Your browser doesn't support javascript.
A Direct Method for RT-PCR Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Clinical Samples.
El-Kafrawy, Sherif A; El-Daly, Mai M; Hassan, Ahmed M; Kaki, Reham M; Abuzenadah, Adel M; Kamal, Mohammad A; Azhar, Esam I.
  • El-Kafrawy SA; Special Infectious Agents Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.
  • El-Daly MM; Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.
  • Hassan AM; Special Infectious Agents Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.
  • Kaki RM; Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.
  • Abuzenadah AM; Special Infectious Agents Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.
  • Kamal MA; Department of Medicine, Department of Infectious Disease and Department of Infection Control and Environmental Health King Abdulaziz University Hospital, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.
  • Azhar EI; Special Infectious Agents Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 9(1)2021 Jan 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1011452
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a global pandemic of acute respiratory disease (COVID-19). SARS-CoV-2 is a positive-strand RNA virus and its genomic characterization has played a vital role in the design of appropriate diagnostics tests. The current RT-PCR protocol for SARS-CoV-2 detects two regions of the viral genome, requiring RNA extraction and several hours. There is a need for fast, simple, and cost-effective detection strategies.

METHODS:

we optimized a protocol for direct RT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 without the need for nucleic acid extraction. Nasopharyngeal samples were diluted to 13 using diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated water. The diluted samples were incubated at 95 °C for 5 min in a thermal cycler, followed by a cooling step at 4 °C for 5 min. Samples then underwent reverse transcription real-time RT-PCR in the E and RdRp genes.

RESULTS:

our direct detection protocol showed 100% concordance with the standard protocol with an average Ct value difference of 4.38 for the E region and 3.85 for the RdRp region.

CONCLUSION:

the direct PCR technique was found to be a reliable and sensitive method that can be used to reduce the time and cost of the assay by removing the need for RNA extraction. It enables the use of the assay in research, diagnostics, and screening for COVID-19 in regions with fewer economic resources, where supplies are more limited allowing for wider use for screening.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Healthcare9010037

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Healthcare9010037