ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the U.S. healthcare system, reducing the capacity available for unrelated conditions, such as sleep disordered breathing, and increasing concerns about the safety of in-lab testing. This study characterizes how the pandemic impacted the assessment of sleep disordered breathing and use of associated services. METHODS: Sleep testing claims occurring between January 2019 and June 2021 were extracted from the database of a national healthcare organization. Utilization was trended. Logistic regressions were run to assess the association between quarter of initial testing, whether testing was followed by treatment, and whether testing was followed by a clinical visit with a diagnosis related to sleep apnea, after controlling for patient-related factors. A Cox proportional hazards model assessed factors influencing time to treatment. Finally, a logistic regression assessed factors influencing the finality of home-based testing. RESULTS: In Q2 2021, home-based testing utilization was 134% of its initial level, while in-lab and split night testing were both at 61% of initial levels. Patients receiving initial home-based testing did not significantly differ in their likelihood of treatment, but were significantly less likely to have a clinical visit for sleep apnea (P < 0.01). Patients initially tested in 2021 were treated significantly more quickly than those initially tested in Q1 2019. Home-based testing occurring in Q4 2019 or later was significantly more likely to be definitive than home-based testing occurring Q1 2019. CONCLUSIONS: Home-based sleep testing increased significantly and durably in 2020, and was associated with faster time to treatment than initial in-lab testing.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Sleep Apnea Syndromes , Humans , Pandemics , Sleep , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/diagnosis , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/epidemiology , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/therapy , PolysomnographyABSTRACT
Background: Saudi Arabia (SA) reported its first case of COVID-19 on 2 March 2020. Mortality varied nationwide: by 14 April 2020 Medina had 16% of SA’s total COVID-19 cases and 40% of all COVID-19 deaths. A team of epidemiologists investigated to identify factors impacting survival. Methods: We reviewed medical records from two hospitals: Hospital A in Medina and Hospital B in Dammam. All patients with a registered COVID-related death between 1 March -22 April 2020 were included. We collected data on demographics, chronic health conditions, clinical presentation and treatment. We analysed data using SPSS. Results: We identified 76 cases: 38 cases from each hospital. More fatalities were among non-Saudis at Hospital A (89%) versus Hospital B (82%, p<.001). Hypertension prevalence was higher among cases at Hospital A (42%) versus Hospital B (21%) (p<.05). We found statistically significant differences (p<.05) in symptoms at initial presentation among cases at Hospital A versus Hospital B, including: body temperature (38º C vs 37º C), heart rate (104 bpm vs 89 bpm), and regular breathing rhythms (61% vs 55%). Less cases (50%) at Hospital A received heparin versus Hospital B (97%, p-value< 0.001). Conclusion: Patients who died at Hospital A typically presented with more severe illness and were more likely to have underlying health conditions. Migrant workers may be at increased risk due to poorer baseline health and reluctance to seek care. This highlights the importance of cross-cultural outreach to prevent deaths. Health education efforts should be multilingual and accommodate all literacy levels.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hypertension , Sleep Apnea SyndromesABSTRACT
We conducted an internet survey to assess sociodemographic variables, lifestyle factors, sleep problems, and comorbidities for sleep apnea syndrome (SAS) in COVID-19 and influenza (FLU) infections. Data from 10,323 workers (50.0% male) were analyzed. COVID-19 was diagnosed in 144 subjects (COVID-19+), and 8,693 were classified as not suspected to be infected (COVID-19-). SAS had been diagnosed in 35.4% of the COVID-19+ subjects, but only 231 (2.7%) of the 8,693 COVID-19- subjects. COVID-19+ subjects were more susceptible to FLU (35.4%) compared to COVID-19- subjects (3.0%). A multivariate analysis revealed that higher risks of COVID-19+ were linked to the following factors: going out without a face mask (OR 7.05, 95% CI 4.53-11.00), FLU+ (OR 6.33, 95% CI 3.80-10.54), excessive exercise before going to sleep (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.63-2.70), SAS+ (OR 5.08, 95% CI 2.88-8.94), younger age (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07), falling sleep while sitting or talking with someone (OR 3.70, 95% CI 2.30-5.95), and use of hypnotics (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.20-4.30). Since sleep impairment played a relatively small role in COVID-19+/SAS- subjects, we assume that SAS itself was a more significant risk factor for COVID-19 infection rather than sleep impairment. A better understanding of the mechanisms that result in increased susceptibility to COVID-19 in SAS is vital for helping prevent COVID-19.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Life Style , Sleep , Female , Humans , Male , COVID-19/epidemiology , Internet , Japan/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/epidemiologyABSTRACT
The novel coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) and the ensuing pandemic have greatly impacted the global healthcare system due to its high infectiousness, associated high mortality, and a complete lack of immunity in the population. Globally, the COVID-19 pandemic has unleashed a health crisis that has not only seriously disrupted people's lives but also affected their normal sleep, along with physical and mental health; this situation is especially exacerbated in people suffering from pre-existing conditions, such as sleep apnea. A recent meta-analysis of 18 studies by Miller et al. (September 2020) showed that obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is related to higher mortality and morbidity in patients with COVID-19 and is most likely independent of other risk factors. A recent meta-analysis indicated that COVID-19 patients with OSA are more severely affected than those without OSA, thereby providing further evidence that concurrent OSA may elevate the severity of COVID-19 infection, along with the risk of mortality. The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted the diagnosis and therapeutic management of patients with OSA. Thus, it is necessary to identify and develop new diagnostic and therapeutic avenues in the future. In this context, the current study summarizes known associations between COVID-19 and OSA and the regular diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for OSA in the light of COVID-19 pandemic prevention and control.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Sleep Apnea Syndromes , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , COVID-19/complications , Humans , Pandemics , Risk Factors , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/epidemiology , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/complications , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe the sociodemographic and epidemiological characteristics of diagnosis and treatment of pediatric patients with sleep apnea, both central and obstructive, in Colombia between 2017 and 2021. METHODS: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional, epidemiological study using the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems as search terms for sleep apnea, based on SISPRO, the Colombian national health registry. Stratification by gender and age groups was performed. We also generated data of the amount of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures performed. A map of prevalence by place of residency was performed. RESULTS: National records report 15200 cases of SA between 2017 and 2021, for an estimated prevalence of 21.1 cases by 100000 inhabitants in 2019 the year with the most cases (4769), being more frequent and in the 6 to 11 age group and in males, with a male to female ratio of 1.54:1. The number of cases declined in 2020 and 2021. The map showed a concentration of cases in the more developed departments of the country. DISCUSSION: This is the first approximation to a nation-wide prevalence of sleep apnea in Colombia which is lower to what is found in the literature worldwide, including studies performed in Latin America and in Colombia, this could reflect sub diagnosis and sub report. The fact that the highest prevalence was found in males and in the 6-11 age group is consistent with reports in literature. The decrease in cases in 2020 and 2021 could be related to the COVID-19 pandemic impact in sleep medicine services.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Sleep Apnea Syndromes , Adolescent , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Colombia/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Prevalence , Registries , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Background: Patients with metabolic syndrome components were frequently noted to have increased nasal and parotid activity on clinically referred scintigraphic whole-body blood pool scans. This increase in activity was not observed in patients without metabolic syndrome. Increased nasal blood pool activity in patients with elevated body mass indices (BMIs) has implications for (1) sleep apnea, (2) risk of nasal infection, and (3) possible impaired nasal lymphatic drainage of brain waste proteins. Methods: To follow-up this clinical observation, a retrospective study was performed on 200 patients having whole-body blood pool scans referred over a 3-year period. The whole-body blood pool scans were evaluated for an association between nose and parotid region of interest (ROI) to heart ROI maximum (max) pixel ratios as correlated with clinical conditions, including obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and sleep apnea. Continuous variables of BMI, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), blood glucose, and blood lipids were also correlated with these ratios. Results: A direct association of nose to heart max ratio (NHMR) with diabetes, sleep apnea, and hypertension was found with an increase in the ratio of +0.10 (P = 0.002), +0.13 (P = 0.0002), +0.08 (P = 0.0123), respectively. Correlation of NHMR with continuous variables had moderate correlation with BMI (r = 0.36, P < 0.0001), glucose (r = 0.27, P = 0.0001), HbA1c (r = 0.25, P = 0.0008) and less association with the number of diabetes medications (r = 0.22, P = 0.0021). Similar associations were found for parotid to heart max ratios but were weaker than the NHMR. Conclusions: Patients with metabolic syndrome components have significantly increased nasal and parotid activity on blood pool scans. These associations have implications for the treatment of sleep apnea, for nasal infections involving such agents as Covid-19, and for the risk of dementias related to decreased clearance of brain waste proteins through nasal turbinate lymphatics in patients with metabolic syndrome. If further studies support these findings, the nasal turbinates and the increased parasympathetic activity controlling their dilation could become a new therapeutic target.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hypertension , Metabolic Syndrome , Sleep Apnea Syndromes , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Metabolic Syndrome/metabolism , Retrospective Studies , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/complicationsABSTRACT
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Sleep disturbance is common in long-COVID (LC). Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is characterized by sleep disturbance and has been reported after viral infections. Therefore, we evaluated RLS symptoms cross-sectionally in individuals with LC at both current and pre-coronavirus disease 2019 (pre-COVID-19) time points. METHODS: Adults on LC-focused Facebook pages were recruited for an online assessment of symptoms before COVID-19 infection and during their present LC state in a cross-sectional manner. The LC group documented baseline symptoms retrospectively. Questions were included about the presence/severity of RLS symptoms and assessments of fatigue, quality of life, and sleep apnea. A control group was recruited and included individuals ≥ 18 years of age who never had overt symptoms of COVID-19. Pregnancy was an exclusion criterion for both groups. RESULTS: There were 136 participants with LC (89.7% females, age 46.9 ± 12.9 years) and 136 controls (65.4% females, age 49.2 ± 15.5). RLS prevalence in females with LC was 5.7% pre-COVID-19 and 14.8% post-COVID-19 (P < .01) vs 6.7% in control females. Severity of RLS was moderate in both groups. Logistic regression predicting post-COVID-19 RLS among females with LC failed to find significant effects of hospitalization, sleep apnea, neuropathic pain severity, or use of antihistamines and antidepressants. CONCLUSIONS: The baseline prevalence of RLS in females with LC was similar to the general population group as well as to patients in epidemiological studies. The prevalence significantly increased in the LC state. Postinfectious immunological mechanisms may be at play in the production for RLS symptoms. CITATION: Weinstock LB, Brook JB, Walters AS, Goris A, Afrin LB, Molderings GJ. Restless legs syndrome is associated with long-COVID in women. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(5):1413-1418.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Restless Legs Syndrome , Sleep Apnea Syndromes , Sleep Wake Disorders , Adult , COVID-19/complications , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Quality of Life , Restless Legs Syndrome/complications , Restless Legs Syndrome/diagnosis , Restless Legs Syndrome/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/complications , Sleep Wake Disorders/complications , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Post-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeABSTRACT
BackgroundAs mortality from COVID-19 is strongly age-dependent, we aimed to identify population subgroups at an elevated risk for adverse outcomes from COVID-19 using age/gender-adjusted data from European cohort studies with the aim to identify populations that could potentially benefit from booster vaccinations. MethodsWe performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to investigate the role of underlying medical conditions as prognostic factors for adverse outcomes due to SARS-CoV-2, including death, hospitalisation, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, and mechanical ventilation within three separate settings (community, hospital and ICU). Cohort studies that reported at least age and gender-adjusted data from Europe were identified through a search of peer-reviewed articles published until 11th June 2021 in Ovid Medline and Embase. Results are presented as Odds Ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%C.I.) and absolute risk differences (RD) in deaths per 1,000 COVID-19 patients. FindingsWe included 88 cohort studies with age/gender adjusted data from 6,653,207 SARS-CoV-2 patients from Europe. Hospital-based mortality was associated with high and moderate certainty evidence for solid organ tumours, diabetes mellitus, renal disease, arrhythmia, ischemic heart disease, liver disease, and obesity, while a higher risk, albeit with low certainty, was noted for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure. Community-based mortality was associated with a history of heart failure, stroke, diabetes, and end-stage renal disease. Evidence of high/moderate certainty revealed a strong association between hospitalisation for COVID-19 and solid organ transplant recipients, sleep apnoea, diabetes, stroke, and liver disease. InterpretationThe results confirmed the strong association between specific prognostic factors and mortality and hospital admission. Prioritisation of booster vaccinations and the implementation of non-pharmaceutical protective measures for these populations may contribute to a reduction in COVID-19 mortality, ICU and hospital admissions. FundingEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) under specific contract No. 10 ECD.11843 within Framework contract ECDC/2019/001 Lot 1B.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasms , Arrhythmias, Cardiac , Kidney Failure, Chronic , Kidney Diseases , Obesity , Heart Diseases , Diabetes Mellitus , Ischemia , Liver Diseases , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Heart Failure , Stroke , Sleep Apnea Syndromes , Encephalomyelitis, Acute DisseminatedABSTRACT
Purpose: To better understand: i) a positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy use during the pandemic, ii) how PAP use may relate to sleep, health, and COVID-19-related outcomes, and iii) factors associated with PAP use during the pandemic. Methods: This study is based on data collected between Apr 2020 and Jan 2021 as part of the online cross-sectional national community-based survey. The included participants were located in North America, 18 years and older, with self-reported sleep-related breathing disorder (SBD) and usage of a PAP device in the last month before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (“in the past 7 days”). Results: Of all respondents, 7.2% (41/570) stopped using PAP during the pandemic. There were no significant differences between individuals who continued and stopped using PAP in the time elapsed since the pandemic declaration, age, sex, education level, occupational status, family income, or the proportions of individuals endorsing symptoms that could be related to COVID-19. Compared to individuals who continued using PAP, those who stopped had significantly shorter sleep time, lower sleep efficiency, and poorer sleep quality. Higher stress levels and living with someone who experienced symptoms that could be attributable to COVID-19 were independently associated with stopping using PAP. Conclusions: In this survey study, we found that most individuals with SBD continued PAP therapy during the pandemic. However, even 7% of participants who stopped using PAP cannot be ignored. Identifying individuals at risk of discontinuing PAP treatment would help design targeted interventions for patients and health professionals to improve PAP use.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Sleep Apnea SyndromesABSTRACT
Purpose: To better understand: i) a positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy use during the pandemic, ii) how PAP use may relate to sleep, health, and COVID-19-related outcomes, and iii) factors associated with PAP use during the pandemic. Methods: This study is based on data collected between Apr 2020 and Jan 2021 as part of the online cross-sectional national community-based survey. The included participants were located in North America, 18 years and older, with self-reported sleep-related breathing disorder (SBD) and usage of a PAP device in the last month before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (“in the past 7 days”). Results: Of all respondents, 7.2% (41/570) stopped using PAP during the pandemic. There were no significant differences between individuals who continued and stopped using PAP in the time elapsed since the pandemic declaration, age, sex, education level, occupational status, family income, or the proportions of individuals endorsing symptoms that could be related to COVID-19. Compared to individuals who continued using PAP, those who stopped had significantly shorter sleep time, lower sleep efficiency, and poorer sleep quality. Higher stress levels and living with someone who experienced symptoms that could be attributable to COVID-19 were independently associated with stopping using PAP. Conclusions: In this survey study, we found that most individuals with SBD continued PAP therapy during the pandemic. However, even 7% of participants who stopped using PAP cannot be ignored. Identifying individuals at risk of discontinuing PAP treatment would help design targeted interventions for patients and health professionals to improve PAP use.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Sleep Apnea SyndromesABSTRACT
Background: The outbreak of coronavirus posits deleterious consequences on global healthcare system while affecting human life in every aspect. Despite various measures undertaken to limit the socio-economic effect of coronavirus, various challenges remain pervasive, and one such challenge is mental health, particularly sleep disorders. Therefore, this study examines the prevalence and determinants of sleep disorders among Malaysian adults. Methods: : An online survey was conducted from 11 January to May 2021. Structured questionnaire link using Google form was sent to the adults through E-mail in Malaysia. The study utilized Holland Sleep Disorder Questionnaire (HSDQ) to screen out the various sleep disorders, namely; Insomnia, Parasomnia, Circadian Rhythm Sleep Disorder (CRSD), Hypersomnia, Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS/PLMD), and Sleep-disordered Breathing (SDB). Percentage distribution and logistic regression analysis were used as study tools. Results: : Around 70% of the surveyed population had one or another sleep disorder. One-third reported RLS/PLMD (34.8%) and CRSD (33.9%). More than one-fourth of the adults reported Insomnia (29.7%) and Hypersomnia (25.8%). Increased risk of sleep disorders was found to be associated with being unemployed (OR=2.4, C.I.=1.17-4.89). The risk of insomnia and hypersomnia was higher among female adults (OR=1.6, C.I.=1.11-2.3) and unemployed adults (OR=2.4, C.I.=1.23-5.04), respectively. Conclusion: Immediate interventions to prevent aggravation of sleep disorders should be promoted. It is recommended to bring forth psychiatric and psychological support to those suffering from various sleep disorders in the ongoing coronavirus pandemic. Government shall impart counselling through various online channels consisting of psychologists and sleep experts to improve the quality of sleep.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Sleep Wake Disorders , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence , Restless Legs Syndrome , Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm , Coronavirus Infections , Sleep Apnea SyndromesABSTRACT
Background: The frequency of persistent symptoms after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in adults varies from 4.5% to 87%. Pulmonary function can also show long-term impairment in adults: 10% of hospitalised adults had reduced spirometry values, and 24% had decreased diffusion capacity. To date, only preliminary evidence is available on persistent respiratory sequelae in children and adolescents, therefore our objective was to examine the long-term effects of COVID-19 on pulmonary function in this age group. Methods: Multiple-breath washout, body plethysmography, and diffusion capacity testing were performed after an average of 2.6 months (range 0.4-6.0) following COVID-19 in 73 children and adolescents (age 5-18 years) with different disease severity. Cases were compared to 45 controls with and without infection within six months prior to assessment after exclusion of severe acute respiratory coronavirus-2 infection (SARS-CoV-2). Results: Of the 19 patients (27.1%) who complained about persistent or newly emerged symptoms since COVID-19, 8 (11.4%) reported respiratory symptoms. Comparing patients with COVID-19 to controls, no significant differences were detected in frequency of abnormal pulmonary function (COVID-19: 12, 16.4%; controls: 12, 27.7%; OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.22-1.34). Only two patients with persistent respiratory symptoms showed abnormal pulmonary function. Multivariate analysis revealed reduced forced vital capacity (p=0.045) in patients with severe infection regardless of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Discussion: Pulmonary function is rarely impaired in children and adolescents after COVID-19, except of those with severe infection. The discrepancy between persistent respiratory symptoms and normal pulmonary function suggests a different underlying pathology such as dysfunctional breathing.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections , Lung Injury , Sleep Apnea SyndromesABSTRACT
Purpose: People living with long COVID describe a high symptom burden, and a more detailed assessment of chronic fatigue and post-exertional malaise (PEM) may inform the development of rehabilitation recommendations. The aims of this study were to use validated questionnaires to measure the severity of fatigue and compare this with normative data and thresholds for clinical relevance in other diseases; measure and describe the impact of PEM; and describe symptoms of dysfunctional breathing, self-reported physical activity/sitting time, and health-related quality of life. Methods: This was an observational study involving an online survey for adults living with long COVID (data collection from February-April, 2021) following a confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection. Questionnaires included the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) and DePaul Symptom Questionnaire-Post-Exertional Malaise. Results: After data cleaning, n=213 participants were included in the analysis. Participants primarily identified as women (85.5%), aged 40-59 (78.4%), who had been experiencing long COVID symptoms for [≥]6 months (72.3%). The total FACIT-F score was 18{+/-}10 (where the score can range from 0-52, and a lower score indicates more severe fatigue), and 71.4% were experiencing chronic fatigue. Post-exertional symptom exacerbation affected most participants, and 58.7% met the scoring thresholds used in people living with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. PEM occurred alongside a reduced capacity to work, be physically active, and function both physically and socially. Conclusion: Long COVID is characterized by chronic fatigue that is clinically relevant and is at least as severe as fatigue in several other clinical conditions, including cancer. PEM appears to be a common and significant challenge for the majority of this patient group. Patients, researchers, and allied health professionals are seeking information on safe rehabilitation for people living with long COVID, particularly regarding exercise. Fatigue and post-exertional symptom exacerbation must be monitored and reported in studies involving interventions for people with long COVID.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasms , Fatigue , Sleep Apnea Syndromes , Fatigue Syndrome, ChronicABSTRACT
Sleep disturbances are among the common nonmotor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Sleep can be disrupted by nocturnal motor and nonmotor symptoms and other comorbid sleep disorders. Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD) causes sleep-related injury, has important clinical implications as a harbinger of PD and predicts a progressive clinical phenotype. Restless legs syndrome (RLS) and its related symptoms can impair sleep initiation. Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is a refractory problem affecting patients' daytime activities. In particular, during the COVID-19 era, special attention should be paid to monitoring sleep problems, as infection-prevention procedures for COVID-19 can affect patients' motor symptoms, psychiatric symptoms and sleep. Therefore, screening for and managing sleep problems is important in clinical practice, and the maintenance of good sleep conditions may improve the quality of life of PD patients. This narrative review focused on the literature published in the past 10 years, providing a current update of various sleep disturbances in PD patients and their management, including RBD, RLS, EDS, sleep apnea and circadian abnormalities.
Subject(s)
Disorders of Excessive Somnolence , Parkinson Disease , REM Sleep Behavior Disorder , Restless Legs Syndrome , Sleep Apnea Syndromes , Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm , COVID-19 , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/diagnosis , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/etiology , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/therapy , Humans , Parkinson Disease/complications , Parkinson Disease/diagnosis , Parkinson Disease/therapy , REM Sleep Behavior Disorder/diagnosis , REM Sleep Behavior Disorder/etiology , REM Sleep Behavior Disorder/therapy , Restless Legs Syndrome/diagnosis , Restless Legs Syndrome/etiology , Restless Legs Syndrome/therapy , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/diagnosis , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/etiology , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/therapy , Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm/diagnosis , Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm/etiology , Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm/therapyABSTRACT
Cognitive improvement after critical illness is complex. Neuro-stimulants are used to speed up physical and mental processes through the increase in arousal, and wakefulness. In this case series, we reviewed the literature and described the effect of modafinil for wakefulness in a cohort of adult patients admitted to our COVID and non-COVID intensive care unit (ICU) between January 2017 and June 2020. A total of 8 patients included; 3 admitted to COVID-19, 4 surgical, and 1 transplant ICU. Obstructive sleep apnea was noted in 2 (25%), 2 patients (25 %) had an initial neuroimaging that showed hemorrhagic stroke, and 1 (12.5%) showed ischemic stroke with hemorrhagic transformation. Modafinil 100-200 mg daily was started for a median duration of 4 days and the median initiation time in relation to ICU admission was 11 (IQR 9-17) days. Glasgow coma Scale improvement was noted on 5 patients (62.5%). The median duration of mechanical ventilation was 17.5 (IQR 15-31.75) days, and the median ICU stay was 28.5 (IQR 20.25-48) days. All-cause mortality rate was 25 % at 28 days and 62.5 % at 90 days. Modafinil prevented tracheostomy in 1 COVID-19 patient. No significant adverse drug reactions were documented. In our case series, we described our experience for modafinil use for wakefulness in ICU ventilated patients including COVID-19 patients. Based on our observations, the known effects of modafinil, and its safety profile, it holds the potential to facilitate recovery from cognitive impairment. Larger studies are warranted to fully evaluate its role for this indication.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coma , Cognition Disorders , Stroke , Sleep Apnea Syndromes , HemorrhageABSTRACT
We examined the relative contribution of pulmonary diseases (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma and sleep apnea) to mortality risks associated with Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) independent of other medical conditions, health risks, and sociodemographic factors. Data were derived from a large US-based case series of patients with COVID-19, captured from a quaternary academic health network covering New York City and Long Island. From March 2 to May 24, 2020, 11,512 patients who were hospitalized were tested for COVID-19, with 4,446 (38.62%) receiving a positive diagnosis for COVID-19. Among those who tested positive, 959 (21.57%) died of COVID-19-related complications at the hospital. Multivariate-adjusted Cox proportional hazards modeling showed mortality risks were strongly associated with greater age (HR = 1.05; 95% CI: 1.04-1.05), ethnic minority (Asians, Non-Hispanic blacks, and Hispanics) (HR = 1.26; 95% CI, 1.10-1.44), low household income (HR = 1.29; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.49), and male sex (HR = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.74, 0.97). Higher mortality risks were also associated with a history of COPD (HR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.02-1.58), obesity (HR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.04-1.37), and peripheral artery disease (HR = 1.33; 95% CI: 1.05-1.69). Findings indicate patients with COPD had the highest odds of COVID-19 mortality compared with patients with pre-existing metabolic conditions, such as obesity, diabetes and hypertension. Sociodemographic factors including increased age, male sex, low household income, ethnic minority status were also independently associated with greater mortality risks.
Subject(s)
Asthma/complications , COVID-19/mortality , Hospital Mortality , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/complications , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/complications , Urban Health/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New York City/epidemiology , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors , Socioeconomic FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Scant data are currently available about a potential link between comorbid chronic lung diseases (CLD) and the risk and severity of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. METHODS: To describe the clinical characteristics of and outcomes for patients with COVID-19 infection, including patients with comorbid respiratory diseases, who have been primarily hospitalized in the pulmonology department of Strasbourg University Hospital, France. In this retrospective, single-center study, we included all confirmed cases of COVID-19 from March 3 to April 15, 2020. We then compared the symptoms, biological and radiological findings, and outcomes for patients with and without CLD. RESULTS: Of the 124 patients that were enrolled, the median age was 62 years, and 75 patients (60%) were male. Overall, 40% of patients (n=50) had preexisting CLD, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (n=15, 12%) and asthma (n=19, 15%). Twenty-eight patients were transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU), and six patients died in our unit. CLD were not predictive of ICU hospitalization, but a significantly higher total mortality was observed (17.6% vs. 5.5%, P<0.05) in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest the lack of an over-representation of CLD in COVID-19, representing 40% of patients in this cohort and even within a pulmonology department. CLD were not a risk factor for ICU management. However, a tendency to higher global mortality was observed in COVID-19 patients with CLD. Further studies are warranted to determine the risk of COVID-19 for patients with comorbid CLD.