Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Employment Uncertainty and Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic Initial Social Distancing Implementation: a Cross-national Study.
Ruffolo, Mary; Price, Daicia; Schoultz, Mariyana; Leung, Janni; Bonsaksen, Tore; Thygesen, Hilde; Geirdal, Amy Østertun.
  • Ruffolo M; School of Social Work, University of Michigan, 1080 South University, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
  • Price D; School of Social Work, University of Michigan, 1080 South University, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
  • Schoultz M; Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbia University, Manor House, Coach LanNE7 & 7TR, Newcastle On the Tyne, UK.
  • Leung J; Faculty of Health and Behavioural Science, The University of Queensland, 17 Upland Roasm, St. Lucia, QLD 4067 Australia.
  • Bonsaksen T; Faculty of Social and Health Sciences, Department of Health and Nursing Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Elverum, Norway.
  • Thygesen H; Faculty of Health Studies, VID Specialized University, Sandnes, Norway.
  • Geirdal AØ; Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Occupational Therapy, Prosthetics and Orthotics, Oslo Metropolitan University, PO Box 4 St Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, Norway.
Glob Soc Welf ; 8(2): 141-150, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1023374
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in changes in the work environment and employment uncertainty. This paper reports on a cross-national comparison of four countries (Norway, UK, USA and Australia) and examines the differences in mental health between those individuals employed and those not employed during the social distancing implementation.

METHODS:

Participants (N = 3,810) were recruited through social media in April/May 2020 and were invited to complete a self-administered electronic survey over a 3-week period. Differences between those employed and those not employed with regard to their sociodemographic characteristics and mental health were investigated with chi-square tests, independent t tests, and one-way analysis of variances (ANOVAs).

RESULTS:

Compared with their counterparts, participants who were employed reported lower levels of mental health distress (p < 0.001), higher levels of psychosocial well-being (p < 0.001), better overall quality of life (p < 0.001), and lower levels of overall loneliness, social loneliness, and emotional loneliness (p < 0.001). Small to medium but consistent differences (Cohen's d = 0.23-0.67) in mental health favor those with employment or those who were retired.

CONCLUSION:

Further study is needed to assess mental health over time as the COVID-19 pandemic and employment uncertainty continues.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Glob Soc Welf Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Glob Soc Welf Year: 2021 Document Type: Article