Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The effect of COVID-19 on emergency department imaging: what can we learn?
Sharperson, Camara; Hanna, Tarek N; Herr, Keith D; Zygmont, Matthew E; Gerard, Roger L; Johnson, Jamlik-Omari.
  • Sharperson C; Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
  • Hanna TN; Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. tarek.hanna@emory.edu.
  • Herr KD; Division of Emergency and Trauma Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Midtown Hospital, 550 Peachtree Road, Atlanta, GA, 30308, USA. tarek.hanna@emory.edu.
  • Zygmont ME; Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
  • Gerard RL; Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
  • Johnson JO; Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Emerg Radiol ; 28(2): 339-347, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1014151
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To investigate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department (ED) imaging.

METHODS:

This retrospective study included all ED visits at a four-hospital academic health system in two matched 5-week periods. Demographic information, COVID-19 status, and disposition were reviewed. Type of imaging, acquisition time, and radiology reports were analyzed. Significance level was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS:

A 43.2% decrease in ED visits and 12% reduction in overall ED imaging occurred during the pandemic period. Mean age was unchanged, but a shift in gender and racial characteristics was observed (p < 0.001). In the pandemic period, COVID-19 ED patients were older (61.8 ± 16.9 years, p < 0.001) and more likely to be Black (64.2%; p < 0.001) than non-COVID-19 patients. Imaging per ED encounter increased to 2.4 ± 2.8 exams from 1.7 ± 1.1 (p < 0.001). Radiography increased (57.2% vs. 52.4%) as a fraction of total ED imaging, while computed tomography (23.4% vs. 27.2%) and ultrasound (8.5% vs. 9.6%) decreased (pre-pandemic vs. pandemic). COVID-19 ED patients underwent CT and US at a lower rate (11.5% and 5.4%) than non-COVID-19 patients (25.4% and 9.1%). The proportion of imaging study reports concluding "no disease" or "no acute disease" decreased from 56.7 to 40.6% (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

The COVID-19 pandemic led to a significant reduction in ED visits, a shift in patient demographics, and a significant decrease in imaging volume. Additional impact included a significant increase in the proportion of positive imaging studies.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Diagnostic Imaging / Emergency Service, Hospital / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Emerg Radiol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S10140-020-01889-9

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Diagnostic Imaging / Emergency Service, Hospital / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Emerg Radiol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S10140-020-01889-9