiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Young Adult
15.
Clinics (Sao Paulo) ; 76: e2959, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1502736

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the presentation characteristics and disease course of seven patients with COVID-19 who spontaneously developed pneumomediastinum without a history of mechanical ventilation. METHODS: A total of seven non-intubated patients with COVID-19, of age ranging from 18-67 years, who developed spontaneous pneumomediastinum between 01 April and 01 October 2020 were included in the study. Patients' demographic data, clinical variables, and laboratory values were examined. Spontaneous pneumomediastinum was evaluated using posteroanterior chest radiography and thorax computed tomography. RESULTS: During the research period, 38,492 patients reported to the emergency department of our hospital with COVID-19 symptoms. Of these, spontaneous pneumomediastinum was detected in seven patients who had no previous history of intubation. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (2/7) and asthma bronchiale (2/7) were determined as the most common causes of comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the frequency of spontaneous pneumomediastinum developing without pneumothorax was found to be high in non-intubated patients. Whether this is related to the nature of the disease or it is a result of the increase in cases diagnosed incidentally owing to the increasing use of low-dose computed tomography should be explored in further studies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Subcutaneous Emphysema , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Humans , Incidence , Mediastinal Emphysema/diagnostic imaging , Mediastinal Emphysema/epidemiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Young Adult
17.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ; 34(2): 236-244, 2022 01 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1447595

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The incidence of pneumomediastinum (PNMD), its causes of development and its effect on prognosis in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are not clear. METHODS: Between March 2020 and December 2020, 427 patients with real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction-confirmed COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit were analysed retrospectively. Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) for initial invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) variables such as initial peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), PaO2/FiO2 (P/F ratio), tidal volume, compliance and positive end-expiratory pressure was evaluated regarding PNMD development. RESULTS: The incidence of PNMD was 5.6% (n = 24). PNMD development rate was 2.7% in non-invasive MV and 6.2% in MV [odds ratio (OR) 2.352, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.541-10.232; P = 0.400]. In the multivariate analysis, the independent risk factors affecting the development of PNMD were PIP (OR 1.238, 95% CI 1.091-1.378; P < 0.001) and P/F ratio (OR 0.982, 95% CI 0.971-0.994; P = 0.004). P/F ratio (AUC 0.815, 95% CI 0.771-0.854), PIP (AUC 0.780, 95% CI 0.734-0.822), compliance (AUC 0.735, 95% CI 0.677-0.774) and positive end-expiratory pressure (AUC 0.718, 95% CI 0.668-0.764) were the best predictors for PNMD development. Regarding the multivariate analysis, independent risk factors affecting mortality were detected as age (OR 1.015, 95% CI 0.999-1.031; P = 0.04), comorbidity (OR 1.940, 95% CI 1.100-3.419; P = 0.02), mode of breathing (OR 48.345, 95% CI 14.666-159.360; P < 0.001), PNMD (OR 5.234, 95% CI 1.379-19.857; P = 0.01), positive end-expiratory pressure (OR 1.305, 95% CI 1.062-1.603; P = 0.01) and tidal volume (OR 0.995, 95% CI 0.992-0.998; P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: PNMD development was associated with the initial P/F ratio and PIP. Therefore, it was considered to be related to both the patient and barotrauma. PNMD is a poor prognostic factor for COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Humans , Incidence , Intensive Care Units , Mediastinal Emphysema/diagnosis , Mediastinal Emphysema/epidemiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/therapy , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
18.
J Intensive Care Med ; 37(1): 12-20, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1405276

ABSTRACT

Background: Since the beginning of the ongoing Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, pneumomediastinum has been reported in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome. It has been suggested that pneumomediastinum may portend a worse outcome in such patients although no investigation has established this association definitively. Research Question: We hypothesized that the finding of pneumomediastinum in the setting of COVID-19 disease may be associated with a worse clinical outcome. The purpose of this study was to determine if the presence of pneumomediastinum was predictive of increased mortality in patients with COVID-19. Study Design and Methods: A retrospective case-control study utilizing clinical data and imaging for COVID-19 patients seen at our institution from 3/7/2020 to 5/20/2020 was performed. 87 COVID-19 positive patients with pneumomediastinum were compared to 87 COVID-19 positive patients without pneumomediastinum and to a historical group of patients with pneumomediastinum during the same time frame in 2019. Results: The incidence of pneumomediastinum was increased more than 6-fold during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to 2019 (P = <.001). 1.5% of all COVID-19 patients and 11% of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients at our institution developed pneumomediastinum. Patients who developed pneumomediastinum had a significantly higher PEEP and lower P/F ratio than those who did not (P = .002 and .033, respectively). Pneumomediastinum was not found to be associated with increased mortality (P = .16, confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-2.09, 1.37). The presence of concurrent pneumothorax at the time of pneumomediastinum diagnosis was associated with increased mortality (P = .013 CI: 1.15-3.17, 1.91). Conclusion: Pneumomediastinum is not independently associated with a worse clinical prognosis in COVID-19 positive patients. The presence of concurrent pneumothorax was associated with increased mortality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Mediastinal Emphysema/diagnostic imaging , Mediastinal Emphysema/epidemiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
19.
Epidemiol Infect ; 149: e137, 2021 06 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1260912

ABSTRACT

The novel coronavirus identified as severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 causes acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Our aim in this study is to assess the incidence of life-threatening complications like pneumothorax, haemothorax, pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema, probable risk factors and effect on mortality in coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) ARDS patients treated with mechanical ventilation (MV). Data from 96 adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit with COVID-19 ARDS diagnosis from 11 March to 31 July 2020 were retrospectively assessed. A total of 75 patients abiding by the study criteria were divided into two groups as the group developing ventilator-related barotrauma (BG) (N = 10) and the group not developing ventilator-related barotrauma (NBG) (N = 65). In 10 patients (13%), barotrauma findings occurred 22 ± 3.6 days after the onset of symptoms. The mortality rate was 40% in the BG-group, while it was 29% in the NBG-group with no statistical difference identified. The BG-group had longer intensive care admission duration, duration of time in prone position and total MV duration, with higher max positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels and lower min pO2/FiO2 levels. The peak lactate dehydrogenase levels in blood were higher by statistically significant level in the BG-group (P < 0.05). The contribution of MV to alveolar injury caused by infection in COVID-19 ARDS patients may cause more frequent barotrauma compared to classic ARDS and this situation significantly increases the MV and intensive care admission durations of patients. In terms of reducing mortality and morbidity in these patients, MV treatment should be carefully maintained within the framework of lung-protective strategies and the studies researching barotrauma pathophysiology should be increased.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Hemothorax/etiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , Pneumothorax/etiology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/complications , Subcutaneous Emphysema/etiology , Adult , Aged , Barotrauma/epidemiology , Barotrauma/etiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Female , Hemothorax/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Lung Injury/epidemiology , Lung Injury/etiology , Male , Mediastinal Emphysema/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Pneumothorax/epidemiology , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/epidemiology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Subcutaneous Emphysema/epidemiology
20.
Respir Investig ; 59(5): 661-665, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1253540

ABSTRACT

In this study, we compared the incidence of pneumomediastinum in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients during the ascending phases of the 1st and 2nd epidemic waves. Crude incidence was higher during the 2nd wave at a quasi-significant level (0.68/1000 vs. 2.05/1000 patient-days, p = 0.05). When restricting the analysis to patients who developed pneumomediastinum during noninvasive ventilation, the difference became clearly significant (0.17/1000 vs 1.36/1000 patient-days, p = 0.039). At logistic regression, predisposing factors (p = 0.031), and COVID-19 radiological severity (p = 0.019) were independently associated with pneumomediastinum. Mortality in patients with pneumomediastinum was 87.5%. However, pneumomediastinum seemed to be related to a generally worse disease presentation in hospitalized patients during the 2nd wave, rather than to a separate pattern of disease.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , COVID-19/complications , Humans , Incidence , Mediastinal Emphysema/diagnostic imaging , Mediastinal Emphysema/epidemiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , Pneumothorax , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL