ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the impact of an innovative nonclinical support role to improve patient experiences while supporting nurse work on inpatient units. BACKGROUND: On the basis of the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey, patients' experience declined nationally during the COVID-19 pandemic. A nonclinical support role, titled an Experience Coordinator, was created as a test of change to collaborate with care teams and respond to patients' and families' nonclinical needs. METHODS: This is a quality improvement (QI) project for a supportive role development and implementation. The health system's HCAHPS data were compared before and after the role was tested on 3 inpatient units. RESULTS: The HCAHPS data indicated that 5 of the 10 domains' top box ratings increased during the QI project month compared with the previous month. CONCLUSION: The study findings may support the implementation of new innovative nonclinical positions to alleviate nurses' workload and promote patients' hospital experience.
Subject(s)
Hospitals , Patient Satisfaction , Professional Role , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Organizational InnovationABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Innovation is needed to solve nursing workforce issues during times of crisis. A collaborative effort between a hospital system and several universities resulted in the Bridge to Professional Practice Program that was implemented during a period of high patient volume and nursing student downtime. The program provided support for staffing needs and clinical hours to promote readiness for practice for students. The program evaluation outcomes and recommendations for improvement are addressed.
Subject(s)
Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate , Hospitals , Interinstitutional Relations , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Humans , Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate/organization & administration , Students, Nursing , Health Workforce , Organizational Innovation , Nursing Staff, Hospital/supply & distribution , Nursing Evaluation ResearchSubject(s)
COVID-19 , Delivery of Health Care , Diffusion of Innovation , Humans , Organizational InnovationABSTRACT
The need to support innovation in health care delivery was prompted by payment reforms and access to digital tools and has been accelerated by the shift to virtual care as part of the COVID-19 pandemic response. Prior to the pandemic, a growing number of health systems set up innovation centers to focus on creating new services and exploring new business models relevant to value-based care. This is distinct from process improvement or implementation science, and often needs a different set of incentives to succeed within a large organization. We used a national survey to identify a diverse sample of innovation centers, and interviewed leaders to describe their aims, organizational structures, and activities. They all aim to improve patient outcomes and experience while reducing costs, but their strategic focus may differ. The centers also vary in their reporting structure, how they build internal capacity, and how they measure success. We highlight the range of strategies through examples of projects that improve quality, reduce costs, and generate new revenue. While the optimal forms and impact of innovation centers are still emerging, the fiscal pressures and the rapid uptake of digital technologies present opportunities for the redesign of health services in the postpandemic era. The experiences of these centers illustrate a set of approaches to increase any organization's capacity for innovation.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Organizational Innovation , SARS-CoV-2Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiology/education , Competency-Based Education/organization & administration , Education, Medical, Graduate/organization & administration , Education , Fellowships and Scholarships , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Clinical Competence , Communicable Disease Control , Education/methods , Education/trends , Fellowships and Scholarships/methods , Fellowships and Scholarships/trends , Humans , Organizational Innovation , SARS-CoV-2 , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The objective was to investigate the changes in urology practice during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic with a perspective from our experience with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003. METHODS: Institutional data from all urology centres in the Hong Kong public sector during the COVID-19 pandemic (1 Feb 2020-31 Mar 2020) and a non-COVID-19 control period (1 Feb 2019-31 Mar 2019) were acquired. An online anonymous questionnaire was used to gauge the impact of COVID-19 on resident training. The clinical output of tertiary centres was compared with data from the SARS period. RESULTS: The numbers of operating sessions, clinic attendance, cystoscopy sessions, prostate biopsy, and shockwave lithotripsy sessions were reduced by 40.5%, 28.5%, 49.6%, 44.8%, and 38.5%, respectively, across all the centres reviewed. The mean numbers of operating sessions before and during the COVID-19 pandemic were 85.1±30.3 and 50.6±25.7, respectively (P=0.005). All centres gave priority to cancer-related surgeries. Benign prostatic hyperplasia-related surgery (39.1%) and ureteric stone surgery (25.5%) were the most commonly delayed surgeries. The degree of reduction in urology services was less than that during SARS (47.2%, 55.3%, and 70.5% for operating sessions, cystoscopy, and biopsy, respectively). The mean numbers of operations performed by residents before and during the COVID-19 pandemic were 75.4±48.0 and 34.9±17.2, respectively (P=0.002). CONCLUSION: A comprehensive review of urology practice during the COVID-19 pandemic revealed changes in every aspect of practice.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Internship and Residency , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/epidemiology , Urologic Surgical Procedures , Urology , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/trends , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Humans , Internship and Residency/methods , Internship and Residency/organization & administration , Organizational Innovation , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/organization & administration , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , SARS-CoV-2 , Urologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Urologic Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Urology/education , Urology/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an ongoing global pandemic affecting all levels of health systems. This includes the care of patients with noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) who bear a disproportionate burden of both COVID-19 itself and the public health measures enacted to combat it. In this review, we summarize major COVID-19-related considerations for NCD patients and their care providers, focusing on cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, haematologic, oncologic, traumatic, obstetric/gynaecologic, operative, psychiatric, rheumatologic/immunologic, neurologic, gastrointestinal, ophthalmologic and endocrine disorders. Additionally, we offer a general framework for categorizing the pandemic's disruptions by disease-specific factors, direct health system factors and indirect health system factors. We also provide references to major NCD medical specialty professional society statements and guidelines on COVID-19. COVID-19 and its control policies have already resulted in major disruptions to the screening, treatment and surveillance of NCD patients. In addition, it differentially impacts those with pre-existing NCDs and may lead to de novo NCD sequelae. Likely, there will be long-term effects from this pandemic that will continue to affect practitioners and patients in this field for years to come.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Communicable Disease Control , Noncommunicable Diseases , Patient Care Management , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/therapy , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Communicable Disease Control/organization & administration , Humans , Noncommunicable Diseases/epidemiology , Noncommunicable Diseases/therapy , Organizational Innovation , Patient Care Management/organization & administration , Patient Care Management/trends , Public Health , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) aims to improve the overall quality, safety, and sustainability of healthcare while reducing delivery costs of more effective care. Despite advantages associated with VBHC transformation, the road to its adoption has been lengthy. Laboratory Medicine (LM) is in a prime position to lead the transition to VBHC because of its key role in diagnosis and treatment of patients. Laboratory medicine results inform/influence 50% to 70% of all clinical decisions. This article summarizes some issues associated with adoption of VBHC and related healthcare innovations and suggests potential approaches using LM-specific examples to help accelerate adoption. Laboratory medicine is both a useful model for VBHC implementation and facilitator for related innovation adoption by helping to target patient populations that would benefit most from specific interventions. The critical value of rapidly adopted diagnostic technologies used during the COVID-19 pandemic and economic recovery provide important insights about the need to embrace and accelerate VBHC implementation.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing , COVID-19/epidemiology , Laboratories/organization & administration , Value-Based Purchasing , Humans , Organizational Innovation , Pandemics , Pathology, Clinical , Point-of-Care Systems , Precision Medicine , Quality Improvement , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent county shelter-in-place order forced the Cardinal Free Clinics (CFCs), Stanford University's 2 student-run free clinics, to close in March 2020. As student-run free clinics adhering to university-guided COVID policies, we have not been able to see patients in person since March of 2020. However, the closure of our in-person operations provided our student management team with an opportunity to innovate. In consultation with Stanford's Telehealth team and educators, we rapidly developed a telehealth clinic model for our patients. We adapted available telehealth guidelines to meet our patient care needs and educational objectives, which manifested in 3 key innovations: reconfigured clinic operations, an evidence-based social needs screen to more effectively assess and address social needs alongside medical needs, and a new telehealth training module for student volunteers. After 6 months of piloting our telehealth services, we believe that these changes have made our services and operations more robust and provided benefit to both our patients and volunteers. Despite an uncertain and evolving public health landscape, we are confident that these developments will strengthen the future operations of the CFCs.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Organizational Innovation , Pandemics , Student Run Clinic/organization & administration , California/epidemiology , HumansABSTRACT
SUMMARY: Hospital and health system leaders alike are increasing their efforts to implement an ambulatory care strategy. The move is understandable: Innovative and well-funded competitors are entering their markets, payers are demanding lower-cost options, and patients are seeking affordability and convenience.Healthcare organizations must consider several imperatives when identifying a long-term ambulatory strategy that is both successful and sustainable. The rise of value-based care and emerging market and competitive trends are among the important considerations that call for a strategy that is affordable, responds to consumer expectations, and ensures that care is coordinated and optimal.Penn Medicine Lancaster General Health (LG Health) strategically transformed its ambulatory services over three decades. Early on, the system focused on providing services in and around its urban flagship hospital. Increased competition, new technologies, market growth, and other influences eventually led the system to expand its depth and breadth while aggregating many of its ambulatory services in a single suburban location designed to optimize efficiency, prioritize clinical coordination, and enhance patient and physician satisfaction.The system built on that foundation by creating a network of ambulatory locations featuring four service delivery models. Each features distinct facility sizes, physician types, patient groups, and services. In addition, LG Health continues to build the technological and operational capabilities to deliver telehealth services that have become more established in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.The investments made, experiences studied, and lessons learned by LG Health since 1990 and during the uncertain course of the current pandemic continue to guide its ambulatory strategy.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities/organization & administration , Organizational Innovation , Ambulatory Care , COVID-19 , Efficiency, Organizational , Humans , Organizational Case Studies , Pandemics , Pennsylvania , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
In Spring 2020, the United States epicenter of COVID-19 was New York City, in which the borough of the Bronx was particularly affected. This Fall, there has been a resurgence of COVID-19 in Europe and the Midwestern United States. We describe our experience transforming our cardiac catheterization laboratories to accommodate an influx of COVID-19 patients so as to provide other hospitals with a potential blueprint. We transformed our pre/postprocedural patient care areas into COVID-19 intensive care and step-down units and maintained emergent invasive care for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction using existing space and personnel.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Cardiology Service, Hospital , Coronary Care Units , Critical Care , Infection Control , Laboratories, Hospital/organization & administration , Organizational Innovation , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Cardiology Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Cardiology Service, Hospital/trends , Coronary Care Units/methods , Coronary Care Units/organization & administration , Critical Care/methods , Critical Care/organization & administration , Critical Care/trends , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/organization & administration , New York City/epidemiology , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Perioperative Care/methods , SARS-CoV-2 , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapySubject(s)
COVID-19 , Civil Defense/standards , Hospitals, Pediatric , Infection Control , Tertiary Care Centers , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Child , Civil Defense/methods , Health Services Needs and Demand , Hospitals, Pediatric/organization & administration , Hospitals, Pediatric/trends , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/organization & administration , Intersectoral Collaboration , Malawi/epidemiology , Organizational Innovation , Physical Distancing , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Tertiary Care Centers/organization & administration , Tertiary Care Centers/trendsSubject(s)
COVID-19 , Communicable Disease Control , Emergencies , Emergency Medical Services , Gynecology , Obstetrics , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/psychology , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Communicable Disease Control/statistics & numerical data , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Emergencies/epidemiology , Emergencies/psychology , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Medical Services/trends , Female , Gynecology/methods , Gynecology/organization & administration , Gynecology/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Obstetrics/methods , Obstetrics/organization & administration , Obstetrics/statistics & numerical data , Organizational Innovation , Pregnancy , SARS-CoV-2 , Triage/statistics & numerical dataSubject(s)
COVID-19 , Hospitals, Psychiatric/organization & administration , Infection Control , Mental Disorders , Organizational Policy , Visitors to Patients , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Canada/epidemiology , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/organization & administration , Inpatients/psychology , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Organizational Innovation , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The unprecedented pandemic spread of the novel coronavirus has severely impacted the delivery of healthcare services in the United States and around the world, and has exposed a variety of inefficiencies in healthcare infrastructure. Some states have been disproportionately affected such as New York and Michigan. In fact, Detroit and its surrounding areas have been named as the initial Midwest epicenter where over 106,000 cases have been confirmed in April 2020. METHOD, RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Facilities in Southeast Michigan have served as the frontline of the pandemic in the Midwest and in order to cope with the surge, rapid, and in some cases, complete restructuring of care was mandatory to effect change and attempt to deal with the emerging crisis. We describe the initial experience and response of 4 large vascular surgery health systems in Michigan to COVID-19.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Health Care Rationing , Hospital Restructuring , Infection Control , Resource Allocation , Vascular Diseases , Vascular Surgical Procedures , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/therapy , Civil Defense/standards , Hospital Restructuring/methods , Hospital Restructuring/organization & administration , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/organization & administration , Michigan/epidemiology , Organizational Innovation , Patient Selection , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Vascular Diseases/diagnosis , Vascular Diseases/epidemiology , Vascular Diseases/surgery , Vascular Surgical Procedures/organization & administration , Vascular Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has presented novel challenges for the entire health-care continuum, requiring transformative changes to hospital and post-acute care, including clinical, administrative, and physical modifications to current standards of operations. Innovative use and adaptation of long-term acute care hospitals (LTACHs) can safely and effectively care for patients during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. A framework for the rapid changes, including increasing collaboration with external health-care organizations, creating new methods for enhanced communication, and modifying processes focused on patient safety and clinical outcomes, is described for a network of 94 LTACHs. When managed and modified correctly, LTACHs can play a vital role in managing the national health-care pandemic crisis.
Subject(s)
Critical Care/methods , Intensive Care Units , Long-Term Care , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Duration of Therapy , Humans , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units/trends , Long-Term Care/methods , Long-Term Care/organization & administration , Long-Term Care/trends , Organizational Innovation , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
COVID 19 pandemic has brought about a sea change in health care practices across the globe. All specialities have changed their way of working during the pandemic. In this study, we evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on the practice of interventional pulmonology at our centre. All interventional pulmonology procedures done during the three months after implementation of lockdown were evaluated retrospectively for patient demographics, clinical diagnosis, indication for procedure and diagnostic accuracy. The changes in practices, additional human resources requirement, the additional cost per procedure and impact on resident training were also assessed. Procedures done during the month of January 2020 were used as controls for comparison. Twenty-two flexible bronchoscopies (75.8%), four semirigid thoracoscopies (13.7%) and three EBUS-TBNAs (10.3%) were carried out during three month lockdown period as compared to 174 during January 2020. Twenty-three of the procedures were for the diagnostic indication (79%), and six were therapeutic (20.6%). The diagnostic yield in suspected neoplasm was 100% while for suspected infections was 58.3%. The percentage of independent procedures being done by residents reduced from 45.4% to 0%. The workforce required per procedure increased from 0.75 to 4-8, and the additional cost per procedure came out to be 135 USD. To conclude, COVID 19 has impacted the interventional pulmonology services in various ways and brought about a need to reorganize the services, while also thinking of innovative ideas to reduce cost without compromising patient safety.
Subject(s)
Bronchoscopy , COVID-19 , Delivery of Health Care , Infection Control , Lung Diseases , Bronchoscopy/methods , Bronchoscopy/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/trends , Diagnostic Techniques, Respiratory System/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , India/epidemiology , Infection Control/instrumentation , Infection Control/methods , Lung Diseases/diagnosis , Lung Diseases/epidemiology , Lung Diseases/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Organizational Innovation , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Since March 2020, when COVID-19 pandemic broke out, the world's healthcare systems' main concern has been fighting the pandemic. However, patients with other diseases, also requiring rehabilitation evaluations and treatments, continued to need care. Our rehabilitation unit managed to maintain contact with patients through alternative communication methods even during the lockdown period and in a situation of staff shortage. If face-to-face evaluations and treatments were necessary, preventive measures were followed to avoid hospital-associated contagion. Rehabilitation beds were cleared to leave them to the acute wards, and consultations for the acute care patients were carried out using personal protective equipment. In the future, the lessons from our experience could contribute toward drawing a plan of measures applicable in similar situations and some of these actions could become part of the rehabilitative practice.