Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Radiology departments as COVID-19 entry-door might improve healthcare efficacy and efficiency, and emergency department safety.
García Santos, José M; Plasencia Martínez, Juana M; Fabuel Ortega, Pablo; Lozano Ros, Marina; Sánchez Ayala, María Carmen; Pérez Hernández, Gloria; Menchón Martínez, Pedro.
  • García Santos JM; Radiology Department, University General Hospital Morales Meseguer, C/ Marqués de Los Vélez, s/n., 30008, Murcia, Spain. josem.garcia11@carm.es.
  • Plasencia Martínez JM; Radiology Department, University General Hospital Morales Meseguer, C/ Marqués de Los Vélez, s/n., 30008, Murcia, Spain.
  • Fabuel Ortega P; Primary Care Health Center Vistabella-La Flota, 6th Health Area, Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
  • Lozano Ros M; Radiology Department, University General Hospital Morales Meseguer, C/ Marqués de Los Vélez, s/n., 30008, Murcia, Spain.
  • Sánchez Ayala MC; Primary Care Health Center Molina-Jesús Marín, 6th Health Area, Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
  • Pérez Hernández G; Radiology Department, University General Hospital Morales Meseguer, C/ Marqués de Los Vélez, s/n., 30008, Murcia, Spain.
  • Menchón Martínez P; Neumology Section, University General Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain.
Insights Imaging ; 12(1): 1, 2021 Jan 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1007145
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Possible COVID-19 pneumonia patients (ppCOVID-19) generally overwhelmed emergency departments (EDs) during the first COVID-19 wave. Home-confinement and primary-care phone follow-up was the first-level regional policy for preventing EDs to collapse. But when X-rays were needed, the traditional outpatient workflow at the radiology department was inefficient and potential interpersonal infections were of concern. We aimed to assess the efficiency of a primary-care high-resolution radiology service (pcHRRS) for ppCOVID-19 in terms of time at hospital and decision's reliability.

METHODS:

We assessed 849 consecutive ppCOVID-19 patients, 418 through the pcHRRS (home-confined ppCOVID-19 with negative-group 1- and positive-group 2-X-rays) and 431 arriving with respiratory symptoms to the ED by themselves (group 3). The pcHRRS provided X-rays and oximetry in an only-one-patient agenda. Radiologists made next-step decisions (group 1 pneumonia negative, home-confinement follow-up; group 2 pneumonia positive, ED assessment) according to X-ray results. We used ANOVA and Bonferroni correction, Student T, Chi2 tests to analyse changes in the ED workload, time-to-decision differences between groups, potential delays in patients acceding through the ED, and pcHRRS performance for deciding admission.

RESULTS:

The pcHRRS halved ED respiratory patients (49.2%), allowed faster decisions (group 1 vs. home-discharged group 2 and group 3 patients 041 ± 105 h; 336 ± 258 h; 350 ± 316 h; group 1 vs. all group 2 and group 3 patients 041 ± 105 h; 5.25 ± 3.08; 536 ± 436 h; group 2 vs. group 3 admitted patients 527 ± 308 h vs. 742 ± 502 h; all p < 0.001) and prompted admission (84/93, 90.3%) while maintaining time response for ED patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our pcHRRS may be a more efficient entry-door for ppCOVID-19 by decreasing ED patients and making expedited decisions while guaranteeing social distance.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Insights Imaging Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S13244-020-00954-8

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Insights Imaging Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S13244-020-00954-8