A systematic review and meta-analysis of glucocorticoids treatment in severe COVID-19: methylprednisolone versus dexamethasone.

OBJECTIVE: The preferred agent of glucocorticoids in the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19 is still controversial. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone and dexamethasone in the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19. METHODS: By searching the electronic literature database including PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science, the clinical studies comparing methylprednisolone and dexamethasone in the treatment of severe COVID-19 were selected according to the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria. Relevant data were extracted and literature quality was assessed. The primary outcome was short-term mortality. The secondary outcomes were the rates of ICU admission and mechanical ventilation, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, hospital stay, and the incidence of severe adverse events. Statistical pooling applied the fixed or random effects model and reported as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.1.0. RESULTS: Twelve clinical studies were eligible, including three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nine non-RCTs. A total of 2506 patients with COVID-19 were analyzed, of which 1242 (49.6%) received methylprednisolone and 1264 (50.4%) received dexamethasone treatment. In general, the heterogeneity across studies was significant, and the equivalent doses of methylprednisolone were higher than that of dexamethasone. Our meta-analysis showed that methylprednisolone treatment in severe COVID-19 patients was related to significantly reduced plasma ferritin and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio compared with dexamethasone, and that no significant difference in other clinical outcomes between the two groups was found. However, subgroup analyses of RCTs demonstrated that methylprednisolone treatment was associated with reduced short-term mortality, and decreased CRP level compared with dexamethasone. Moreover, subgroup analyses observed that severe COVID-19 patients treated with a moderate dose (2 mg/kg/day) of methylprednisolone were related to a better prognosis than those treated with dexamethasone. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that compared with dexamethasone, methylprednisolone could reduce the systemic inflammatory response in severe COVID-19, and its effect was equivalent to that of dexamethasone on other clinical outcomes. It should be noted that the equivalent dose of methylprednisolone used was higher. Based on the evidence of subgroup analyses of RCTs, methylprednisolone, preferably at a moderate dose, has an advantage over dexamethasone in the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19.

Successive onset of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome in father and son.

BACKGROUND: Vogt‒Koyanagi‒Harada (VKH) disease is a multifactorial systemic autoimmune disorder against melanocytes that is characterized by panuveitis. Familial occurrence of VKH disease is rare. Here, we report two cases of a father and his son with characteristic manifestations of VKH disease. CASE PRESENTATION: A 53-year-old male with typical clinical symptoms of VKH disease was referred to Tangshan Eye Hospital. Examination showed the presence of ciliochoroidal effusion and exudative retinal detachment in both eyes. The patient was given intravenous methylprednisolone 120 mg for 2 days and intravenous methylprednisolone 80 mg for 1 day followed by 48 mg (1 mg/kg/day) oral methylprednisolone daily, accompanied by oral azathioprine 50 mg daily. Cycloplegic agent (0.5% tropicamide three times daily [TID]) was added. The patient was free of symptoms and recurrence within more than 1-year-follow-up period, the best corrected visual acuity (BVCA) was increased and maintained in both eyes with complete resolution of subretinal fluid. One year and nine months later, case 2 (his son) also presented with the typical clinical symptoms of VKH disease at 29 years of age. The son also recovered from VKH disease after routine and standard treatment. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first VKH disease case report of a father-son relationship. Although genetic factors have been demonstrated to be involved in the pathogenesis of VKH disease, the different inheritance modes of VKH patients need to be further explored and studied.

Evaluation of steroid therapy in COVID-19 patients; in the right dose at the right time to the right patients.

Background: Although there is still no universally accepted treatment agent, steroids have been administered chronologically at every dose and at every stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. Aim: We aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of high-dose steroid therapy and its effect on mortality in COVID-19 patients with severe pneumonia, severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), and septic shock. Patients and Methods: : Patients with severe pneumonia, septic shock, and ARDS due to COVID-19 who were followed up in the intensive care unit were retrospectively reviewed. Results: The study population was divided into two groups; the methylprednisolone pulse group (MP) (n = 55) and the dexamethasone group (Dex) (n = 39). When the values before and after treatment were compared; there was a statistically significant increase in the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio after treatment in the MP group (p = 0.006). Although it was not statistically significant in the MP group, There was a numerical increase in D-dimer levels (p = 0.28). Thromboembolic complications developed in 2 patients in the MP group. The mortality outcomes of the groups were statistically similar (p = 0.943). Conclusion: We recommend steroids use in the condition that it is indicated in the critically ill group with the poor general condition. Since there is no significant difference between high-dose pulse steroid treatment and standard treatment doses, we think that the risk of complications should not be taken into account and high doses should not be used.

Transverse Myelitis as a Rare Neurological Complication of Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Case Report and Literature Review.

The novel Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is primarily a respiratory virus. However, an increasing number of neurologic complications associated with this virus have been reported, e.g., transverse myelitis (TM). We report a case of a 39-year-old man admitted to Namazi Hospital affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. In December 2020, the patient was infected with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). During hospitalization, the patient suffered from sudden onset of paraplegia, and urinary retention, and had a T6-T7 sensory level. TM was diagnosed and an extensive workup was performed to rule out other etiologies. Eventually, para-infectious TM associated with COVID-19 was concluded. The patient received pulse methylprednisolone therapy of 1 g/day for 10 consecutive days followed by seven sessions of plasma exchange without a favorable response. The patient then underwent regular physical rehabilitation and tapering oral administration of prednisolone 1 mg/Kg. As a result, weakness in the lower extremities improved slightly after six months. Overall, we suspect a correlation between COVID-19 and TM, however, further studies are required to substantiate the association.

Case report: Electrocardiographic changes in pembrolizumab-induced fatal myocarditis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced myocarditis is rare but fatal. Because of the rapid course of ICI-induced myocarditis, understanding of clinical course is only possible through information from case reports. We report a case of pembrolizumab-induced myocarditis in which we were able to document the course of electrocardiographic changes from onset to death. A 58-year-old woman with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma, who had completed her first cycle of pembrolizumab, carboplatin, and pemetrexed, was admitted with pericardial effusion. She underwent pericardiocentesis after admission. A second cycle of chemotherapy was administered 3 weeks after the first cycle. Twenty-two days after admission, she developed a mild sore throat and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 antigen. She was diagnosed with mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), isolated, and treated with sotrovimab. Thirty-two days after admission, an electrocardiogram showed monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT). Suspecting myocarditis caused by pembrolizumab, the patient was started on daily methylprednisolone after coronary angiography and endocardial biopsy. Eight days after the start of methylprednisolone administration, she was considered to have passed the acute stage. However, four days later, R-on-T phenomenon triggered polymorphic VT and she died. The impact of viral infections such as COVID-19 on patients be treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors is still unknown and we need to be careful with systemic management after viral infections.

Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis following COVID-19 in an Adolescent.

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is a systemic disease that causes vasculitis in various organs. Although the mechanism of pathogenesis remains unclear, infection has been reported to be a causative factor. We herein report a case of GPA that developed following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in an adolescent girl. One month after contracting mild COVID-19, the patient had facial allodynia, a fever, and weight loss and was admitted for multiple nodular shadows on a chest roentgenogram. GPA was diagnosed based on pathological findings of the lung and nasal mucosal biopsies. She received methylprednisolone and rituximab, and her symptoms and radiological findings improved.

Anti-myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-positive Myelitis after Coronavirus Disease 2019.

We herein report a case of anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody-related myelitis caused by coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection in 2021. A 22-year-old man with no history of any related illness contracted COVID-19. Eight days later, he developed bladder problems, paraplegia and sensory disturbances. Cervical spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging revealed extensive hyperintensity at T2 and spinal cord lesions extending from C4 to Th1. The patient was diagnosed with transverse myelitis and started on intravenous methylprednisolone, plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. The symptoms improved only after intravenous methylprednisolone therapy. Anti-MOG antibodies were found in his serum and cerebrospinal fluid during routine screening. As this observation is unusual and could cause serious health problems, we wonder if COVID-19 triggered this autoimmune response.

Drug-induced liver injury in COVID-19 patients during hospitalization.

Since coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreaks in December 2019 in Wuhan, almost no studies have systematically described drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in COVID-19 patients. This study aimed to assess the characteristics of liver test abnormality or liver injury in patients with COVID-19, and further to explore DILI in COVID-19 patients during hospitalization. It was a single-center retrospective analysis of confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infected patients in the hospital from January 2020 to March 2020. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to assess the risk factors associated with liver test abnormality or liver injury. At admission, 148 (48.8%, 148/303) patients had abnormal liver test results and 7 (2.4%, 7/303) had liver injury, while 195 (64.4%, 195/303) had abnormal liver test results and 17 (5.6%, 17/303) had liver injury during hospitalization. After excluding these patients with liver disease and liver function abnormalities or liver injury at admission, 15 (11.1%, 15/135) patients developed DILI during hospitalization. Further regression analysis indicated that methylprednisolone (odds ratio = 4.177, 95% confidence interval [1.106-15.771], P = .035), but not Chinese herbal medicine or other used drug, was associated with DILI in patients during hospitalization. Abnormal liver function results were in more than half of patients with COVID-19, and the incidence of DILI in COVID-19 patients was 11.1% during hospitalization. Liver test abnormality or liver injury in patients might be directly caused by the viral infection at admission, but the detrimental effects on liver injury mainly related to certain medications used during hospitalization, particularly methylprednisolone. Severe COVID-19 could increase the occurrence of liver injury (P = .007) during hospitalization, but not a risk factor of liver injury. However, Chinese herbal medicine was a protective factor for liver injury.

Ruxolitinib and methylprednisolone for treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Although Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy for treating autoimmune disorders and myeloproliferative neoplasms, their efficacy in treating other types of cancer has not been clearly demonstrated. We evaluated oral ruxolitinib (15 mg twice daily) with oral methylprednisolone (40 mg every other day) for multiple myeloma (MM) patients with progressive disease who had received a proteasome inhibitor, lenalidomide, glucocorticosteroids and three or more prior regimens. All of the planned 29 patients had been enrolled with follow-up until 28 April 2022. Median lines of prior therapy were 6 (range 3-12). Cytogenetics and fluorescent in situ hybridization were evaluable in 28 patients; 9 (32%) and 17 (70%) patients showed high-risk cytogenetics and/or 1q+, respectively. The overall response rate was 31%. The median duration of response was 13.1 (range 2.8-22.0) months. Median progression-free survival rate was 3.4 (range 0.5-24.6) months, Overall, the treatment was well tolerated. The combination of ruxolitinib and methylprednisolone demonstrated significant clinical activity among previously heavily-treated MM patients, and responses were achieved among patients who had high-risk cytogenetics. This is the first clinical study to show activity of JAK inhibitors in combination with steroids for MM patients and expands the potential use of these drugs to those with cancers other than myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Corticosteroids: A boon or bane for COVID-19 patients?

Several drugs and antibodies have been repurposed to treat COVID-19. Since the outcome of the drugs and antibodies clinical studies have been mostly inconclusive or with lesser effects, therefore the need for alternative treatments has become unavoidable. However, corticosteroids, which have a history of therapeutic efficacy against coronaviruses (SARS and MERS), might emerge into one of the pandemic's heroic characters. Corticosteroids serve an immunomodulatory function in the post-viral hyper-inflammatory condition (the cytokine storm, or release syndrome), suppressing the excessive immunological response and preventing multi-organ failure and death. Therefore, corticosteroids have been used to treat COVID-19 patients for more than last two years. According to recent clinical trials and the results of observational studies, corticosteroids can be administered to patients with severe and critical COVID-19 symptoms with a favorable risk-benefit ratio. Corticosteroids like Hydrocortisone, dexamethasone, Prednisolone and Methylprednisolone has been reported to be effective against SARS-CoV-2 virus in comparison to that of non-steroid drugs, by using non-genomic and genomic effects to prevent and reduce inflammation in tissues and the circulation. Clinical trials also show that inhaled budesonide (a synthetic corticosteroid) increases time to recovery and has the potential to reduce hospitalizations or fatalities in persons with COVID-19. There is also a brief overview of the industrial preparation of common glucocorticoids.

Intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy and the risk of in-hospital mortality among acute COVID-19 patients: Nationwide clinical cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Steroids are widely used to modulate the inflammatory reactions associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, the optimal upper limit dose of steroid use for acute COVID-19 care remains unclear and currently available data may suffer from a time-dependent bias of no effectiveness or reversed causation given the desperate situation of treatment during this pandemic. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to elucidate the impact of intravenous pulse therapy with methylprednisolone (500 mg or greater per day) on the risk of in-hospital mortality among patients with COVID-19 by controlling for time-dependent bias. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study with 67,348 hospitalised acute COVID-19 patients at 438 hospitals during 2020-2021 in Japan. The impact of intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy on the risk of in-hospital mortality was examined based on hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), with stratification according to the status of invasive mechanical ventilation (iMV). Time-dependent bias was controlled for in a marginal structural model analysis, with reference to patients without methylprednisolone therapy. RESULTS: During the study period, 2400 patients died. In-hospital mortality rates of iMV-free patients without or with methylprednisolone pulse therapy were 2.3% and 19.5%, and the corresponding values for iMV-receiving patients were 24.7% and 28.6%, respectively. The marginal structural model analysis showed that intravenous pulse therapy with methylprednisolone was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality among patients receiving-iMV (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.52-0.68). In contrast, pulse therapy with methylprednisolone increased the risk of in-hospital mortality among iMV-free patients (HR 3.38; 95% CI 3.02-3.79). The benefits of pulse therapy for iMV-receiving patients were greater than in those treated with intermediate/higher doses (40-250 mg intravenously) of methylprednisolone (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.71-0.89). CONCLUSION: The results of our study suggest that intravenous methylprednisolone showed dose-response efficiencies, and pulse therapy may benefit critically ill patients with acute COVID-19, such as those requiring iMV.

Methylprednisolone versus intravenous immunoglobulins in children with paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2 (PIMS-TS): an open-label, multicentre, randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: The emergence of paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2 (PIMS-TS) led to the widespread use of anti-inflammatory treatments in the absence of evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We aimed to assess the effectiveness of intravenous methylprednisolone compared with intravenous immunoglobulins. METHODS: This is an open-label, multicentre, two-arm RCT done at ten hospitals in Switzerland in children younger than 18 years hospitalised with PIMS-TS (defined as age <18 years; fever and biochemical evidence of inflammation, and single or multiorgan dysfunction; microbiologically proven or putative contact with SARS-CoV-2; and exclusion of any other probable disease). Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to intravenous methylprednisolone (10 mg/kg per day for 3 days) or intravenous immunoglobulins (2 g/kg as a single dose). The primary outcome was length of hospital stay censored at day 28, death, or discharge. Secondary outcomes included proportion and duration of organ support. Analyses were done by intention-to-treat. The study was registered with Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal (SNCTP000004720) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04826588). FINDINGS: Between May 21, 2021, and April 15, 2022, 75 patients with a median age of 9·1 years (IQR 6·2-12·2) were included in the intention-to-treat population (37 in the methylprednisolone group and 38 in the intravenous immunoglobulins group). The median length of hospital stay was 6·0 days (IQR 4·0-8·0) in the methylprednisolone group and 6·0 days (IQR 5·0-8·8) in the intravenous immunoglobulins group (estimated effect size -0·037 of the log10 transformed times, 95% CI -0·13 to 0·065, p=0·42). Fewer patients in the methylprednisolone group (ten [27%] of 37) required respiratory support compared with the intravenous immunoglobulin group (21 [55%] of 38, p=0·025). Need and duration of inotropes, admission to intensive care units, cardiac events after baseline, and major bleeding and thrombotic events were not significantly different between the study groups. INTERPRETATION: In this RCT, treatment with methylprednisolone in children with PIMS-TS did not significantly affect the length of hospital stay compared with intravenous immunoglobulins. Intravenous methylprednisolone could be an acceptable first-line treatment in children with PIMS-TS. FUNDING: NOMIS Foundation, Vontobel Foundation, and Gaydoul Foundation.

A case of antisynthetase syndrome presenting solely with life-threatening interstitial lung disease.

A previously fit and well 38-year-old man presented during the COVID-19 pandemic with dyspnoea, cough and palpitations. C-reactive protein was elevated and chest X-ray demonstrated bilateral lower zone consolidation. SARS CoV-2 swab was negative. He was diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia and treated with oral antibiotics. He developed severe type 1 respiratory failure and was admitted to the high-dependency unit for non-invasive ventilation. CTPA was negative for pulmonary embolism, instead demonstrating bilateral organising pneumonia. Empirical treatment for swab-negative COVID-19 pneumonitis was started; however, further deterioration ensued and prompted intubation and ventilation. Microbiological testing did not yield any positive results, thereby raising suspicion for the presence of an autoimmune disease. Pulsed intravenous methylprednisolone was administered with good effect. ENA screen was positive for anti-Jo1 and myositis-specific autoantibodies were positive for Ro-52, Ku and PL-12. The patient was extubated and did not exhibit any muscle weakness on clinical examination. Creatine kinase was only mildly elevated. He was diagnosed with amyopathic antisynthetase syndrome - frequently considered as a form of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) - and treated with further intravenous methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide. Oxygen therapy was gradually weaned and the patient discharged on mycophenolate mofetil and a weaning course of oral steroids.

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated optic neuritis in a COVID-19 patient: A case report.

RATIONALE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread worldwide. It involves multiple organs of infected individuals and encompasses diverse clinical manifestations. We report a case of acute optic neuritis (ON) associated with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody possibly induced by COVID-19. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 47-year-old man presented to our clinic with left eye pain and vision loss. Magnetic resonance imaging of the orbit revealed the bilateral high intensity of the optic nerve sheaths. He tested positive for COVID-19 by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing on the day of admission but he had no signs of respiratory illness. Laboratory testing revealed that MOG immunoglobulin G (MOG IgG) was positive, but other antibodies including aquaporin-4 were negative. DIAGNOSIS: The patient was diagnosed with MOG antibody-positive acute ON possibly induced by COVID-19. INTERVENTIONS: Steroid pulse therapy consisting of methylprednisolone 1 g/day for a total of 3 days, followed by an oral prednisolone taper was performed. OUTCOMES: His left eye pain was immediately relieved, and his decimal vision improved from 0.03 to 0.1 on the day of discharge. Outpatient follow-up 2 weeks later revealed left a decimal vision of 1.2, and a complete resolution of the left eye pain. LESSONS: Our case indicated that COVID-19 might trigger an autoimmune response that leads to MOG antibody-associated ON, similar to other pathogens that were reported in the past. The treatment response to steroid pulse therapy was preferable following a typical course of MOG antibody-positive ON.

Fatal multisystem inflammatory syndrome in a 78-year-old adult after severe COVID-19 pneumonia during 2022 Omicron variant epidemic in Shanghai, China.

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome adult type (MIS-A) is a rare type of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome which more frequently occurred in younger population. Here we present a 78-year-old Chinese female, the oldest case reported, diagnosed with MIS-A who had severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. She was diagnosed with severe COVID-19 and experienced an unexpected sudden hemodynamic collapse in the recovery period within three weeks. Her platelet count was sharply dropped, accompanied with sustained cardiac, kidney and liver injury. She was diagnosed with MIS-A according to criteria established by Center of Disease Control and Prevention. Though her condition was improved under administrating with high dose of methylprednisolone and intravenous immunoglobulin, methylprednisolone was unable to withdraw till two weeks as her partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspiration oxygen ratio and platelet count dropped on the heels of decreasing dosage. Unfortunately, the patient's condition gradually deteriorated with the development of severe nosocomial pneumonia. We presented this rare case in order to emphasize that MIS-A could occur in the elderly and the management of this population might be more difficult as the condition of the elderly with SARS-CoV-2 infection and MIS-A might be more severe.

Comparison of the efficacy of equivalent doses of dexamethasone, methylprednisolone, and hydrocortisone for treatment of COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective three-arm randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: This prospective controlled clinical trial aimed to compare the efficacy of methylprednisolone, dexamethasone, and hydrocortisone at equivalent doses in patients with severe COVID-19. METHODS: In total, 106 patients with mild to moderate COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) were randomized to receive either dexamethasone (6 mg once a day), methylprednisolone (16 mg twice a day), or hydrocortisone (50 mg thrice a day) for up to 10 days. All participants received a standard of care for COVID-19. The primary and secondary efficacy outcomes included all-cause 28-day mortality, clinical status on day 28 assessed using the World Health Organization (WHO) eight-category ordinal clinical scale, number of patients requiring mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit (ICU) care, number of ventilator-free days, length of hospital and ICU stay, change in PaO2:FiO2 ratios during the first 5 days after treatment, and incidence of serious adverse events. P-values below 0.008 based on Bonferroni's multiple-testing correction method were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: According to the obtained results, there was a trend toward more favorable clinical outcomes in terms of needing mechanical ventilation and ICU care, number of ventilator-free days, change in PaO2:FiO2 ratios during the first 5 days after treatment, clinical status score at day 28, length of ICU and hospital stay, and overall 28-day mortality in patients receiving dexamethasone compared to those receiving methylprednisolone or hydrocortisone; however, likely due to the study's small sample size, the difference between groups reached a significant level only in the case of clinical status score on day 28 (p-value = 0.003). There was no significant difference in the incidence of serious adverse events between the study groups. CONCLUSION: Based on the results, severe cases of COVID-19 treated with dexamethasone might have a better clinical status at 28-day follow-up compared to methylprednisolone and hydrocortisone at an equivalent dose. Larger multicenter trials are required to confirm our findings.