ABSTRACT
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the ENT community has demonstrated strong clinical leadership, adaptability to rapid change, enhanced clinical pathways and local networks, widespread use of digital technology for consultation and teaching and redirection of research programmes. These have permanently changed the way we work and, when the current global pandemic improves as COVID-19 infections drop and vaccination programmes are rolled out, we should ensure that the positive changes that have been made are embedded in clinical practice to improve patient care.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Otolaryngology/standards , Quality Improvement , Humans , Leadership , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: To review the literature on pediatric ENT COVID-19 guidelines worldwide, in particular, surgical practice during the pandemic, and to establish a comprehensive set of recommendations. STUDY DESIGN: Review. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review through an independent electronic search of the COVID-19 pandemic in PubMed, Medline, Google, and Google Scholar was performed on April 26-30, 2020. Resources identified comprised of published papers, national and international pediatric ENT society guidelines. RESULTS: Fourteen guidelines fit the inclusion criteria. Key statements were formulated and graded: 1) Strong recommendation (reported by 9 or more/14); 2) Fair recommendation (7-8/14); 3) Weak recommendation (5-6/14); and 4) Expert opinion (2-4/14). Any single source suggestion was included as a comment. Highly scored recommendations included definition of urgent/emergent cases that required surgery; surgery for acute airway obstruction; prompt diagnosis of suspected cancer; and surgical intervention for sepsis following initial first-line medical management. Other well scored recommendations included senior faculty to perform the surgery; the use of open approaches rather than endoscopic ones; and avoidance of powered instruments that would aerosolize virus-loaded tissue. A tracheostomy should be performed on a case by case basis where key technical modifications become necessary. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic will have a profound short and long-term impact on pediatric ENT practice. During this rapidly evolving climate, guidelines have been based on local practice and expert opinion. Until evidence-based practice in the COVID era is established, a comprehensive set of recommendations for pediatric ENT surgical practice based on a review of currently available literature and guidelines, is therefore, appropriate. Laryngoscope, 131:1876-1883, 2021.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Infection Control/standards , Otolaryngology/standards , Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures/standards , Pediatrics/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Child , Humans , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
This article provides best practice guidelines regarding nasopharyngolaryngoscopy and OHNS clinic reopening during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim is to provide evidence-based recommendations defining the risks of COVID-19 in clinic, the importance of pre-visit screening in addition to testing, along with ways to adhere to CDC guidelines for environmental, source, and engineering controls.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Otolaryngology/standards , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19 Testing/standards , Endocrinology/standards , Humans , Mass Screening/standards , Nasal Surgical Procedures/standards , Personal Protective Equipment , Risk , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To compare personal protective equipment (PPE) guidelines, specifically respirator use, among international public health agencies, academic hospitals, and otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS) departments in the United States for the care of coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) patients. STUDY DESIGN: Cross sectional survey. METHODS: Review of publicly available public health and academic hospitals guidelines along with review of communication among otolaryngology departments. RESULTS: Among 114 academic institutions affiliated with OHNS residencies, 20 (17.5%) institutions provided public access to some form of guidance on PPE and 73 (64%) provided information on screening or diagnostic testing. PPE guidelines were uniquely described based on several variables: location of care, COVID-19 status, involvement of aerosol generating or high-risk procedures, and physical distance from the patient. Six hospital guidelines were highlighted. Across these six institutions, there was agreement that N95 respirators were needed for high-risk patients undergoing high-risk procedures. Variations existed among institutions for scenarios with low-risk patients. Definitions of the low-risk patient and high-risk procedures were inconsistent among institutions. Three of the highlighted institutions had OHNS departments recommending higher level of airway protection than the institution. CONCLUSIONS: OHNS departments typically had more stringent PPE guidance than their institution. Discrepancies in communicating PPE use were frequent and provide inconsistent information on how healthcare workers should protect themselves in the COVID-19 pandemic. Identification of these inconsistencies serves as an opportunity to standardize communication and develop evidence-based guidelines. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V Laryngoscope, 131:E746-E754, 2021.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/transmission , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Otolaryngology/standards , Personal Protective Equipment/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Academic Medical Centers/standards , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19 Testing/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Health Personnel/standards , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Surgery Department, Hospital/standards , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Mastoidectomy is associated with extensive bone-drilling which makes it a major aerosol generating procedure. Considering the ongoing COVID-19 global pandemic, it is essential to devise methods to minimize aerosolization and hence ensure safety of the healthcare workers during the operative procedure. METHODS: Two disposable surgical drapes are used to create a closed pocket prior to commencement of mastoid bone-drilling. This limits aerosolization of bone-dust in the external operating theatre environment. CONCLUSION: Two-drape closed pocket technique is an easy, cost-effective and safe method to limit aerosolization of tissue particles during mastoidectomy.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Infection Control/methods , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Operating Rooms/standards , Otolaryngology/standards , Pandemics/legislation & jurisprudence , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Aerosols/adverse effects , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Dust , Humans , Mastoid/surgery , Mastoidectomy , Otolaryngology/instrumentation , Pandemics/prevention & control , Personal Protective Equipment/virology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Surgical EquipmentABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection in patients presenting with epistaxis to a tertiary otolaryngology unit. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted of 40 consecutive patients presenting with epistaxis referred to our tertiary otolaryngology unit. A group of 40 age-matched controls were also included. All patients underwent real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2. Symptoms of fever, cough and anosmia were noted in the study group. RESULTS: The mean age was 66.5 ± 22.4 years in the study group. There were 22 males (55 per cent) and 18 females (45 per cent). The mean age in the control group was 66.3 ± 22.4 years (p = 0.935). There were six positive cases for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (15 per cent) in the epistaxis group and one case (2.5 per cent) in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Epistaxis may represent a presenting symptom of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection. This may serve as a useful additional criterion for screening patients.
Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/genetics , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Epistaxis/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , Case-Control Studies , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Cough/diagnosis , Cough/virology , Epistaxis/epidemiology , Epistaxis/virology , Female , Fever/diagnosis , Fever/virology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Olfaction Disorders/diagnosis , Olfaction Disorders/virology , Otolaryngology/standards , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2 , Tertiary Care Centers/standards , United Kingdom/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: A study was carried out to evaluate the relationship between anosmia and hospital admission in coronavirus disease 2019 patients. METHODS: The clinical data of 1534 patients with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 virus were analysed. The study was conducted with medical records of 1197 patients (78 per cent). The basic characteristics of patients and symptoms related to otolaryngology practice were examined. The patients were divided into two groups according to their follow up: an out-patient group and an in-patient group. RESULTS: The majority of patients presented with anosmia (44.2 per cent), dysgeusia (43.9 per cent) and fever (38.7 per cent). Anosmia was observed in 462 patients (47 per cent) in the out-patient group, and in only 67 patients (31.2 per cent) in the in-patient group. Younger age (odds ratio = 1.05, 95 per cent confidence interval = 1.03-1.06) and the presence of anosmia (odds ratio = 2.04, 95 per cent confidence interval = 1.39-3) were significantly related to out-patient treatment. CONCLUSION: Anosmia could be a symptom in the clinical presentation of the coronavirus disease 2019 infection.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/complications , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Olfaction Disorders/diagnosis , Otolaryngology/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Adult , Betacoronavirus/genetics , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , Case-Control Studies , Comorbidity , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Dysgeusia/diagnosis , Dysgeusia/epidemiology , Female , Fever/diagnosis , Fever/epidemiology , Hospitalization/trends , Humans , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Olfaction Disorders/etiology , Olfaction Disorders/virology , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Turkey/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Recommendations of the Main Board of the Polish Society of Otorhinolaryngologists, Head and Neck Surgeons for providing services during the COVID-19 pandemic constitute the guidance to outpatient and hospital practices in all cases where contact with a patient whose status of COVID-19 is unknown. They have been created based on world publications and recommendations due to the current state of the COVID-19 pandemic. Justification for suspension of planned provision of services in the first phase of a pandemic was presented. The indication of the best medical practices for the time of stabilization, but with the persistence of the risk of COVID-19 infection in the population are discussed. The possibility of providing services in the following months of the pandemic is important. We provide the rationale for launching medical activities and indicate optimal practices until the consolidation of SARS COV-2 prevention and treatment methods.
Subject(s)
Anesthesiology/standards , Coronavirus Infections , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Infection Control/standards , Otolaryngology/standards , Pandemics , Patient Care/standards , Pneumonia, Viral , Ambulatory Care/standards , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Hospitalization , Humans , Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases/therapy , Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures/standards , Pandemics/prevention & control , Personal Protective Equipment/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , PolandABSTRACT
The purpose of this article is to give rhinologists advice on how to adapt their standard practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. The main goal of these recommendations is to protect healthcare workers against COVID-19 while continuing to provide emergency care so as to prevent loss of chance for patients. We reviewed our recommendations concerning consultations, medical prescriptions and surgical activity in rhinology.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Decision Trees , Humans , Operating Rooms , Otolaryngology/standards , Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases/diagnosis , Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases/surgery , Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Practice Guidelines as TopicABSTRACT
Procedures putting healthcare workers in close contact with the airway are particularly at risk of contamination by the SARS-Cov-2 virus, especially when exposed to sputum, coughing, or a tracheostomy. In the current pandemic phase, all patients should be considered as potentially infected. Thus, the level of precaution recommended for the caregivers depends more on the type of procedure than on the patient's proved or suspected COVID-19 status. Procedures that are particularly at high risk of contamination are clinical and flexible endoscopic pharyngo-laryngological evaluation, and probably also video fluoroscopic swallowing exams. Voice rehabilitation should not be considered urgent at this time. Therefore, recommendations presented here mainly concern the management of swallowing disorders, which can sometimes be dangerous for the patient, and recent dysphonia. In cases where they are considered possible and useful, teleconsultations should be preferred to face-to-face assessments or rehabilitation sessions. The latter must be maintained only in few selected situations, after team discussions or in accordance with the guidelines provided by health authorities.