Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on patients and families with Dravet syndrome.
Brambilla, Isabella; Aibar, José Ángel; Hallet, Anne Sophie; Bibic, Irena; Cardenal-Muñoz, Elena; Prpic, Igor; Darra, Francesca; Specchio, Nicola; Nabbout, Rima.
  • Brambilla I; Dravet Italia Onlus, Milano, Italy.
  • Aibar JÁ; Research Center for Pediatric Epilepsies Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Hallet AS; Dravet Syndrome Foundation Spain, Madrid, Spain.
  • Bibic I; Alliance Syndrome de Dravet, Malesherbes, France.
  • Cardenal-Muñoz E; Dravet Sindrom Hrvatska, Split, Croatia.
  • Prpic I; Dravet Syndrome Foundation Spain, Madrid, Spain.
  • Darra F; Department of Child Neurology, Medical Faculty, Referral Center for Childhood Epilepsy and Convulsive Disorders, University Hospital Rijeka, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
  • Specchio N; Research Center for Pediatric Epilepsies Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Nabbout R; Child Neuropsychiatry, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Epilepsia Open ; 6(1): 216-224, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1001847
ABSTRACT
We explored the impact of coronavirus virus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on patients with Dravet syndrome (DS) and their family. With European patient advocacy groups (PAGs), we developed an online survey in 10 languages to question health status, behavior, personal protection, and health services before and after lockdown. Approximately 538 European PAG members received electronic invitations. Survey ran from April 14, to May 17, 2020, with 219 answers; median age 9 year 10 months. Protection against infection was highly used prior to COVID-19, but 88% added facemask-use according to pandemic recommendations. Only one patient was tested positive for COVID-19. Most had stable epilepsy during lockdown, and few families (4%) needed emergency care during lockdown. However, behavior disorder worsened in over one-third of patients, regardless of epilepsy changes. Half of appointments scheduled prior to lockdown were postponed; 12 patients (11%) had appointments fulfilled; and 39 (36%) had remote consultations. Responders welcomed remote consultations. Half of responders were unsatisfied with psychological remote support as only few (21 families) received this support. None of the five of patient in clinical trials stopped investigational treatment. Prior adoption of protective measures against general infection might have contributed to avoiding COVID-19 infections. Protocols for the favored remote contact ought to now be prepared.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Behavior / Epilepsies, Myoclonic / Problem Behavior / COVID-19 / Health Services / Masks Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Language: English Journal: Epilepsia Open Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Epi4.12464

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Behavior / Epilepsies, Myoclonic / Problem Behavior / COVID-19 / Health Services / Masks Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Language: English Journal: Epilepsia Open Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Epi4.12464