Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Videoconference Intervention for Distance Caregivers of Patients With Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Douglas, Sara L; Mazanec, Polly; Lipson, Amy R; Day, Kim; Blackstone, Eric; Bajor, David L; Saltzman, Joel; Krishnamurthi, Smitha.
  • Douglas SL; School of Nursing and Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
  • Mazanec P; Case Western Reserve University, School of Nursing, Cleveland, OH.
  • Lipson AR; Case Western Reserve University, School of Nursing, Cleveland, OH.
  • Day K; Independent Contractor, Cleveland, OH.
  • Blackstone E; Case Western Reserve University, School of Nursing, Cleveland, OH.
  • Bajor DL; Seidman Cancer Center and Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH.
  • Saltzman J; Lake Health UH Seidman Cancer Center and Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Mentor, OH.
  • Krishnamurthi S; Taussig Cancer Center and Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 17(1): e26-e35, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1024379
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Approximately 20% of caregivers (CGs) live > 1 hour away from the patient and are considered distance caregivers (DCGs) who often report higher distress and anxiety than local CGs. The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of an intervention aimed at reducing anxiety and distress in DCGs of patients with cancer.

METHODS:

This randomized controlled trial enrolled DCGs of patients with all cancer types who were being seen monthly by oncologists in outpatient clinics. There were three arms of the intervention delivered over a 4-month period arm 1 (a) received 4 monthly videoconference-tailored coaching sessions with an advanced practice nurse or social worker focused on information and support, (b) participated in patient's appointments with the oncologist via videoconference over the 4-month study period, and (c) had access to a website designed for DCGs. Arm 2 did not receive the coaching sessions but received the other two components, and arm 3 received access to the DCG website only.

RESULTS:

There were 302 DCGs who provided pre- and postintervention data. There were significant anxiety by group (P = .028 and r = 0.16) and distress by group interactions (P = .014 and r = 0.17). Arm 1 had the greatest percentage of DCGs who demonstrated improvement in anxiety (18.6%) and distress (25.2%).

CONCLUSION:

Coaching and use of videoconference technology (to join the DCG into the patient-oncologist office visit) were effective in reducing both anxiety and distress for DCGs. These components could be considered for local CGs who-with COVID-19-are unable to accompany the patient to oncologist visits.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Anxiety Disorders / Caregivers / COVID-19 / Neoplasms Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Long Covid Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Anxiety Disorders / Caregivers / COVID-19 / Neoplasms Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Long Covid Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Year: 2021 Document Type: Article