ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Cases with organ-specific and systemic vasculitis associated with corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination have been reported. However, acute partial transverse myelitis (APTM) is rare adverse events following received COVID-19 vaccines. To the best of our knowledge, there is no report on vaccine-associated APTM accompanied by possible concurrent vasculitis. Herein we present a case with possible concurrent spinal vasculitis and APTM following the second dose of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine. CASE SUMMARY: A 33-year-old man presented with weakness of left lower limb and aberrant sensation of his left lower trunk and limb (from T9 level to toes) for 2 days following receipt of an inactivated COVID-19 vaccine. Remarkable demyelinating lesion at T7 spinal cord was showed by 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. Moreover, vertebral bodies of T3-T7 also presented high signal in T-2 weighted imaging (T2WI) accompanied by multiple sites of flowing void effect indicating possible vasculitis. Oligoclonal band was positive in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) while it was negative in sera. Intravenous methylprednisolone (1 g/d) was administrated for 5 days followed by subsequent dose-tapering prednisone. His limb weakness and aberrant sensation both improved and he was able to walk unaided after treatment. The MRI recheck also showed remarkable improvement on the lesions in spinal cord and vertebral bodies. CONCLUSION: this case illustrates the concurrence of possible vasculitis in vertebral bodies and acute transverse myelitis (ATM) following COVID-19 vaccination.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Myelitis, Transverse , Vasculitis , Vertebral Body , Adult , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , Myelitis, Transverse/chemically induced , Oligoclonal Bands , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Vaccination , Vasculitis/chemically induced , Vasculitis/drug therapyABSTRACT
Since the beginning of mass vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), vaccine-linked immune-mediated diseases have been increasingly reported. The development of these diseases after COVID-19 vaccination may be attributed to the mechanisms of molecular mimicry and cross-reactivity between the viral spike protein and self-antigens. The most frequent vaccine-linked glomerular disease is immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN). Cutaneous vasculitis has also been reported after COVID-19 vaccination. In both diseases, deposition of immune complexes activates the inflammatory response with end-organ damage. We report on a case of de novo IgAN in a young man and a case of severe cutaneous vasculitis in a 68-year-old woman, both after the second dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Neither of the patients had a history of autoimmunity or adverse reactions to vaccines. The temporal association between vaccination and disease development in the absence of other possible intercurrent inciting events suggests a causal mechanism, although coincidental co-occurrence cannot be excluded. In both cases, immunosuppressive treatment was warranted to stop disease progression and to partially or completely resolve the disease. A timely reaction is needed if new-onset signs of an immune-mediated disease appear after vaccination.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccines , Vasculitis , Aged , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Vaccination/adverse effects , Vaccines/adverse effects , Vasculitis/chemically inducedABSTRACT
Levamisole is effectively used in steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome and the more frequent side effects reported are cytopenia and liver enzymes alterations. Several studies have demonstrated that this drug can induce high titers of circulating perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies (ANCA) and vasculitis, most of them occurring in the case of prolonged use. A four-year-old boy that was affected with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome was treated with Levamisole as a steroid-sparing agent at a dose of 2 mg/kg/48 h. After initiation of the treatment, the number of relapses drastically decreased, enabling a significant reduction in the cumulative steroid dose. Levamisole was well tolerated, and was therefore administered for several years. At the age of 15, he was also diagnosed with celiac disease. After nine years of continuous Levamisole treatment, he presented with a high fever, hand and foot joint arthritis, and increased levels of total and direct bilirubin. Since the symptoms started two days after the injection of the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, it was initially concluded that these manifestations were rare vaccination side effects. Therefore, he did not receive any specific treatments, and Levamisole was continued at the same dose. After an initial improvement, two months later, the patient presented with the same symptoms. Suspecting Levamisole-induced vasculitis, an ANCA titer was measured and this returned positive. Clinical manifestations and double positivity for both myeloperoxidase (MPO) and anti-proteinase 3 (PR3) antibodies argued against the fact that that these findings were secondary to vaccination, cocaine abuse, or celiac disease. Assuming that we were facing a rare drug reaction, Levamisole was promptly interrupted. This resulted in a rapid remission of fever and arthritis improvement, and a decrease in ANCA titers. By reporting this case, we want to raise awareness among clinicians regarding a rare complication of treatment with Levamisole that is often misdiagnosed due to the fact that the current literature lacks univocal guidelines regarding the precise timing of ANCA titrations and the duration of the treatment.
Subject(s)
Arthritis , COVID-19 , Celiac Disease , Nephrotic Syndrome , Vasculitis , Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic , COVID-19 Vaccines , Child, Preschool , Humans , Levamisole/adverse effects , Male , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Vasculitis/chemically inducedABSTRACT
Currently the most powerful tool in combating the COVID-19 pandemic is vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. A growing percentage of the world's population is being vaccinated. Various vaccines are worldwide on the market. Several adverse reactions have been reported as a part of post-marketing surveillance of COVID-19 vaccines. Among the possible adverse events, cutaneous vasculitis has occasionally been reported. We present a narrative review on cutaneous vasculitis related to COVID-19-vaccination to summarize clinical findings, histopathology, treatment and outcome. We searched for "COVID vaccine", "COVID vaccination" AND "cutaneous vasculitis" in PUBMED. Articles in English have been selected, from inception to December 2021, and analyzed for patient's characteristics, type of vaccine, time of appearance of cutaneous vasculitis and clinico-histopathologic type. Treatment and outcome have also been considered in this narrative review. Two new unpublished cases of ours were added. Cutaneous vasculitis is a rare adverse event to COVID-19 vaccination. It has been observed with mRNA and adenovirus-vector vaccines. IgA vasculitis, lymphocytic and ANCA-associated vasculitis, leukocytoclastic and urticarial vasculitis have been reported. This adverse event can occur after first or second shot. Most cases run a mild to moderate course. Cornerstone of medical treatment are systemic corticosteroids. Complete remission could be achieved in most patients. Vasculitis may not be considered as a contraindication of vaccination, being uncommonly reported and shows a favorable prognosis. The benefit of the vaccination remains high especially for immunocompromised patients. COVID-vaccine induced vasculitis is important in the differential diagnosis of purpuric and vasculitis disorders.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Vasculitis , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination/adverse effects , Vasculitis/chemically induced , Vasculitis/diagnosisSubject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Skin Diseases, Vascular , Vasculitis , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Skin Diseases, Vascular/chemically induced , Skin Diseases, Vascular/etiology , Vaccination/adverse effects , Vasculitis/chemically induced , Vasculitis/etiology , Vasculitis, Leukocytoclastic, Cutaneous/chemically induced , Vasculitis, Leukocytoclastic, Cutaneous/etiologySubject(s)
COVID-19 , Exanthema , Vasculitis , COVID-19 Vaccines , Exanthema/chemically induced , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Vasculitis/chemically induced , Vasculitis/diagnosisSubject(s)
COVID-19 , Vasculitis , COVID-19 Vaccines , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , RNA, Messenger , SARS-CoV-2 , Vasculitis/chemically inducedSubject(s)
COVID-19 , Urticaria , Vasculitis, Leukocytoclastic, Cutaneous , Vasculitis , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Urticaria/chemically induced , Urticaria/diagnosis , Vasculitis/chemically induced , Vasculitis/diagnosis , Vasculitis, Leukocytoclastic, Cutaneous/chemically induced , Vasculitis, Leukocytoclastic, Cutaneous/diagnosisSubject(s)
COVID-19 , Vasculitis , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , RNA, Messenger , SARS-CoV-2 , Vasculitis/chemically induced , Vasculitis/diagnosisSubject(s)
COVID-19 , Vasculitis , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination , Vasculitis/chemically inducedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: As more people become vaccinated against the SARS-CoV-2 virus, reports of delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions are beginning to emerge. METHODS: In this IRB-approved retrospective case series, biopsy specimens of potential cutaneous adverse reactions from the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna mRNA vaccine were identified and reviewed. Clinical information was obtained through the requisition form, referring clinician, or medical chart review. RESULTS: Twelve cases were included. Histopathological features from two injection-site reactions showed a mixed-cell infiltrate with eosinophils and a spongiotic dermatitis with eosinophils. Three biopsy specimens came from generalized eruptions that showed interface changes consistent with an exanthematous drug reaction. Three biopsy specimens revealed a predominantly spongiotic pattern, consistent with eczematous dermatitis. Small-vessel vascular injury was seen in two specimens, which were diagnosed as urticarial vasculitis and leukocytoclastic vasculitis, respectively. There were two cases of new-onset bullous pemphigoid supported by histopathological examination and direct immunofluorescence studies. Eosinophils were seen in 10 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Dermatopathologists should be aware of potential cutaneous adverse reactions to mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines. Histopathological patterns include mixed-cell infiltrates, epidermal spongiosis, and interface changes. Eosinophils are a common finding but are not always present. Direct immunofluorescence studies may be helpful for immune-mediated cutaneous presentations such as vasculitis or bullous pemphigoid.