Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Implementing telemedicine for the management of benign urologic conditions: a single centre experience in Italy.
Checcucci, Enrico; De Luca, Stefano; Alessio, Paolo; Verri, Paolo; Granato, Stefano; De Cillis, Sabrina; Amparore, Daniele; Sica, Michele; Piramide, Federico; Piana, Alberto; Volpi, Gabriele; Manfredi, Matteo; Balestra, Gabriella; Autorino, Riccardo; Fiori, Cristian; Porpiglia, Francesco.
  • Checcucci E; Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043, Orbassano, Turin, Italy. checcu.e@hotmail.it.
  • De Luca S; Uro-technology and SoMe Working Group of the Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Working Party of the European Association of Urology (EAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands. checcu.e@hotmail.it.
  • Alessio P; Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy. checcu.e@hotmail.it.
  • Verri P; Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
  • Granato S; Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
  • De Cillis S; Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
  • Amparore D; Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
  • Sica M; Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
  • Piramide F; Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
  • Piana A; Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
  • Volpi G; Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
  • Manfredi M; Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
  • Balestra G; Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
  • Autorino R; Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
  • Fiori C; Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Polytechnic University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
  • Porpiglia F; Division of Urology, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, USA.
World J Urol ; 39(8): 3109-3115, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1002078
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To assess the use of telemedicine with phone-call visits as a practical tool to follow-up with patients affected by urological benign diseases, whose clinic visits had been cancelled during the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS:

Patients were contacted via phone-call and a specific questionnaire was administered to evaluate the health status of these patients and to identify those who needed an "in-person" ambulatory visit due to the worsening of their condition. Secondarily, the patients' perception of a potential shift towards a "telemedicine" approach to the management of their condition and to indirectly evaluate their desire to return to "in-person" clinic visits.

RESULTS:

607 were contacted by phone-call. 87.5% (531/607) of the cases showed stability of the symptoms so no clinic in-person or emergency visits were needed. 81.5% (495/607) of patients were more concerned about the risk of contagion than their urological condition. The median score for phone visit comprehensibility and ease of communication of exams was 5/5; whilst patients' perception of phone visits' usefulness was scored 4/5. 53% (322/607) of the interviewees didn't own the basic supports required to be able to perform a real telemedicine consult according to the required standards.

CONCLUSION:

Telemedicine approach limits the number of unnecessary accesses to medical facilities and represents an important tool for the limitation of the risk of transmission of infectious diseases, such as COVID-19. However, infrastructures, health workers and patients should reach out to a computerization process to allow a wider diffusion of more advanced forms of telemedicine, such as televisit.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Urologic Diseases / Attitude to Health / Telemedicine / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: World J Urol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S00345-020-03536-x

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Urologic Diseases / Attitude to Health / Telemedicine / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: World J Urol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S00345-020-03536-x