Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Analytical sensitivity and clinical sensitivity of the three rapid antigen detection kits for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Mak, Gannon Ck; Lau, Stephen Sy; Wong, Kitty Ky; Chow, Nancy Ls; Lau, C S; Lam, Edman Tk; Chan, Rickjason Cw; Tsang, Dominic Nc.
  • Mak GC; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China. Electronic address: so_phls10@dh.gov.hk.
  • Lau SS; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
  • Wong KK; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
  • Chow NL; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
  • Lau CS; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
  • Lam ET; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
  • Chan RC; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
  • Tsang DN; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
J Clin Virol ; 133: 104684, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1014610
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Numerous rapid antigen detection (RAD) kits for diagnosing COVID-19 patients are available in the market recently.

OBJECTIVE:

To compare analytical sensitivity and clinical sensitivity for the three commercially available RAD kits. STUDY

DESIGN:

Analytical sensitivity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus was determined by limit of detection (LOD) using RT-PCR as a reference method. Clinical sensitivity was evaluated by using respiratory specimens collected from confirmed COVID-19 patients.

RESULTS:

The LOD results showed that the three RAD kits varied from 102-105 fold less sensitive than RT-PCR. Clinical sensitivity of RAD kits ranged from 22.9 %-71.4 % for detecting specimens from COVID-19 patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although RAD kits were less sensitive than RT-PCR, understanding the clinical characteristics of different RAD kits can guide us to obtain suitable specimens for testing. The likelihood of positive results for RAD kits will be higher.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Nasopharynx / COVID-19 Serological Testing / COVID-19 / Antigens, Viral Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Clin Virol Journal subject: Virology Year: 2020 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Nasopharynx / COVID-19 Serological Testing / COVID-19 / Antigens, Viral Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Clin Virol Journal subject: Virology Year: 2020 Document Type: Article