ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The most important cause of mortality and morbidity of COVID-19 is lung involvement. In this study, the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in the post-acute COVID-19 period on lung functions, functional capacity, dyspnea, quality of life, and psychiatric state were investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were admitted to a PR program after discharge when their general condition had stabilized. The patients' scores of forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), FEV1/FVC ratio, maximum vital capacity (VCmax), peripheral arterial oxygen saturation (PaO2), 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (MRC), St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGSA), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) before and after pulmonary rehabilitation were compared. The patients were divided into three groups, mild, moderate, and severe, according to their thorax CT findings. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients [mean age: 46.7 ± 12.5 (range: 19-76) years] were included in the study. Nineteen patients were in the mild group, 16 in the moderate group, and 17 patients comprised the severe group. Comparing the parameters before and after PR, significant improvement was observed in all three groups in the evaluation parameters after treatment including FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, 6MWD, and MRSC; SGSA symptoms, activity, effects and total scores; HADS depression, anxiety, and total scores (p<0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: PR is a beneficial treatment for patients with COVID-19 with lung involvement for improving lung functions, eliminating dyspnea, and improving functional capacity, psychological status, and life quality of the patient.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , COVID-19/complications , Dyspnea/etiology , Vital Capacity , Forced Expiratory Volume , Exercise ToleranceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) require regular physician visits and referral to specialist ILD clinics. Difficulties or delays in accessing care can limit opportunities to monitor disease trajectory and response to treatment, and the COVID-19 pandemic has added to these challenges. Therefore, home monitoring technologies, such as home handheld spirometry, have gained increased attention as they may help to improve access to care for patients with ILD. However, while several studies have shown that home handheld spirometry in ILD is acceptable for most patients, data from clinical trials are not sufficiently robust to support its use as a primary endpoint. This review discusses the challenges that were encountered with handheld spirometry across three recent ILD studies, which included home spirometry as a primary endpoint, and highlights where further optimisation and research into home handheld spirometry in ILD is required. Rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) as measured by daily home handheld spirometry versus site spirometry was of primary interest in three recently completed studies: STARLINER (NCT03261037), STARMAP and a Phase II study of pirfenidone in progressive fibrosing unclassifiable ILD (NCT03099187). Unanticipated practical and technical issues led to problems with estimating FVC decline. In all three studies, cross-sectional correlations for home handheld versus site spirometry were strong/moderate at baseline and later timepoints, but longitudinal correlations were weak. Other issues observed with the home handheld spirometry data included: high within-patient variability in home handheld FVC measurements; implausible longitudinal patterns in the home handheld spirometry data that were not reflected in site spirometry; and extreme estimated rates of FVC change. CONCLUSIONS: Home handheld spirometry in ILD requires further optimisation and research to ensure accurate and reliable FVC measurements before it can be used as an endpoint in clinical trials. Refresher training, automated alerts of problems and FVC changes, and patient support could help to overcome some practical issues. Despite the challenges, there is value in incorporating home handheld spirometry into clinical practice, and the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the potential for home monitoring technologies to help improve access to care for patients with ILD.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lung Diseases, Interstitial , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pandemics , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnosis , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/drug therapy , Spirometry , Vital Capacity , Disease Progression , Clinical Trials, Phase II as TopicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Persistent symptoms after acute coronavirus-disease-2019 (COVID-19) are common, and there is no significant correlation with the severity of the acute disease. In long-COVID (persistent symptoms >4 weeks after acute COVID-19), respiratory symptoms are frequent, but lung function testing shows only mild changes that do not explain the symptoms. Although COVID-19 may lead to an impairment of the peripheral nervous system and skeletal muscles, respiratory muscle function has not been examined in this setting. METHODS: In this study, we assessed the severity of dyspnea (NYHA-function class) in long-COVID patients and analyzed its association with body mass index (BMI), FEV1, forced vital capacity, other parameters of body plethysmography, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), arterial blood gases, and inspiratory muscle function, assessed by airway occlusion pressure (P0.1) and maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax) in two respiratory clinics in Germany between Oct 2020 and Aug 2021. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 50.2 ± 14.5 years; BMI, 26.7 ± 5.87 kg/m2; NYHA class I, 19%; II, 27%; III, 41%; and IV, 14%. While lung function values and computed tomography or conventional X-ray of the chest were in the normal range, inspiratory muscle function was markedly impaired. P01 was elevated to 154 ± 83%predicted and PImax was reduced to 41 ± 25%predicted. PImax reduction was strongly associated with the severity of dyspnea but independent of BMI, time after acute COVID-19 and most of the other parameters. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that in long-COVID patients, respiratory symptoms may be mainly caused by reduced inspiratory muscle strength. Assessment of PImax and P0.1 might better explain dyspnea than classical lung function tests and DLCO. A prospective study is needed to confirm these results.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , COVID-19/complications , Respiratory Muscles , Vital Capacity/physiology , Dyspnea/etiology , Muscle Strength/physiology , Post-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeABSTRACT
Objective: To explore the clinical effects of different forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) reference equations on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) airflow limitation (AFL) classification. Methods: We conducted a COPD screening program for residents over 40 years old from 2019 to 2021. All residents received the COPD screening questionnaire (COPD-SQ) and spirometry. Postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC (forced vital capacity) <0.7 was used as the diagnostic criterion of COPD and two reference equations of FEV1 predicted values were used for AFL severity classification: the European Respiratory Society Global Lung Function Initiative reference equation in 2012 (GLI-2012) and the Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health reference equation in 2017 (GIRH-2017). Clinical characteristics of patients in GOLD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 1-4 grades classified by the two reference equations were compared. Results: Among 3524 participants, 659 subjects obtained a COPD-SQ score of 16 or more and 743 participants were found to have AFL. The COPD-SQ showed high sensitivity (59%) and specificity (91%) in primary COPD screening. Great differences in COPD severity classification were found when applying the two equations (p < 0.001). Compared with GIRH-2017, patients with AFL classified by GLI-2012 equations were significantly severer. The relationship between symptom scores, acute exacerbation (AE) history distributions and COPD severities classified by the two equations showed a consistent trend of positive but weak correlation. Group A, B, C and D existed in all GOLD 1 to 3 COPD patients, but in GOLD 4, only Groups B and D existed. However, no clear significant differences were found in symptoms, AE risk assessments, risk factors exposure and even the combined ABCD grouping under the two equations. Conclusion: There were significant differences in COPD AFL severity classification with GLI-2012 and GIRH-2017 FEV1 reference equations. But these severity estimation differences did not affect symptoms, AE risk assessments and ABCD grouping of patients at all GOLD grades.
Subject(s)
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Adult , Forced Expiratory Volume , Humans , Lung , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Spirometry , Vital CapacityABSTRACT
The rapidly increasing number of COVID-19 patients has posed a massive burden on many healthcare systems worldwide. Moreover, the limited availability of diagnostic and treatment equipment makes it difficult to treat patients in the hospital. To reduce the burden and maintain the quality of care, asymptomatic patients or patients with mild symptoms are advised to self-isolate at home. However, self-isolated patients need to be continuously monitored as their health can turn into critical condition within a short time. Therefore, a portable device that can remotely monitor the condition and progression of the health of these patients is urgently needed. Here we present a portable device, called Respinos, that can monitor multiparameter vital signs including respiratory rate, heart rate, body temperature, and SpO2. It can also operate as a spirometer that measures forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume (FEV), FEV in the first second (FEV1), and peak expiratory flow Rate (PEFR) parameters which are useful for detecting pulmonary diseases. The spirometer is designed in the form of a tube that can be ergonomically inflated by the patient, and is equipped with an accurate and disposable turbine based air flow sensor to evaluate the patient's respiratory condition. Respinos uses rechargeable batteries and wirelessly connects to a mobile application whereby the patient's condition can be monitored in real-time and consulted with doctors via chat. Extensive comparison against medical-grade reference devices showed good performance of Respinos. Overall results demonstrate the potential of Respinos for remote patient monitoring during and post pandemic.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , Vital Capacity , Forced Expiratory Volume , Spirometry , Vital SignsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which has been a global pandemic for nearly 2 years, presents with highly variable clinical manifestations in both the acute and post-acute periods. This study evaluated the relationship between CRP/albumin ratio and pulmonary function at 12 weeks in patients with post-acute COVID-19. METHODS: The study included 157 patients with a previous diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia who presented to our outpatient clinic with symptoms of post-acute COVID-19 (12 weeks after first testing positive) between July 2021 and October 2021. Patients who had non-severe pneumonia were included in group 1, severe pneumonia that did not require intensive care in group 2, and severe pneumonia that required intensive care in group 3. RESULTS: At 12 weeks, group 3 had significantly lower percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1%), percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%), percent predicted diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO%), and oxygen saturation (SO2) compared to patients in groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.001, 0.04, 0.001, and 0.001, respectively). CRP/albumin ratio was significantly lower in group 2 compared to groups 1 and 3 (p = 0.001). Correlation analysis independent of age and comorbidity showed that CRP/albumin ratio was negatively correlated with SO2, FEV1%, FVC%, and DLCO%. CONCLUSIONS: CRP and albumin levels have prognostic significance during acute COVID-19 infection. The negative correlation between CRP/albumin ratio and respiratory function observed in our study suggest this parameter may be used in the follow-up of patients presenting at 12 weeks with post-acute COVID-19 symptoms.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lung , Albumins/analysis , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/physiopathology , Forced Expiratory Volume , Humans , Lung/physiopathology , Vital Capacity , Post-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeABSTRACT
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is usually less severe in children and adolescents than in adults. However, it can cause severe respiratory illness in a small proportion of children with risk factors. Here, we report a rare case of a 10-year-old boy with postinfectious bronchiolitis obliterans that developed after pneumonia caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). This patient was previously healthy apart from a high body mass index (BMI, 30.13; 99.6th percentile for the age bracket), history of preterm birth (35 weeks), and low birth weight (1,850 g). He had persistent exertional dyspnea after recovering from SARS-CoV-2-related pneumonia. Spirometry revealed obstructive lung disease with the following results: predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%pred), 71%; forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1%pred), 63%; FEV1/FVC, 0.81; and forced expiratory flow25-75%pred, 55%. Chest computed tomography showed multifocal areas of parenchymal hyperlucency and mosaic attenuation in both lungs. This case suggests that careful observation of children with obesity and low birth weight is necessary after recovery from SARS-CoV-2-related pneumonia.
Subject(s)
Bronchiolitis Obliterans , COVID-19 , Pneumonia , Premature Birth , Adolescent , Adult , Bronchiolitis Obliterans/diagnosis , Bronchiolitis Obliterans/etiology , COVID-19/complications , Child , Female , Forced Expiratory Volume , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Male , Pneumonia/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Spirometry , Vital CapacityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Few studies have assessed lung function in Hispanic subjects recovering from mild COVID-19. Therefore, we examined the prevalence of impaired pulmonary diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) as defined by values below the lower limit of normal (< LLN, < 5th percentile) or less than 80% of predicted in Hispanics recovering from mild COVID-19. We also examined the prevalence of a restrictive spirometric pattern as defined by the ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) to forced vital capacity (FVC) being ≥ LLN with the FVC being < LLN. Finally, we evaluated previous studies to find factors correlated to impaired DLCO post-COVID-19. METHODS: In this observational study, adult patients (n = 146) with mild COVID-19 were recruited from a long-term follow-up COVID-19 clinic in Yucatan, Mexico, between March and August 2021. Spirometry, DLCO, and self-reported signs/symptoms were recorded 34 ± 4 days after diagnosis. RESULTS: At post-evaluation, 20% and 30% of patients recovering from COVID-19 were classified as having a restrictive spirometric pattern and impaired DLCO, respectively; 13% had both. The most prevalent reported symptoms were fatigue (73%), a persistent cough (43%), shortness of breath (42%) and a blocked/runny nose (36%). Increased age and a restrictive spirometric pattern increased the probability of having an impaired DLCO while having a blocked nose and excessive sweating decreased the likelihood. The proportion of patients with previous mild COVID-19 and impaired DLCO increased by 13% when the definition of impaired DLCO was < 80% predicted instead of below the LLN. When comparing previous studies, having severe COVID-19 increased the proportion of those with impaired DLCO by 21% compared to those with mild COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of patients with mild COVID-19 have impaired DLCO thirty-four days post-diagnosis. The criteria that define impaired DLCO and the severity of COVID-19 disease affects the proportion of those with impaired DLCO at follow-up. One-fifth of patients have a restrictive spirometric pattern.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Forced Expiratory Volume , Humans , Lung , Spirometry , Vital CapacityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the validity and home use of a personal ultrasonic spirometer. METHODS: Supervised spirometry was performed using laboratory equipment and a personal ultrasonic spirometer. In addition, the ability of children to perform acceptable spirometry during supervised telehealth appointments at home was assessed. RESULTS: 59 children completed spirometry on both devices. There was high between-device intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC): ICC 0.991 (95% CI 0.985 to 0.995) and 0.989 (95% CI 0.981 to 0.993), respectively. Bland-Altman analysis revealed mean bias and limits of agreement of -0.01 (-0.22 to 0.24) L for FEV1 and -0.02 (-0.30 to 0.33) L for FVC. 125 of 140 (89%) supervised telehealth spirometry sessions were acceptable. CONCLUSION: There was excellent reliability in between-device measurements; however, the limits of agreement were wide. Therefore, caution is needed if the device is used interchangeably with laboratory equipment. High success rates of telehealth spirometry sessions indicate the device is suitable for this application.
Subject(s)
Telemedicine , Ultrasonics , Child , Forced Expiratory Volume , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Spirometry , Vital CapacityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Concerns have been raised on the impact of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) on lung transplant (LTx) patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the transplant function pre- and post-COVID-19 in LTx patients. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from LTx patients with confirmed COVID-19 from all 3 Dutch transplant centers, between February 2020 and September 2021. Spirometry results were collected pre-COVID-19, 3- and 6-months post infection. RESULTS: Seventy-four LTx patients were included. Forty-two (57%) patients were admitted, 19 (26%) to the intensive care unit (ICU). The in-hospital mortality was 20%. Twelve out of 19 ICU patients died (63%), a further 3 died on general wards. Patients with available spirometry (78% at 3 months, 65% at 6 months) showed a significant decline in mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (ΔFEV1 138 ± 39 ml, p = 0.001), and forced vital capacity (FVC) (ΔFVC 233 ±74 ml, p = 0.000) 3 months post infection. Lung function improved slightly from 3 to 6 months after COVID-19 (ΔFEV1 24 ± 38 ml; ΔFVC 100 ± 46 ml), but remained significantly lower than pre-COVID-19 values (ΔFEV1 86 ml ± 36 ml, p = 0.021; ΔFVC 117 ± 35 ml, p = 0.012). FEV1/FVC was > 0.70. CONCLUSIONS: In LTx patients COVID-19 results in high mortality in hospitalized patients. Lung function declined 3 months after infection and gradually improved at 6 months, but remained significantly lower compared to pre-COVID-19 values. The more significant decline in FVC than in FEV1 and FEV1/FVC > 70%, suggested a more restrictive pattern.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lung Transplantation , Forced Expiratory Volume , Humans , Lung , Retrospective Studies , Spirometry , Vital CapacityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the performance of different respiratory function testing parameters in a multidisciplinary amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) clinic. METHODS: Demographics, clinical data, and respiratory testing parameters were abstracted from the medical records of patients who attended a multidisciplinary ALS clinic from 2008 to 2016. We compared the performance of the 3 primary respiratory test parameters used by Medicare for the initiation of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) (forced vital capacity [FVC] < 50% predicted, maximum inspiratory pressure [MIP] < 60 cm H2O, and abnormal overnight pulse oximetry [OvOx]) on how they related to several clinically relevant attributes. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-six patients were identified who underwent at least 1 respiratory test. Abnormalities of OvOx, MIP, and FVC occurred at a median of 1.6, 1.5, and 3.8 years from disease onset, respectively (p < 0.00001). Patients with bulbar-onset ALS exhibited earlier abnormalities in MIP and FVC than in spinal-onset ALS (p < 0.005). The median survival after an abnormal OvOx, MIP, or FVC test was 1.4, 1.4, and 0.9 years, respectively (p < 0.0001). Using the ALS Functional Rating Score respiratory subscales, at the time of reported respiratory symptoms there were abnormalities in OvOx (60%), MIP (69%), and FVC (19%). Conversely, when respiratory parameter abnormalities preceded reported respiratory symptoms, this occurred with frequencies in OvOx (79%), MIP (42%), or FVC (24%). Four hundred forty-three patients (93.1%) developed at least 1 abnormal respiratory measure meeting Medicare criteria for NIV consideration, but fewer than 50% in our cohort demonstrated NIV use. Improved survival in subjects using NIV was statistically significant in patients with bulbar-onset ALS. DISCUSSION: Abnormalities in OvOx and MIP perform better than FVC at early detection of neuromuscular respiratory weakness in ALS. Initiation of NIV in patients with respiratory insufficiency may improve the overall survival in ALS. In the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic, FVC and MIP have not been routinely performed because of infectious aerosol generation. OvOx, which we now routinely mail to patients' homes, has been used exclusively during the COVID-19 pandemic and allows for continued remote monitoring of the respiratory status of patients with ALS. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This cohort study provides Class III evidence that in people with ALS, OvOx and MIP are valuable respiratory parameters for the detection of early respiratory insufficiency.
Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , COVID-19 , Noninvasive Ventilation , Respiratory Insufficiency , Aged , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/complications , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/diagnosis , Cohort Studies , Humans , Medicare , Pandemics , Respiratory Insufficiency/diagnosis , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology , United States , Vital CapacityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Individuals who suffer from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia may experience pulmonary dysfunction during the chronic period due to pulmonary parenchymal damage after acute disease. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the pulmonary function and exercise capacity of patients treated for COVID 19 pneumonia after discharge. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 79 people who were hospitalized with COVID-19 between March and October 2020 were evaluated at least two months after discharge. A pulmonary function test and a six-minute walk test were administered to the individuals included in the study. RESULTS: Restrictive-type disorder was detected in 21.5% of the individuals who were evaluated at least two months after discharge. The forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and the forced vital capacity (FVC) values of the pulmonary function tests were significantly lower in the individuals with severe/critical clinical disease compared to those with moderate disease (p = 0.004 and p = 0.001, respectively). Although the six-minute walk test (6MWT) distances were lower in the severe/critical group than in the moderate group, the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals who are discharged after hospitalization for COVID-19 pneumonia may develop a restrictive type of pulmonary dysfunction. Therefore, survivors of COVID-19 pneumonia should be evaluated for pulmonary function and rehabilitation needs and should be provided with treatment as required.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pneumonia , COVID-19/complications , Cross-Sectional Studies , Exercise Tolerance , Forced Expiratory Volume , Humans , Lung , Vital CapacityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to ascertain the long-term respiratory effects of COVID-19 pneumonia through pulmonary function tests in follow-ups at 1 and 6 months. METHODS: Our study was conducted between August 1, 2020 and April 30, 2021. At 1 month after discharge, follow-up evaluations, PFTs, and lung imaging were performed on patients aged above 18 years who had been diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia. In the 6th month, the PFTs were repeated for those with pulmonary dysfunction. RESULTS: A total of 219 patients (mean age, 49±11.9 years) were included. Pathological PFT results were noted in the 1st month for 80 patients and in the 6th month for 46 (7 had obstructive disorder, 15 had restrictive disorder, and 28 had small airway obstruction) patients. A significant difference was found between abnormal PFT results and patient-described dyspnea in the 1st month of follow-up. The 6-month PFT values (especially those for forced vital capacity) were statistically significantly lower in the patients for whom imaging did not indicate complete radiological improvement at the 1-month follow-up. No statistically significant difference was found between the severity of the first computed tomography findings or clinical condition on emergency admission and pulmonary dysfunction (Pearson's chi-square test, P=0.904; Fisher's exact test, P=0.727). CONCLUSION: It is important that patients with COVID-19 pneumonia be followed up for at least 1 month after discharge to be monitored for potential long-term lung damage. PFTs should be administered to those in whom ongoing dyspnea, which started with COVID-19, and/or full recovery were not identified in pulmonary imaging.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Aged , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Middle Aged , Respiratory Function Tests , SARS-CoV-2 , Vital CapacitySubject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/complications , Guillain-Barre Syndrome/etiology , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Aged , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Vital Capacity , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To quantify the potential decline in dynamic lung volumes following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the general population. METHODS: A prospective matched cohort study of adult Copenhagen General Population Study (CGPS) participants with a prepandemic spirometry available. CGPS individuals with positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test performed repeat spirometry, a questionnaire regarding respiratory symptoms, and diffusing capacity test for carbon monoxide. A matched uninfected CGPS control sample was used, and simple regression and linear mixed effect models were computed to study lung function decline. RESULTS: A total of 606 individuals were included; 92/107 (85.9%) with positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test experienced coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms and 12 (11.2%) were hospitalized. Spirometry was performed at median 5.6 months (interquartile range, 3.9-12.8) after positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test. COVID-19 was associated with adjusted 7.3 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], .3-14.3) and 22.6 mL (95% CI, 13.1-32.0) steeper decline in annual forced expiratory volume in first second (FEV1) and FVC or total 113.8 and 301.3 mL lower FEV1 and FVC from baseline to follow-up. Results were robust in analyses restricted to individuals not requiring hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19-related declines of dynamic lung volume in the general population not requiring hospitalization were small but measurable.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Cohort Studies , Humans , Lung , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Vital CapacityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: With an increase in published reports on respiratory rehabilitation (RR) in severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), there is a need for a meta-analysis and systematic review to measure the effects of the RR in SARS. OBJECTIVE: Objective of the review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RR in patients recovering from SARS. METHODS: PubMed/ MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and Clinical Trial Registries were systematically searched (between January 1, 2003, to July 31, 2021) to identify all patients who received RR, at least for six days, following SARS. The primary outcome was exercise capacity [6-meter walking distance (6-MWD)], and secondary outcomes were change in pulmonary function test (PFT) parameters, activities in daily livings (ADLs), and quality of life (QoL). Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.4. RESULTS: Twenty-one observational studies, including eight comparative studies, were included. Eight comparative studies participated in quantitative meta-analysis. The intervention group, who received RR, improved significantly in exercise capacity (6-MWD) [mean difference (MD):45.79, (95% CI:31.66-59.92)] and PFT parameters, especially in forced vital capacity (FVC%) [MD:4.38, (95% CI:0.15-8.60)], and diffusion lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO%) [MD:11.78, (95% CI:5.10-18.46)]. The intervention group failed to demonstrate significant improvement in ADLs and QoL outcomes. No significant adverse events were reported during the intervention. CONCLUSION: Respiratory rehabilitation can improve exercise capacity and PFT parameters in patients recovering from SARS infection. The RR does not cause serious adverse events. Clinical trials to determine the best RR program (in terms of initiation, duration, and components) in SARS and its treatment efficacy, both in the short and long- term are needed.
Subject(s)
Quality of Life , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome , Humans , Lung , Vital CapacityABSTRACT
Background: Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was discovered in December 2019 and has infected more than 80 million people worldwide, and more than 50 million people have achieved a clinical cure. In this study, the pulmonary function results of patients after clinical medicine for three months were reported. Objective: To investigate the effect of COVID-19 on lung function in patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 56 COVID-19-infected patients who were cured after the clinical treatment at Taizhou Public Health Medical Center in Zhejiang Province from January 31, 2020, to March 10, 2020. At discharge and three months after discharge, lung function was measured, including inspiratory vital capacity (IVC), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in first second (FEV1), forced expiratory volume in first second to inspiratory vital capacity (FEV1/IVC), maximum mid-expiratory flow rate (MEF), peak expiratory flow rate (PEF), and carbon monoxide dispersion (DLCO). Results: At discharge, there were 37 patients (66.1%) with pulmonary dysfunction, 22 patients (39.3%) with ventilation dysfunction, 31 cases (55.4%) with small airway dysfunction, and 16 cases (28.6%) with restricted ventilation dysfunction combined with small airway dysfunction. At 3 months after discharge, 24 of the 56 patients still had pulmonary dysfunction and all of them had small airway dysfunction, of which 10 patients (17.9%) were restricted ventilation dysfunction combined with small airway dysfunction. DLCO was measured three months after discharge. Twenty-nine patients (51.8%) had mild to moderate diffuse dysfunction. All pulmonary function indexes of 56 patients recovered gradually after 3 months after release, except FEV1/IVC, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There were 41 patients of normal type (73.2%) and 15 patients of severe type (26.8%). Among the 15 severe patients, 8 patients (53.3%) had ventilation dysfunction at discharge, 9 patients (60%) had small airway dysfunction, 4 patients (26.7%) still had ventilation dysfunction 3 months after discharge, 7 patients (46.7%) had small airway dysfunction, and 10 patients (66.7%) had diffuse dysfunction. Among the 41 common type patients, 14 patients (34.1%) had ventilation dysfunction at discharge, 22 patients (53.7%) had small airway dysfunction, 6 patients (14.6%) still had ventilation dysfunction 3 months after discharge, 17 patients (41.5%) had small airway dysfunction, and 19 patients (46.3%) had diffuse dysfunction. Patients with severe COVID-19 had more pulmonary impairment and improved pulmonary function than normal patients. Conclusion: COVID-19 infection can cause lung function impairment, manifested as restricted ventilation dysfunction, small airway dysfunction, and diffuse dysfunction. The pulmonary function of most patients was improved 3 months after clinical cure and discharge, and some patients remained with mild to moderate diffuse dysfunction and small airway dysfunction.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Lung , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Vital CapacitySubject(s)
COVID-19/physiopathology , Cognitive Dysfunction/physiopathology , Endothelium, Vascular/physiopathology , Aged , COVID-19/psychology , COVID-19/rehabilitation , Cognitive Dysfunction/psychology , Convalescence , Female , Forced Expiratory Volume , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Pulmonary Diffusing Capacity , SARS-CoV-2 , Vital CapacityABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Prospective and longitudinal data on pulmonary injury over one year after acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are sparse. We aim to determine reductions in pulmonary function and respiratory related quality of life up to 12 months after acute COVID-19. METHODS: Patients with acute COVID-19 were enrolled into an ongoing single-centre, prospective observational study and prospectively examined 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months after onset of COVID-19 symptoms. Chest CT-scans, pulmonary function and symptoms assessed by St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire were used to evaluate respiratory limitations. Patients were stratified according to severity of acute COVID-19. RESULTS: Median age of all patients was 57 years, 37.8% were female. Higher age, male sex and higher BMI were associated with acute-COVID-19 severity (p < 0.0001, 0.001 and 0.004 respectively). Also, pulmonary restriction and reduced carbon monoxide diffusion capacity was associated with disease severity. In patients with restriction and impaired diffusion capacity, FVC improved over 12 months from 61.32 to 71.82, TLC from 68.92 to 76.95, DLCO from 60.18 to 68.98 and KCO from 81.28 to 87.80 (percent predicted values; p = 0.002, 0.045, 0.0002 and 0.0005). The CT-score of lung involvement in the acute phase was associated with restriction and reduction in diffusion capacity in follow-up. Respiratory symptoms improved for patients in higher severity groups during follow-up, but not for patients with initially mild disease. CONCLUSION: Severity of respiratory failure during COVID-19 correlates with the degree of pulmonary function impairment and respiratory quality of life in the year after acute infection.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/physiopathology , Lung/physiopathology , Quality of Life , Respiratory Insufficiency/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , COVID-19/therapy , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Female , Forced Expiratory Volume/physiology , Hospitalization , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy , Pulmonary Diffusing Capacity/physiology , Recovery of Function , Respiration, Artificial , Respiratory Function Tests , Respiratory Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Total Lung Capacity/physiology , Vital Capacity/physiology , Post-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Thousands of people worldwide are suffering the consequences of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), and impulse oscillometry (IOS) and lung ultrasound (LUS) might be important tools for the follow-up of this population. Our objective was to prospectively evaluate abnormalities detected using these two methods in a cohort of COVID-19 survivors with respiratory symptoms. METHODS: In this follow-up study, 59 patients underwent clinical evaluations, spirometry, IOS and LUS in the 2nd (M1) and 5th (M2) months after diagnostic confirmation of COVID-19 by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Aeration scores were obtained from the LUS exams based on the following findings: B-lines >2, coalescent B-lines, and subpleural consolidations. RESULTS: Fifty-nine (100%) participants had cough and/or dyspnea at M1, which decreased to 38 (64.4%) at M2 (p = 0.0001). Spirometry was abnormal in 26 (44.1%) and 20 (33.9%) participants at M1 and M2, respectively, although without statistical significance (p = 0.10). Normal examination, restrictive patterns, and obstructive patterns were observed in 33 (55.9%), 18 (30.5%), and 8 (13.6%) participants, respectively, at M1 and in 39 (66.1%), 13 (22%), and 7 (11.9%) participants at M2 (p = 0.14). Regarding IOS, considering changes in resistive and reactive parameters, abnormal exams were detected in 52 (88.1%) and 42 (71.2%) participants at M1 and M2, respectively (p = 0.002). Heterogeneity of resistance between 4 and 20 Hz >20% was observed in 38 (64.4%) and 33 (55.9%) participants at M1 and M2, respectively (p = 0.30). Abnormal LUS was observed in 46 (78%) and 36 (61%) participants at M1 and M2, respectively (p = 0.002), with a reduction in aeration scores between M1 and M2 [5 (2-8) vs. 3 (0-6) points, p<0.0001]. CONCLUSIONS: IOS and LUS abnormalities are frequent in the first 5 months post-COVID-19 infection; however, when prospectively evaluated, significant improvement is evident in the parameters measured by these two methods.