Your browser doesn't support javascript.
80 questions for UK biological security.
Kemp, Luke; Aldridge, David C; Booy, Olaf; Bower, Hilary; Browne, Des; Burgmann, Mark; Burt, Austin; Cunningham, Andrew A; Dando, Malcolm; Dick, Jaimie T A; Dye, Christopher; Weiss Evans, Sam; Gallardo, Belinda; Godfray, H Charles J; Goodfellow, Ian; Gubbins, Simon; Holt, Lauren A; Jones, Kate E; Kandil, Hazem; Martin, Phillip; McCaughan, Mark; McLeish, Caitríona; Meany, Thomas; Millett, Kathryn; ÓhÉigeartaigh, Sean S; Patron, Nicola J; Rhodes, Catherine; Roy, Helen E; Shackelford, Gorm; Smith, Derek; Spence, Nicola; Steiner, Helene; Sundaram, Lalitha S; Voeneky, Silja; Walker, John R; Watkins, Harry; Whitby, Simon; Wood, James; Sutherland, William J.
  • Kemp L; Biosecurity Research Initiative at St Catharine's (BioRISC), St Catharine's College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Aldridge DC; Centre for the Study of Existential Risk (CSER), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Booy O; Biosecurity Research Initiative at St Catharine's (BioRISC), St Catharine's College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Bower H; Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Browne D; Great Britain Non-native Species Secretariat, Sand Hutton, Animal and Plant Health Agency, York, United Kingdom.
  • Burgmann M; Centre for Wildlife Management, School of Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom.
  • Burt A; UK Public Health Rapid Support Team, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
  • Cunningham AA; Biosecurity Research Initiative at St Catharine's (BioRISC), St Catharine's College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Dando M; Centre for the Study of Existential Risk (CSER), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Dick JTA; Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Dye C; UK Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Weiss Evans S; Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Gallardo B; Division of Peace Studies and International Development, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom.
  • Godfray HCJ; Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
  • Goodfellow I; Oxford Martin School and Department of Zoology, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Gubbins S; Biosecurity Research Initiative at St Catharine's (BioRISC), St Catharine's College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Holt LA; Centre for the Study of Existential Risk (CSER), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Jones KE; Program on Science, Technology, and Society, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, United States of America.
  • Kandil H; Biosecurity Research Initiative at St Catharine's (BioRISC), St Catharine's College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Martin P; Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • McCaughan M; Oxford Martin School and Department of Zoology, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • McLeish C; Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Meany T; The Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Surrey, United Kingdom.
  • Millett K; Biosecurity Research Initiative at St Catharine's (BioRISC), St Catharine's College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • ÓhÉigeartaigh SS; Centre for the Study of Existential Risk (CSER), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Patron NJ; UK Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Rhodes C; Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Roy HE; Biosecurity Research Initiative at St Catharine's (BioRISC), St Catharine's College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Shackelford G; Biosecurity Research Initiative at St Catharine's (BioRISC), St Catharine's College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Smith D; Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Spence N; Marine and Fisheries Division, Department of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Northern Ireland, Downpatrick, United Kingdom.
  • Steiner H; SPRU, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, United Kingdom.
  • Sundaram LS; OpenCell, London, United Kingdom.
  • Voeneky S; Biosecure Ltd, Bourton-on-the-Water, United Kingdom.
  • Walker JR; Biosecurity Research Initiative at St Catharine's (BioRISC), St Catharine's College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Watkins H; Centre for the Study of Existential Risk (CSER), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Whitby S; Earlham Institute, Norwich, United Kingdom.
  • Wood J; Biosecurity Research Initiative at St Catharine's (BioRISC), St Catharine's College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Sutherland WJ; Centre for the Study of Existential Risk (CSER), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
PLoS One ; 16(1): e0241190, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1013205
ABSTRACT
Multiple national and international trends and drivers are radically changing what biological security means for the United Kingdom (UK). New technologies present novel opportunities and challenges, and globalisation has created new pathways and increased the speed, volume and routes by which organisms can spread. The UK Biological Security Strategy (2018) acknowledges the importance of research on biological security in the UK. Given the breadth of potential research, a targeted agenda identifying the questions most critical to effective and coordinated progress in different disciplines of biological security is required. We used expert elicitation to generate 80 policy-relevant research questions considered by participants to have the greatest impact on UK biological security. Drawing on a collaboratively-developed set of 450 questions, proposed by 41 experts from academia, industry and the UK government (consulting 168 additional experts) we subdivided the final 80 questions into six categories bioengineering; communication and behaviour; disease threats (including pandemics); governance and policy; invasive alien species; and securing biological materials and securing against misuse. Initially, the questions were ranked through a voting process and then reduced and refined to 80 during a one-day workshop with 35 participants from a variety of disciplines. Consistently emerging themes included the nature of current and potential biological security threats, the efficacy of existing management actions, and the most appropriate future options. The resulting questions offer a research agenda for biological security in the UK that can assist the targeting of research resources and inform the implementation of the UK Biological Security Strategy. These questions include research that could aid with the mitigation of Covid-19, and preparation for the next pandemic. We hope that our structured and rigorous approach to creating a biological security research agenda will be replicated in other countries and regions. The world, not just the UK, is in need of a thoughtful approach to directing biological security research to tackle the emerging issues.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Security Measures / Pandemics Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0241190

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Security Measures / Pandemics Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0241190