Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Performance evaluation of stool DNA methylation tests in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gachabayov, Mahir; Lebovics, Edward; Rojas, Aram; Felsenreich, Daniel M; Latifi, Rifat; Bergamaschi, Roberto.
  • Gachabayov M; Section of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
  • Lebovics E; Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
  • Rojas A; Section of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
  • Felsenreich DM; Section of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
  • Latifi R; Section of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
  • Bergamaschi R; Section of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Colorectal Dis ; 23(5): 1030-1042, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1012951
ABSTRACT

AIM:

There is not sufficient evidence about whether stool DNA methylation tests allow prioritizing patients to colonoscopy. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there will be a wait-list for rescheduling colonoscopies once the mitigation is lifted. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the accuracy of stool DNA methylation tests in detecting colorectal cancer.

METHODS:

The PubMed, Cochrane Library and MEDLINE via Ovid were searched. Studies reporting the accuracy (Sackett phase 2 or 3) of stool DNA methylation tests to detect sporadic colorectal cancer were included. The DerSimonian-Laird method with random-effects model was utilized for meta-analysis.

RESULTS:

Forty-six studies totaling 16 149 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of all single genes and combinations was 62.7% (57.7%, 67.4%) and 91% (89.5%, 92.2%), respectively. Combinations of genes provided higher sensitivity compared to single genes (80.8% [75.1%, 85.4%] vs. 57.8% [52.3%, 63.1%]) with no significant decrease in specificity (87.8% [84.1%, 90.7%] vs. 92.1% [90.4%, 93.5%]). The most accurate single gene was found to be SDC2 with a sensitivity of 83.1% (72.6%, 90.2%) and a specificity of 91.2% (88.6%, 93.2%).

CONCLUSIONS:

Stool DNA methylation tests have high specificity (92%) with relatively lower sensitivity (81%). Combining genes increases sensitivity compared to single gene tests. The single most accurate gene is SDC2, which should be considered for further research.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Colorectal Neoplasms / Genetic Testing / Early Detection of Cancer / Feces / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Colorectal Dis Journal subject: Gastroenterology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Codi.15521

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Colorectal Neoplasms / Genetic Testing / Early Detection of Cancer / Feces / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Colorectal Dis Journal subject: Gastroenterology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Codi.15521