Your browser doesn't support javascript.
YouTube Videos Demonstrating the Nasopharyngeal Swab Technique for SARS-CoV-2 Specimen Collection: Content Analysis.
Itamura, Kyohei; Wu, Arthur; Illing, Elisa; Ting, Jonathan; Higgins, Thomas.
  • Itamura K; Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
  • Wu A; Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
  • Illing E; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
  • Ting J; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
  • Higgins T; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
JMIR Public Health Surveill ; 7(1): e24220, 2021 01 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2141289
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Real-time polymerase chain reaction using nasopharyngeal swabs is currently the most widely used diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2 detection. However, false negatives and the sensitivity of this mode of testing have posed challenges in the accurate estimation of the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection rates.

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether technical and, therefore, correctable errors were being made with regard to nasopharyngeal swab procedures.

METHODS:

We searched a web-based video database (YouTube) for videos demonstrating SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swab tests, posted from January 1 to May 15, 2020. Videos were rated by 3 blinded rhinologists for accuracy of swab angle and depth. The overall score for swab angle and swab depth for each nasopharyngeal swab demonstration video was determined based on the majority score with agreement between at least 2 of the 3 reviewers. We then comparatively evaluated video data collected from YouTube videos demonstrating the correct nasopharyngeal swab technique with data from videos demonstrating an incorrect nasopharyngeal swab technique. Multiple linear regression analysis with statistical significance set at P=.05 was performed to determine video data variables associated with the correct nasopharyngeal swab technique.

RESULTS:

In all, 126 videos met the study inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, 52.3% (66/126) of all videos demonstrated the correct swab angle, and 46% (58/126) of the videos demonstrated an appropriate swab depth. Moreover, 45.2% (57/126) of the videos demonstrated both correct nasopharyngeal swab angle and appropriate depth, whereas 46.8% (59/126) of the videos demonstrated both incorrect nasopharyngeal swab angle and inappropriate depth. Videos with correct nasopharyngeal swab technique were associated with the swab operators identifying themselves as a medical professional or as an Ear, Nose, Throat-related medical professional. We also found an association between correct nasopharyngeal swab techniques and recency of video publication date (relative to May 15, 2020).

CONCLUSIONS:

Our findings show that over half of the videos documenting the nasopharyngeal swab test showed an incorrect technique, which could elevate false-negative test rates. Therefore, greater attention needs to be provided toward educating frontline health care workers who routinely perform nasopharyngeal swab procedures.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Specimen Handling / Video Recording / Nasopharynx / Social Media / COVID-19 Testing / SARS-CoV-2 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: JMIR Public Health Surveill Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 24220

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Specimen Handling / Video Recording / Nasopharynx / Social Media / COVID-19 Testing / SARS-CoV-2 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: JMIR Public Health Surveill Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 24220