Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Impact of Telemedicine on Patient Satisfaction and Perceptions of Care Quality in Radiation Oncology.
Shaverdian, Narek; Gillespie, Erin F; Cha, Elaine; Kim, Soo Young; Benvengo, Stephanie; Chino, Fumiko; Kang, Jung Julie; Li, Yuelin; Atkinson, Thomas M; Lee, Nancy; Washington, Charles M; Cahlon, Oren; Gomez, Daniel R.
  • Shaverdian N; 1Department of Radiation Oncology.
  • Gillespie EF; 1Department of Radiation Oncology.
  • Cha E; 1Department of Radiation Oncology.
  • Kim SY; 2Department of Psychiatry and Behavior Sciences, and.
  • Benvengo S; 1Department of Radiation Oncology.
  • Chino F; 1Department of Radiation Oncology.
  • Kang JJ; 1Department of Radiation Oncology.
  • Li Y; 2Department of Psychiatry and Behavior Sciences, and.
  • Atkinson TM; 3Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • Lee N; 2Department of Psychiatry and Behavior Sciences, and.
  • Washington CM; 1Department of Radiation Oncology.
  • Cahlon O; 1Department of Radiation Oncology.
  • Gomez DR; 1Department of Radiation Oncology.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 19(10): 1174-1180, 2021 01 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1006433
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The COVID-19 pandemic has transformed cancer care with the rapid expansion of telemedicine, but given the limited use of telemedicine in oncology, concerns have been raised about the quality of care being delivered. We assessed the patient experience with telemedicine in routine radiation oncology practice to determine satisfaction, quality of care, and opportunities for optimization. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Patients seen within a multistate comprehensive cancer center for prepandemic office visits and intrapandemic telemedicine visits in December 2019 through June 2020 who completed patient experience questionnaires were evaluated. Patient satisfaction between office and telemedicine consultations were compared, patient visit-type preferences were assessed, and factors associated with an office visit preference were determined.

RESULTS:

In total, 1,077 patients were assessed (office visit, n=726; telemedicine, n=351). The telemedicine-consult survey response rate was 40%. No significant differences were seen in satisfaction scores between office and telemedicine consultations, including the appointment experience versus expectation, quality of physician's explanation, and level of physician concern and friendliness. Among telemedicine survey respondents, 45% and 34% preferred telemedicine and office visits, respectively, and 21% had no preference for their visit type. Most respondents found their confidence in their physician (90%), understanding of the treatment plan (88%), and confidence in their treatment (87%) to be better or no different than with an office visit. Patients with better performance status and who were married/partnered were more likely to prefer in-person office visit consultations (odds ratio [OR], 1.04 [95% CI, 1.00-1.08]; P=.047, and 2.41 [95% CI, 1.14-5.47]; P=.009, respectively). Patients with telephone-only encounters were more likely to report better treatment plan understanding with an office visit (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.00-4.77; P=.04).

CONCLUSIONS:

This study is the first to assess telemedicine in routine radiation oncology practice, and found high patient satisfaction and confidence in their care. Optimization of telemedicine in oncology should be a priority, specifically access to audiovisual capabilities that can improve patient-oncologist communication.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Telemedicine / Radiation Oncology / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Journal subject: Neoplasms Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Telemedicine / Radiation Oncology / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Journal subject: Neoplasms Year: 2021 Document Type: Article