Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Frontline healthcare workers' experiences with personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a rapid qualitative appraisal.
Hoernke, Katarina; Djellouli, Nehla; Andrews, Lily; Lewis-Jackson, Sasha; Manby, Louisa; Martin, Sam; Vanderslott, Samantha; Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia.
  • Hoernke K; Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
  • Djellouli N; Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
  • Andrews L; Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK.
  • Lewis-Jackson S; Department of Anthropology, University College London, London, UK.
  • Manby L; Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK.
  • Martin S; Oxford Vaccine Group, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Vanderslott S; Oxford Vaccine Group, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Vindrola-Padros C; Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London, London, UK c.vindrola@ucl.ac.uk.
BMJ Open ; 11(1): e046199, 2021 01 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1039890
Preprint
This scientific journal article is probably based on a previously available preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See preprint
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To report frontline healthcare workers' (HCWs) experiences with personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK. To understand HCWs' fears and concerns surrounding PPE, their experiences following its guidance and how these affected their perceived ability to deliver care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

DESIGN:

A rapid qualitative appraisal study combining three sources of data semistructured in-depth telephone interviews with frontline HCWs (n=46), media reports (n=39 newspaper articles and 145 000 social media posts) and government PPE policies (n=25).

PARTICIPANTS:

Interview participants were HCWs purposively sampled from critical care, emergency and respiratory departments as well as redeployed HCWs from primary, secondary and tertiary care centres across the UK.

RESULTS:

A major concern was running out of PPE, putting HCWs and patients at risk of infection. Following national level guidance was often not feasible when there were shortages, leading to reuse and improvisation of PPE. Frequently changing guidelines generated confusion and distrust. PPE was reserved for high-risk secondary care settings and this translated into HCWs outside these settings feeling inadequately protected. Participants were concerned about differential access to adequate PPE, particularly for women and Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic HCWs. Participants continued delivering care despite the physical discomfort, practical problems and communication barriers associated with PPE use.

CONCLUSION:

This study found that frontline HCWs persisted in caring for their patients despite multiple challenges including inappropriate provision of PPE, inadequate training and inconsistent guidance. In order to effectively care for patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, frontline HCWs need appropriate provision of PPE, training in its use as well as comprehensive and consistent guidance. These needs must be addressed in order to protect the health and well-being of the most valuable healthcare resource in the COVID-19 pandemic our HCWs.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Infection Control / Health Personnel / Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional / Personal Protective Equipment / COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2020-046199

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Infection Control / Health Personnel / Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional / Personal Protective Equipment / COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2020-046199