ABSTRACT
With the appearance of SARS-CoV-2, the range of infections, considered the most common cause of death for people with multiple myeloma, has expanded. Although the omicron variant (PANGO B.1.1.529) of SARS-CoV-2, that dominates the world at the time of manuscript writing, is less likely to cause fatal infection in immunocompetent patients compared to the delta variant (PANGO B.1.617.2), its transmissibility did not decrease. The likelihood of a severe or critical course of COVID-19 in patients with multiple myeloma is increased by the humoral and cellular immunosuppression caused by the malignancy itself, its targeted hematological treatment, and other comorbidities associated with the disease (e.g., chronic kidney failure). Antiviral therapies, monoclonal antibody preparations used as pre- or post-exposure prophylaxis, and possibly convalescent plasma therapy, started as early as possible might prevent the clinical progression of COVID-19. While the incidence of community-acquired co-infections accompanying COVID-19 in the average population is not exceptionally high, in people with multiple myeloma, Streptococcus pneumoniae infection that follows respiratory viral diseases is approximately 150 times more likely to cause invasive disease. As a result of modern oncohematological treatment, multiple myeloma has now become a chronic disease accompanied by relapses, and those affected should be immunized against the above two pathogens. In our manuscript, we describe the case of an adult patient with severe COVID-19 complicated by cytokine storm and invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae infection who was diagnosed with de novo multiple myeloma during hospital care, and, finally, we briefly review the related literature data. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(20): 763-769.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Multiple Myeloma , Pneumococcal Infections , Adult , Humans , COVID-19/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Cytokine Release Syndrome/etiology , COVID-19 Serotherapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , RainSubject(s)
Multiple Myeloma , von Willebrand Diseases , Humans , von Willebrand Factor , Factor VIIIABSTRACT
Background: To evaluate the benefits of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in cancer patients it is relevant to understand the adaptive immune response elicited after vaccination. Patients affected by hematologic malignancies are frequently immune-compromised and show a decreased seroconversion rate compared to other cancer patients or controls. Therefore, vaccine-induced cellular immune responses in these patients might have an important protective role and need a detailed evaluation. Methods: Certain T cell subtypes (CD4, CD8, Tfh, γδT), including cell functionality as indicated by cytokine secretion (IFN, TNF) and expression of activation markers (CD69, CD154) were assessed via multi-parameter flow cytometry in hematologic malignancy patients (N=12) and healthy controls (N=12) after a second SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dose. The PBMC of post-vaccination samples were stimulated with a spike-peptide pool (S-Peptides) of SARS-CoV-2, with CD3/CD28, with a pool of peptides from the cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus and influenza A virus (CEF-Peptides) or left unstimulated. Furthermore, the concentration of spike-specific antibodies has been analyzed in patients. Results: Our results indicate that hematologic malignancy patients developed a robust cellular immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination comparable to that of healthy controls, and for certain T cell subtypes even higher. The most reactive T cells to SARS-CoV-2 spike peptides belonged to the CD4 and Tfh cell compartment, being median (IQR), 3.39 (1.41-5.92) and 2.12 (0.55-4.14) as a percentage of IFN- and TNF-producing Tfh cells in patients. In this regard, the immunomodulatory treatment of patients before the vaccination period seems important as it was strongly associated with a higher percentage of activated CD4 and Tfh cells. SARS-CoV-2- and CEF-specific T cell responses significantly correlated with each other. Compared to lymphoma patients, myeloma patients had an increased percentage of SARS-CoV-2-specific Tfh cells. T-SNE analysis revealed higher frequencies of γδT cells in patients compared to controls, especially in myeloma patients. In general, after vaccination, SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells were also detectable in patients without seroconversion. Conclusion: Hematologic malignancy patients are capable of developing a SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4 and Tfh cellular immune response after vaccination, and certain immunomodulatory therapies in the period before vaccination might increase the antigen-specific immune response. A proper response to recall antigens (e.g., CEF-Peptides) reflects immune cellular functionality and might be predictive for generating a newly induced antigen-specific immune response as is expected after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections , Hematologic Neoplasms , Multiple Myeloma , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines , SARS-CoV-2 , Leukocytes, Mononuclear , COVID-19/prevention & control , Herpesvirus 4, Human , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , VaccinationABSTRACT
CAR T-cells have revolutionized the treatment of many hematological malignancies. Thousands of patients with lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and multiple myeloma have received this "living medicine" and achieved durable remissions. Their place in therapy continues to evolve, and there is ongoing development of new generation CAR constructs, CAR T-cells against solid tumors and CAR T-cells against chronic infections like human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B. A significant fraction of CAR T-cell recipients, unfortunately, develop infections. This is in part due to factors intrinsic to the patient, but also to the treatment, which requires lymphodepletion (LD), causes neutropenia and hypogammaglobulinemia and necessarily increases the state of immunosuppression of the patient. The goal of this review is to present the infectious complications of CAR T-cell therapy, explain their temporal course and risk factors, and provide recommendations for their prevention, diagnosis, and management.
Subject(s)
Hematologic Neoplasms , Multiple Myeloma , Receptors, Chimeric Antigen , Humans , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/adverse effects , T-Lymphocytes/pathology , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Multiple Myeloma/pathologyABSTRACT
SUMMARY: In patients with multiple myeloma, completion of mRNA-based vaccination schemes failed to yield detectable SARS-CoV-2 Omicron-neutralizing antibodies and S1-RBD-specific CD8+ T cells in approximately 60% and 80% of the cases, respectively. Patients who develop breakthrough infections exhibited very low levels of live-virus neutralizing antibodies and the absence of follicular T helper cells. See related article by Azeem et al., p. 106 (9). See related article by Chang et al., p. 1684 (10).
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematologic Neoplasms , Multiple Myeloma , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Breakthrough Infections , mRNA Vaccines , COVID-19/prevention & control , Antibodies, Neutralizing , CD8-Positive T-LymphocytesABSTRACT
Patients with active myeloma, especially with earlier stages of the disease, are susceptible to COVID-19 infection and can have adverse outcomes, even in those on first-line treatment. Importantly, myeloma therapy can be safely administered, and optimal control of myeloma is associated with improved outcome. See related video: https://vimeo.com/486246183/559a80cfae See related article by Hultcrantz et al., p. 234.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Multiple Myeloma , Humans , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Multiple myeloma (MM) and anti-MM therapy cause profound immunosuppression, leaving patients vulnerable to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and other infections. We investigated anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies longitudinally in ultra-high-risk patients with MM receiving risk-adapted, intensive anti-CD38 combined therapy in the Myeloma UK (MUK) nine trial. Despite continuous intensive therapy, seroconversion was achieved in all patients, but required a greater number of vaccinations compared to healthy individuals, highlighting the importance of booster vaccinations in this population. Reassuringly, high antibody cross-reactivity was found with current variants of concern, prior to Omicron subvariant adapted boostering. Multiple booster vaccine doses can provide effective protection from COVID-19, even with intensive anti-CD38 therapy for high-risk MM.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Multiple Myeloma , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Vaccination , Immunity , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Antibodies, ViralABSTRACT
COVID-19 adversely affects individuals with cancer. Several studies have found that seroconversion rates among patients with hematologic malignancies are suboptimal when compared to patients without cancer. Patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM) are immunocompromised due to impaired humoral and cellular immunity in addition to prescribed immunosuppressive therapy. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy is now widely used for NHL and MM, but little is known about seroconversion rates after COVID-19 vaccination among these populations. We evaluated SARS-CoV-2 spike-binding IgG antibody levels following COVID-19 vaccination among NHL and MM CAR T therapy recipients. Out of 104 CAR T infusions, 19 patients developed known COVID-19 infection post-CAR T. We tested 17 patients that received CAR T for antibody spike titers post COVID-19 vaccination, only 29 % (n = 5) were able to mount a clinically relevant antibody response (>250 IU/mL).
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin , Multiple Myeloma , Receptors, Chimeric Antigen , Humans , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Antibodies, Viral , Immunoglobulin GABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The use of virtual care rapidly increased during the COVID-19 pandemic and has persisted as a routine method of care delivery. Much of the literature on virtual care in oncology has focused on solid tumors, and little is known about its application in malignant hematology. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with hematologic malignancies at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre from October 2019 to March 2021 to determine the use of virtual care during this period, cost-savings associated with virtual visits, and patient satisfaction. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the Your Voice Matters survey, a provincially administered survey to evaluate patient experience. RESULTS: Overall, 12.1% (1,122/9,295) of patients had a virtual visit during the study period (0% from October 2019 to February 2020, 36% from March to August 2020, and 30% from September 2020 to March 2021), of which 36% were in the lymphoma clinic and 46% were in the myeloma clinic. The mean two-way opportunity cost for an in-person visit was $168.00 CAD per person with public transit, and $120.40 CAD per person driving. Responses to the Your Voice Matters survey indicated that patients with a virtual visit reported that physical symptoms were discussed appropriately (mean 4.73/5), and were more likely to ask for a follow-up virtual visit compared with patients with in-person visits (mean 4.50/5 v 3.02/5, respectively; P < .01). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that virtual care may be a feasible and well-received tool for delivering care to a substantial proportion of patients with hematologic malignancies, while enabling substantial cost-savings to patients.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematologic Neoplasms , Multiple Myeloma , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Multiple Myeloma/epidemiology , Multiple Myeloma/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) patients have variable responses to mRNA vaccination to COVID-19. Little is known regarding their vaccine-induced antibody levels over time. METHODS: We monitored spike IgG antibody levels over 24 weeks among a subset of 18 MM patients who showed a full response after two mRNA vaccinations. RESULTS: MM patients had a more rapid decline in antibody levels as compared to eight healthy controls, with power law half-lives of 72 days (vs. 107 days) and exponential half-lives of 37 days (vs. 51 days). The patients with longer SARS-CoV-2 antibody half-lives were more likely to have undetectable monoclonal protein than those with shorter half-lives, suggesting better disease control may correlate with longer duration of vaccine-induced antibodies. Regardless, by 16 weeks post-second dose of mRNA vaccination, the majority of patients had antibody levels below 250 binding arbitrary units per milliliter, which would be unlikely to contribute to preventing COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, even MM patients who respond adequately to vaccination are likely to require more frequent booster doses than the general population.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Multiple Myeloma , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination , RNA, MessengerABSTRACT
In patients with multiple myeloma (MM), SARS-CoV-2 infection has been associated with a severe clinical course and high mortality rates due to the concomitant disease- and treatment-related immunosuppression. Specific antiviral treatment involves viral replication control with monoclonal antibodies and antivirals, including molnupiravir and the ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir. This prospective study investigated the effect of these two agents on SARS-CoV-2 infection severity and mortality in patients with MM. Patients received either ritonavir-nirmatrelvir or molnupiravir. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as levels of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), were compared. A total of 139 patients was treated with ritonavir-nirmatrelvir while the remaining 30 patients were treated with molnupiravir. In total, 149 patients (88.2%) had a mild infection, 15 (8.9%) had a moderate infection, and five (3%) had severe COVID-19. No differences in the severity of COVID-19-related outcomes were observed between the two antivirals. Patients with severe disease had lower neutralizing antibody levels before the COVID-19 infection compared to patients with mild disease (p = 0.04). Regarding treatment, it was observed that patients receiving belantamab mafodotin had a higher risk of severe COVID-19 (p < 0.001) in the univariate analysis. In conclusion, ritonavir-nirmatrelvir and molnupiravirmay prevent severe disease in MM patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. This prospective study indicated the comparable effects of the two treatment options, providing an insight for further research in preventing severe COVID-19 in patients with hematologic malignancies.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Multiple Myeloma , Humans , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Ritonavir/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , SARS-CoV-2 , Antibodies, NeutralizingABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 has profound effects on patients with multiple myeloma (MM) mainly due to underlying immune dysfunction and associated therapies leading to increased susceptibility to infections. The overall risk of morbidity and mortality (M&M) in MM patients due to COVID-19 infection is unclear with various studies suggesting case fatality rate of 22% to 29%. Additionally, most of these studies did not stratify patients by their molecular risk profile. METHODS: Here, we aim to investigate the effects of COVID-19 infection with associated risk factors in MM patients and the effectiveness of newly implemented screening and treatment protocols on outcomes. After obtaining institutional review board approvals from each participating institution, we collected data from MM patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection from March 1, 2020, to October 30, 2020, at 2 myeloma centers (Levine Cancer Institute & University of Kansas medical center). RESULTS: We identified a total of 162 MM patients who had COVID-19 infection. The majority of patients were males (57%) with a median age of 64 years. Most patients had an associated comorbid condition. Their myeloma disease status and prior autologous stem cell transplant at the time of infection had no impact on hospitalization or mortality. In univariate analysis, chronic kidney disease, hepatic dysfunction, diabetes, and hypertension were associated with an increased risk of hospitalization. In multivariate analysis regarding survival, increased age and lymphopenia were associated with increased COVID-19-related mortality. CONCLUSION: Our study supports the use of infection mitigation measures in all MM patients, and adjustment of treatment pathways in MM patients diagnosed with COVID-19.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Multiple Myeloma , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Female , COVID-19/complications , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Multiple Myeloma/epidemiology , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has had global healthcare impacts, including high mortality from SARS-CoV-2 infection in cancer patients; individuals with multiple myeloma (MM) are especially susceptible to poor outcomes. However, even for MM patients who avoided severe infection, the ramifications of the pandemic have been considerable. The consequences of necessary socio-geographical behavior adaptation, including prolonged shielding and interruptions in delivery of non-pandemic medical services are yet to be fully understood. Using a real-world dataset of 323 consecutive newly diagnosed MM patients in England, we investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on routes to myeloma diagnosis, disease stage at presentation and relevant clinical outcomes. We demonstrate increasing MM presentations via emergency services and increased rates of bony and extra-medullary disease. Differences were seen in choice of induction therapy and the proportion of eligible patients undertaking autologous stem cell transplantation. Whilst survival was statistically inferior for emergency presentations, significant survival differences have yet to be demonstrated for the entire cohort diagnosed during the pandemic, making extended follow-up critical in this group. This dataset highlights wide-ranging issues facing MM patients consequent of the COVID-19 pandemic, with full impacts for clinicians and policy-makers yet to be elucidated.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Multiple Myeloma , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Multiple Myeloma/epidemiology , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics , Delayed Diagnosis , Transplantation, Autologous , COVID-19 TestingABSTRACT
Although Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy for treating autoimmune disorders and myeloproliferative neoplasms, their efficacy in treating other types of cancer has not been clearly demonstrated. We evaluated oral ruxolitinib (15 mg twice daily) with oral methylprednisolone (40 mg every other day) for multiple myeloma (MM) patients with progressive disease who had received a proteasome inhibitor, lenalidomide, glucocorticosteroids and three or more prior regimens. All of the planned 29 patients had been enrolled with follow-up until 28 April 2022. Median lines of prior therapy were 6 (range 3-12). Cytogenetics and fluorescent in situ hybridization were evaluable in 28 patients; 9 (32%) and 17 (70%) patients showed high-risk cytogenetics and/or 1q+, respectively. The overall response rate was 31%. The median duration of response was 13.1 (range 2.8-22.0) months. Median progression-free survival rate was 3.4 (range 0.5-24.6) months, Overall, the treatment was well tolerated. The combination of ruxolitinib and methylprednisolone demonstrated significant clinical activity among previously heavily-treated MM patients, and responses were achieved among patients who had high-risk cytogenetics. This is the first clinical study to show activity of JAK inhibitors in combination with steroids for MM patients and expands the potential use of these drugs to those with cancers other than myeloproliferative neoplasms.
Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma , Humans , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Pyrimidines/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , DexamethasoneABSTRACT
Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) mount suboptimal neutralizing antibodies (nAb) following 2 doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. Currently, circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC) carry the risk of breakthrough infections. We evaluated immune recognition of current VOC including BA.1, BA.2, and BA.5 in 331 racially representative patients with MM following 2 or 3 doses of mRNA vaccines. The third dose increased nAbs against WA1 in 82%, but against BA variants in only 33% to 44% of patients. Vaccine-induced nAbs correlated with receptor-binding domain (RBD)-specific class-switched memory B cells. Vaccine-induced spike-specific T cells were detected in patients without seroconversion and cross-recognized variant-specific peptides but were predominantly CD4+ T cells. Detailed clinical/immunophenotypic analysis identified features correlating with nAb/B/T-cell responses. Patients who developed breakthrough infections following 3 vaccine doses had lower live-virus nAbs, including against VOC. Patients with MM remain susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 variants following 3 vaccine doses and should be prioritized for emerging approaches to elicit variant-nAb and CD8+ T cells. SIGNIFICANCE: Three doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines fail to yield detectable VOC nAbs in nearly 60% and spike-specific CD8+ T cells in >80% of myeloma patients. Patients who develop breakthrough infections following vaccination have low levels of live-virus nAb. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 101.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Multiple Myeloma , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Breakthrough Infections , COVID-19/prevention & control , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes , mRNA Vaccines , Antibodies, NeutralizingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND Numerous treatment options are available for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Because of the course of the disease, most patients will experience serial relapse or the MM will become refractory to most of these treatments, leaving patients with few or no treatment options over time. Selinexor, a treatment with a novel mechanism of action, is an oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound that blocks exportin 1, the major nuclear exporter of tumor suppressor proteins. CASE REPORT In this case series, we report on treatment with the weekly oral administration of selinexor combined with bortezomib and dexamethasone (XVd) in 3 patients from Argentina who were heavily treated (5-7 prior therapies) for MM that relapsed or was refractory to each previous treatment. Two patients had the high-risk cytogenetic abnormality del(17p). All 3 patients experienced efficacy with XVd reaching a best response of partial response or very good partial response. These responses were consistent with those of patients from the BOSTON study who were treated with XVd but were less heavily pretreated (1-3 prior therapies) and had a shorter median time since diagnosis of MM (7 years vs 3.7 years). The 3 patients experienced adverse events (AEs) that included nausea, thrombocytopenia, asthenia, and fatigue, which were similar to the most commonly reported AEs associated with selinexor treatment. CONCLUSIONS With its oral administration, novel mechanism of action, and responses in heavily pretreated patients, selinexor may help to address an important clinical need in the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory MM.
Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Argentina , Dexamethasone , Humans , Hydrazines , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , TriazolesABSTRACT
RATIONALE: Light-chain deposition disease (LCDD) is a rare condition characterized by the abnormal deposition of monoclonal light chains (LCs) in multiple organs, leading to progressive organ dysfunction. Herein, we report a case of plasma cell myeloma initially diagnosed as LCDD on liver biopsy performed for prominent cholestatic hepatitis. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 55-year-old Korean man complained of dyspepsia as the main symptom. On abdominal computed tomography performed at another hospital, the liver showed mildly decreased and heterogeneous attenuation with mild periportal edema. Preliminary liver function tests revealed abnormal results. The patient was treated for an unspecified liver disease; however, his jaundice gradually worsened, prompting him to visit our outpatient hepatology clinic for further evaluation. Magnetic resonance cholangiography revealed liver cirrhosis with severe hepatomegaly of unknown cause. A liver biopsy was performed for the diagnosis. Hematoxylin and eosin staining revealed diffuse extracellular amorphous deposits in perisinusoidal spaces with compressed hepatocytes. The deposits, which morphologically resembled amyloids, were not stained by Congo red but stained strongly positive for kappa LCs and weakly positive for lambda LCs. DIAGNOSES: Therefore, the patient was diagnosed with LCDD. Further systemic examination revealed a plasma cell myeloma. INTERVENTIONS: Fluorescence in situ hybridization, cytogenetics, and next-generation sequencing tested in bone marrow showed no abnormalities. The patient initially received bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone as the treatment regimen for plasma cell myeloma. OUTCOMES: However, he died shortly thereafter because of coronavirus disease 2019 complications. LESSONS: This case demonstrates that LCDD may present with sudden cholestatic hepatitis and hepatomegaly, and may be fatal if patients do not receive appropriate and timely treatment because of delayed diagnosis. Liver biopsy is useful for the diagnosis of patients with liver disease of unknown etiology.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Liver Diseases , Multiple Myeloma , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Hepatomegaly , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , COVID-19/complications , Liver Diseases/diagnosis , Liver Diseases/complications , Lenalidomide , Bortezomib/therapeutic use , Dexamethasone , BiopsyABSTRACT
Background Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at a higher risk of contracting COVID-19 due to their close contact with infected patients. However, the true burden of COVID-19 among HCWs in Yemen is unknown due to the inadequacy of the healthcare system and the subclinical nature of the disease. This study aims to estimate the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among HCWs in two Yemeni governorates and identify associated factors using a cross-sectional design.Method A total of 404 HCWs were surveyed from June 2022 to September 2022 in Lahj and AL-Dhalea hospitals. A self-administered questionnaire collected demographic data, COVID-19 infection history, and vaccination status. Sera were tested using a specific electrochemiluminescence immunoassay assay. Association analysis was conducted to identify associations between antibody prevalence and demographic and vaccine-related variables.Result The mean age of the HCWs was 33 ± 9.0 years, with 65.0% being male and 35.0% female. Of all HCWs surveyed, 94% were SARS-CoV-2 seropositive, and 72.0% had no confirmed test of COVID-19-related symptoms. There was no significant association between seropositivity and age, gender, occupation, or COVID-19 vaccination (P > 0.05).Conclusion The seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 was high among HCWs in Yemen, primarily due to natural infection rather than vaccination. Compliance with infection prevention and control measures did not significantly affect seropositivity. This study highlights the need for improved healthcare systems and resources to reduce the burden of COVID-19 among HCWs in Yemen.
Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma , Infections , COVID-19ABSTRACT
Pomalidomide is a third generation immunomodulatory drug in the treatment of refractory and relapsed multiple myeloma patients. Our aim was to investigate the efficacy and safety of pomalidomide therapy in a real world setting. Eighty-six Hungarian patients were included, 45 of whom received pomalidomide ± an alkylating agent, while in 38 of them pomalidomide was combined with a proteasome inhibitor. 56 patients (65%) showed any response to the treatment with 18 complete or very good partial remissions and 38 partial remissions. At a median duration of follow-up of 18.6 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.03 months, while the median overall survival (OS) was 16.53 months in the whole cohort. Patients with early stage disease (R-ISS 1 and 2) had better survival results than those with stage 3 myeloma (p = 0.002). Neither the number of prior treatment lines, nor lenalidomide refractoriness had a significant impact on PFS. PFS was found similar between the cohort of patients with impaired renal function and the cohort without kidney involvement. During the study, eight mortal infections and two fatal bleeding complications occurred, however, mild hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities were identified as the most frequent adverse events. The results of our investigations confirm that pomalidomide is an effective treatment option for relapsed/refractory MM, besides, the safety profile is satisfactory in subjects with both normal and impaired renal function.