Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 prophylaxis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Lewis, Kimberley; Chaudhuri, Dipayan; Alshamsi, Fayez; Carayannopoulos, Laiya; Dearness, Karin; Chagla, Zain; Alhazzani, Waleed.
  • Lewis K; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Chaudhuri D; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Alshamsi F; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Carayannopoulos L; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Dearness K; Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
  • Chagla Z; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Alhazzani W; St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada.
PLoS One ; 16(1): e0244778, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1013217
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Populations such as healthcare workers (HCW) that are unable to practice physical distancing are at high risk of acquiring Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). In these cases pharmacological prophylaxis would be a solution to reduce severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS CoV-2) transmission. Hydroxychloroquine has in vitro antiviral properties against SARS CoV-2. We therefore sought to determine the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine as prophylaxis for COVID-19. METHODS AND

FINDINGS:

We electronically searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane COVID-19 Register of Controlled Trials, Epistemonikos COVID-19, clinicaltrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform up to September 28th, 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We calculated pooled relative risks (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effect model. We identified four RCTs (n = 4921) that met our eligibility criteria. The use of hydroxychloroquine, compared to placebo, did not reduce the risks of developing COVID-19 (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.04, moderate certainty), hospitalization (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.50, moderate certainty), or mortality (RR 3.26, 95% CI 0.13 to 79.74, low certainty), however, hydroxychloroquine use increased the risk of adverse events (RR 2.76, 95% CI 1.38 to 5.55, moderate certainty).

CONCLUSION:

Although pharmacologic prophylaxis is an attractive preventive strategy against COVID-19, the current body of evidence failed to show clinical benefit for prophylactic hydroxychloroquine and showed a higher risk of adverse events when compared to placebo or no prophylaxis.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Drug Treatment / Hydroxychloroquine Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0244778

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Drug Treatment / Hydroxychloroquine Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0244778